George Osborne left Britain a legacy of soaring council tax bills
A 5pc increase alone would send bills for the average Band D home above £2,500 in 21 areas – up from four last year, according to analysis by the TaxPayers' Alliance pressure group.
Yet taxpayers increasingly feel like they are getting less and less for their money, with some authorities cutting bin collections to just once a month – a symptom of decline in their fiscal health.
If you're looking to appoint blame, Keir Starmer's Government may make for an easy target – but in reality, the issue dates back to cuts spearheaded by George Osborne 10 years ago.
Following the Conservative party's victory in the 2010 general election, the former chancellor wasted little time in launching his own assault on public spending – a period of austerity that crippled public spending and investment lasting almost a decade.
Just months after the election, Mr Osborne announced that local authority funding would be cut by 27pc over the following four years, along with 'a massive devolution of financial power' that would see councils gain more responsibility over where money was spent, and cuts were made.
The former chancellor also made good on a promise he made to give local authorities the ability to freeze council tax for two years, between 2012 and 2013. In exchange for freezing council tax, local authorities would receive additional funding – but in retrospect, this has proved to be a costly error for councils that took the deal.
'On the face of it, it sounds like a very good idea – and I imagine he thought it was a fantastic idea when he delivered his speech promising to lower the cost of living – but there were two huge problems,' says Joanne Pitt, senior policy manager at the Chartered Institute of Public Finance and Accountancy (CIPFA).
'Firstly, council tax is cumulative. If councils raise council tax by 3pc or 5pc each year, their base council tax increases. If you do not increase council tax for two years, and other councils do, you fall behind permanently. It was an incredibly short-termist view, and councils are still paying for it.
'Secondly, freezing council tax across the board is a poor way to allocate limited public sector funds. If you look at who benefits from a reduction in council tax payments, it is not the poorest in society. If your policy objective is to help people in poverty, the figures do not work – it is too little across too broad a patch. People who do not need the support end up benefiting.
'If you combine that with the austerity over the following eight or nine years, it is a hell of a lot to come back from.'
Faced with more control over their spending and a significant blow to their budgets, several councils set about plugging the gap by investing some of the remaining money they had, plunging funds into everything from fine art to property, with the hope of beating cash returns and boosting their coffers.
The results have been disastrous, to put it mildly.
Between 2016 and 2019, local authorities collectively spent £3.1bn on office developments, £2.3bn on retail property including shopping centres, and nearly £1bn on industrial property, according to the National Audit Office (NAO) – which marked a 1400pc increase on the previous three years.
The Covid pandemic that immediately followed saw their value plunge, as the post-pandemic shift to homeworking depressed prices of office buildings.
Desperate for cash and unable to hold out and ride the ups and downs of their investments, councils sold £1.4bn of assets last year, despite analysts warning it was the worst possible time to do so.
After a series of failed investments – predominantly in solar farms – the local authority of Thurrock, Essex, accumulated debts of £1.5bn and was forced to declare bankruptcy in 2022. Its residents will see their council tax payments jump by 8pc from April.
Croydon Borough Council, which declared bankruptcy in both 2021 and 2022, has total capital borrowings of almost £2bn. It borrowed £545m over three years to invest in housing and commercial property, including a £200m loan to its own housing development arm Brick By Brick. After posting losses every year, Brick by Brick collapsed in 2022.
In December 2023, Nottingham City Council became the latest local authority to declare bankruptcy. One of the council's most notable failings was its decision to launch Robin Hood Energy in 2015, taking on the major energy suppliers in a highly competitive market. At one point, the firm boasted former Labour leader, Jeremy Corbyn, as a customer.
Unfortunately, this was not enough for Robin Hood Energy to ever turn a profit, and it collapsed just five years after its inception. Leaked documents estimate a £38m cost to local taxpayers.
But while these instances make for effective cautionary tales – and have landed taxpayers in some local authorities with heftier tax bills – they are in the minority, says Ms Pitt, who has 25 years of experience advising local governments.
'Very few local authorities have actually done that, and those have hit the headlines. But you have over 300 of them, and the vast majority did not do that. Most organisations make sensible, pragmatic investment decisions within a prudent borrowing environment, but there are absolutely some outliers.'
It is not just giving councils both Conservative and Labour more freedom to invest the limited cash they have that has seen things go awry for so many local authorities.
The austerity pushed on councils by Mr Osborne saw funding cut from vital programmes, such as Sure Start, which invested in early learning and family support programmes. Between 2010 and 2022, funding for Sure Start dropped by over two thirds and over 1,300 centres closed their doors.
