logo
Bernie Sanders backs two progressives in NYC Democratic primaries

Bernie Sanders backs two progressives in NYC Democratic primaries

UPI17-06-2025
Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-VT, speaks during a press conference on March 6, 2025. Sanders will support a pair of progressive candidates running in Democratic primaries against more established candidates. File Photo by Bonnie Cash/UPI | License Photo
June 17 (UPI) -- Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., has thrown support to a pair of progressive candidates running in Democratic primaries against more established candidates.
Sanders is expected to officially endorse Zohran Mamdani in the party's mayoral primary in New York City on Tuesday.
A Brooklyn native, Sanders joins Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y. in support of Mamdani, a left-wing Democrat who must compete against former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo in the primary. Current mayor Eric Adams is running for reelection as an independent.
"Our nation faces a fundamental choice: Will we continue with a corporate-dominated politics driven by billionaires or will we build a grass-roots movement fueled by everyday people, committed to fighting oligarchy, authoritarianism and kleptocracy?" Mr. Sanders has said about Mamdani.
"The New York City Democratic primary presents a clear choice as to the path forward," he added.
Sanders has also announced his support for Michigan state Rep. Donavan McKinney, who seeks to unseat current Rep. Shri Thanedar, D-Mich.
"As a Member of Congress, Donavan will fight to raise the minimum wage to a living wage, fully fund our public schools, invest in public housing and support Medicare for all," said Sanders of McKinney. "A former union leader, he has dedicated his life to standing with working people, and is ready to lead the struggle against Donald Trump, the oligarchy, and the corporate interests who prioritize profits over people."
McKinney, who also has the support of Rep. Rashida Tlaib, D-Mich., said in a statement that "Senator Sanders has long been a progressive champion for working class Americans, and I am honored to receive his endorsement."
Sanders had also announced in May he had partnered with the Run for Something young candidate recruitment organization, which posted to X in May that "His message is clear-run for office-and we're here to make sure new leaders have the tools to win."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

House Republicans advance Trump's tax and spending cuts bill
House Republicans advance Trump's tax and spending cuts bill

UPI

time38 minutes ago

  • UPI

House Republicans advance Trump's tax and spending cuts bill

July 3 (UPI) -- House Republicans advanced Donald Trump's massive tax and spending cuts bill early Thursday following a mammoth overnight marathon session that included interventions by the president and House Speaker Mike Johnson to gain the votes of a handful of GOP holdouts. At 3:23 a.m. Thursday, the House voted 219-213 to bring the bill to the floor for debate. The vote was along party lines, with only one Republican, Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania, crossing the aisle to vote against Trump's bill with his Democratic colleagues. That's a dramatic turnaround, as Republicans in opposition to the bill had stalled the House for hours. About an hour before the bill passed, five Republicans had voted "no" and there were eight holdouts. "FOR REPUBLICANS, THIS SHOULD BE AN EASY YES VOTE. RIDICULOUS!!!" the president complained late Wednesday on his Truth Social media platform. "What are the Republicans waiting for???" Trump interjected in another post. "What are you trying to prove??? MAGA IS NOT HAPPY, AND IT'S COSTING YOU VOTES!!!" His deputy chief of staff for policy and homeland security advisor, Stephen Miller, described the bill in almost biblical proportions, stating on social media that the vote "is the kind of opportunity, once lost, where people look back centuries later and ask how the moment to save civilization was allowed to pass by." Johnson held the vote open for five hours, and before it closed -- and in unprecedented fashion -- he gathered his GOP holdouts and prayed with them on the House floor. then he snapped their photo. The bill was then adopted. "It's been a long, productive day," Johnson of Louisiana told reporters earlier Wednesday night amid the stall. "We've been talking with members from across the conference and making sure that everyone's concerns are addressed and their questions are answered. And it's -- it's been a good day. We're in a good place right now." The bill is forecast to add $3.3 trillion to the deficit over the next decade, according to the Congressional Budget Office. Adding to the deficit, tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans and cuts to Medicaid are some of the reasons why opposition to the bill came not only from Democrats but also from conservative Republicans. According to The Hill, Trump spoke over the phone early Thursday with holdouts Reps. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., Victoria Spartz, R-Ind. and Tim Burchett, R-Tenn. -- all of whom eventually voted to move to bill forward This is a developing story.

Trump says Powell costs US $900B a year in interest by not cutting rates. Is he right?
Trump says Powell costs US $900B a year in interest by not cutting rates. Is he right?

USA Today

time39 minutes ago

  • USA Today

Trump says Powell costs US $900B a year in interest by not cutting rates. Is he right?

