logo
Aberdeen to make final decision on proposed 7% tourist tax

Aberdeen to make final decision on proposed 7% tourist tax

STV News2 days ago
Councillors in Aberdeen are set to make a final decision over a proposed 7% tourist tax next week.
It is hoped the introduction of a visitor levy would generate up to £7.5m per year, adding around £5 on top of the cost of an average hotel room in the city per night.
In February, councillors agreed to press ahead with plans to introduce the levy and launch a public consultation on the scheme, giving residents and local businesses the chance to have their say on it.
Now, those consultations have come back to the council for consideration, and the local authority's finance and resources committee is due to make a final decision on Wednesday, August 6.
Councillors say that the additional income could help bring events like the World Rally Championship and Tall Ships Races back to Aberdeen.
The cash could also be spent on improvements across the city, such as upgrades to the Winter Gardens and replacement Christmas lights.
If the levy is approved, it is estimated that it could be in place by April 2027 at the earliest.
'I think this visitor levy, if we did choose to implement it, would offer a real opportunity in terms of boosting the Aberdeen and local economy,' said Alex McLellan, convener of the finance and resource committee at Aberdeen City Council.
'To contextualise, you're talking about the price of a coffee. You're talking about a few pounds on top of your cost per night, which could really boost the local economy in Aberdeen.
'The visitor levy offers a real opportunity for the council to generate additional revenue, which can be used to boost the visitor economy, bring people here, bring major events here, and really put Aberdeen on the map as a destination in Scotland.'
The rate would apply to all overnight accommodation in the city, including hotels, hostels, guest houses, B&Bs and self-catering lets.
Camping sites and caravan parks would also charge the fee.
Exemptions would be made for homeless people, asylum seekers and refugees, and those who receive benefits, payments or allowances for disabilities.
Those who are travelling to the city for medical appointments would also be excluded from paying the levy.
Stephen Gow, general manager of the Chester Hotel in Aberdeen, said a visitor levy is 'not an unusual thing to have'.
'You go to most European cities and you'll find that there's a levy on the visitors coming in,' he said.
'We have to be careful that the percentage is not misinterpreted. The rates in Aberdeen are perhaps lower than they are in the Central Belt, who have suggested that they're going to have a lower percentage, but the actual amount of money paid will be higher.'
The Visitor Levy (Scotland) Bill was passed in May last year, allowing councils across the country to charge a fee or tax on overnight stays.
Glasgow's new tourist tax has already been given the go-ahead, with visitors to be charged on average £4.83 per night from January 25, 2027.
Edinburgh councillors approved a similar 5% visitor levy in January, which will take effect from July 24, 2026.
Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News
Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Brian Cox is spellbinding in James Graham's most definitive drama yet
Brian Cox is spellbinding in James Graham's most definitive drama yet

Telegraph

time42 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Brian Cox is spellbinding in James Graham's most definitive drama yet

