
The ‘career criminal' accused of stealing Kristi Noem's handbag
After spotting the bag, a thief in a Covid mask and dark cap hooked his foot through the strap, tugged it over to his table and swiftly exited the building before heading out onto the evening streets of Washington, DC, prosecutors say.
It seems to have been sheer bad luck for the man, whom authorities claim is Mario Bustamante Leiva, that the bag belonged to Kristi Noem, the US homeland security secretary and one of the most powerful figures in Donald Trump's government.
Court documents claim the theft of Ms Noem's bag was just one incident in a one-man crime spree, alleging the suspect committed three separate robberies in just over a week in the city.
Mr Leiva, a Chilean national whom police said has admitted to stealing Ms Noem's bag after being arrested last month, reportedly honed his pickpocketing skills on the streets of London more than a decade ago.
The 49-year-old, who was branded a 'career criminal' by Ms Noem, and whom the department of homeland security (DHS) says is in the US illegally, was previously handed a prison sentence for a series of thefts in Britain.
In the space of five months, he reportedly stole £21,000 ($27,800) of phones, wallets and computers in bars and cafes in high-end areas of London, the Daily Mail reported.
When Mr Leiva was finally arrested in December 2014 entering a pub north of London Bridge, he was said to have been listening to a stolen iPod.
Mr Leiva, a father of three with no fixed address, reportedly admitted to 22 charges of theft, and was sentenced to three years in prison by a judge who branded him 'dishonest to his fingertips', according to the Daily Mail.
It is unclear how long Mr Leiva spent in prison. He is reported to have entered the US legally in 2021 under Joe Biden, before breaching the terms of his admission.
Chile is the only South American state that belongs to the US's visa waiver programme, which allows citizens to enter for 90 days – although it is unclear if Mr Leiva made use of this.
The New York Post reports he belonged to a large 'robbery organisation' operating on the East Coast, although this is not mentioned in court documents.
Authorities place him in Washington, DC, on April 12 this year, where he is said to have removed a woman's purse from the back of her chair while she was eating in a Nando's restaurant, using his jacket to conceal it on his way out.
He allegedly acted alongside a second individual who blocked the theft from view.
The pair then apparently went to a Safeway supermarket, where Mr Leiva's alleged accomplice is said to have bought a £377 ($500) gift card using the woman's credit card.
Five days later, Mr Leiva had re-appeared at DC's downtown Westin Hotel, where he allegedly walked in with a coat hanging over his left arm, brushing past the chair where a woman was eating with her family – and swiping her purse in the process.
On his way there, at the Dolcezza coffee shop a block away, he appears to have removed an object – the size of a wallet or purse, investigators said – from a tan shoulder bag.
He is then said to have returned to the Safeway and made two purchases: a £9 ($12) bottle of Cabernet Sauvignon, and ten minutes later, a £300 ($400) gift card.
On April 19 he appeared in Silver Spring, Maryland, where he called the police and reported that he had been sleeping on a bench when he was robbed by five men, saying they had taken his bag containing over £755 ($1,000) in cash and Chilean passport.
Officers noted that he was 'somewhat un-cooperative' and smelled strongly of alcohol.
On April 20, Kristi Noem took her family, including her grandchildren, out for dinner at Capital Burger, a restaurant located roughly halfway between the White House and US Capitol.
The homeland security secretary had £2,270 ($3,000) in cash in her handbag, which she intended to use to pay for the meal.
'[Ms Noem's] entire family was in town including her children and grandchildren – she was using the withdrawal to treat her family to dinner, activities, and Easter gifts,' a DHS spokesperson said after the incident.
It is unclear whether Mr Leiva, had he been in the restaurant, would have recognised Ms Noem had he been in Capital Burger, or realised two of the men sat at the bar near her table were plainclothes Secret Service officers.
Prosecutors do not allege he targeted her because she is the face of Donald Trump's immigration crackdown,
Instead, authorities allege it was Ms Noem's Gucci shoulder bag that caught his eye.
