Need to bring law to stop 'love jihad', says Goa CM
PORVORIM: Goa CM Pramod Sawant said in the assembly on Monday that it was time the state also brought in anti-conversion laws like
Uttar Pradesh
to curb cases of '
love jihad
'.
The chief minister said many cases of love jihad were reported earlier in Goa too, and he would release the numbers soon.
"We need to bring in the anti-conversion law, and all of you from Congress need to support it," Sawant said after opposition criticised state govt over Goa Police's inability to track an accused woman, Ayesha, who was recently arrested by UP Police in an anti-conversion case.
Sawant's statement was, however, opposed by Goa Forward Party's Fatorda MLA Vijai Sardesai, who said the CM was trying to push his party's national agenda in Goa.
"There are no cases of love jihad in Goa. He should give the number of such cases. We are diverting from the issue of a transnational network, which also saw activities from Goa. No Goans live in Aldeia de Goa (a gated complex where accused Ayesha's parents rented a flat) and nobody knows what the residents there are up to," Sardesai said.
Sawant said the anti-conversion law would only be applicable in cases of forced conversions and would not interfere with consensual inter-religious marriages. "Conversion should not take place by offering lures like money, etc.," he added. tnn
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
23 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Danger of thought: on the Maharashtra Special Public Security Bill
The Maharashtra Special Public Security (MSPS) Bill, 2024 follows the disturbing pattern of executive overreach in the name of security. Existing laws are often misused against political opponents and critics of the ruling party, including commentators. Charges are often vague and sweeping, and the process itself becomes the punishment in many of these cases. Given this pattern, the move by Maharashtra's Mahayuti government led by the BJP to create an entire law to criminalise a certain kind of thought portends danger to freedom and democracy. Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis has said that the new law would only target those who try to undermine the constitutional order, but the possibility — indeed the probability — of its misuse is apparent. The State says that it is seeking to prevent Maoists from brainwashing youth, professionals, and civil servants through front organisations. As in the proposed law, which is now awaiting the assent of the Governor before coming into force, the State government can declare any suspect 'organisation' as an 'unlawful organisation'. Offences under the proposed law include membership of such organisations, fundraising on their behalf, managing or assisting them, and committing unlawful activities. The Bill's focus is on people and organisations that act as a front for Maoists, and what is unlawful is so broadly defined that anyone can be its target. Among other things, according to the Bill, 'unlawful' is 'any action taken by an individual or organization whether by committing an act or by words either spoken or written or by sign or by visible representation or otherwise, which constitute a danger or menace to public order, peace and tranquility'. Offences are cognisable and the accused can be arrested without a warrant. Punishment includes jail terms of two years to seven years, along with fines ranging from ₹2 lakh to ₹5 lakh. The State argues that Chhattisgarh, Telangana, Andhra Pradesh and Odisha have enacted Public Security Acts and banned 48 Naxal frontal organisations. The Opposition parties offered feeble resistance to the Bill and raised some broad concerns regarding its misuse but it was passed in the Assembly through a voice vote. As an afterthought, the Congress and the Shiv Sena (UBT) protested on the floor when it was taken up in the Legislative Council. The Bill had gone through a long deliberative process, but as it turns out, all parties appeared to be in agreement, barring the lone CPI (M) MLA who protested against it on the floor of the Assembly. The idea that thought and speech, howsoever unpalatable they might be to the ruling establishment, should be policed poses a grave danger for India as an open society.
India Today
31 minutes ago
- India Today
Why chase someone who won't fight: Smriti Irani's 'tone shift' on Rahul Gandhi
Union Minister Smriti Irani, once known for her fierce criticism of Rahul Gandhi, now appears markedly more conciliatory toward the Congress leader. In an exclusive interview with India Today Group's Anjana Om Kashyap, Irani was asked why she no longer takes an aggressive stance against Gandhi. Her response was direct and pointed: 'Because the Gandhi family refused to fight me in 2024.'advertisementIrani, who famously defeated Rahul Gandhi in 2019 in his long-held Amethi constituency, said that with Gandhi opting out of contesting from Amethi in the 2024 Lok Sabha elections, there was no political battle to engage in.'If they aren't even stepping into the battlefield, what am I supposed to say? I can't go chasing after them,' Smriti Irani said. During the interview, Smriti Irani also pointed out that the Gandhi family moved to contest from Wayanad due to its favourable social demographics.'No intelligent leader willingly chooses a seat where defeat is certain,' she said. 'If a seat like that is given, it's only out of duty to the party. But in 2019, I turned the impossible into possible.'Irani also reflected on her journey and recalled her defeat in Amethi in 2014. She said that she spent the next five years working tirelessly on the ground.'I cleaned drains myself, brought electricity to villages, built over a lakh homes, set up a medical college, a 200 bed hospital, a collector's office, a police line and even a fire station,' she Anjana Om Kashyap asked whether Irani could have defeated Rahul Gandhi again if he had contested in 2024, Irani responded with a smile, 'Absolutely, that's why he didn't contest.'Irani also spoke about the emotional toll of being removed from Amethi, calling it a place she is deeply connected with. 'If I had not worked and people had said I did not deliver on my promises, that would have hurt more. But I did everything I could,' she asked why she lost, Irani responded, 'Because there's a diference between work and political equations. Those who are in politics understand this – electoral politics isn't the same as national service.'When asked whether stepping away from Amethi and the government left her feeling uprooted, she admitted, 'Maybe.''Because I defeated the national president of Congress, I had to tolerate a few barbs,' she Irani clarified that her return to television does not signal a retirement from politics. Dismissing speculation, she said, 'Who retires at 49? At 49, most people's careers are just beginning and I have already been a Member of Parliament three times,' she added with a Irani is making her comeback on the screen with the same show that made her a household name 25 years ago, Kyunki Saas Bhi Kabhi Bahu Thi.- EndsMust Watch
Time of India
37 minutes ago
- Time of India
Congress slams BJP men in BHU's EC
Lucknow: The Congress party opposed the inclusion of BJP MP (from Chandauli) Mahendra Nath Pandey and Mayor Ashok Tiwari in the executive council of BHU. "Instead of choosing academicians, the university appointed politicians and people with known RSS backing. This move is akin to ruining a world-renowned university and turning it into an RSS office," said Ajay Rai, UPCC president. He added, "The politicisation of the executive council is unfortunate and we demand an immediate end to this politicisation and that qualified individuals be made members of the council." Emphasising that the RSS influence in this council is condemnable, Rai stated: "We raised this issue last year, suggesting that the council should include academicians, vice-chancellors, scientists and important figures from the education sector who were honoured with prestigious awards like Padma Shree or Padma Bhushan." tnn However, the Central govt, which already influenced BHU with RSS ideology, repeated its low-level actions." Rai asserted that the situation in BHU deteriorated over time. "When there was a vice-chancellor at BHU, there was no executive council and now when there is an executive council, there is no vice-chancellor. The situation is so dire that BHU became a victim of corruption rather than a centre of education, with chaos and corruption everywhere. In a prestigious institution like BHU, justice and ethics are being strangled," Rai said.