Make It Happen, an eye-catching curtain-raiser to the 2025 Edinburgh International Festival theatre programme, is the latest opus from our foremost political playwright, James Graham. It also brings Succession star and Dundee-born acting titan, Brian Cox, back to the Scottish stage for the first time in a decade. While the play is a triumph, its sobering focus – the tenure of Fred Goodwin as CEO of the Royal Bank of Scotland – will offer little fillip to Edinburghian pride. Established in the city in 1727, RBS was one of the world's biggest banks to founder in the 2008 financial crash, bailed out by Gordon Brown's government to the tune of £45bn. Far from seeming parochial or passé, this play feels like a belated, vital invitation for us all to reflect on the debacle, which saw Goodwin stripped of his knighthood. 'Fred the Shred' – as the reputedly ruthless executive was nicknamed – is played by Sandy Grierson, while Cox incarnates the 'ghost of fiscal past': the 18th-century Scottish economist – and here, Goodwin's hero – Adam Smith. Over two hours, weaving fact and fiction, the production charts the course of RBS's rise and fall, from Goodwin's arrival there in 1998 to the bail-out emergency, with Cox providing a more satirical element as a fitfully appearing Smith. As such, the play examines the recklessness and inept regulation of the New Labour era, as well as – via Smith – the legacy of the Enlightenment. Graham has done it again – turned complex history into theatrical gold. And this may be his most essential work yet, because it identifies the source of the political upheaval that preoccupies his work (whether in This House, on the stage, or Brexit: The Uncivil War, on TV). Gordon Brown's regime – when boom turned to bust – may have battered the nation, but it put new force behind Graham's career. Brown is just one of the high-profile figures to emerge amid the finely co-ordinated ensemble, along with Alistair Darling, banker and baroness Shriti Vadera, and Laura Kuenssberg. Ideally, we'd see more of what went awry in the heart of government. But it's the nondescript, shadowy figure of Grierson's Goodwin who dominates the evening, empire-building in Edinburgh and determined to make corporate conquest after conquest. ('Make it Happen' was the company's adopted slogan, and it's frequently issued as a command to quivering staff.) Goodwin isn't represented as a panto villain. With director Andrew Panton harnessing up-tempo, apposite pop hits from the period, the play stresses the aspirational energy Goodwin strove to unleash, chiming with the can-do spirit of Scottish devolution (1998). But Grierson brings self-contained menace to the role besides an unnerving resemblance to Vladimir Putin. There's the odd light touch of Carry On – bonking sessions in an office cupboard – but the dominant reference is Greek tragedy, the chorus stalking, Fury-like, a figure who becomes almost mythic in his hubris. There's a quality of madness, then, to the apparition of Cox's economic grandee. The actor initially – gamely – plays himself, reluctantly recruited for a pop-up corporate entertainment. Later, the bewigged sage appears, as if surreally summoned by Goodwin's modern-day Faust, indulging in campy asides and marvelling at the 21 st century. But he increasingly becomes a figure of conscience-pricking disapproval, dismayed that Goodwin hasn't fully digested his writings. The moral of Graham's story? Substance always trumps style, and if you're at the apex of power, you need to do your homework. Rachel Reeves: take note.

Tourists book 'hotel' for Italian holiday but arrive to something totally different
Tourists book 'hotel' for Italian holiday but arrive to something totally different

Daily Mirror

time3 hours ago

  • Daily Mirror

Tourists book 'hotel' for Italian holiday but arrive to something totally different

Matt Hey was excited to spend a few days of his European holiday relaxing at a resort in Sorrento, but he was in for a big surprise when he arrived at the accommodation A tourist was left baffled after arriving at what he believed was a luxury resort in Sorrento, Italy, only to find that his party were the only guests there. Matt Hey, from Sydney, Australia, had been travelling across Europe for four weeks, living in cheap accommodation in cities like London, Rome and Pisa to make the most of the experience travellling with friends. ‌ However, the party then decided to splash out on their next accommodation. As they were heading towards the Italian coastal town Sorrento, they decided to book in to what they believed was a luxurious resort by the sea. ‌ However, they soon realised their mishap when they arrived at their holiday destination. Taking to TikTok, Matt was seen recounting the moment they realised their "hotel resort" ended up coming with a lot more than they'd expected. ‌ "I'm just baffled, I'm honestly baffled," Matt said at the start of the video as he looked out over the view of the nearby sea. "This is bizarre." "So we got here, we walk through the gates up there," Matt said pointing to the gates in question. "We walk down here because Google Maps just said it was at the end there. We walk all the way down here and I'm saying 'wow, isn't this nice and peaceful and quiet.'" He went onto say he started to think it was weird that they hadn't seen another person on the premises. As they get to the main building, he goes onto explain that he first thought it looked like someone's house before assuming it's the reception area where they could check in, or possibly one of the rooms. ‌ "Anyway, so then I'm like, let's go around looking this way and we'll have a look," he said before the video cut to them arriving at a different area. "And we get down here and this is what I see." Warning: Below video may contain offensive language ‌ He went onto show a big patio with a view of the sea. There were also some tables and chairs to sit down at, but again not a single other person could be seen. He then turned the camera once again towards the house, which has a balcony with a big glass door on the first floor. "There's like a little wedding reception area sort of thing," he said before turning the camera to a different door of the house with white curtains hanging from it. They then walked closer to the end of the patio, which showed that the "hotel" was located right on a cliff which looked down onto the bright blue water, with a beach right below them. ‌ "Looks amazing, right? So I'm thinking, 'why haven't I seen anyone yet?'" he questioned, before revealing that a woman suddenly walked up to them asking if they needed help. Matt went onto say that he'd told the woman that they were in the wrong place, but said they were looking to check in to their room, to which she replied she'd call the concierge. They then continued to explore the area, finding another area that looked like a "wedding dance floor" according to Matt, who said he believed there must be smaller villas for them to stay in. The concierge then met them, and they proceeded to do the check in at one of the sitting areas by the dancefloor, before he handed them the key. He then took them to the house, which also looked like it'd been decorated for a wedding. ‌ "And to be clear, we thought we were getting a hotel," he said. "Don't get me know, I'm not complaining, we're going to have a beautiful time here. But we didn't need an entire wedding venue. I'm rattled, actually. Like, genuinely rattled." In the caption of the video, Matt revealed that they'd paid $600AUD (£292) per night to stay at Villa Antiche Mura Relais in Sorrento, which describes themselves as "villas for weddings" on their website. Taking to the comments, people were shocked when they realised just how much they'd gotten for their money. But some were also baffled as to how they'd managed to make this "mistake." "Is this Sorrento?? How is this 600 dollars?????" one baffled person asked. Another suggested: "Invite some locals round for a party not like you don't have set-up haha." "Send the details I've found my wedding venue," a third viewer said. Another person shared: "I got married in Tuscany because we got the wedding plus a full week's accommodations for 30 people for less than we would have paid for a single-day sit-down dinner wedding for 150 people at a major US city."