'Frankly, it was a nice-looking purse,' Ed Martin, the US attorney for the District of Columbia, later told NBC News.
Referencing to CCTV footage of the incident, he added: 'This was not an amateur. This was a person, a thief, that knew how to do this. You could see how he scouted the room out.'
The relatively upmarket restaurant – its flagship burger, which boasts caramelised onions, Gruyère cheese and shallot aioli, costs £17 ($23) – is dimly lit with tables set close together.
Mr Leiva is said to have edged his chair towards the homeland security secretary, twisted his body to the left, and used his leg to edge the bag towards him before scooping it up and leaving abruptly.
He reportedly told police that he disposed of most of the contents of the bag, which included Ms Noem's driving licence, government identification card, medication and keys, but kept her purse and the £2,270 ($3,000) she had inside.
He then apparently boarded a bus to an Italian restaurant, where he spent more than £151 ($200) on food and drink with her credit cards, leaving both the bag and purse in full view of a security camera as he sat at the bar.
Mr Leiva then allegedly headed outside and is said to have fallen asleep at one of the restaurant's tables until 7.30am the following morning.
Police later arrested him at a Motel 6 in northern Washington, roughly a 35-minute bus ride from Capital Burger.
According to documents submitted to DC's US district court, Mr Leiva admitted to stealing Ms Noem's bag but could not remember the other offences, citing memory loss caused by alcoholism.
Staff at a Quality Inn had told authorities that he had drunkenly argued with a shift manager who had asked him to return to his room.
Soon after his arrest he was transferred to hospital after complaining of alcohol withdrawal, according to the court filing.
He has been charged with wire fraud, aggravated identity theft, and robbery in connection with the three thefts.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
21 minutes ago
- The Independent
Donald Trump must put himself at the forefront of peace-building
Nobody expects consistency from Donald Trump, nor the Trump administration, dominated as it is by capricious personalities, but America's latest diplomatic moves in Middle Eastern policy are especially bewildering. The Palestinian Authority (PA) has latterly become a target for US sanctions, for which it is hardly the most deserving of candidates. It is not Hamas, for example – far from it, in fact: the terrorist organisation is a bitter rival, having effectively ceded Gaza from PA control many years ago. In contrast to so many other entities in the region, it has renounced violence and has even recognised the state of Israel. And yet Marco Rubio, secretary of state, has imposed new visa restrictions on PA officials, such that they cannot visit the US, which would include, ironically, peace conferences such as the one currently organised by the United Nations and being held in New York. Can the Trump administration be so resentful about the unexpected success of the conference that it could be so spiteful? It seems so – but it is counterproductive and unhelpful to the peace process. The conference, boycotted by Israel and the United States, is the result of a joint French and Saudi Arabian initiative, and has enjoyed great success in further securing international recognition for the state of Palestine while demanding Hamas disarm and give up its grip on Gaza. Virtually the entire Arab world has endorsed that concept of Palestinian nationhood, without Hamas – as has, in effect, the UK. Yet despite President Trump giving the green light to the British and French to recognise Palestine, and never having raised any retrospective objections to some 140 other nations that have previously done so, including India and China, he has thrown a tantrum. The latest country to recognise Palestinian statehood is Canada. This has provoked an unusually harsh reaction from Mr Trump, who once again is threatening Canada with a trade war in retaliation, itself an attack on Canadian sovereignty. Then again, given that President Trump doesn't recognise the legitimacy of the state of Canada itself, that is not so surprising. By contrast, he has shown no such vengeance – yet – towards Britain or France, nor Saudi Arabia or the rest of the Arab League. Or Mexico, for that matter, which is also joining the diplomatic wave. The world has had to act now, not because it wishes to reward Hamas for the atrocities it committed on 7 October 2023, but to try to preserve life in Gaza and advance the cause of a two-state solution to the conflict. At its simplest, the act of recognising Palestine is a way of pressuring Israel into declaring a ceasefire, ending the military actions, and preventing the famine from worsening. It is not about putting Hamas back into power; any viable two-state solution by definition cannot allow Hamas, or any Hamas-like organisation, to have a role in the governance of any part of the state of Palestine. That is why it is in the interests of Israel and America to support the creation of such an entity. An independent Palestine, by its own actions and with international guarantees, cannot be allowed to exist as a threat to Israel; nor, however, can Israel follow policies that force the Palestinian people to suffer and drive them from their homeland, as defined as the occupied territories. 