
Can trade in soil carbon credits help farmers – and the climate?
Sinking a spade into the soil, Gent grins as he points to the freshly dug clod of earth on the blade. 'Look at the root structure,' he says. 'It rained 20mm last night. The water has drained down because the soil structure is in the right format.'
Unlike the vast majority of farmed fields in the UK, this one has not been ploughed for 17 years, ever since Gent's family switched to regenerative agricultural methods designed to increase soil carbon stores.
Such practices are not just good for the environment; they are now becoming big business. Companies are springing up that evaluate existing carbon stocks in soil and track their improvement, allowing farmers to earn – and sell – carbon credits, which can provide them with an alternative income stream.
Much of modern agriculture has damaged the earth's soils through repeated cultivation of the same crops and use of fertilisers. Regenerative methods include: tilling the soil less or not at all; growing cover crops such as clover; reducing the use of ammonia-based fertiliser to restore soil health; and keeping organic matter in the soil to help crops grow and sequester carbon.
Back in 2008, when Thomas was just a boy, the Gent family were viewed as trailblazers for wanting to move away from conventional systems on their 800-hectare farm, where they grow cereals and other crops.
Such an approach remains rare in the sector, yet the now 27-year-old youngest Gent believes that the movement's time has come.
Given that food systems produce a third of human-caused global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, he believes that regenerative agriculture has a significant role to play in tackling the climate crisis while benefiting farmers financially.
He also works for a Danish startup, Agreena, which aims to grow the regenerative movement as it develops what it describes as the 'largest soil carbon programme in Europe', building a model to produce credits that could be bought by companies for their climate change programmes.
Agreena is one of a host of firms – including Soil Capital, Trinity Natural Capital Group and the largest global player, the US-based Indigo – who are trying to grab a slice of the voluntary carbon offsets market through soil carbon trading.
Research from the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development suggests that net soil carbon sequestration on agricultural land 'could offset 4% of annual global human-induced GHG emissions over the rest of the century'.
However, even as the market grows rapidly, so does the scepticism around it. Much in the world of soil carbon is disputed, and scientists question whether regenerative practices actually increase the amount of carbon stored in soil, while others query the robustness of the data on which the market is based.
The total voluntary offsets market was valued at nearly $2bn (£1.6bn) at its peak in 2022. However, it is estimated to have dropped to $723m in 2023, following a series of scientific and media reports that found many offsetting schemes did little to mitigate the climate crisis and biodiversity loss.
Soil carbon projects are estimated to represent a small but growing part of the voluntary carbon market, according to Tommy Ricketts, co-founder of the carbon credit rating agency BeZero Carbon.
'If you include peatland, we estimate the value of soil credits issued to the market is upwards of $100m, or roughly 5%-10% of the global traded market,' Ricketts says.
'If you factor in the current project pipeline and growth of compliance demand, even at today's prices of $10-$20 per credit, we expect it to grow significantly to hundreds of millions of dollars, and billions by the mid-2030s.'
While Agreena is yet to issue credits, it has secured its position as one of Europe's best-funded 'agritech' firms after raising €46m (£39m) in Series B funding in 2023, and plans to seek more funding in future.
Simon Haldrup, Agreena's chief executive and a former banker who is not from a farming background, considers regenerative agriculture 'such a potent solution model, both in terms of climate change, but also all the other nature-related risks such as biodiversity and water quality'.
When he helped to found Agreena in 2018, Haldrup says he realised there were 'millions and millions of farmers that literally have to change behaviour for [this] to scale'.
It can take a significant period of time – often years – for farmers to transition away from conventional farming practices, including using nitrogen fertilisers, while crop yield and their profit can take a hit, at least in the short term.
Agreena's plan is to help farmers by measuring and verifying their current soil carbon stores, calculating their carbon credits, and selling them to companies in sectors including food, transport and technology.
Sign up to Down to Earth
The planet's most important stories. Get all the week's environment news - the good, the bad and the essential
after newsletter promotion
Crop growers who sign a group of their fields up with Agreena are required to do so for 10 years. At the start, the company has to work out the soil's existing carbon stocks, using the MRV (measurement, reporting and verification) process favoured for calculating, tracking and verifying the amount of greenhouse gas emissions reduced by specific mitigation activities.
Agreena's project is verified by Verra, a non-profit organisation that operates the world's leading carbon standard, which has previously been criticised for some of its own schemes.
The way Agreena measures and models soil carbon stores differs from the standard methods of taking large numbers of soil samples across fields. 'We take a certain number of soil samples that statistically makes sense,' says the company's climate lead, Kanika Chandaria. 'We then use remote sensing and satellite imagery to understand from the aerial level, and specifically to each individual field, what is happening.'
Farmers can keep their credits from such schemes, but many choose to sell. Haldrup says farmers can earn on average €20 to €50 per hectare, although this varies, depending on their baseline soil carbon levels and how many regenerative practices they follow. Agreena aims to take a 15% cut on the deal, with 85% going to the farmer.
The company has large expansion plans. Already operating in 20 countries across Europe, it is working with 2,500 farmers to transition 4.5m hectares of land to regenerative agriculture and plans to take its operation global.
