logo
‘Don't erase the soul of Bingin': Bali locals dismayed as 48 businesses destroyed in local crackdown

‘Don't erase the soul of Bingin': Bali locals dismayed as 48 businesses destroyed in local crackdown

The Guardiana day ago
'I can't believe this is happening,' said Komang Agus, looking on in despair at his workplace of 16 years in the Bali tourist hotspot of Bingin, lying in fresh ruins.
'I have a wife, three sons, my father is sick and in the hospital, how am I going to support them?' the manager of Morabito Art Cliff Villa said, his voice cracking and tears welling in his eyes. 'We understand the laws and the need for regulation, but why only here?'
Agus spoke to the Guardian shortly after the government embarked on a sweeping crackdown on alleged illegal coastal developments on Indonesia's most popular tourist island. The demolition of 48 cliffside establishments at Bingin beach – ranging from warungs (small eateries) and homestays to boutique villas and restaurants overlooking one of the world's most revered waves – marks a flashpoint in Bali's struggle with mass tourism, overdevelopment and the desire to retain the cultural and surfing heritage that put the island on the global tourist map in the first place.
Bingin is being cleared as part of a campaign led by the re-elected governor, Wayan Koster, to enforce zoning regulations and eliminate unregulated structures on protected government-owned land.
'The Bali provincial government is preparing a team to conduct an investigative audit of tourism business permits throughout Bali,' said Koster, hammer in hand at the start of the Bingin demolition in July. 'We cannot allow it. If we let these methods continue throughout Bali, Bali will be ruined.'
More than 20 other businesses have also been targeted as allegedly illegal by local authorities at nearby Balangan beach, and others across the Bukit peninsula and beyond may soon face similar action.
But for many locals, the loss of Bingin represents a further gutting of a historic and cherished part of the island's surf culture that in many places has been overtaken by mega resorts, shopping strips and beach clubs.
Surfers, many of them Australian, began arriving at Bingin in the 1970s and 1980s, attracted by its perfect mechanical left-hand barrel waves. Local families built small warungs on the cliffs to serve them. Among them was Kelly's Warung, established by the family of local professional surfer Mega Semadhi.
'This place feels like home, away from the noise and chaos above – a beautiful beach, beautiful wave and people,' Samadhi told the Guardian. 'There are not many places like this left.'
Over time, the area grew and commercialised, with some rooms now renting for over A$200 a night and small family-run businesses morphing into multi-level luxury suites like the towering Morabito Art Cliff boutique hotel, with multiple swimming pools – and one even in its master suite.
'The developments got out of control and people got greedy,' said Semadhi, who lives and works in the village nearby with his wife and two young children. 'We tried to stop it, but the government didn't listen to us [at the time]. And now it's too late.'
Semadhi called for the community to be involved in the future of the area. 'If they are going to redo it, we want to do it properly. To return the soul of how it started. If we lose this place, all of Bingin will suffer.'
Tourists have also expressed dismay; many gathered on the beach throughout the week after the demolition began, completely unaware of the plans.
Several Australian expats said they had been advised against speaking out publicly, with concerns they could be deported.
An Australian surfer and local business owner, who first visited Bingin over 30 years ago, described it as a 'very special place'.
'The first time I came down here, we could only eat food and sleep on people's decks. There was something magical about it,' he said. 'Australians were among the first surfers to come here and form a special relationship with the Balinese. There aren't many places like this left.'
Business owners – many foreigners, including Australians – say many of the structures existed before zoning rules were formalised and the land became deemed a protected area, and efforts were made to ensure operations were compliant.
Alex Barung, a lawyer representing some owners attempting to halt the demolitions, said the community had tried multiple times to resolve the issue and work with the government.
'In 1985, the community realised the tourism potential and built supporting facilities. They lacked capital and so partnered with foreigners – but the businesses came first, before the regulations.'
Owners argue that they were operating under customary law, with informal permission from the village to operate.
Critics of the demolition – which officials expect to take a month – warn that erasing Bingin risks destroying a unique cultural and social ecosystem.
'This is part of Bali's surfing heritage,' said Piter Panjaitan, a local surfer and environmentalist. 'It became a hotspot, a golden egg of the Bukit peninsula. Now, 1,000 people are losing their jobs overnight. People are crying.'
He questioned the transparency and consistency of the government's approach. 'We understand the need to clean up, but why here, and why like this? We want to make Bali better, but we also want social justice.'
The demolition highlights challenges in Bali's growth. The island's population has doubled since the 1960s to more than 4 million, and tourist arrivals are projected to hit 6.5 million this year.
The government has floated – and abandoned – a moratorium on tourism development, opting instead for tighter controls. Local environmental group Walhi Bali said it supported reining in unregulated growth but criticised 'selective enforcement'.
'From our research, there are many other developments across Bali lacking permits and environmental assessments,' said Walhi Bali's Ida Bagus Arya Yoga Bharata. 'The inconsistency highlights the slow and weak governance in Bali's development planning.'
The head of Bali's Public Order Agency, I Dewa Nyoman Rai Darmadi, denied claims that the demolitions were clearing space for luxury developments. 'That's a hoax,' he told the Guardian. He said it was about safety, with many businesses packed into the steep cliff zone and that public land was 'not for business like currently'.
'This is protected land. There's no indication of it being taken over by an investor.'
Still, uncertainty looms, even from officials.
'Once it's renovated, it will become an attraction – whether for surfers or something else,' said Governor Koster. 'At the very least, tourists will want to come, and it will contribute to the wellbeing of the local community.'
And without a clear plan, locals worry the area could be redeveloped without them.
But despite the sadness, Semadhi said he was optimistic about the future.
'If they are going to do it, then maybe we can do it properly this time, a new beginning. But let us be part of it. Don't erase the soul of Bingin.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Venice's anti-tourism protesters should stop whining
Venice's anti-tourism protesters should stop whining

