Why banning social media for NZers under 16 is a bad idea – and will affect adults too
Photo:
RNZ
Analysis:
Government coalition partners National and Act are at odds over proposed restrictions on social media use by New Zealanders aged 16 and under.
Prime Minister Christopher Luxon recently announced a National Party private member's bill that would require social media companies to verify someone is aged 16 or older. Luxon said social media was not "always a safe place for young people".
But ACT Party leader David Seymour has dismissed National's proposal, saying it was "simple, neat and wrong".
Even if the member's bill is not chosen out of the parliament biscuit tin, global interest in getting young people off social media is increasing.
In late 2024, Australia passed a law banning children aged under 16 from social media platforms. Advocates, police and politicians in the United Kingdom, United States and elsewhere have all proposed similar laws.
While there is merit in young people spending more time offline, and there are real concerns about the impact of social media on wider society, it's not clear that outright prohibition will achieve what is hoped for.
Here are 10 reasons a blanket ban is not the answer.
Lobby group Before 16 has compared social media to tobacco, saying the platforms should be treated as a public health harm. The implication is that young people could get addicted to social media.
But the standard for diagnosing addiction is high. Most young people are not addicted to social media; they have a habitual relationship with it that is hard to change.
Likewise, comparing digital experiences to food may not capture the full range of interactions and impacts. This often implies value judgements, suggesting online experiences are all about "dopamine hits" (similar to sweet treats) and inherently less valuable or "unhealthy" compared to offline experiences.
Prime Minister Christopher Luxon says social media is not 'always a safe place for young people'.
Photo:
RNZ / Samuel Rillstone
The language of the ban seems to suggest the relationship between social media and users goes in one direction - that people are simply exposed to the good and bad of platforms such as Facebook, TikTok and X. But using social media is not like going outside and getting burnt by the sun.
While social media affects people, it's also a tool we use to actively shape and create meaning for ourselves. It provides social scaffolding for day-to-day lives, identity formation, communication with family overseas, community support, and even a place to complain about parents.
One of most influential books behind the ban is Jonathan Haidt's The Anxious Generation. Haidt claims a causal link between social media use and increased anxiety and depression in Gen Z (those born between 1995 and 2012).
But this claim is highly contentious and has been criticised for failing to consider other causes for the rise in anxiety in young people.
At best, there may be a correlation between social media and poor mental health - they are happening at the same time. Young people are also grappling with the climate crisis, increasing inequality and global instability. These variables are difficult to isolate in a study, meaning social media becomes an easy target.
Critics of social media also assume everyone has a negative experience online. And yes, if you tend to compare yourself to others on social media then you might end up feeling bad about your life.
But not everyone thinks this way or uses social media to compare what they have (and don't have) with others.
Moral panics can occur when emerging technologies challenge established social norms.
Phenomena such as "phubbing" (using a phone to snub someone) challenge what is considered "socially acceptable" behaviour, triggering a deluge of think pieces about how they hurt society.
While some skills may decline (such as reading and writing) with new technology, others like visual or oral storytelling practiced on social media are on the rise.
Banning social media could mean young people miss out on valuable digital skills.
ACT Party leader David Seymour has called the social media ban bill 'simple, neat and wrong'.
Photo:
RNZ / Calvin Samuel
Getting young people off social media might not be a big deal for kids who fit within their community. But if you are young, gay and live in a small town, for example, social media may provide the only space where you can feel safe or celebrated for who you are.
Social media is also a key means for immigrants to stay in touch with their families and culture.
There are also problems with how the ban is supposed to work - something Australia is still grappling with despite already passing a ban into law (which comes into effect at the end of this year).
Policymakers have yet to explain how age verification technologies would work without giving away more personal data to media platforms. And everyone would have to verify their age, regardless of whether they are under 16 years old or not.
Young people are savvier with technology than older generations. They lead with innovations such as FINSTA (fake Instagram) accounts - fake profiles that allow people to post more privately on Instagram without the pressure of conforming to expectations or the judgement of people who know them.
Blanket bans could hurt this technological adeptness and creativity and stop young people from teaching us how to navigate our online and offline lives.
Media literacy is also a crucial skill in today's media saturated age. The skill of unplugging could become part of that curriculum.
Temporarily going offline is an excellent way to make students aware of their relationship with social media. Schools could have media-free classes or courses to build awareness, encourage new habits and support students to develop new routines.
No one is arguing that social media hasn't had a negative effect on individuals and society as a whole. But instead of a ban, why not work to improve the platforms?
We could focus regulatory efforts on creating safer spaces, like we do with physical buildings.
Overseas advocacy work on children's digital rights shows how we can protect children from algorithms, gamification and other predatory tactics used by social media platforms, rather than introducing an outright ban.
Alex Beattie is a lecturer in media and communication at Te Herenga Waka - Victoria University of Wellington.