'From the river to the sea' cannot be the slogan of either side if peace, stability and prosperity are to prevail. With a sustainable Israeli ceasefire, the hostages are far more likely to be released. Not so very long ago, that was the avowed and consistent aim of US policy under successive administrations. It was also, from time to time, the policy of Israeli prime ministers. There were successes – international treaties, peace accords, smaller deals and, in President Trump's first term, the Abraham accords, which saw more regional players normalising full diplomatic relations with Israel. That process was interrupted by the murderous attacks and hostage taking of 7 October, but it must be resumed, as another part of the peace process. Like presidents before him, Mr Trump could and should be at the forefront of peace-building. Indeed, he can hardly avoid it, given the geopolitics, and he ran for office on a pledge that he would end the war in Gaza. He has sent another envoy, Steve Witkoff, to see the situation on the ground, and Mr Witkoff should confirm the dire humanitarian situation. That is but the first step in a process that takes in a permanent ceasefire, the establishment of Hamas-free governance in Gaza, a plan to rebuild Gaza – with American investment along the lines of Mr Trump's Mediterranean resort plan – and the aim of a Palestinian nation peacefully co-existing with its neighbour, with both peoples free from fear and secure in their respective homelands. The expulsion of the population of Gaza, a continuation of the war and a return to terrorism isn't good for anyone, and certainly not the people of Israel, who yearn for permanent safety and security for themselves and their families, and no future '7 Octobers'. That vision is surely something that President Trump could get behind – preferably with a dogged determination and consistency.


The Independent
21 minutes ago
- The Independent
Gunman shot by officers after killing 3 people outside a Reno casino has died, police say
The suspected gunman who killed three people outside the largest casino in Reno, Nevada, before police officers shot and arrested him has died. Dakota Hawver, a 26-year-old Reno resident, died in the overnight hours, police announced Thursday morning. Hawver had been hospitalized in critical condition since the shooting at the Grand Sierra Resort. Two of the three people killed in Monday's shooting were visiting from Southern California for a bachelor party, while the third victim was a 66-year-old man who lived in the area, authorities said. Investigators haven't found any connections between Hawver, the casino or the victims, according to police in the neighboring town of Sparks who are leading the investigation. They said the motive is still unknown. Two other people wounded in the shooting remained hospitalized but were expected to make a full recovery, police said. Justin Aguila and Andrew Canepa, both 33 years old and from Southern California, were fatally shot from behind while waiting in the valet area for a ride to the airport, police said. Reno resident Angel Martinez was shot and killed by the suspect as he drove through the parking lot. Police said the shooter had been hiding behind a parked vehicle. Investigators determined the suspect fired around 80 rounds from a 9mm handgun that he had legally purchased two years ago. He has no criminal record and no history of mental health problems, officials have said. The shooting unfolded early Monday, when the gunman walked up to the valet area, pulled out the gun and pointed it at a group of people, police said. His weapon initially malfunctioned, but he was quickly able to get it to shoot before running through the parking lot, where he encountered an armed casino security guard. The gunman opened fire on the guard, who returned fire as the shooter fled again before being shot by police and taken into custody. The Grand Sierra Resort is one of Reno's most prominent venues. It has hosted concerts, sporting events and a campaign rally by President Donald Trump before the 2024 election. Near the California border and just northeast of Lake Tahoe, the town is a popular summer tourist destination.