Advocates of soil carbon trading say this market linking up corporates with cash-strapped farmers combines capitalism and environmentalism, tackling greenhouse gas emissions and allowing businesses to meet green targets.
However, some soil scientists do not believe enough is known about how soil carbon stores are increased, or released, to accurately track improvements and generate carbon credits.
Soil carbon methodologies are now being assessed by the Integrity Council for the Voluntary Carbon Market, a body that establishes and maintains standards for the global voluntary carbon market.
The British Society of Soil Science (BSSS), a membership organisation for the study of soil, warns in a guidance note that 'there is limited UK evidence' on how soil carbon stocks can be changed through reducing tillage and planting 'cover crops', such as clover.
Whether soil carbon levels can be forecast through modelling, Dr David Tompkins, a member of the society's board who co-authored the guidance note, says: 'That is the trillion-dollar question, and my one word answer is 'no'.
'Soil carbon levels can be predicted with models, where sufficiently robust, but the BSSS would encourage anyone approached with a view to monetising their soil carbon to take a good hard look at the evidence.'
Some farming groups are also concerned about how long growers will be bound to an offsetting scheme, and what would happen if flooding or the sale of the farm left them unable to fulfil their contract.
'We understand that farmers are looking for alternative income streams,' says Liz Bowles, chief executive of Farm Carbon Toolkit, created by farmers to help them better understand greenhouse gas emissions in agriculture.
'However, it's perfectly possible for a farmer to be quite a high greenhouse gas-emitting business but still sell carbon offsets – we don't think that's a sensible way forward.'
Haldrup rebuffs such criticism, saying Agreena has so far collected more than 400,000 samples to inform a model that follows international carbon market standards.
'We have a solid enough foundation that will improve over time as the science improves further. I don't think we should let perfect get in the way of good,' Haldrup says. 'I think we are well beyond good enough.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
15 minutes ago
- The Independent
The government must ensure the promise of free childcare is delivered
Takeup of the government's offer of free childcare has been one-quarter higher than predicted, which has prompted some voices in the sector to warn of its imminent 'collapse', because it is unclear how the planned expansion of the scheme in September will be funded. Bridget Phillipson, the education secretary, in an exclusive interview with The Independent, says the unexpectedly high numbers signing up for the scheme is a 'good problem to have'. There is no doubt that there is a problem, however. The higher takeup meant that the Department for Education spent £2bn on the scheme in the last financial year, covering most of the first year of the Labour government, rather than the planned £1.6bn. That gap was covered by additional funding announced in the spending review in March, but as we report today, the Institute for Fiscal Studies estimates that the gap will continue to widen as the scheme expands. The next expansion will happen in September, when working parents with children aged nine months and older will be offered 30 hours a week of 'free' childcare. Of course, the care is not 'free' in that it has to be paid for by taxpayers generally – on the grounds that helping the parents of young children to work is a public good. As Ms Phillipson puts it: 'If people are able to work, or work a few more hours, that helps us all as a society as well and it gets economic growth going.' The funding of the scheme will continue to be under pressure, but the most important fact about the scheme so far is that it has not collapsed. The Independent was among those voices warning that it had been underfunded by the Conservative government, but to its credit the new government has increased the money available. The finances of the scheme may be stretched, and many childcare providers continue to say that they cannot recruit enough staff at the wages they can afford, but the gloomier warnings of chaos and thousands of parents left without places have not yet been borne out. It is crucial to remain vigilant as the scheme expands so that remains the case. At the insistence of Jeremy Hunt, the chancellor in the previous government, the scheme was designed to start small, with a limited offer of free hours to older children, before expanding gradually to provide full coverage. This September's expansion is the final stage of that planned rollout, which so far has gone more smoothly than we expected. If the last stage is a stretch too far and some parents cannot immediately find the places they want, that would be a blow to the government's ambitions. Ms Phillipson is right that the problem facing the scheme in its final phase is the problem of success. The higher-than-expected demand means additional pressure on the public finances in the later years of this parliament – pressure that coincides with other increased demands on Rachel Reeves, the chancellor, from slow growth, higher interest rates and a government U-turn on disability benefits spending. Providing greater access to free childcare is a good policy that will help working families. Its success and ambition should be applauded. The government must now make sure that its expansion is a success.


