logo
The housing market is shifting—here's where it's happening most rapidly

The housing market is shifting—here's where it's happening most rapidly

Fast Company20 hours ago

Want more housing market stories from Lance Lambert's ResiClub in your inbox? Subscribe to the ResiClub newsletter.
A few days after I launched ResiClub in October 2023, I wrote an article titled 'The key housing market metric heading into 2024.' In it, I reaffirmed a point I had also made at Fortune in 2022: that some traditional rules of thumb—i.e., months-of-supply thresholds for what constitutes a buyers' market versus a sellers' market—could struggle in this post–Pandemic Housing Boom environment, where there's downward pressure on prices.
For the time being, I suggested that an easy-to-create and useful metric for housing stakeholders to follow—one that helps gauge short-term pricing momentum and whether downside risk might manifest—is a local market's level of active inventory compared to that same market's inventory level in the same month of pre-pandemic 2019.
The thinking was that markets where active inventory remains well below 2019 levels would still exhibit some tightness, while those where inventory has surged back to or above pre-pandemic 2019 levels would experience a shift in the supply-demand equilibrium more in favor of homebuyers.
Heading into 2025, I recreated that analysis showing the dynamic was still holding true.
Fast-forward to today, and this particular data cut still proves useful (overtime ResiClub believes its usefulness will diminish—just not right now).
Generally speaking, housing markets where active housing inventory for sale has surged above pre-pandemic 2019 levels have experienced weaker or softer home price growth (or even outright home price declines) over the past 36 months. Conversely, housing markets where active housing inventory for sale remains far below pre-pandemic 2019 levels have, generally speaking, experienced more resilient home price growth over the past 36 months.
Indeed, just look at the scatter plot below showing 'Shift in home prices since their local 2022 peak' Vs. 'active inventory for sale now compared to the same month in 2019' for the nation's 250 largest metro area housing markets.
Below is the same scatter plot as the one above, only its color scheme is adjusted to show which markets have LESS active inventory now than in 2019 (BROWN) and which markets have MORE active inventory right now than in 2019 (GREEN).
Click here for an interactive version of the scatter plot below.
To see if this data cut still proves useful, let's swap out 'home price since their local 2022 peak' for 'year-over-year home price shift.'
The answer is yes—the trend still holds. (Recently, both the Wall Street Journal and John Burns Research and Consulting created their own versions of this longtime ResiClub scatter plot.)
Below is the same scatter plot as the one above, only its color scheme is adjusted to show which markets have LESS active inventory now than in 2019 (BROWN) and which markets have MORE active inventory right now than in 2019 (GREEN).
The current regional bifurcation—greater weakness in Sun Belt and Mountain West boomtowns and greater resiliency in the Northeast and Midwest—shouldn't be surprising to ResiClub readers. Given that we cover that regional bifurcation frequently, we're not going to spend time in this piece discussing what's driving that bifurcation.
Instead, let's discuss why this particular data cut is useful right now, and why overtime it could become less useful.
This data cut's usefulness—right now—explained
During the Pandemic Housing Boom, housing demand surged rapidly amid ultralow interest rates, stimulus, and the remote work boom—which increased demand for space and unlocked 'WFH arbitrage' as high earners were able to keep their income from a job in, say, NYC or L.A., and buy in, say, Austin or Tampa. Federal Reserve researchers estimate 'new construction would have had to increase by roughly 300% to absorb the pandemic-era surge in demand.'
Unlike housing demand, housing stock supply isn't as elastic and can't ramp up as quickly. As a result, the heightened pandemic era demand drained the market of active inventory and overheated home prices, with U.S. home prices rising a staggering +43.2% between March 2020 and June 2022.
At the height of the Pandemic Housing Boom in spring 2022, most of the country had 60% to 75% less active inventory than in 2019. Once mortgage rates spiked, national housing demand cooled off.
While many commentators view active inventory and months of supply simply as measures of 'supply,' ResiClub sees them more as proxies for the supply-demand equilibrium. Large swings in active inventory or months of supply are usually driven by shifts in housing demand. For example, during the Pandemic Housing Boom, surging demand caused homes to sell faster—pushing active inventory down, even as new listings remained steady.