Daily Mail
21 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Critics like me predicted Trump's trade war would tank the economy: Now, in a stunning mea culpa, DAN MCLAUGHLIN reveals why he was so wrong
One-hundred and twenty days out from President Donald Trump 's self-declared 'Liberation Day,' you can't blame the administration for wanting to crow, 'I told you so.' On April 2, Trump rolled out a vast slate of taxes on about sixty countries in the most expansive US tariffs policy in nearly a century, triggering a flood of apocalyptic predictions of everything from an uncontrollable trade war to US recession to global financial doom. In March, in anticipation of the tariff rollout, Goldman Sachs slashed its forecast for US GDP growth in 2025 from 2.4 percent to 1.7 percent. Two days after Trump's Rose Garden address, JP Morgan predicted a 60 percent chance of recession in 2025. And even I, your humble Daily Mail contributor, sounded the alarm in April: 'Donald Trump has made a complete hash of economic policy. His tariffs are a bad idea, badly implemented, and badly explained.' To be honest, I still believe that. But Trump has demonstrated an ability to adjust on the fly that many failed to appreciate. And now – while I won't dismiss the spectre of worldwide cataclysm just yet – things are looking pretty good. US GDP growth surged between April and June, increasing at an annual rate of three percent, beating estimates. The US stock markets have notched historic climbs. Consumer sentiment is rising, as is consumer spending, which grew at 1.4 percent between April and June – despite Trump's tariffs – up from 0.5 percent from January to March. Unemployment remains in check and recession fears have subsided. JP Morgan now puts the chances of a downturn in 2025 at 40 percent. A unified front of aggrieved US trading partners hasn't formed to force Trump to back down, nor have they hobbled American influence abroad. And while the president's position in the polls isn't great, it has stabilized, and more Americans are telling pollsters that they approve of his handling of the economy. Now, with the administration announcing new trade deals, notably with the European Union, nearly everything appears to be coming up Trump. On Sunday, EU negotiators agreed to a 15 percent tariff. That's less than Trump's punitive threats, but up significantly from around 5 percent tariffs before Trump took office, and more painful than the 10 percent deal that the United Kingdom inked in May. The European bloc had to make promises of nearly $2 trillion in new investments in the United States and new purchases of American energy and weapons. Selling American-built weapons is also a better way for the government to create jobs than trying to use tariffs to reinvigorate industries that will never return to the US soil. But all this doesn't mean the EU deal is flawless. Higher tariffs are still a cost on American consumers (the US inflation rate, which excludes the cost of tariffs, has been ticking up from 2.3 percent in June) and companies that have been hesitant to pass those added costs to their customers are likelier to do so now that the tariffs are permanent. Additionally, many of the promises of new EU purchases may not be enforceable, because the EU doesn't have the full powers of a sovereign government to guarantee compliance. Finally, if the point of Trump's tariffs was to break down import barriers to create greater access for American goods in the European market, Trump left a lot on the table, from digital and carbon levies to GMO restrictions on American agriculture. But it is clear that Trump got the better of the EU, which swallowed much higher tariffs just to avoid a harsher deal, while doing little to improve its position. There's an old poker saying: if you can't spot the sucker at the table, you're the sucker. Well, we've spotted the sucker: it's the EU with its cumbersome multi-national structure, unable to act decisively or resist Trump's overwhelming pressure campaign. So, are these developments proof that sky-high tariffs work? No. But it is a tribute to Trump's flexibility. He believes more strongly in tariffs than in any other idea in politics, but he's still willing to throw them overboard to get what he wants. When markets and opinion polls were hitting the panic button, Trump didn't dig in; he shifted course and climbed down from his most extreme tariffs. Trump doesn't plan. He negotiates by feel and gut instinct. And there are plenty of dangers ahead for Trump's trade strategy. The toughest trade deals, from China to Canada and Mexico, are yet to be inked. And the Federal Reserve again declined to lower interest rates – signaling persistent fears of a return to high inflation. However, the worst predictions of recessionary ruin were overstated. Trump is a master of hype, and he's driven his critics to a lot of overhype. At least, some of us have enough sense to take a step back – and reconsider.