Telegraph

time34 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Venice's anti-tourism protesters should stop whining

If there was an annual award for anti-tourism then surely this year's prize would have to go to Venice. Yes, the usual suspects in Barcelona and the Canary Islands may have been busy with their water pistols again but it's their counterparts in the Floating City who have truly upstaged them this time around. Maybe organising a weekend of street protests against Jeff Bezos's wedding was always going to seize the news agenda, given the hordes of reporters already heading to Venice to cover it. But the protests also deserve some credit for just how effectively they revealed the true face of anti-tourism protests as another iteration of the same old politics of envy. Venice as a billionaire's playground for the weekend? What on earth would the great old Doge have made of it all? While the ancient Venetian rulers might have other concerns (like why their name has been pinched by a US government department), does anyone believe they wouldn't be delighted to see that the city they built is still able to court the ultra-wealthy? In truth, the Venice naysayers show the hypocrisy of the anti-tourism movement. In Barcelona, protesters point to the deluge of Airbnbs across the city contributing to the housing affordability crisis as well as dumping drunken party-goers into residential neighbourhoods. But the idea that this applies to the ultra-rich who visit Venice is frankly ludicrous. Everyone knows the super rich love Venice, which is exactly why so many of them flock there every year for the Venice Film Festival or the Biennale. And when they get there they stay in dreamy hotels that were built for their custom – quite literally in some cases. Did you know the Four Seasons spent more than $30 million to restore the glorious Hotel Danieli as a five-star hotel. What would have happened to that building if it weren't for the roaring demand from high-net-worth travellers? In some ways, it's a tale as old as Venice itself. Like its modern-day equivalent in Dubai, much of the city was built to cater to the super rich of the 13th and 14th centuries. And you can bet those glorious palazzos were pretty controversial in their heyday too. Just look at the famous Ca' d'Oro (House of Gold). Built by one of Venice's founding families, the Contarini, it was practically the antidote to old-fashioned Christian modesty. Still, that's what Venice does: it attracts the rich and famous, and those who want to walk in their footsteps. Remember the iconic images of Princess Diana in her gondola? How many trips to Venice do you think they inspired in the decade that followed? Within a year, she'd probably put most of those gondoliers' future children through university with the extra business. And don't listen to anyone tell you that 'overtourism' is ruining Venice either. In fact, the truth remains that the city is actually much less crowded than it was 500 years ago – even when you factor in those cruise ships. These days, the city has just 20,000 residents, and attracts around 15,000 tourist per day, on average. But this compares to 180,000 residents back in the Renaissance days. That means it isn't difficult to find a quiet bistro or bar, provided you're happy to wander ten minutes away from St Mark's Square. Even the most visited parts of Venice still have a seductive charm. Perhaps it's the constraints that come with being a canal city, but I'm always struck by how well modern Venice seems to have managed to maintain not just its character, but also the kind of characters who frequent it – particularly after the sun goes down and the cruise ship day-trippers disappear. Last time I was there, I dined at the Club del Doge in the famous Gritti Palace. As I was perusing the menu, a hushed silence fell over the room. When I looked up, I saw a rather famous designer followed by what appeared to be their two romantic partners (an arrangement that the TikTok generation calls a 'polycule') in tow. Witnessing the rich and famous with their guard down is always interesting. But in Venice it is something else entirely. In those scandalous seconds, I felt the same thrill that well-heeled Venetian traders must have experienced when catching a glimpse of the most powerful nobles peeking from behind their carnival masks. It's that sort of magic that makes Venice such an intoxicating place. And while certain locals might pull their hair about the city's all-year-round popularity, the truth is that none of the kind of gimmicks we've seen in recent years – like the tourism tax on day-trippers or the ban on groups of over 25 people – will put a dent in its appeal to the rest of us, and certainly not to the super rich. Still, at least Venice makes for a stunning backdrop for those who do still want to protest. Let's just hope they leave the water pistols behind for now.