In his stinging monthslong campaign to badger Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell into lowering interest rates, President Donald Trump has relied on a variety of arguments. He's pointed to the European Central Bank's two percentage points of rate cuts and a report showing weakening private-sector job growth. Most recently, he has cited a claim that Fed's refusal to slash its key rate is costing the federal government hundreds of billions of dollars a year in interest payments on its debt. Is Trump right? In the short term, analyst say, lower rates likely would save the government money. But that comes with some big caveats. What is Trump saying about Fed rates? This week, on his Truth Social site, Trump shared a handwritten note he wrote to Powell. 'You are, as usual, 'Too Late,' he wrote. 'You have cost the USA a fortune and continue to do so. You should lower the interest rate by a lot! Hundreds of billions of dollars being lost! No inflation.' Attaching a list of central bank interest rates, Trump drew two arrows pointing to a rate between Japan's 0.5% and the 1.75% shared by Denmark, Seychelles and Thailand. That suggests Trump thinks the Fed should chop its key short term interest rate by a whopping 3 percentage points or so, from a range of 4.25% to 4.5% to about 1.25%. Last week, calling Powell a 'numbskull,' a 'dumb guy,' and a 'Trump Hater,' the president said a 3 point rate cut would save the government $900 billion a year in interest payments. What will happen when the Fed cuts rates? Broadly speaking, 'If the Fed were to lower rates… it would indeed likely lower the cost of Treasury debt,' said John Canavan, lead financial market analyst at Oxford Economics. 'Lower rates are probably going to save the government money,' added Wells Fargo senior economist Mike Pugliese. However, Trump appears to be overstating the savings, said Gbenga Ajilore, chief economist of the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. What is the main job of the Federal Reserve? The Fed is an independent agency and its job is not to reduce interest rates to make borrowing cheaper for the federal government, Canavan and Pugliese said. Under its two congressional mandates, the central bank reduces rates to lower borrowing costs for Americans and bolster a sluggish economy. It hikes rates or keeps them high longer to head off inflation. How much did the Fed reduce interest rates? The Fed slashed its key rate by a percentage point late last year after a pandemic-related inflation spike eased but has paused since. In testimony before Congress in late June, Powell agreed the Fed's preferred inflation measure, now at 2.3%, has dropped closer to its 2% goal. But he said Trump's tariffs are expected to spark a 'meaningful increase in inflation' in coming months and officials want to wait and see how that plays out before reducing rates again. Putting aside the Fed's mandates, it's reasonable to wonder if a Fed rate decrease would save the government lots of money at a time the national debt tops $36 trillion. Trump's 'big, beautiful' budget bill is projected to add $3.3 trillion to the red ink, according to the Congressional Budget Office. It's not clear how Trump came up with the $900 billion and a White House spokesperson did not return an email seeking an explanation. But Trump told Fox News on June 29 that the government must refinance $9 trillion in debt coming due this year. The Treasury Department's total annual interest payments on all its debt are projected to grow to about $1 trillion in fiscal 2026, according to the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget. Just taking the $9 trillion that must be refinanced, interest rates that have risen sharply since the U.S. first issued the debt could cost the government as much as an additional $300 billion a year, Axel Funhoff, a corporate finance professor at Antwerp Management School in Belgium, wrote in a LinkedIn article earlier this year. That suggests the U.S. Treasury could save more than $100 billion a year if the Fed cut its key rate by 3 percentage points. But that would be a massive cut, unprecedented during a time the economy is generally stable and far larger than the percentage point drop Fed officials estimate they'll approve through gradual quarter-point decreases by 2027. Also, large rate cuts could have unintended consequences for U.S. debt costs. How do interest rates impact the cost of borrowing? The Fed's benchmark interest rate is a short-term rate and so it directly affects short-term assets such as Treasury bills with terms up to a year, Canavan said. Thus, a quarter-point Fed rate cut, he said, likely would have a similar affect on such Treasury bills. But only about 20% of the Treasury's outstanding debt is in such short-term securities, though almost all new debt is short term because long-term rates are high, Canavan said. More than half the debt is in 2- to 10-year Treasury bonds, he said, and the rest is in longer term securities of up to 30 years, floating rate bonds and other assets. Those securities are affected by Fed rate moves because they influence investor expectations about future Fed actions, Canavan said. But only partly. Because investors hold those assets for long periods of time, they're mostly affected by factors such as the economic outlook, inflation expectations, the size of the federal deficit and investors' confidence in Treasury bonds as a safe and reliable investment, Canavan said. 'If the market decides the Fed is cutting too much' to satisfy Trump or lower borrowing costs for the U.S. Treasury, investors likely would worry about a future inflation spike, causing them to demand higher rates to lend the government money, Canavan said. Otherwise, he said, inflation could erode the value of their bonds. In that case, 'You may see long term rates rise' even though the Fed is reducing its short term rate, he said. In other words, by causing investors to question the Fed's independence, Trump's calls for rate cuts could result in the outcome he least desires, assuming the Fed acquiesced to his pleas. "Monetary policy only works if the Fed has credibility," Ajiilore said. Canavan said it's difficult to say if government savings from a drop in short-term rates – which must be refinanced more frequently – would more than offset any losses from a rise in long-term rates. Pugliese said the U.S. Treasury likely still would come out ahead in the near term. But 'over the long term it would probably cost money,' he said. By contrast, if the Fed reduces rates twice later this year and once in 2026 as officials expect, investors would be more confident that officials are making the moves because inflation is easing and not because of political pressure. The result likely would be lower short-term and long-term rates, and lower interest payments for the government.

