
Social media erupts after Indian media falsely claims destruction of Pakistan's Karachi Port
In what appears to be a major disinformation campaign, several major Indian media outlets are claiming to have damaged or destroyed the Port of Karachi and other Pakistani targets, airing video evidence that many have proven to be fabricated.
Throughout Thursday night, a multitude of Indian news channels with broad local audiences, such as Aaj Tak, India Today, Zee News, and Business Today, among others, broadcast various videos of the supposed attack.
The unverified footage spread quickly online soon after, with many citizens of India celebrating the reported attack.
Verified Drone Footage from Balochistan confirms large-scale devastation at #KarachiPort — a blow now officially acknowledged by the Karachi Port Authority.
Precision of #IndianNavyAction leaves no room for denial.
Jai hind 🇮🇳 pic.twitter.com/2QoF4ypf4q — Shilpa Sahu (@shilpasahu432) May 9, 2025
Some also drew comparisons to Operation Trident, a 1971 military attack launched by the Indian Navy on Karachi during the Indo-Pakistani War of 1971, leaving the port of Karachi heavily damaged. The INS Vikrant, India's first aircraft carrier, played a major role in enforcing the naval blockade of East Pakistan during the war.
🚨BREAKING: INS Vikrant strikes again! Karachi Port in flames.
Port infrastructure decimated
Lahore command center hit
Islamabad bases under fire
Echoes of 1971—Karachi burned for days back then! 🇮🇳💪🏻 pic.twitter.com/FwgkzqMihr — THAKUR SUNIL SINGH (@HackSentry) May 8, 2025
While the official X account of Karachi's Port Authority first confirmed the allegations, it later issued a statement claiming that India hacked its account. The Port Authority also confirmed that no damage was done to the port.
New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch
Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters
Other reports that circulated, later also debunked as fake, floated that Islamabad had been captured by the Indian Navy alongside Pakistan's chief of army staff, General Asim Munir. Indian media reports also later falsely claimed that Munir had been arrested and that a coup was underway in Pakistan.
AajTak has destroyed Karachi Port.
Zee Media has destroyed Islamabad.
Republic TV has arrested Asim Munir.
Sudarshan has destroyed Pakistan.
Unreal Clownery🤡 — Mohit Chauhan (@mohitlaws) May 8, 2025
Outlets like Outlook India debunked many of the videos circulated by Indian broadcasters. One image that was circulated widely is reportedly from a 2020 BBC report on Gaza, not Karachi.
Several social media users living around the port joined in on the efforts to counteract the false claims, posting pictures and videos of the port and other sites being intact.
My office is hardly 2 kms from Karachi Port, this is the view from the rooftop. All calm and business as usual. pic.twitter.com/V7YNmtwoQz — Faizan Lakhani (@faizanlakhani) May 8, 2025
After the reports on the destruction of the port emerged, social media users seemingly debunked the claims as fake news and expressed their anger towards Indian media outlets.
"We are becoming a global joke," one social media user posted on X. "There are global observers watching closely and this is the show we put up?! Shameful."
While many social media users from India are frustrated with India's claims, others have employed a dose of irony when commenting on the faulty news reports.
India 'destroyed' Karachi port and we, the people of Karachi, didn't even know. Imagine that this fake news comes from one of India's leading news channels.pic.twitter.com/I4pcG6wbWD — Naimat Khan (@NKMalazai) May 8, 2025
"Indian media and pundits fed their audiences Bollywood level propaganda last night," one social media user wrote on X. "The world is laughing, Indians are fuming, and Karachi and Lahore remain intact."
Tensions between India and Pakistan have been at fever pitch since gunmen killed 26 civilians in a famous tourist spot in India-administered Kashmir's Pahalgam on 22 April.
Soon after, India began launching air strikes on several locations in Pakistan, in what it called a retaliatory action against "terrorists" to avenge the Pahalgam attack. In the ensuing salvos, Pakistan is confirmed to have downed at least one Indian jet, with the Pakistani government claiming they downed five jets.
Last night, several Indian cities reported blackouts while the Indian government accused Pakistan of unsuccessfully launching attacks on Indian civilian infrastructure in 15 different locations.
