Pakistan, SPAR6C explore carbon market
Federal Minister for Climate Change Dr Musadik Malik, held a meeting on Tuesday with the delegation of SPAR6C (Supporting Preparedness for Article 6 Cooperation), a global initiative overseen by the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP).
SPAR6C is a five-year programme (2022-2027) supporting Pakistan, Colombia, Thailand, and Zambia in preparing to participate effectively in international carbon markets under Article 6 of the Paris Agreement.
According to a statement, during the meeting, both sides discussed avenues for strengthening Pakistan's readiness for Article 6 cooperation, with a particular focus on the student sponsorship programme under SPAR6C. They reviewed ongoing support for Pakistani students who have been trained or conducted research related to Article 6 and explored future opportunities to connect their expertise with national carbon market initiatives.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
14 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Pakistan offers Kabul to jointly fight terror
Listen to article Pakistan offered the Afghan interim government to jointly fight terrorist groups, which are causing unrest and instability, as Interior Minister Mohsin Naqvi held crucial talks with Taliban authorities in a daylong visit to Kabul on Sunday. Naqvi is the latest high-ranking Pakistani minister to travel to the neighbouring country as part of a renewed push to reset ties and address the issue of cross border terrorism. The interior minister's visit came on the heels of Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar's trip to Kabul a few days ago. Naqvi, who was accompanied by special representative for Afghanistan Ambassador Muhammad Sadiq Khan and Interior Secretary Khurram Agha, met with Afghan Interim Interior Minister Sirajuddin Haqqni. The talks, according to officials, focused on the issue of terrorism, border management and repatriation of Afghan refugees. But the issue of presence of banned Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) and other anti-Pakistan groups in Afghanistan was on top of the agenda. Sources said that Naqvi delivered a clear message that Pakistan considers Afghanistan as its "brotherly neighbouring" country but highlighted the activities of terrorist groups as major obstacle in the bilateral ties. "Terrorist organisations are causing unrest and instability, we must jointly stop them," Naqvi was quoted as saying by his office after his meeting with the head of Haqqani Network. An interior ministry handout said the two sides discussed bilateral relations, particularly focusing on counterterrorism, cross-border infiltration, and the banned TTP. The talks were also held on effective management of the Pakistan-Afghanistan border, prevention of drug trafficking, and regulating cross-border movement. The repatriation process of Afghan nationals, illegally residing in Pakistan, also came under discussion. Both interior ministers emphasised the need for peaceful coexistence, stability, and enhanced cooperation between Pakistan and Afghanistan. They agreed to strengthen mutual collaboration to improve border management and eliminate the menace of terrorism. "Pakistan desires fraternal and long-lasting relations with Afghanistan. For decades, Pakistan has hosted millions of Afghan refugees selflessly, and the doors remain open for Afghan citizens to enter Pakistan legally," Naqvi said. Relations between Pakistan and Afghanistan have remained stalled for many months before the two sides made a fresh attempt to sort out their differences. Dar's visit to Kabul in April led to greater engagement between the two neighbours. The Afghan government, according to sources, took certain steps to control the TTP. Some measures including a crackdown on Afghans, who were joining the TTP. Those steps helped build some trust between the two countries. Officials, however, cautioned that the Afghan side will have to demonstrate a lot more commitment to completely eradicate the threat emanating from the neighbouring country. Meanwhile, high-level exchanges between the two countries will continue as Afghan Interim Foreign Minister Amir Khan Muttaqi is expected to travel to Islamabad soon.
