logo
Pride mattered when it was 'our' holiday. There's nothing to be proud of now.

Pride mattered when it was 'our' holiday. There's nothing to be proud of now.

USA Today09-06-2025
Pride mattered when it was 'our' holiday. There's nothing to be proud of now. | Your Turn Do you think it's important to have a Pride Month? Are you concerned the Trump administration may try to further infringe upon the rights of LGBTQ+ people? Here's what you said.
You've likely heard the phrase, "Pride started as a riot." And while it's true that pride as we know it grew out of the Stonewall Uprising of June 1969 – the first pride parade took place one year later on June 28, 1970, with protest marches occurring in New York City, Chicago, San Francisco and Los Angeles – LGBTQ+ history is still unfolding today.
Did you know it was still illegal to be gay as recently as 22 years ago? In 2003, the Supreme Court decision in Lawrence v. Texas decriminalized same-sex sexual conduct, ruling state sodomy laws as unconstitutional. And it wasn't until 10 years ago, in 2015, that full marriage equality arrived with the Supreme Court's decision in Obergefell v. Hodges. And it wasn't until 2020 – five years ago – that the Supreme Court ruled protections against workplace discrimination extended to sexual orientation and gender identity.
Under President Donald Trump's second administration, LGBTQ+ rights are back in the spotlight as he issues executive orders banning transgender military servicemembers and rescinding funding from educational institutions that allow trans athletes to compete in sports. So far in 2025, more than 500 bills targeting the LGBTQ+ community have been introduced across America.
As Pride Month 2025 gets underway across the country (albeit with fewer corporate sponsors), we asked what pride means to you – not just the parades, protests and community, but also your feelings, fears and hopes – and whether it can continue to exist in its current form. Here's what readers told us.
Share your take: Republicans want massive cuts to Medicaid. What do you want? Tell us. | Opinion Forum
I'm saddened by what pride ‒ and our country ‒ has become
Pride Month was extraordinarily significant to me when it was "our" holiday, until about 15-20 years ago. Since then, it has become a politically divisive public spectacle that is nothing to be proud of. All the corporate trucks and vans with no apparent association to our community, driving slowly down the parade route without even decorating their vehicles, are extravagantly insulting. Recently, there have been more gawking straight families in attendance than LGBTQ+ people.
I'm not at all disappointed with the businesses that are no longer participating in pride events. Their duplicitous "support" only benefited themselves. Our pride is not a commodity, despite the ignorance of younger LGBTQ+ people.
When Pride Month was new in Houston, every business in the Montrose neighborhood closed for the duration of the parade, even the bars. Andy Mills and Ray Hill assumed risks to their lives to direct us participants in the parade down Westheimer Road. They tolerated police raids, arrests and physical abuse by the cops for living authentic lives. They protected marchers from the Ku Klux Klan that threatened us about 40 years ago. Young community members are completely unaware that this is not a frivolous observation.
My wife and I have been exclusively committed for 33 years. In June 2015, the Supreme Court declared our marriage rights and we married the following week. We're in our 70s now and poor. But we're so fearful of President Donald Trump annulling our union that we're selling everything we own to move to Mexico. We have made two frugal trips and now have official Mexican residency cards. We anticipate leaving for good on June 8, the day after my best friend's funeral. We hope never, ever to return.
To the younger LGBTQ+ community: Please educate yourselves. There are only a few of us who were there in the beginning, but we'll be happy to share our information. And the fact is that we feel thoroughly disrespected by you.
— Jazz Paz, 73, Houston
Pride is so much more than rainbows and parades to me
Without a doubt, Pride Month is important, and it means so much more to me than rainbows and parades. From an outside view, it's easy to look at pride as a corporate-centered, rehearsed display of disingenuous virtue signaling. To those of us in the community, that skin-deep assumption is lobbed at us every June.
Pride to me, however, means acceptance. It means reflecting on the endless strife for equality ‒ in marriage, in employment, in housing and in spousal rights. We're celebrating how far we've come, but we're also rallying for the future and the challenges our community still faces.
Corporations and their involvement in Pride Month have long been controversial. Many in our community welcome the awareness, visibility and donations to LGBTQ+ causes. However, others see corporate sponsoring as a market scheme to cash out on our community and its allies by slapping some rainbows on merchandise for a month or making a cliché social media post advertising their support every first of June.
Your Turn: I think the WNBA's popularity is here to stay – thanks to Caitlin Clark | Opinion Forum
Indeed, the reversal of several companies this year, deciding that pride is no longer profitable to them during this political climate, has shown just how shallow their sponsorship was all along. When they were given the chance to prove that those who were always skeptical of corporate support of pride were wrong, they didn't hesitate to bend the knee to bigotry and prove the pessimists correct.