Daily Mail
43 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Investigation launched into SNP ministers over huge eye operation delays as thousands of Scots are forced to go private
An investigation has been launched into long waiting times for cataract surgery in light of MailOnline's revelations that thousands of hard-pressed Scots are having to go private. The Scottish Liberal Democrats are heaping pressure on SNP ministers after it was revealed 8,500 Scots were forced to raid their savings to pay for basic care last year – more than double those who went private in 2019. Nearly 19,000 people are stuck on NHS waiting lists for the eye op across Scotland – with one patient in NHS Grampian waiting for more than three years. Party leader Alex Cole-Hamilton has now filed more than 20 written questions to the Scottish Government to uncover the reasons behind such long delays. He said: 'I'm pleased to see MailOnline drawing attention to this important issue and piling the pressure on the Scottish Government. Patients having to go private or facing waits of up to three years to be able to see again is simply not on. 'Ministers need to ensure that cataract surgery waits come down and people can get the care they need swiftly. I want these patients to know that I am on their side. These questions are part of an effort to get to the bottom of what is holding back patients from getting the care they need.' Mr Cole-Hamilton has asked about staffing levels, the reasons for waiting times, and what contact Health Secretary Neil Gray has had with NHS boards over the delays. Earlier this month, the party revealed figures showing the true scale of cataract surgery waiting times with NHS Grampian admitted that one person had been on their treatment list for 1,253 days. Delays recorded at other health boards include 869 days in NHS Shetland, 824 days in NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, 680 days in NHS Ayrshire and Arran, 644 days in NHS Borders, 548 days in NHS Fife, 532 days in NHS Lanarkshire and 508 days in NHS Highland. In total 18,956 Scots are on a cataract surgery waiting list, with the longest list in NHS Ayrshire and Arran, where 3,207 people have been referred. NHS Fife is second, with 2,440 patients waiting for the surgery. MailOnline's own investigation found 8,500 Scots paid for cataract ops out of their own pocket in 2024, more than double the 4,075 people forced to go private for the surgery in 2019. Grandfather David Samson from Tayport in Fife has been waiting more than 19 months for a cataract operation on his right eye. The 87-year-old was first diagnosed in January 2024 and was originally told he would be treated within 18 weeks. That then became 18 months – and later almost two years. Mr Samson, a former kitchen designer and builder, hopes to finally be seen at Dundee's Ninewells Hospital in October. He said: 'It's not affecting my driving yet but I am anxious about it. My condition is slowly getting worse.' Mr Samson has a relative in England with the same condition who expects to be treated in 16 weeks. He added: 'I am 87. When I'm in my box I want to see where I'm going.' A spokeswoman for NHS Tayside said it hopes to cut surgery waiting lists to 52 weeks by the end of the financial year. Mr Cole-Hamilton added: 'Our NHS is being held back by neglect and mismanagement from SNP ministers. 'The SNP has repeatedly demonstrated that the NHS will never be its priority.' A Scottish Government spokesman said: 'This year, we are investing a record £21.7 billion in health and social care including £106 million to help health boards tackle the longest waits and deliver over 300,000 additional appointments. 'The Scottish Government is clear that no one should face a lengthy wait for important surgery and procedures.'


Daily Mail
43 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Forget fat jabs, if you want to lose some weight take this VERY unusual pill (just ask Nicole Kidman!)
They are the miniscule sea creatures devoured by fish, seals, Nicole Kidman. Now scientists have discovered that adding a krill to your meals could be the secret to the perfect weight-loss diet. An experiment involving overweight Glaswegians found that taking supplements containing oil from the shrimp-like creatures helped the participants keep muscle mass while losing weight. Researchers found taking a daily krill pill maintained dieters' muscle and strength despite dramatic cuts to their food intake. Their study – published in the journal Obesity – concludes: 'Supplementation may offer a beneficial strategy to enhance the quality of weight loss.' Krill are tiny crustaceans that form a vital link in the food chain, feeding on microscopic plankton and then being hoovered up themselves by fish and sea mammals. They live in vast swarms and flourish best in the colder waters of the polar regions, also helping to slow climate change by fixing carbon in the seabed. The blue whale lives exclusively on krill, consuming as much as four tons a day. But their potential value to our own health is now emerging as their oil is rich in omega-3 fatty acids and antioxidants that can nourish the brain, heart and joints. For the latest study – led by Dr Dalia Malkova, a senior lecturer in human nutrition - 41 middle-aged Glaswegians were chosen, all of whom were either obese or very overweight. All went on a special weight-loss regime for two months, in which they fasted on alternate days when they consumed only 500 calories. They also underwent physical tests of their strength both at the start and end of the trial. Roughly half the dieters were given four krill oil capsules a day with their meals while the others were handed placebo pills containing plant-based substitutes. After two months, participants in both groups had lost an average of ten pounds on the scales. But 96 per cent of the weight shed by the krill group was fat, compared with only 73 per cent in the group given a placebo. That additional muscle retention meant those taking the supplements lost next to no hand-grip strength, even as the others weakened markedly. And they also gained power in their legs while the placebo group showed no change. In an added bonus, the krill-takers saw their blood pressure and markers of inflammation drop faster too. The authors explain that weight-loss diets cause 'reduced muscle mass, potentially leading to diminished muscle strength [and] this could have adverse effects on metabolic health.' But the Glasgow results show that taking krill oil 'is a valuable strategy to mitigate some of the adverse effects of diet-induced weight loss'. Hollywood actress Kidman, 58 - who won a Best Actress Oscar for the 2002 movie The Hours - is the face of Swisse, an Australian health supplement company that sells oil capsules from krill harvested in the Antarctic. She starred in a television advert for the pills, dancing on a beach and running into the sea, alongside the slogan: 'Live healthy. Be happy.'