Community programmes were lifelines for young families, improving health and education standards, and therefore work prospects later in life. Sure Start reduced the likelihood of young people ending up in youth custody by a fifth, according to research from the Institute for Fiscal Studies.
The effects of crippling cuts to these schemes – while saving the Government money in the short run – are now being seen, with councils forced to pick up the tab and hike taxes in turn.
By cutting spending on local people early on in their lives, councils are forced to pay more when they are older.
With the adult social care bill for adults projected to top £17bn by 2030, according to the County Councils Network (CCN), councils that fell behind in the 2010s due to austerity and tax freezes have been overwhelmed. Tax rises appear inevitable.
Ms Pitt adds: 'Ten years or so of austerity have taken their toll. Grants that councils received from the Government were reduced, which affected deprived areas more, as they couldn't raise council tax as much and raised their own income.
'You've got massively rising demand for schemes which support schools with special educational needs. More children are surviving that would have been born prematurely, which is fantastic – but that individual will need millions of pounds of help over their lifetime.
'As they go through the system, they become adults, and our funding system does not keep up with that sort of medical technology and the demand.
'Local authorities cannot afford those types of costs, because you've also got huge numbers of adults coming into the system in need of social care.
'If you have a high number of dependent adults and children, you cannot control your costs. You can't just say you've reached your limit.'
Instead of taking advantage of historically cheap borrowing rates and building infrastructure and investing in communities so that Britain may reap the rewards of growth and lower taxes for years to come, George Osborne had other ideas.
Ambrose Evans-Pritchard put it best, writing in The Telegraph in 2022: '[Austerity] both lowered the growth trajectory of the economy and slowed the organic fall in the debt ratio, and was therefore futile in every respect.'
For a country desperate to find its way to healthy economic growth six years on from austerity, rising council tax may be just the tip of the iceberg.
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Will Palantir Be a $1 Trillion Company by 2035?
Palantir's growth in the government sector has been outstanding. The company could receive a significant boost from growing European demand for artificial intelligence (AI). However, the stock's valuation has become excessively high. 10 stocks we like better than Palantir Technologies › Palantir Technologies (NASDAQ: PLTR) has been one of the top-performing stocks since the start of 2024, rising nearly 700%. It has also been a top performer in 2025, rising 80% so far. Palantir's business has been booming alongside the artificial intelligence (AI) arms race. With no signs of AI spending slowing down, investors are speculating that Palantir's stock could eventually reach a $1 trillion market capitalization. Palantir's current valuation hovers around $320 billion, so the stock would need to more than triple to cross that threshold. But can that happen over the next decade? Palantir offers AI-powered data analytics solutions that help decision makers make the best choice possible. Originally, Palantir began with government clients, but it has also expanded into the commercial sector over the past few years. Although commercial revenue has grown significantly, government revenue still makes up the majority of Palantir's total revenue. In Q1, government revenue was $487 million, and on the commercial side, it was $397 million. Government revenue is also rapidly increasing, rising 45% year over year. The U.S. government increased at the same rate as international, indicating widespread adoption of Palantir's products worldwide. However, that story is completely different on the commercial side. U.S. commercial revenue rose 71% year over year in Q1, while overall commercial revenue rose 33%. This indicates global AI adoption (specifically in Europe) lags the U.S., but that story could change over the next few years. That could rapidly accelerate and cause Palantir's impressive 39% growth rate to rise even further. Palantir bulls point to this as a reason why the stock could reach a $1 trillion valuation by 2035. However, the bears have another key point to consider, and it could derail the entire investment thesis. One thing that should raise a red flag for investors with Palantir's stock is its 700% rise alongside its 39% growth rate. Those two figures are completely mismatched, indicating that Palantir's stock might be overvalued. After evaluating Palantir's price-to-sales valuation, this fact is confirmed. Most software companies trade at a multiple of 10 to 20 times sales. The best companies with rapid growth rates can trade upwards of 30 times sales. However, Palantir's stock is more than three times that level. Achieving nearly 110 times sales is practically unheard of in the stock market, and if a stock ever reaches that valuation, it usually only does so when it's doubling or tripling its revenue year over year. Even then, some of those companies crash from a high valuation. Even if Palantir gets a boost from rising European revenue, I don't think it's going to be enough to propel its stock to a reasonable level. Multiple years of revenue growth are already baked into the stock price. For Palantir to achieve a still very expensive but far more reasonable price tag of 30 times sales, it would require 363% revenue growth from today's levels. As a result, I don't think Palantir can triple its stock price over the next decade because it's going to spend the first part of it growing into the extremely high valuation it has now. Investors need to be cautious because high expectations are already baked into the stock price; any misstep could cause the stock to tumble back to reality. Before you buy stock in Palantir Technologies, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Palantir Technologies wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $699,558!