Pakistan's military strongly denied any involvement in these attacks but said it killed 40 to 50 Indian soldiers in cross-border fighting.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Middle East Eye
27 minutes ago
- Middle East Eye
Israeli air strike on south Lebanon kills one
An Israeli strike on southern Lebanon killed one person on Saturday, the Lebanese health ministry said, in the latest violation of a ceasefire between Israel and Hezbollah. In a statement, the health ministry said that an Israeli drone strike on a car in the village of Kunin killed one man in a preliminary toll. The Israeli military did not immediately comment on the incident. The attack comes a day after Israel killed a woman and wounded 25 other people in heavy strikes across the country's south. Lebanon's state-run National News Agency reported that the woman was killed in an Israeli drone strike on a residential apartment in the city of Nabatiyeh. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters Friday's air strikes were "the most intense" on southern Lebanon since the end of the 66-day war last November, according to residents. The Israeli military claimed, without evidence, that the site was part of a damaged underground project that Hezbollah had attempted to repair in recent days. Israel is reported to have violated the November 2024 ceasefire that ended over a year of hostilities with Hezbollah almost daily. At least 173 people have been killed and more than 400 wounded in Israeli attacks since the ceasefire went into effect, Hussein Chaabane, an investigative journalist with Legal Agenda who has been tracking the strikes, was quoted as saying by the Washington Post. Under the ceasefire deal, Hezbollah was to pull its fighters back north of the Litani river, some 30 kilometres from the Israeli border, leaving the Lebanese army and United Nations peacekeepers as the only armed parties in the region. Hezbollah has previously said the majority of its military sites in southern Lebanon are now under the control of the Lebanese army. "Out of 265 Hezbollah military positions identified south of the Litani [River], the movement has ceded about 190 to the army," a party source told AFP in April. Israel was required to fully withdraw from the country but its forces still occupy in five "strategic" locations in south Lebanon.


Middle East Eye
2 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
UAE top court upholds life terms for 24 convicted in mass trial
The supreme court in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) has sentenced 24 people to life in prison after upholding their convictions for "terrorist" links, which had been dismissed following a mass trial criticised by human rights groups. "The Criminal Chamber of the Federal Supreme Court ruled [on Thursday] to partially overturn the judgment issued by the State Security Chamber at the Abu Dhabi Federal Court of Appeal and to reconvict 24 defendants," the official Emirates News Agency (WAM) reported on Friday. The 24 were originally convicted in a mass trial of 84 people in July last year - most of whom, according to human rights groups, had already been imprisoned since a similar mass trial of 94 individuals in 2013. "Following yesterday's ruling... the total number of convicted individuals in this case has risen to 83 out of 84 referred to trial," WAM said. Sixty-seven of them have been sentenced to life imprisonment. "The court sentenced the defendants to life imprisonment for collaborating with the 'Terrorist Justice and Dignity Organisation', and providing funds to the Al-Islah," WAM added, referring to a group with ties to the outlawed Muslim Brotherhood. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters Human Rights Watch (HRW) said the convictions were based on "a fundamentally unfair mass trial". 'The UAE's second-largest mass trial case has been justified under the guise of countering terrorism, but it's just part of the Emirati government's relentless efforts to prevent the re-emergence of any independent civil society in the country,' said Joey Shea, UAE researcher at HRW. 'Life in prison for nonviolent activism shows Abu Dhabi's utter contempt for both peaceful criticism and the rule of law.' 'UAE 94' The 2013 trial of the so-called "UAE 94", held at the peak of the Arab uprisings, was widely criticised by rights groups as grossly unfair. Lawyers, professors, activists and students who had petitioned the government for democratic reforms were tried for plotting to overthrow it. In March, the UAE rejected the appeals of 53 individuals who were convicted in the July 2024 trial. UAE 'retaliates' against jailed activist Ahmed Mansoor for exposing abuses Read More » The Abu Dhabi Federal Appeals Court overturned the convictions of the other 24 defendants, but the attorney general sought to reverse that decision, arguing it had been "legally flawed". Prominent activist Ahmed Mansoor and academic Nasser bin Ghaith were among those tried last July, HRW said. Bin Ghaith was sentenced to 10 years in 2017 over tweets criticising Egypt, a key ally of the Gulf state. Authorities said he had published 'photos and articles that are offensive to the state's symbols and values, its internal and foreign policies and its relations with an Arab state', understood to refer to Egypt. The UAE prohibits criticism of its rulers and any speech deemed likely to spark social unrest. Emirati courts have convicted dozens of citizens and Egyptian expats of forming clandestine cells, including al-Islah.