The very crux of Trump's second presidency has been to target minorities, whether it be us, racial minorities, the undocumented and many more. I think it's important to point out that just six years ago, Trump was declaring his support for Pride Month on Twitter during his first term. His administration's actions, back then, proved to be the opposite of supporting the LGBTQ+ community, but he still had the gall to at least pretend he cared about us.
Now, Trump wouldn't dare even mention Pride Month in a positive light because the fringe conservative wing he aligns himself with has grown so hateful and obsessed with LGBTQ+ issues that showing any shred of kindness to us would be worthy of excommunication to them.
I would be dumbfounded if the federal government recognized Pride Month during this administration. Cruelty, brashness and classlessness highlight the priorities of this administration. None of these are compatible with pride or what we stand for, so it's easy to see why it's an absolute no for them. Marginalization and apathy are all that Trump and his allies know.
My questions to the older LGBTQ+ generations would be: How have you remained so resilient?
— Jacob Vertrees, 21, Phoenix
My partner and I won't be at Pride Month. I fear for those who will.
I used to think pride was important, but I think that pride, and a lot of other gay events, have been overshadowed by the prevalence and acceptance of drugs in the LGBTQ+ community.
Although we have in the past, my partner and I won't be attending this year, specifically because of this. I think sponsors are pulling out because they don't want to be associated with what it has become.
It took an alarming amount of time for permits to be approved for WorldPride in Washington, DC. I am expecting them to arrest people who congregate on federal lands.
— David Thibodeau, 64, Washington, DC
This is just my 2nd Pride Month out. It feels like finally exhaling.
I think Pride Month's importance cannot be overstated enough. To me, pride means visibility, courage and, most important, joy. It's the exhale of built-up closeted anxiety and fears finally being able to be truly released among a community of those who not only accept you for who you are, but also celebrate it. This will be just my second Pride Month where I'm publicly out, and my grandfather is a gay man who had to live in shame and had the courage to finally come out in the 1980s while his friends died suddenly of AIDS.
Pride is also about honoring those who came before us, who paved the way for our freedom.
I absolutely think corporations and businesses have a role in pride. With such a large, influential monetary impact on society amid a backdrop of volatile and dangerous political rhetoric, corporations have a responsibility and moral obligation to support heritage events like Pride Month. Corporations can make a very powerful impact, which can not only change the lives of those who are struggling but also help boost their own success and productivity. Diversity makes things run smoothly and work better.
Trump is not shy about his direct homophobia, transphobia and attacks against the LGBTQ+ community. His putrid policies, hateful rhetoric and unconstitutional directives purport baseless attacks on the community that do not affect him in any way. If corporations, organizations, communities, lawmakers and individuals do not stand up, mobilize and advocate, we could see our country fall back in time where something as simple as being yourself is punishable by law.
With right-wing extremists at the helm, there is no telling what their next move will be. Would it be surprising? Not at all. But we have the responsibility ‒ as queer people, and those who are allies ‒ to stand up and not allow that to happen. Shunning our pride federally will not and cannot stop celebrations; that's how they win.
How can we rise together to combat this hatred?
— Gillian Gurney, 26, New York City
I'm an educator. I see how meaningful pride is to marginalized students.
As an educator, I realize that marginalized students face daily criticism from false stereotypes, misguided religious zealots and even their parents. Pride Month is not some "liberal" plot. It is a month to recognize marginalized citizens in our society. If we can have Mother's Day, Veterans Day and other events to recognize specific groups, it seems the only ones who dispute helping subgroups are the intolerant haters. Yes to helping anyone in the United States who needs help, not ignoring or hating them.
Since the war on diversity, equity and inclusion began with Project 2025's hope of making America more white-male centric, many American citizens have rejected this arrogant, racist theory. Businesses like Target and Tesla are losing financially and in public opinion.
The Trump administration's goal is to keep the American culture wars as inflamed as possible to deflect from gross mismanagement by Elon Musk and the Republican budget cuts to health care that will decimate senior citizens who rely on Social Security and Medicare for their survival. Sounds a bit like North Korea, does it not?
Why does a mostly white male administration need to target specific communities? Trump is the least Christian president ever; sleeping with a porn star while your wife is pregnant is not found in the New Testament.
— Neil Reilly, 57, Sacramento, California
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Appeals court keeps order blocking Trump administration from indiscriminate immigration sweeps
Appeals court keeps order blocking Trump administration from indiscriminate immigration sweeps