Conversely, in recent years, weakening demand has led to slower sales, causing active inventory to rise in many markets—even as new listings fell below trend.
For a market like Austin or Punta Gorda to surge from historically low active inventory levels in spring 2022 to now well above pre-pandemic 2019 levels, it has taken a significant shift in the balance of power—from sellers to buyers.
That shift has also coincided with those markets experiencing outright home price corrections. Conversely, despite the affordability shock, markets like Syracuse and Milwaukee still have active inventory levels well below 2019 levels and continue to see slightly positive year-over-year home price growth.
Inventory wasn't historically 'high' back in 2019—so why does climbing back to 2019 levels matter?
During the Pandemic Housing Boom, housing demand overwhelmed the Denver metro housing market—pushing active housing inventory for sale down to just 2,288 homes by May 2021, down 69% from the 7,490 listings in May 2019.
Since the Pandemic Housing Boom fizzled out, and mortgage rates spiked, active inventory for sale in Denver has spiked up to 12,354 active listings as of May 2025—65% above pre-pandemic May 2019 levels.
While active inventory for sale in Denver today isn't necessarily that high by historical comparison, the sharp jump from 2022 inventory levels to 2025 levels in such a short window reflects a pretty big shift in the supply-demand equilibrium. On the ground that shift should feel jarring.
That greater active inventory bounce up in Denver has coincided with a greater house price softening/weakening. Indeed, Denver metro area home prices as measured by ResiClub analysis of the Zillow Home Value Index are down 1.7% year-over-year, and down 7.3% since their 2022 peak.
Why, over time, this data cut could prove less useful
One of the common pushbacks I hear when comparing today's active inventory for sale to 2019 levels is that some markets—like Austin and Punta Gorda—have larger populations now than they did back in 2019.
It's true that some of the markets with higher inventory today compared to 2019 are also the ones that have experienced notable population growth in recent years. However, that actual population growth—i.e., a larger population base—isn't the sole reason inventory has jumped so quickly in places like Austin and Punta Gorda. Rather, it's because those markets have experienced a sharper weakening in their for-sale market since the Pandemic Housing Boom fizzled out. And that has helped push up unsold inventory in those markets.
That said, over time, changes in market size—specifically population and total households—will naturally affect what constitutes a 'normal' level of active inventory. By 2035, for example, comparing active inventory to 2019 levels will be far less meaningful than it has been in 2021-2025.
Some traditional rules of thumb have fallen short this cycle
A rule of thumb in real estate is that anything below a six-month supply of inventory is considered a 'seller's market,' while anything above a six-month supply is a 'buyer's market.' However, that hasn't always held true this cycle, and ResiClub's view is that this rule of thumb is a bit outdated.
In many housing markets, including Austin's metro area, where house prices began to decline in June 2022 with only 2.1 months of inventory, that rule hasn't applied effectively. In fact, even though Austin's inventory only peaked at 5.2 months as of April 2025, according to Texas A&M University's Texas Real Estate Research Center, home prices in the Austin metro have already fallen 22.8% from their 2022 peak, based on our analysis of the Zillow Home Value Index.
A better measure of this incoming pricing weakness was the abrupt active inventory jump that occurred in Austin in spring/summer 2022 (going from 0.4 months of inventory in February 2022 to 2.1 in June 2022), which quickly pushed active listings near/above pre-pandemic 2019 levels.
Big picture: In today's post-Pandemic Housing Boom landscape, comparing a market's current level of active inventory to its same-month 2019 baseline remains a useful gauge for the shift in the supply-demand balance.
While imperfect, this simple metric captures the degree of tightness or softening better than some traditional measures. Markets where inventory has surged well above 2019 levels—like Austin or Punta Gorda—are typically the ones that have seen demand weaken most, restoring buyer leverage and, in some cases, producing home price corrections. Meanwhile, markets where inventory remains far below 2019 levels continue to exhibit greater pricing resiliency.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Bitcoin Soars, Altcoins Fade in $300 Billion Crypto Shakeout
Bitcoin Soars, Altcoins Fade in $300 Billion Crypto Shakeout

