Lebanon's Central Bank Bans Interactions with Hezbollah's Al-Qard Al-Hassan
The US Department of Treasury imposed sanctions on Al-Qard Al-Hassan in 2007, saying the Iran-backed militant group Hezbollah used the institution as a cover to manage 'financial activities and gain access to the international financial system.'
Al-Qard Al-Hassan, founded in 1983, describes itself as a charitable organization which provides loans to people according to Islamic principles that forbid interest.
Israel struck branches of the institution during its war with the group last year.
The organization, which operates under a license granted by the Lebanese government, has more than 30 branches, mostly in predominantly Shia Muslim areas of Beirut, southern Lebanon and the Bekaa Valley.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Nahar Net
34 minutes ago
- Nahar Net
Aoun, Berri reportedly put final touches on response to US paper
by Naharnet Newsdesk 18 July 2025, 16:31 President Joseph Aoun met Friday with Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri to put the final touches on Lebanon's response to a U.S. request to disarm Hezbollah, Saudi news interactive channel al-Hadath said. Aoun who took office in the aftermath of more than a year of hostilities between Israel and Hezbollah had vowed a state monopoly on bearing arms, while demanding Israel comply with a November ceasefire. Israel has warned it will continue to strike until Hezbollah has been disarmed. U.S. envoy Thomas Barrack asked Lebanese leaders to formally commit to disarming Hezbollah in a proposal that reportedly focused on halting hostilities for a comprehensive and lasting solution to the Lebanese-Israeli conflict, with a deadline for a complete disarmament of Hezbollah before the end of November. After that, the reconstruction of war-hit regions can begin, al-Joumhouria newspaper said Friday.
Nahar Net
34 minutes ago
- Nahar Net
Army urges Lebanese to show unity, protect civil peace
by Naharnet Newsdesk 18 July 2025, 17:04 The Lebanese Army said Friday that it will not allow 'any security breach or harm against civil peace,' urging the Lebanese not to 'carry out any act that can have uncalculated repercussions on security' amid the current local and regional developments. 'Lebanon is currently facing a host of extraordinary circumstances, most notably the continuation of attacks and violations of national sovereignty by the Israeli enemy, in addition to the challenges of preserving security inside the country, controlling the border, and the complicated developments in the region,' the army said in a statement. 'The army will not allow any security breach or harm against civil peace, and it also stresses that overcoming this period requires the unity of the Lebanese and their solidarity and awareness of the gravity of this period,' the army added, calling on citizens 'not to carry out any act that can have uncalculated repercussions on the security of the Lebanese.' Several Lebanese areas had witnessed road-blocking protests and attacks on Syrian passersby in the wake of the deadly clashes between Druze fighters and Sunni forces and tribesmen in the Druze-majority Syrian city of Sweida. The northern city of Tripoli also witnessed a demo supportive of the new Islamist rulers of Syria.
Tayyar.org
an hour ago
- Tayyar.org
Bassil: We are the only bloc that did not grant confidence, and we will continue our positive yet effective opposition
The president of the Free Patriotic Movement, MP Gebran Bassil, stated in a speech following the parliamentary session to hold the government accountable that, 'We previously submitted ten questions to the government, and according to the rules of procedure, it must respond within fifteen days.' He added: 'When we were ministers and received questions from deputies, we would rush to respond. This current disregard for Parliament and its members allows us to turn these questions into formal interrogations—and that is exactly what we will do, starting tomorrow.' Bassil emphasized that 'the issue extends beyond this. It concerns when a session will be set to answer questions that are clear, scientific, and objective. As expected, we received no answers today—neither from the government nor from the Prime Minister's speech, which was full of fallacies. Among them was the claim that this is the first return plan presented by the government, which is untrue, as there was a prior plan that demonstrated far greater seriousness under more difficult circumstances.' He continued: 'The Prime Minister spoke of plans we have yet to see. Any such plan should be written and officially approved by the government.' Bassil explained: 'We were not satisfied with the government's answers. From the outset, we chose to be a positive opposition to identify flaws and correct them.' He added that, 'After nearly five months, the Lebanese people can clearly see the lack of serious government action apart from appointments made without any real adherence to proper mechanisms, and in a discretionary, vindictive manner that reflects political retaliation.' He declared: 'That is why we proposed a vote of confidence in the government, fully aware that we are the only parliamentary bloc that would withhold confidence. We insisted on this step because the government's parliamentary votes do not reflect the reality on the ground, and over time, popular confidence will decline which is what matters most.' Bassil continued: 'We took this step to expose the hypocrisy of those who publicly criticize the government's policies but in practice support them, making them complicit in those decisions and responsible for the outcomes.' He stressed that 'many of those who claimed to oppose the government's actions have reaffirmed their confidence in it. This exposes a pattern of using media rhetoric to gain popularity, while privately benefiting from or endorsing the government's policies.' He also noted: 'A minister who remains in the government without knowing the content of the American proposal or the response to it, yet still reaffirms confidence in the government, is clearly indifferent and willingly uninformed about crucial developments.' Bassil concluded: 'We will continue our role as a positive yet effective opposition, aiming to shed light on misconduct, negligence, and the absence of planning. We will continue to ask more questions exposing these issues to public opinion and pressuring the government to improve its performance. It is not in Lebanon's interest, nor the Lebanese people's, to accept this level of dysfunction from the government and the ruling authority as a whole. This failure will ultimately affect everyone.'