Arabian Post
14 hours ago
- Arabian Post
India's Diplomatic Isolation Was Firmly Evident At The SCO Meet In Qingdao In China
By Nitya Chakraborty India's total diplomatic isolation was in show in the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO)'s defence ministers meet in Qingdao city in China on June 25 and 26 when a joint statement was prepared calling upon the members to jointly fight terror but there was no mention of Pahalgam killings on April 22 while taking note of attacks in Balochistan. The joint statement was prepared after discussions among the members including India and Pakistan at the meet presided over by China, the host nation for 2025 summit. Indian defence minister Rajnath Singh strongly spoke against terror during the deliberations focusing on the Pahalgam massacre and the consequent action of India to dismantle the terror camps in Pakistan through Operation Sindoor. But the joint statement on the final day did not incorporate Indian point on Pahalgam terror while the Pakistani point on Balochistan was included. Naturally, Singh did not sign this one sided declaration. The norm in SCO is that every resolution will have to be on the basis of consensus. So as a result of India's objection, the joint statement could not be issued. Pakistan is happy that India was alone in not signing. So it was a diplomatic victory for Islamabad which is engaged with India in a perception battle after Pahalgam killings and Operation Sindoor, to influence the global opinion. SCO has presently ten members- China, Russia, India, Pakistan, Iran, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan. Indian officials claimed that the statement was tuned in favour of Pakistan by China. Fine enough. It might be true. But then what about the other seven members including Russia? It was a sheer failure of our foreign office that all the central Asian member states of the SCO did not come in support of India. Even Russia did not intervene to amend the statement to incorporate Indian view. In all in SCO, out of ten members, excepting India, no other country was against the statement. It was a clear 9-1 in favour of Pakistan. The SCO summit of head of states will be held later this year in Tianjin in China. Prime Minister Narendra Modi will be attending the SCO summit, it is stated. He will be meeting there the Chinese President Xi Jinping, Russian President Vladimir Putin, Pakistan Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif as also the other leaders.. The issue of fighting terror will also figure at that summit like the latest meeting of defence ministers. What is Prime Minister of India going to do to ensure that the summit declaration finally contains the Indian viewpoint.? Even before that SCO summit later this year, BRICS summit will be held in Brazil on July 6 and 7. Indian PM will be attending that. At that meeting also, the fight against terror issue will come up. Pakistan is not a member of BRICS. That way that pressure from Islamabad which was there on the Qingdao meeting, will not be there in Brazil summit. But every country has taken some position and that does not change suddenly. It requires constant persuasion and presentation of facts. Rajnath Singh and his team totally failed at Qingdao meeting to convince the members of the SCO. That should not be repeated at the Brazil summit. Only few days are left for the BRICS summit. In these eight days, Indian diplomats have to make all efforts to meet the member countries and convince them of Indian position with full facts about the involvement of Pakistan with terror attacks against India. Brazil and South Africa are key members. They should be briefed properly to avoid any embarrassment at the summit As regards the coming SCO summit later this year, the deliberations will be highly important from the perspective of both security and economy of the region. Now in its 25th year, the SCO has expanded from its original six founding members into a 'big family' of 10 member states, two observer states, and 14 dialogue partners – stretching from the East European plains to the Indian Ocean and the Pacific Rim, and encompassing nearly half of the world's population. SCO sources say that the SCO has become a mature platform for regional security cooperation, with continuously growing influence, cohesion and appeal. Over the past 25 years, this 'giant ship of security' has been riding the waves against terrorism, separatism and extremism, making outstanding contributions to regional security. The economic and trade dividends and people-to-people exchanges emerging from security cooperation have also been remarkable, significantly bringing the peoples of the member states closer together in all aspects. India has neglected the functioning of BRICS and SCO in the last five years out of its love for US sponsored QUAD. Now with the US President Trump humiliating Indian Prime Minister consistently by mentioning his decision on India-Pakistan ceasefire 18 times since May10 and entertaining Pakistan chief of army staff Asim Munir over lunch, our Prime Minister should give a relook to the foreign policy pursued by him in the last five years. This is time India should join hands with Brazil, South Africa and other developing countries to fight for Global South .The country's interests lie with Global South, that Mr. Narendra Modi should not forget. (IPA Service)