Yahoo

time18 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Bitcoin Soars, Altcoins Fade in $300 Billion Crypto Shakeout

(Bloomberg) -- On the face of it, 2025 looks like a banner year for crypto: Bitcoin hitting a record, an industry-boosting US president whose family is venturing headlong into the sector, and key legislation widely expected to be passed by Congress. Philadelphia Transit System Votes to Cut Service by 45%, Hike Fares Squeezed by Crowds, the Roads of Central Park Are Being Reimagined Sao Paulo Pushes Out Favela Residents, Drug Users to Revive Its City Center Sprawl Is Still Not the Answer Mapping the Architectural History of New York's Chinatown But look beyond the bullish headlines and the rally in Bitcoin, and a vastly different landscape comes into view. Most of the so-called altcoins once touted as competitors to the original cryptoasset are nursing steep declines, with more than $300 billion of market value wiped out so far this year. The sea of red points to a wider malaise that's forcing parts of the industry to confront existential questions. Crypto was imagined by early enthusiasts as a universe where a host of coins competed for investor money, offering a diverse set of use cases. But as Bitcoin reigns supreme, that's giving way to predictions that large swathes of the sector will become a digital wasteland. 'I think they're just going to die, frankly,' Nick Philpott, co-founder of trading platform Zodia Markets, said of altcoins. 'They'll just wither away. Technically, a lot of this stuff will just sit there and gather dust in perpetuity.' Bitcoin's share of the total market value of cryptoassets has climbed by nine percentage points this year to 64%, the highest since January 2021, according to CoinMarketCap. Back then, cryptocurrencies were a largely unregulated space, crypto lending was roaring with few safeguards and nonfungible tokens were just starting to take off. In sharp contrast, altcoins — the catch-all term for all digital assets outside of Bitcoin and stablecoins — are faltering. A MarketVector index tracking the bottom half of the largest 100 digital assets, which more than doubled in the aftermath of Donald Trump's Nov. 5 election victory, has since given up all those gains and is down around 50% in 2025. With Bitcoin soaking up the bulk of capital flows from investors in exchange-traded funds, other parts of the market are increasingly left behind. Even Ether, the second-largest cryptocurrency, remains about 50% below its all-time high after a modest rebound fueled by inflows to spot ETFs investing in the token. 'Historically, Bitcoin's moved and then that's passed down into altcoins,' said Jake Ostrovskis, an OTC trader at Wintermute. 'We've not really seen that yet this cycle.' Crypto is no stranger to mass extinction events. The 2022 market crash, punctuated by the implosions of algorithmic stablecoin TerraUSD and Sam Bankman-Fried's FTX exchange, led to the demise of hundreds of projects. Thousands of coins still exist on their blockchains, with little or no activity — relegated to the status of 'ghost chains' in crypto parlance. What's different this time is that crypto is becoming a more regulated, institutionally-driven marketplace, and that stablecoins appear to be the only tokens with a real shot at achieving means-of-payment status, due to the fact that they eliminate volatility. In the past year alone, the market value of stablecoins has swelled by $47 billion, and some of the world's largest banks are entering the field. The Wall Street Journal reported this month that Inc. is studying a potential stablecoin. That's putting pressure on altcoin projects to find ways to shore up their status and appeal to a wider base of investors. 'I've talked to a couple of projects that have been thinking about merging foundations, putting it up for governance, saying, 'Hey, we can now be governed under this other authority' — that authority being another altcoin community,' said Kanyi Maqubela, managing partner at venture capital firm Kindred Ventures. The shifting tides are also reflected in corporate behavior. Modeled on Michael Saylor's Strategy, a new breed of Bitcoin accumulators has emerged. In April, a special-purpose acquisition company affiliated with Cantor Fitzgerald LP partnered with Tether Holdings SA and SoftBank to launch Twenty One Capital Inc., seeded with nearly $4 billion in Bitcoin. The Trump family, which is also getting involved in Bitcoin mining, has raised $2.3 billion via Trump Media & Technology Group Corp. to create a Bitcoin treasury. While similar vehicles have been set up recently to accumulate smaller tokens like Ether, Solana and BNB, they are much smaller. Glimmers of Hope Not all altcoins are floundering. Tokens like Maker and Hyperliquid that are linked to thriving decentralized-finance protocols have notched big gains this year. 'There's certainly a subset of the market doing incredibly well — generally companies with real businesses, real revenues, and those revenues are being used to buy back tokens,' said Jeff Dorman, chief investment officer of digital asset investment firm Arca. There's also the prospect of more favorable regulations. The potential for US Securities and Exchange Commission approval of ETFs backed by coins like Solana are stirring hopes of wider adoption. Another possible catalyst is the Digital Asset Market Clarity (CLARITY) Act, informally referred to as crypto's market structure bill. The CLARITY Act aims to provide a comprehensive regulatory framework, including delineating responsibilities between the Commodity Futures Trading Commission and the SEC. 'The Clarity Act has the potential to do for altcoins what ETFs did for Bitcoin and Ethereum: provide the regulatory legitimacy that unlocks real institutional capital,' said Ira Auerbach, a senior executive at Offchain Labs. Yet according to Maqubela, the issue ultimately boils down to utility. He compares Bitcoin to gold and Ether to copper — the former has a capped final supply and the latter's blockchain underpins much of crypto's functionality — and says most altcoins are stuck in a sort of twilight zone, underpinned by big promises and not much else. 'I think a lot of them are going to whittle down to zero because they were driven by speculation without that mimetic value like Bitcoin, and they tried to be utilitarian without achieving any real scale,' he said. America's Top Consumer-Sentiment Economist Is Worried How to Steal a House Inside Gap's Last-Ditch, Tariff-Addled Turnaround Push Apple Test-Drives Big-Screen Movie Strategy With F1 Does a Mamdani Victory and Bezos Blowback Mean Billionaires Beware? ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Brad Stevens reveals Celtics' ‘foundation' amid Jaylen Brown, Derrick White trade rumors
Brad Stevens reveals Celtics' ‘foundation' amid Jaylen Brown, Derrick White trade rumors