Express Tribune
14 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Victory celebration and reality check
Listen to article Pakistani luck is flying these days. It has been blessed with massive success, one after the other. First, Pakistan successfully and comprehensively defeated India in the military conflict. It was an enormous triumph, which laid the foundation for a regional reset. India, which had portrayed itself as the regional power, a rising market and economy in Asia, and a leader of the Global South, had to face a checkmate at the hands of Pakistan. Second, on the diplomatic front, Pakistan achieved many accomplishments. After the war, India sent a delegation to the world to launch a propaganda campaign. It wanted to tag Pakistan with terrorism. Pakistan analysed the situation and sent its own delegation, which outperformed the Indian delegation. The world did not buy the Indian argument, and the Pakistani point of view had wider acceptance. Pakistan maintains a balanced relationship with the world's major powers, including China, the United States, and Russia. There is no need to discuss the China-Pakistan relationship, as everyone is aware that both countries share a deep and enduring brotherhood. However, the recent shift in the Pakistan-US relationship is the talk of the town. The US played a prominent role in halting the war between India and Pakistan. After the truce, President Trump praised Pakistan for its sensible and rational behaviour. He also invited Army Chief General Asim Munir for a meeting at the White House. Both sides reportedly discussed enhancing the relationship in multiple fields. On the other hand, Pakistan and Russia intensified efforts to further enhance and strengthen their bilateral relationship. Russia has shown interest in investing more than $2 billion in reviving and expanding Pakistan Steel Mills. It is a good omen, as Pakistan was looking for opportunities to revive the mill. Also, a breakthrough happened at the SCO defence ministers' meeting, where Russia supported Pakistan's stance on terrorism. Simultaneously, Pakistan played a prominent and leading role in ending the Iran-Israel war. It diligently convinced the US administration that the war in the region had no justification. Therefore, all efforts must be made to end the war and work for peace. These examples collectively indicate that Pakistan has achieved significant success in recent months. However, the country needs to be cognizant that these achievements cannot be sustained without solving domestic challenges. Pakistan continues to face multiple challenges. The economic and governance system is in shambles. The government claims that the economy is improving and that the budget will provide a foundation for accelerated economic growth and development, as promised the previous year. But the Economic Survey 2024-25 and the budget for 2025-26 present a bleak picture. The Economic Survey shows that the national GDP grew at a 2.7% rate. However, independent sources are not willing to accept government claims and instead raise questions. They question that, during the first three quarters of FY25, the economy grew at an average annual rate of 1.7%. To achieve a yearly rate of 2.7%, the economy would have had to grow at 5.3% during the last quarter, which is not possible. Apart from that, agriculture, which had provided a significant boost to economic growth in FY24, presented a dismal picture in FY25. A booming sector experienced a sharp decline in production and market share. The growth rate fell to 0.56% in FY25 from 6.25% in FY24, driven by a steep fall in the growth of major crops. Major crops' growth rate fell to -13.26% in 2025, from 11.3% in 2024. Similarly, the large-scale industry is struggling to enter a positive growth trajectory, having demonstrated a negative growth of -1.7%. Social indicators too are pretty disturbing. The World Bank estimates that 44.7% of the population lives below the poverty line, and 16.5% of the population resides in extreme poverty. Poverty is increasing, despite the government's assertions of investing in poverty reduction such as the Benazir Income Support Programme (BISP). This raises questions about the effectiveness and sustainability of the BISP. Food insecurity is another constant irritant, and a 2013 study estimated that 58.8% of the population in Pakistan was food insecure. Unfortunately, we have to rely on old data because the government has not updated it. There are fears that food insecurity has increased over the years due to multiple factors. Poor economic conditions and the devaluation of the PKR have substantially impacted people's purchasing power, resulting in fewer resources available to afford healthy food. Additionally, inadequate governance and management of the agricultural sector have led to lower production and reduced availability of quality food. Bad governance is further complicating the situation. The elite class has designed the institutions to ensure the exclusion of common citizens from the governance system without explicitly mentioning it. The system encourages wealth accumulation, and there is no system in place for redistributing wealth or resources. It is deepening the divide between the haves and have-nots. A few influential