logo
Brussels, my love? Can the EU stave off a trade war with the US?

Brussels, my love? Can the EU stave off a trade war with the US?

Euronews21-02-2025
We are joined this weekend by Ben Butters, the Chief Executive Officer at Eurochambres, Cory Bennet, climate editor for POLITICO Europe and Chloé Mikolajczak, a climate and social justice activist.
The panel broke down the rumours that the European Commission is set to simplify life for all those doing business in the EU. From the Competitive Compass to various 'Omnibus' packages expected soon - the EU executive has promised to focus on deregulation as opposed to more.
Climate activist Chloé Mikolajczak thinks this is a big mistake.
'It's making me feel incredibly worried and incredibly angry', she tells the panel adding that the laws took years of negotiations of compromise to be adopted.
The panel also reflected on the EU Trade Commissioner's visit to Washington DC this week to stave off a full-blown trade war. The EU has said it is open to working with President Trump to lower duties for industrial goods and increase the purchase of US products.
'The problem is you never know with Donald Trump. The thing to do with him is you have to take him seriously, but not literally', Cory Bennet quipped.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

LVMH and luxury giants undermine EU pushback on US trade threats
LVMH and luxury giants undermine EU pushback on US trade threats

Fashion Network

time28 minutes ago

  • Fashion Network

LVMH and luxury giants undermine EU pushback on US trade threats

Luxury powerhouse LVMH is at the forefront of quiet corporate diplomacy as the European Union scrambles to respond to looming US tariff threats. With a July deadline approaching, the group is among several major firms pushing for a softer stance in high-level trade talks. Behind closed doors, LVMH and other European multinationals have reportedly urged Brussels and national governments to pursue a compromise over confrontation regarding Donald Trump 's proposed 50% tariffs on EU imports. The luxury sector—deeply reliant on the US market—has become a leading voice advocating de-escalation to safeguard transatlantic business. Executives from companies such as LVMH and Mercedes-Benz are reported to have participated in informal talks with US representatives, urging EU officials to soften their countermeasures. According to sources familiar with the discussions, this included recommendations to exclude iconic American goods—such as bourbon—from the EU's proposed retaliation list. For LVMH, the stakes are particularly high. Chairman Bernard Arnault has cautioned that failure to reach a trade deal could have serious consequences for France's wine and spirits industry. Urging restraint, Arnault has advocated for a cooperative path forward and even floated the idea of a US–EU free trade zone. Arnault, who has maintained longstanding ties with Trump, has reportedly visited Washington multiple times since the former president's return to the political spotlight. His son, Alexandre Arnault, also met with officials in May in support of trade de-escalation. 'I hope to succeed, with my modest means and my contacts, in convincing Europe to adopt the most constructive attitude possible,' Arnault told French lawmakers in May. Luxury isn't the only sector weighing in. German automakers—including BMW, Mercedes-Benz and Volkswagen—have also proposed their own solutions directly to US officials. Mercedes, for instance, has shifted production of its GLC SUV to Alabama, while other firms have announced expanded US investments as diplomatic signals. These moves, though strategic, have raised concerns in Brussels. EU officials fear that an over-accommodating response could encourage companies to increasingly shift production and investment across the Atlantic, weakening Europe's industrial core. Industry leaders contend that reciprocal tariffs would do more harm than good. While retaliation may appear symbolic, it risks reducing EU access to essential US-made technologies, components, and research ecosystems—particularly in high-growth areas such as fashion innovation, AI, and biotechnology. Meanwhile, industry groups representing French Cognac and Irish whiskey producers have intensified lobbying efforts, warning that retaliatory tariffs would unjustly penalize products unrelated to the core trade dispute. These sectors rely heavily on the US and Chinese markets for exports and have become particularly vulnerable to policy crossfire. The European Commission has outlined proposed tariffs on $112 billion worth of US goods. However, pressure from member states and industry groups may lead to as much as €70 billion worth of items being removed from the final list—significantly diluting the EU's leverage. As a potential compromise, the EU is reportedly open to a universal 10% tariff on many of its exports, while seeking lower rates for key sectors, such as aerospace, pharmaceuticals, semiconductors, and luxury goods. With stakes rising, the next few weeks will be critical. For LVMH and other fashion leaders, the hope is that quiet diplomacy will succeed where confrontation may fail—and that maintaining access to the US market remains central to the EU's trade strategy.