Yahoo

time23 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Brad Stevens reveals Celtics' ‘foundation' amid Jaylen Brown, Derrick White trade rumors

The post Brad Stevens reveals Celtics' 'foundation' amid Jaylen Brown, Derrick White trade rumors appeared first on ClutchPoints. BOSTON — The Boston Celtics have dominated trade conversations since the end of the 2024-25 season. And because they recently moved center Kristaps Porzingis and guard Jrue Holiday, two key members of their 2024 championship core, numerous teams across the league have reportedly been calling about the availability of two other Cs: Jaylen Brown and Derrick White. Despite the fact that most reports have clarified that the Celtics would prefer not to lose Brown and White, the NBA rumor mill hasn't stopped. However, perhaps Brad Stevens' comments from a Wednesday evening presser will change that. Advertisement Following the first round of the 2025 NBA Draft, the Celtics' President of Basketball Operations sat down to speak with the media just minutes before midnight. Even though he didn't want to delve into trade talk details, the de facto general manager referred to Brown and White — and a few other C's — as integral parts of the Celtics' 'foundation.' 'We'll do our best to put the right group together,' Stevens said of the future roster. 'We've got the foundation, obviously, with Jaylen and Jayson [Tatum] and D-White and Payton [Pritchard] and all those guys that a lot of teams would love to have.' Why Brad Stevens' 'foundational guys' could survive a busy offseason Celtics star Jayson Tatum is perhaps the only Green Teamer who's largely avoided trade rumors. It's no secret that Boston wants to duck under the second apron and shed salary this summer, and although the six-time All-Star is set to earn around $54 million next season, he's the cornerstone of the franchise in the eyes of the front office. Advertisement Brown, the longest-tenured Celtic, hasn't been immune to trade chatter. Yet, it doesn't seem like Stevens is seriously considering any of the offers he's heard for the 2024 NBA Finals MVP. In fact, the coach-turned-GM emphasized the importance of letting Brown recover from a partial meniscus tear so he can return to action in time for training camp and carry the load while Tatum sits for longer due to an Achilles injury. 'We've got to prioritize JT's health and make sure that he comes back fully strong,' Stevens asserted. 'JB had a surgery, although his timeline to be back will be much quicker, obviously, and ready at the start of the season. So, I think the biggest thing for us is just making sure that we balance [financial flexibility and health], maximizing what we can with regard to what we bring back so we can continue to build and grow.' Because Stevens is primarily focused on Tatum and Brown's rehabs, it doesn't sound like the seasoned stars are being shopped to other teams. Advertisement 'We have to, again, prioritize the health of those two guys,' Stevens reiterated. He made no further comment about White or Payton Pritchard, but the latter's name hasn't appeared in any serious trade gossip. As for White, the Toronto Raptors reportedly proposed a deal for him involving the ninth pick in the draft, per ClutchPoints insider Brett Siegel. That never came to fruition, as the Raptors went on to select forward Collin Murray-Boyles at no. 9 while the C's didn't conduct a single trade during the draft. Rather than shaking up the roster again, Boston held onto its foundational players on Wednesday and picked 19-year-old Spanish forward Hugo González late in the first round. Many question marks still remain for the Celtics this offseason, and more moves could be on the way if they continue to pursue financial freedom. But, for now, Stevens and the rest of the front office seem content to build around a terrific tandem, a fringe All-Star guard, and the reigning Sixth Man of the Year. Advertisement Related: Celtics rumors: The 7-footer who 'makes sense' at No. 32 Related: Jonathan Givony praises Celtics for major draft steal