Boston Globe

time26 minutes ago

  • Boston Globe

Appeals court keeps order blocking Trump administration from indiscriminate immigration sweeps

In her order, Frimpong said there was a 'mountain of evidence' that federal immigration enforcement tactics were violating the Constitution. She wrote the government cannot use factors such as apparent race or ethnicity, speaking Spanish or English with an accent, presence at a location such as a tow yard or car wash, or someone's occupation as the only basis for reasonable suspicion to detain someone. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up The appeals court panel agreed and questioned the government's need to oppose an order preventing them from violating the constitution. Advertisement 'If, as Defendants suggest, they are not conducting stops that lack reasonable suspicion, they can hardly claim to be irreparably harmed by an injunction aimed at preventing a subset of stops not supported by reasonable suspicion,' the judges wrote. A hearing for a preliminary injunction, which would be a more substantial court order as the lawsuit proceeds, is scheduled for September. Advertisement The Los Angeles region has been a battleground with the Trump administration over its aggressive immigration strategy that spurred protests and the deployment of the National Guards and Marines for several weeks. Federal agents have rounded up immigrants without legal status to be in the U.S. from Home Depots, car washes, bus stops, and farms, many who have lived in the country for decades. Among the plaintiffs is Los Angeles resident Brian Gavidia, who was shown in a video taken by a friend June 13 being seized by federal agents as he yells, 'I was born here in the states, East LA bro!' They want to 'send us back to a world where a U.S. citizen ... can be grabbed, slammed against a fence and have his phone and ID taken from him just because he was working at a tow yard in a Latino neighborhood,' American Civil Liberties Union attorney Mohammad Tajsar told the court Monday. The federal government argued that it hadn't been given enough time to collect and present evidence in the lawsuit, given that it was filed shortly before the July 4 holiday and a hearing was held the following week. 'It's a very serious thing to say that multiple federal government agencies have a policy of violating the Constitution,' attorney Jacob Roth said. He also argued that the lower court's order was too broad, and that immigrant advocates did not present enough evidence to prove that the government had an official policy of stopping people without reasonable suspicion. He referred to the four factors of race, language, presence at a location, and occupation that were listed in the temporary restraining order, saying the court should not be able to ban the government from using them at all. He also argued that the order was unclear on what exactly is permissible under law. Advertisement 'Legally, I think it's appropriate to use the factors for reasonable suspicion,' Roth said The judges sharply questioned the government over their arguments. 'No one has suggested that you cannot consider these factors at all,' Judge Jennifer Sung said. However, those factors alone only form a 'broad profile' and don't satisfy the reasonable suspicion standard to stop someone, she said. Sung, a Biden appointee, said that in an area like Los Angeles, where Latinos make up as much as half the population, those factors 'cannot possibly weed out those who have undocumented status and those who have documented legal status.' She also asked: 'What is the harm to being told not to do something that you claim you're already not doing?' Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass called the Friday night decision a 'victory for the rule of law' and said the city will protect residents from the 'racial profiling and other illegal tactics' used by federal agents.