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $976,677!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,060% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 180% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 30, 2025 Keithen Drury has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Palantir Technologies. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Will Palantir Be a $1 Trillion Company by 2035? was originally published by The Motley Fool
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Plan to scrap two-child benefit cap ‘dead in the water' after welfare U-turn
Sir Keir Starmer will not scrap the two-child benefit cap after his U-turn on welfare cuts left a £5bn hole in Labour's spending plans. Senior Labour figures have reportedly warned that tax hikes are on the horizon after the benefits climbdown, with a change in the controversial cap, introduced when George Osborne was chancellor, now thought to be off the table. 'My assessment is that is now dead in the water,' a No 10 source told The Sunday Times. A source close to the chancellor added: 'MPs will need to acknowledge that there is a financial cost to not approving the welfare changes, whether that's tax rises or not scrapping the two-child benefit cap. They need to understand the trade-offs.' The prospect of Labour keeping the two-child benefit cap in place will provoke fresh unrest among Labour backbenchers, who have a taste for rebellion after forcing Sir Keir's hand on cuts to the personal independence payment (Pip), the main disability benefit. Sir Keir is believed to have told his cabinet he wants to scrap the two-child cap - first imposed by Osborne in 2015. Critics of the policy, which restricts parents from claiming certain benefits for more than two of their children, say it pushes children into poverty. Charities frequently cite the £3.4bn move as one of the most cost effective ways of alleviating child poverty. Asked on Thursday whether he still wanted to scrap the two-child cap, Sir Keir said: 'The last Labour government drove down child poverty and it's one of the proudest things that we did. 'Sadly, the last government allowed child poverty to go back up again. 'I'm determined that this government will drive it down, just as the last Labour government did. 'We've got a strategy and a task force working on this and will lay out the details of that. I personally don't think there's a silver bullet that if you do this one thing, it will deal with child poverty.' Labour's Child Poverty Taskforce, headed by work and pensions secretary Liz Kendall and education secretary Bridget Phillipson, was due to report in the spring but was delayed until the autumn. Pressure on the PM over the two-child benefit cap will likely increase in the run up to this autumn's Budget, in which Rachel Reeves has been warned she must raise taxes or put Labour's agenda at risk. Jim O'Neill, a former Goldman Sachs chief turned Treasury minister who quit the Conservatives and later advised Ms Reeves, said she faces no choice but to abandon key parts of her economic policy – including her commitment not to raise income tax, national insurance contributions for employees or VAT. 'Without changing some of the big taxes, welfare and pensions, they [Labour] can't commit to things like Northern Powerhouse Rail, small modular nuclear reactors, and various other things that will make an investment and growth difference,' he told The Independent.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Accenture plc (ACN) and Palantir (PLTR) Partner to Deliver AI Solutions
Accenture plc (NYSE:ACN) is one of the 10 Best Dip Stocks to Buy According to Billionaires. On June 30, Accenture plc (NYSE:ACN) announced its partnership with Palantir Technologies Inc. (NASDAQ:PLTR) to deliver advanced AI-powered solutions to US federal government agencies. As part of the partnership, Accenture Federal Services, which is a subsidiary of Accenture plc (NYSE:ACN), has been named Palantir's preferred implementation partner for deploying its AI platforms to federal customers. Accenture Federal will train and certify 1,000 of its Data & AI professionals on Palantir's Foundry and Artificial Intelligence Platform. The company will also build a large-scale joint delivery team focused on AI automation in government. A team of data experts gathered around a computer monitor analyzing customer data. Some of the initial joint offerings by both companies include Enterprise-to-Edge data fusion, predictive supply chain orchestration, and operationalized financial intelligence. Accenture plc (NYSE:ACN) is a leading international professional services company that helps organizations improve their performance. The company operates through key areas including Strategy and Consulting, Technology, Operations, and Industry X. While we acknowledge the potential of ACN as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: The Best and Worst Dow Stocks for the Next 12 Months and 10 Unstoppable Stocks That Could Double Your Money. Disclosure: None. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data