Brad Stevens hits Celtics with harsh reality after major trades
Brad Stevens hits Celtics with harsh reality after major trades

Yahoo

time25 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Brad Stevens hits Celtics with harsh reality after major trades

The post Brad Stevens hits Celtics with harsh reality after major trades appeared first on ClutchPoints. Following their elimination from the 2025 NBA playoffs at the hands of the New York Knicks, the Boston Celtics had one goal in mind: get under the second tax apron. This became imperative after losing Jayson Tatum to an Achilles injury, as it was rather impractical for the Celtics to foot a bill worth nearly half a billion dollars for a team that could make it to the second round of the playoffs at best without their best player in Tatum. Advertisement To their credit, the Celtics wasted not much time in fulfilling this goal of theirs. They traded away Jrue Holiday to the Portland Trail Blazers for Anfernee Simons and two second-round picks, and then followed that up with a three-team trade that sent Kristaps Porzingis to the Atlanta Hawks, bringing back just Georges Niang and a second-rounder. These deals brought them under the second apron rather swiftly, and to make matters better, both Simons and Niang's contracts are expiring at the end of the 2025-26 season. Nonetheless, Celtics president of basketball operations Brad Stevens doused everyone with the cold reality that the team is facing, that is Tatum is out for the entirety of next season. 'The biggest problem is our First Team All-NBA player is in a boot,' Stevens said on the night of the 2025 NBA Draft, per Daniel Donabedian, Celtics beat reporter for ClutchPoints. Indeed, games are won on the court, not on the cap sheet, and the Celtics, especially after trading away two pillars of their 2024 championship-winning squad, are about to be markedly worse next season. But the Celtics' goal is to pick up where they left off once Tatum returns, and at the very least, the trades they made put them in a good position to do so. More changes to come for the Celtics? Winslow Townson-USA TODAY Sports The Celtics are surely not done wheeling and dealing just yet. They have a huge void in their frontcourt, with both Al Horford and Luke Korney being free agents and Porzingis off to Atlanta. The only man on the roster at the moment who can play center is Xavier Tillman Sr., and Boston will surely want to reinforce that position before the season begins. Advertisement They could very well try to get under the first apron as well, if only to reduce their tax bill and grease the wheels on potential trades in the future. Boston will have to trim around $8 million from their player payroll to do so. Related: Brad Stevens reveals Celtics' 'foundation' amid Jaylen Brown, Derrick White trade rumors Related: Jonathan Givony praises Celtics for major draft steal

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store