Dubai ruler installed solar panels ‘without planning permission'
Dubai ruler installed solar panels ‘without planning permission'

Telegraph

time5 hours ago

  • Telegraph

Dubai ruler installed solar panels ‘without planning permission'

The billionaire ruler of Dubai has built solar panels on his sprawling Highland estate without planning permission, The Telegraph can reveal. Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid al-Maktoum installed the eco-friendly technology on the Inverinate estate to improve the 'sustainability performance' of one of the properties. The estate is on the banks of Loch Duich, which is a special area of conservation and home to wildlife including deer, Eurasian otters, pipistrelles, and western European hedgehogs. His representatives are now seeking retrospective planning permission for the plans, which also include an additional room for staff and a new road. Sheikh Mohammed is a strong supporter of solar energy and has spearheaded the development of the Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum Solar Park in Dubai, the world's largest single-site solar park. But the plans come amid growing questions from locals after long periods of construction work on the 63,000-acre estate. A design statement included with the plans states: 'Solar photovoltaic (PV) panels have been installed on the roof to enhance the building's sustainability performance in line with national and local renewable energy goals. Their location ensures minimal visual impact.' The 74-year-old bought the estate in Wester Ross – which boasts three helipads and a pool – more than 20 years ago and usually visits once or twice a year. Sheikh Mohammed has undertaken a vast expansion of the estate in recent years and was recently given permission for a tenth property on the site with 15 bedrooms, a large living room and dining room area, and a conservatory. His representatives say that he has been expanding the number of buildings on his land in recent years to make more room for guests and staff. 'He's rarely in Scotland' One local told The Telegraph: 'I think he has been good to the local community, but he's rarely in Scotland, so why the constant expansion on the estate?' Another pointed out that construction work 'has become a little bit too much in recent years for an estate which doesn't appear to be used much.' In 2020 he won a planning battle to build a six-bedroom lodge at the estate after the Scottish Government overruled the council, which blocked the application in the wake of more than 30 local objections. The application was approved on the condition that the Sheikh's property firm paid £30,000 towards local affordable housing. Sheikh Mohammed, who also owns several vast estates in Essex, Surrey, and Suffolk, is one of the UK's biggest landowners and one of the world's richest men, valued at £11bn. Meanwhile, Scotland has some of the most concentrated land ownership in the West, with half of all private land owned by just 400 people. Richard Scott, the 10th Duke of Buccleuch, owns about 200,000 acres of land, whilst Danish billionaire Anders Holch Povlsen, who owns the global clothing chain Bestseller, owns over 220,000 acres of land. A statement from his representatives submitted to Highland Council said: 'This retrospective application reflects necessary and beneficial modifications made during the construction and operational planning phases. 'The proposed changes are minor in scale relative to the approved development and are fully justified in terms of functional necessity, sustainability, and design integrity. 'We respectfully request that The Highland Council support this application.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store