I'm proud to be an American. If you don't like it here, leave.
I'm proud to be an American. If you don't like it here, leave.

USA Today

time42 minutes ago

  • USA Today

I'm proud to be an American. If you don't like it here, leave.

America isn't perfect of course, but I hope that a glance around the globe provides a reality check for those who believe our democracy is doomed and our citizens oppressed. It's America's 249th birthday, and here's what I want for a gift: I want the people who live in the United States and hate it to leave. That sounds harsh, but hear me out. More than two centuries ago, men and women far more courageous than I am broke Britain's chains of tyranny at the risk of their lives and their livelihoods. They founded a country that made liberty its priority. And with free speech and free markets as guideposts, the United States has become the world's most prosperous nation, generating more than 26% of the global gross domestic product. It's not just about wealth − it's about opportunity. The fact that more than 10 of the most highly valued companies in the world were founded and thrived in the United States speaks to how fertile the entrepreneurial soil is in America. The United States also possesses the most lethal military in the world. Yet, our military might has been used far more often to liberate than to conquer. Are you proud to be an American? What does patriotism mean to you? Tell us. | Opinion Forum That fact is often overlooked, but it shouldn't be. For most of human history, the strongest nations subjugated weaker nations with swords and ships. America has changed that reality, especially in the past century after winning two world wars. It may sound silly, but I wish the signers of our Declaration of Independence could see America now. We have much to thank them for. Patriotism declined after Trump was elected But not everyone feels proud to be an American. A Gallup poll released four days before the Fourth of July found that only 58% of U.S. adults say they are 'extremely 'or 'very' proud to be an American. That was down 9 percentage points from last year. Democrats are largely responsible for the decline in patriotism. Only 36% say they are extremely or very proud to be an American, down from 62% a year ago when Joe Biden was president. I observed the decline in patriotism after Donald Trump was reelected president in November. Liberals were deeply angry for months after the election, and they still haven't recovered. Their rage wasn't directed only at Trump. They also smeared the 75.6 million Americans who voted for him. Opinion: Liberals call Trump a clown. But he's winning where it matters most. We've also seen an increase in anti-American attitudes − along with antisemitism − at protests on college campuses and in our major cities. Opinion newsletter: Sign up for our newsletter on conservative values, family and religion from columnist Nicole Russell. Get it delivered to your inbox. Americans have a right to peacefully protest, of course. And to hate the current occupant of the White House. But I have to wonder at the mindset of people who express so much anger at America while enjoying the freedom and protection it so richly provides. America looks great when put in perspective I also have to ask: If America isn't good enough for you, what country is? Perhaps it's Finland, with a personal income tax rate of more than 57% and a sales tax of 24%. Or maybe it's Saudi Arabia, where women continue to face widespread discrimination and LGBTQ+ rights are nonexistent. Then there's China and Russia − countries where 20% of the world's population lives but where freedom is worse than tenuous. America isn't perfect, of course, but I hope that a glance around the globe provides a reality check for those who believe our democracy is doomed and our citizens oppressed. In America, we are accustomed to an incredible array of choices in almost everything we consume. But when it comes to loving or hating America, we really have only two options: Embrace and be grateful for our God-given right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Or leave. Nicole Russell is an opinion columnist with USA TODAY. She lives in Texas with her four kids. Sign up for her newsletter, The Right Track, and get it delivered to your inbox. You can read diverse opinions from our USA TODAY columnists and other writers on the Opinion front page, on X, formerly Twitter, @usatodayopinion and in our Opinion newsletter.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store