individuals have all the resources, while millions struggle to make a decent living. Furthermore, the elite have devised an extremely complex business system and environment to strengthen their control over the economic system and resources. This system has given birth to rampant corruption and deep-rooted rent-seeking behaviour. It only works for the powerful or those who can afford to offer bribes. Environmental degradation, particularly climate change, is another issue that is worsening over time. Climate change-related disasters, such as floods and droughts, are regular visitors. Pakistan is still struggling to recover from the impacts of the 2022 floods, and there is a prediction that Pakistan will again face floods. On the other hand, climate change is severely impacting agriculture, which is threatening Pakistan's food security and economy. Farmers are bearing the brunt of climate change. Poor governance and attitude of the government have left farmers vulnerable to the impacts of climate change. In conclusion, Pakistan needs to be mindful that its heyday can be limited if it does not address these issues. The writer is a political economist and a visiting research fellow at Hebei University, China
Business Recorder
15 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Grave policy gaps in sugar sector
EDITORIAL: The Trading Corporation of Pakistan's (TCP) July 15 directive to slash its sugar import tender from 300,000 to just 50,000 metric tonnes is the latest twist in a saga that has completely exposed the confusion, lack of foresight and planning, and utter incompetence that has defined the government's handling of sugar export and import decisions in recent months. More tellingly, it reveals a policy regime designed to reward rent-seeking behaviour rather than protecting the public interest and market stability. As previously detailed in this space, the government, acting under the considerable, and dare one say, pernicious influence of powerful sugar barons, many of whom hold prominent positions within the political mileu, approved the export of roughly 765,000 metric tonnes of sugar during the last fiscal year. The decision was ostensibly based on assurances that only surplus stocks would be exported, ensuring that domestic prices would remain stable. However, what ensued was a shortage of sugar domestically and a sharp price surge, solely benefitting trade. To rein in soaring domestic prices, the government recently decided to allow the tax-concessions on import of sugar. The timing of the import decision, however, highlights a serious lack of planning and coordination among key stakeholders. By the time imported sugar enters the Pakistani market, the local crushing season will be in full swing, risking disruption to the domestic crop's market. Even more critically, importing such large quantities raises questions regarding the pressures that will be brought to bear on our precarious foreign exchange reserves. And given the tax waivers on these imports – wherein the FBR has exempted these from customs duty and reduced the sales tax rate from 18 percent to 0.25 percent – not only is this going to seriously burden the national exchequer, the country will also risk violating the $7 billion IMF programme that mandates it to not grant preferential tax treatments or engage in commodity purchases. While the IMF has made no official comment, there are reports of it privately taking strong exception to the government's haphazard moves that deviate from agreed reforms. It is this pressure, ostensibly, that compelled the TCP to considerably scale back its sugar import tender. The exorbitant prices Pakistani consumers have been forced to pay for sugar reveal not only the folly of the ill-conceived decision to export the commodity in the first place, it also points to deeper, systemic issues related to rampant price manipulation, hoarding, the entrenched political clout of sugar barons, their cartel-like behaviour and the collapse of regulatory oversight. Over the last seven months, there has been a consistent rise in prices of the commodity from Rs140 per kg to around Rs210 per kg even as its international price at current exchange rate levels hovers around the Rs104 per kg mark. Now, despite the government reaching an agreement with mill owners that fixed the wholesale price at Rs165 per kg, media reports indicate that many wholesale outlets have openly defied the agreement, demanding prices far beyond the official rate. As a result, consumers continue to face inflated retail prices that bear little relation to the official ex-factory cost. This encapsulates all that is wrong with the regime governing the trade of agricultural commodities: toothless oversight mechanisms, unchecked power and impunity of entrenched agro-industrial lobbies, and the complete marginalisation of the public interest. It must be noted that sugar is not a staple crop nor does it have substantive strategic value. Given this, it is unacceptable that successive governments have essentially subsidised its growth at the cost of more vital commodities. The government must put an end to the mollycoddling of the sugar sector and enforce discipline and transparency in its regulation. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