The truth about why tourists are leaving Las Vegas
The truth about why tourists are leaving Las Vegas

Telegraph

time36 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

The truth about why tourists are leaving Las Vegas

While most of us Vegas regulars have long assumed that Sin City is immortal, viral videos on social media are apparently telling a different story. Over on YouTube, there are dozens of clips of seemingly empty scenes on the Strip, as influencers gawp into the camera and proclaim that the party is truly over. Can it really be that Vegas is emptying out, and falling from favour? The official statistics suggest that, at the very least, there is a downward trend at play. Numbers from the Las Vegas Convention and Visitors Authority (the guys who coined the 'What happens in Vegas' slogan) show tourism is down 6.5 per cent since last year, with a marked slump since April. As you might expect, gambling revenues have dwindled too, with a 2.9 per cent year-on-year drop across the sector – enough to wipe some $600 million from casino revenues this year. If you concentrate purely on the Strip casinos that depend almost exclusively on out-of-towners, the drop is even bigger at 3.9 per cent. Some claim it's down to the general squeeze of disposable income, with surveys showing a drop in overall consumer confidence across the States. Naturally, anti-Trump types have been quick to jump on any evidence that the decline could be partly the fault of the White House – and when it comes to one particular measure they may well have a point. According to LVCVA figures, Canadians make up around 3 per cent of Vegas visitors, with 1.4 million making the trip last year. Yet one year later, the data shows that more Canadians are thinking twice about crossing the border, perhaps due to the President's fiery rhetoric towards his northern neighbour. Recent figures from Vegas's Harry Reid Airport show that arrivals on Air Canada jets are down 5 per cent year-on-year, while passenger numbers for the low-cost Canadian carrier Flair have plummeted 55 per cent. Not the sort of thing you want to see in an already tight economy. Where does it all leave Vegas? The overall decline is real, but it isn't as bad as some headlines suggest, says casino expert John Mehaffey, who runs the Vegas Advantage website. 'The slowdown has been more noticeable at the lower end of the market, but luxury resorts appear broadly level with last year,' he says. 'In any event, Vegas is always a bit slower in the summer.' As for those viral videos showing the supposed death of Vegas, he suspects some of the creators have been disingenuous in their tactics. 'I saw one picture of empty side walks in front of Caesars Palace, but you could see from the position of the sun that the photo was taken in the early part of the morning,' he says. @chasasworld ♬ original sound - chasasworld On the other hand, plenty of social media users are convinced they've found the real reason that fewer people are visiting Las Vegas – rip-off prices. In June, a humble bottle of water briefly became a social media sensation, when one stunned traveller revealed that it had been priced at a shocking $26 in the mini-bar at the iconic Bellagio hotel. The story was picked up across the American media. On the popular discussion website Reddit, meanwhile, forums about Las Vegas have descended into a strange game of Top Trumps, with users competing to see who can find the most excessive examples of Vegas pricing during their visit. 'I paid $14 for a bottle of Sprite and $32 for chicken tenders,' posted one user, sounding strangely proud about the whole experience. Of course, steep prices are nothing new in Sin City. But while the world's entertainment capital has never been cheap, the data shows that prices have jumped disproportionately since the pandemic, with a 50 per cent rise in the average hotel room price since 2019. Fees and charges have also spiked, as casinos seek to make up for lost revenues during the shutdown. As Vegas regulars will know, it isn't hard to avoid the worst of the pricing – provided you do your homework in advance. As a rule of thumb, I always advise anyone staying on the Strip to do as much as their discretionary spending (things like refreshments and snacks) outside of the casino resort, given that most are notorious for high prices. Another option is to get off the Strip altogether and opt for a downtown casino. Fremont Street might lack some of the extravagance of the Bellagio, but it's certainly no less vibrant. Not only are the prices much cheaper (and the odds marginally more generous), but it's a much shorter walk to get to independent restaurants and bars that cost a fraction of those on the Strip. Some might say that penny-pinching goes against the Vegas spirit. But my attitude has always been the less money you spend unnecessarily – for example, on a $10 coke from a casino concession store – the more you have to spend on the genuinely exciting stuff, whether that's playing the tables or seeing one of the shows. Will the falling visitor numbers force Vegas to change tack on its premium prices? There are already signs that some casinos are doing just that, says John Mehaffey. This summer, the Resorts World hotel and casino waived some of its charges (including the hated resort fee) in a bid to attract more visitors. As for what the future holds beyond that, Sin City will have plenty on its plate dealing with everything from Gen Z's famous aversion to alcohol to the liberalisation of sports betting across much of the States. Expect the push towards big sporting events like the Super Bowl and Formula 1 to continue at full speed, given they don't rely on gamblers or drinkers to make money. All in all, it seems the decline of Vegas has been exaggerated. This glorious city has seen off a slump many times before, and you can bet your bottom dollar it will do the same again.