Tributes pour in for Diogo Jota after Liverpool star killed in car crash
Tributes pour in for Diogo Jota after Liverpool star killed in car crash

France 24

time32 minutes ago

  • France 24

Tributes pour in for Diogo Jota after Liverpool star killed in car crash

01:38 03/07/2025 Trump close to victory on flagship 'Big Beautiful' tax bill 03/07/2025 Israel orders evacuation of West Bank's Tulkarem 03/07/2025 A 'tsunami of need' feared as US House close to final vote on Trump tax bill 03/07/2025 French diplomat visits detainees held in Iran in first 'proof of life' since Israeli strikes 03/07/2025 Sean 'Diddy' Combs denied bail after prostitution conviction 03/07/2025 Ukraine scrambling for clarity as US downplays halt to arms shipments 03/07/2025 Italy to issue half million non-EU work visas over next three years 03/07/2025 Palestinians mourn director of key Gaza hospital killed in Israeli strike 03/07/2025 French air traffic controllers' strike disrupts early summer season travel

EU now imports more LNG than pipeline gas: Is it bad for the climate?
EU now imports more LNG than pipeline gas: Is it bad for the climate?

Euronews

timean hour ago

  • Euronews

EU now imports more LNG than pipeline gas: Is it bad for the climate?

The first quarter of 2025 has marked a significant shift in EU gas imports. For the first time, the bloc seems to be importing more liquefied natural gas (LNG) than natural gas through pipelines: 8.4 million tonnes compared with 8.2 million tonnes, according to Eurostat data. The quantity of LNG imports soared by 12%, compared to Q1 2024, which also meant a sharp increase in money spent on these imports. This figure soared by 45%, totalling €5.3 billion. This shift was driven by the recent expansion or reactivation of LNG regasification facilities in countries like Poland, Finland, the Netherlands, Germany, Croatia, Italy, Belgium and Greece following the 2022 full-scale invasion of Ukraine. More expensive and questionable environmentally: the dark side of LNG LNG implies higher upfront operational costs because it needs to be frozen to -162°C to be transported, becoming 600 times smaller in volume before it's regassified. Also, transporting it requires specially equipped trucks or cargo ships, which have a much bigger environmental impact than common pipelines. A study by New York's Cornell University quantified LNG's carbon footprint as 33% higher than coal. "The emissions of methane and carbon dioxide released during LNG's extraction, processing, transportation and storage account for approximately half of its total greenhouse gas footprint," says the study's author, Robert Howarth. Compared to pipeline gas, the International Energy Agency claimed LNG has a 67% larger carbon footprint (12 g CO2/MJ pipeline vs 20 g CO2/MJ). However, the International Energy Agency (IEA) insisted that there's room to bring emissions down by about 60% by reducing leaks and flaring, as well as using carbon capture. Why was the EU forced to resort to LNG? LNG is an extremely flexible resource, due to the possibility of signing short-term contracts, allowing for quicker adjustments to market downturns and volatility. The fact that importing LNG doesn't require pipelines also makes it more resilient to logistical issues like infrastructural damage or blockades, mitigating the impact of geopolitical shocks. The EU used to import a lot of natural gas from Russia via pipeline, but that dramatically changed after the full-scale invasion of Ukraine. First, Moscow shut down its Nord Stream 1 pipeline to Europe, which was also badly damaged, later, in an underwater sabotage by unknown attackers, along with Nord Stream 2 (which was never launched). Additionally, almost no Russian gas is coming to Europe through Ukraine, as Kyiv didn't renew the necessary transit contracts in January. Russia remains the EU's second LNG provider after the US The share of Russian natural gas in total EU energy imports fell dramatically from 41% in 2021 to around 18% in 2024, according to EU Commission data. Faced with pipeline cuts, the EU was forced to pivot to liquefied gas. In 2025, the US continues to be the EU's largest LNG partner, accounting for just over half of all imports in value (50.7%), followed by Russia (17%) and Qatar (10.8%). Russia's imports, however, are still relevant, and the EU can't afford to cut them completely just yet. The bloc opted for sideline measures like a ban on future investments in LNG projects in Russia as well as a ban on the use of EU ports for the transhipment of Russian LNG, and on the provision of goods, technology and services for Russian LNG projects. Recently, the EU set 2027 as its deadline to stop all Russian energy imports, including LNG. Whether it will meet it or not, member states are rushing to diversify their gas partners, primarily boosting pipeline imports from Norway — which sells the EU over half of its natural gas imports — Azerbaijan and Algeria. Germany backs extraction agreement with the Netherlands "Energy prices are higher in the EU than in most other industrialised economies, presenting a fundamental competitiveness challenge," a recent Bruegel report read. Countries like Germany and Romania are responding by launching plans to boost gas extraction. On Wednesday, Berlin backed a cross-border agreement with the Netherlands for cross-border extraction in the North Sea. Bucharest is headed to the Black Sea with an ambitious project called Neptun Deep. This marks Romania's biggest energy project in two decades, and should become operational in 2027, to exploit the estimated 100 billion cubic meters of gas reserves. In Q1 2025, the EU spent 19% more on natural gas imports compared to the same period last year, although it bought 12% less in quantity. Regarding all energy imports, Eurostat notes that costs "increased slightly by 0.3%, while the volume decreased by 3.9%".

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store