Trump recalibrates Gaza stance as humanitarian concerns grow
Trump recalibrates Gaza stance as humanitarian concerns grow

Yahoo

time42 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump recalibrates Gaza stance as humanitarian concerns grow

President Donald Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff and U.S. Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee made a rare trip to Gaza on Friday, spending five hours on the ground touring an aid distribution center and vowing to address a humanitarian crisis amid a growing global outcry. 'The purpose of the visit was to give @POTUS a clear understanding of the humanitarian situation and help craft a plan to deliver food and medical aid to the people of Gaza,' Witkoff wrote on X. The visit is emblematic of the ongoing shift inside the White House as Trump, while still supportive of Israel's campaign, has grown increasingly concerned about the humanitarian conditions in Gaza. A White House official, granted anonymity to speak candidly about the president's thinking, asserted that Trump 'hasn't changed his fundamental belief' that Hamas is 'largely' to blame for the protracted conflict. Still, referring to Trump's own comments in recent days, the official acknowledged 'some new concerns.' Those concerns, spurred by photos and accounts of starving children, are echoed within MAGA circles and the broader public. A Gallup poll this week showed that American support for Israel's military action has dropped to 32 percent, a new low. Trump 'calibrates his interactions based on what the issues are. And sometimes people make the mistake of not just listening to the president,' said a senior White House official granted anonymity to discuss the president's thinking. 'He's just straightforward on this stuff. … Like, what's going on with Gaza and Israel. He wants to settle it. Yes, you can't negotiate with Hamas. But, like, he doesn't want kids to starve. He doesn't want that to happen. It's just, that's it. You know, there's not more to it than that.' That doesn't mean Trump is ready to embrace some foreign allies' call to recognize Palestinian statehood — although his opposition may not be quite as firm as it was a couple months ago. Trump earlier this summer privately urged French President Emmanuel Macron against recognizing a Palestinian state, according to two people familiar with the conversation, who were granted anonymity to share closely held details. The call, which has not been previously reported, did not produce the intended result and Macron announced his intention to recognize a Palestinian state last week. But when Trump was asked about it while traveling in Scotland last weekend, he was nonchalant about Macron going ahead with something he'd worked privately to forestall. 'What he says doesn't matter,' the president said. During a meeting with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer on Monday, Trump seemed almost agnostic about Palestinian statehood, leaving his counterpart space to fall in line behind Macron. 'I'm not going to take a position,' said Trump with Starmer seated at his side. 'I don't mind him taking a position.' The White House declined to comment on Trump's conversation with Macron or his overall approach to the situation in Gaza. And on Thursday, press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters that the president has 'expressed his displeasure and disagreement' with both Macron and Starmer, as well as Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney, who also indicated support for Palestinian statehood. Trump, Leavitt continued, still opposes recognizing Palestine as a separate state. 'He feels as though that's rewarding Hamas at a time where Hamas is the true impediment to a ceasefire and to the release of all of the hostages,' she said. Even so, Trump has broken with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, not only acknowledging the humanitarian crisis in Gaza but also dispatching top aides to address it. Witkoff's social media post included a picture of him and Huckabee meeting with the Israel-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, to which the U.S. has committed $30 million. Scores of charities and aid groups have criticized the organization for failing to safely distribute aid and said hundreds of Palestinians have been killed trying to access its distribution sites. The Israeli military insists it fires only 'warning shots' and blames Hamas for the violence. Trump on Friday said Witkoff had a "great meeting." "He had a meeting on getting the people fed, and that's what we want,' Trump said. Concern for the plight of the Palestinians is a striking turn for the U.S. president who, just months ago, mused about creating a 'riviera' in the Middle East, a plan that appeared to be centered on forcibly relocating Palestinians into neighboring countries and razing their homes in Gaza. And it was Trump who gave Netanyahu explicit approval, if not outright encouragement, in March to end the fragile U.S. brokered ceasefire after just two months and resume Israel's all-out war and near-total blockade of humanitarian aid. At the time, the president warned Hamas 'THERE WILL BE HELL TO PAY!' if continued to hold hostages and declared he was giving Israel "everything it needs to finish the job.' The senior White House official said Trump just wants the bloodshed to end and is 'not deeply concerned about the details.' 'The president routinely preserves optionality and off ramps,' the official said. 'That's kind of his way — a lot of exit strategies on any given thing that are somewhat acceptable.' Solve the daily Crossword

50 Cent Gloats As Trump Nixes Pardon For 'Half-Innocent' Diddy, For Now
50 Cent Gloats As Trump Nixes Pardon For 'Half-Innocent' Diddy, For Now