The only place in the world ‘without time' is a beautiful island where the sun doesn't set for 69 days in the summer
The only place in the world ‘without time' is a beautiful island where the sun doesn't set for 69 days in the summer

The Sun

time2 hours ago

  • The Sun

The only place in the world ‘without time' is a beautiful island where the sun doesn't set for 69 days in the summer

A TINY fishing village where the sun doesn't set for 69 days is one of the most beautiful places in the world. Home to just 300 people, the island's residents have chosen not to live by strict time conventions and instead "do what they want—when they want". 6 6 6 Sommarøy meaning summer island has constant sunlight between May 18 to July 26 every year. You can walk across the gorgeous wind sandy beaches at 2am, and stroll amongst the gorgeous Arctic mountains whilst others are sleeping. Due to its northern location, it hardly ever gets warm in Sommarøy, with average temperatures between seven and 15 degrees. And in the winter, the midnight sun is replaced by constant darkness, which occurs between November and January. The long polar nights are perfect for seeing the Aurora Borealis, which can light up the sky at any time during the "day" or "night". The island's economy depends on fishing and tourism and there's so much to do for visitors, including hiking, swimming and kayaking. Time free zone Due to it's unusual daylight hours, Sommarøy exists without the normal time constraints placed on society. In fact, the iconic Sommarøy Bridge, which is used as a way to access the island is covered in watches from visitors, who want to ditch the concept of time whilst on the island. In 2019, the inhabitants launched a campaign to make Sommarøy "time free". 'In many cases this can be linked to the feeling of being trapped by the clock", ' Kjell Ove Hveding, the leader of the campaign said. "We will be a time-free zone where everyone can live their lives to the fullest … Our goal is to provide full flexibility, 24/7. "If you want to cut the lawn at 4am, then you can do it." The campaign called for opening hours to be abolished, and for people do be allowed to do whatever they liked at any time of day. Residents of the island said: "Here we enjoy every minute of the midnight sun, and yes, a coffee with friends on the beach at 2am is a normal thing.' It was later revealed that the campaign was partly a marketing ploy by Visit Norway, to boost tourism to the island. However, the island's residents did have a meeting to sign a petition to become the word's first time-free zone, and their unique attitude to time is real. 'We apologize as we should have been [clearer] from the start about the role of the agency", Marianne Mork, former head of business communications for Visit Norway, told CNN. "However, the initiative is real and came from the islanders themselves, and their time-free way of living is real." 6 6 6

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store