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

50 Cent Gloats As Trump Nixes Pardon For 'Half-Innocent' Diddy, For Now

Donald Trump believes Sean 'Diddy' Combs is 'half-innocent' out of his sex-trafficking trial, but there will be no presidential pardon right now for the much-accused Grammy winner. And, just two days after Deadline exclusively reported that Trump was 'seriously considering' such a pardon and the White House played its cards close to the chest, Friday's no pardon stance makes Diddy foe 50 Cent very happy indeed. More from Deadline Sydney Sweeney American Eagle Ad Addressed By Clothing Company Amidst Partisan Uproar In Reaction To Dismal Jobs Report, Donald Trump Says He's Ordered Commissioner Of Labor Statistics To Be Fired Corporation For Public Broadcasting To Shut Down Operations After Loss Of Federal Funding 'Can you believe he thought he was getting pardoned,' the Power franchise EP and pro-Trump rapper posted on social media with an AI generated image late Friday after a still grievance fueled POTUS told Newsmax he wasn't inclined to grant Combs a get outta jail card. 'No Sir, you are not. You said very nasty things.' Yet, Trump being Trump, it could all change on a dime. Sticking it to federal prosecutors sweeping case, the eight-men and four-women jury just found Combs guilty of lesser charges of transportation to engage in prostitution on July 2. Though the U.S. Attorney's office for the Southern District of New York now want self-declared swinger and domestic violence perpetrator Combs to continued to be denied getting out on a $50 million bond and be sentenced to several years behind bars on October 2, the reality is the not guilty decision on the harsh sex trafficking and racketeering conspiracy charges was a serious blow for now fired lead prosecutor Maurene Comey and her team. Part of Trump's public and behind closed door dalliance with a Combs pardon is to stick a knife in the family of ex-FBI Director James Comey. The president also wants to punish what he views as an overreaching and too independent SDNY, sources tell me. Earlier Friday, months after Curtis '50 Cent' Jackson promised he would try to talk Trump out of any Combs pardon, the 'In Da Club' rapper posted a clip from the former Celebrity Apprentice host's sit-down with the fledgling conservative cable newswer where Trump agreed with reporter Rob Finnerty that any pardon for Diddy would 'more likely be a no.' Amidst a clemency campaign from Combs loyalists to the White House and those close to the transactional POTUS and Trump being Trump, the pardon 'no' tonight was qualified. Right after a discussion about a pardon for Jeffrey Epstein's newly cooperative confidant Ghislaine Maxwell, Finnerty asked: 'Sean 'Diddy' Combs. Would you consider pardoning him?' To which, a typically self-centered Trump replied: 'Well, he was essentially, I guess, sort of half innocent. Probably— I was very friendly with him but when I ran for office he was very hostile and it's hard. So, I don't know, it's more difficult.' Espousing ignorance one moment and then intimate knowledge the next about both Maxwell and Combs, Trump was just slightly less inclined towards the latter back in May when he was when asked about a pardon for the now convicted Bad Boy Records founder. 'I would certainly look at the facts if I think somebody was mistreated, whether they like me or don't like me,' Trump said on May 30 in the Oval Office just a couple of weeks after Combs' eventually eight-week long and often horrifically depraved trial began. Since our story on Combs receiving a possible pardon, MAGA media standard-bearers such as Megyn Kelly have pleaded Trump not to give the one-time mogul a pass. 'MAGA is already upset over elites seeming to cover for each other,' the ex-Fox News host said on July 30. 'This would not help. GOP struggling (with) young female voters, most of whom will hate a Diddy pardon,' Kelly exclaimed in a pretty convincing argument that also served as a warning shot to the transactional and media thin skinned Trump Staring at a maximum of 20 years for the prostitution charges he was found guilty of, Combs remains at Brooklyn's Metropolitan Detention Center. Diddy has been at the often criticized facility since his arrest last September in a NYC hotel. Trying to quell a MAGA uprising over the withholding of the promised files on the vile Epstein, who died in custody in 2019, Trump has been letting loose even more of a barrage of distractions that usual to direct attention away from his well-known relationship with convicted and well-connected sex offender Epstein and what the files may say about him. To that, just days after being granted immunity in a two-day conversation with a top DOJ official, the 20-year sentenced Maxwell was suddenly moved out of federal prison in Florida to a low-security prison camp in Texas. Maxwell, Combs …nothing to see here. Best of Deadline 2025 TV Cancellations: Photo Gallery 2025 TV Series Renewals: Photo Gallery 2025-26 Awards Season Calendar: Dates For Emmys, Oscars, Grammys & More

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store