This story was originally published on
The Conversation.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
8 minutes ago
- RNZ News
'Very dangerous': Waipiro marina rubber-stamped for fast track
Local iwi and hapū Ngāti Kuta, Patukeha and Ngāti Hine are against a fast-tracked Waipiro Marina Project. Photo: supplied / Jay Howell The Bay of Islands community is shocked that a fast-tracked marina proposal will progress to the next stage. The approval on Monday by Minister of Infrastructure Chris Bishop comes with no support from local iwi and hapū Ngāti Kuta, Patukeha, and Ngāti Hine. "We are deeply concerned and do not understand how the minister could disregard the united oppositon to this proposal from across the district," Kohu Hakaraia of Patukeha hapū said. Bishop has been approached for comment, however, Hakaraia said they "refute" the minister's previous statements that the marina is regionally or nationally significant. The proposed build of a commercial marina will offer berthage for 200-250 recreational boating vessels with 14 spaces for 50-metre superyachts. The cost of each berth depends on the vessel size - a 10-20m slot would cost between $80,000 - $640,000 while a 20-30m berth could be priced up to $1.2 million. A public boat ramp, a parking lot, fuelling services, and hospitality and retail venues would also be constructed on reclaimed seabed with sand dredging used during construction and for maintanence. It is estimated to bring an economic impact of $177.9 to $218.8 million in value-added GDP and generate just under 150 full time jobs in construction, operations, and boat maintenance over a 30-year period. The proposed plan for up to 250 boating vessels Photo: supplied Those opposing the Waipiro Marina Project have called for transparency and accountability from the two companies - Hopper Developments and Azuma Property - and hoped the decision would go back to a Resource Management Act process. "As hapū and community, we feel that our voices have not been adequately heard," Hakaraia said. Both companies did not respond to requests for comment. An online petition has rallied 14,600 signatures disagreeing with the use of fast-track legislation for the site and Far North Mayor Moko Tepania had also pledged to write a personal letter . There has also been a stern no from boaties. Russell Boating Club members voted at their AGM in June to oppose use of the Fast Track Approvals Act 2024 with regards to the Bay of Islands project. Life member and former commodore of the club Jay Howell said the area was a quiet, treasured destination for locals to "anchor up and enjoy getting away from the hustle and bustle of Russell and the western flank of the Bay of Islands". The proposed marina and boat ramp would overwhelm the waterways with boat traffic, he said. Plus, the Ōpua-Okiato Vehicle Ferry crossing already brought long lines of cars that worsened in the summertime, Howell said. "That ferry is going to get overwhelmed by traffic. There aren't any alternatives really. They can't add more ferries and more ferry capacity, they're already at capacity. "There's infrastructure issues that Fast-Track just overlooks all of that and allows somebody [who isn't local] to make a decision that it has big ramifications locally." Boating and tourism businesses in Ōpua and Paihia were already struggling, he noted, and the marina could take business away from existing commercial centres making businesses less economically viable. A low tide aerial shot of Waipiro Bay. Photo: supplied Environmental benefits stated in the application included the creation of new marine environments, and improved ability to monitor and manage international and domestic boats that could be carrying foreign invasive species, like seaweed pest exotic caulerpa. Howell was also a member of the Eastern Bay of Islands Preservation Society. He was concerned that the influx of a couple of hundred extra boats would cause further decline of the whale and dolphin populations - something he had noticed in the last 15 years of living there. "Private boats just follow them around and don't leave them alone, and the marina will just exacerbate that situation out here." In addition, scallop beds and mussels in the area had already been decimated due to overharvesting. Te Rāwhiti residents would lose one of their main pipi beds. "There's all these impacts that the human activities are having on the marine environment in the area, and the marina will certainly put a lot more burden on all of that," Howell said. Another member of the Preservation Society, Sandra Scowen, said the area should be protected from large-scale commercial development and preserved for future generations. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
8 minutes ago
- RNZ News
Cabinet paper leak suggests Minister Nicole McKee's U-turn on alcohol sales reform
Associate Justice Minister, ACT's Nicole McKee, is reforming the Sale and Supply of Alcohol Act. Photo: RNZ / Samuel Rillstone A leaked Cabinet paper shows the government was planning to restrict the hours bottle stores and supermarkets could sell alcohol but then backed away to focus on reforms more friendly to the alcohol industry. The Associate Justice Minister - ACT's Nicole McKee - is reforming the Sale and Supply of Alcohol Act and had said that part of her focus would be reducing alcohol harm, which currently costs the country $9.1 billion a year. But documents leaked to RNZ, including a draft Cabinet paper, suggest the minister is now switching the focus of her reforms to making business easier for the alcohol industry. The documents show McKee initially proposed to change off-licence sale hours, from the current 7am to 11pm, to only allow alcohol sales between 9am and 9pm. The draft Cabinet paper says restricting opening hours could have had a major impact on violent crime - preventing 2400 "violent victimisations" each year. But that move has now been axed. A Ministry of Justice email, also leaked to RNZ, shows justice officials "were directed by Minister McKee to proceed with speed to lodge a revised Cabinet paper" to go before a Cabinet committee on 13 August. "The focus of the paper had changed during negotiations - it is now on reducing regulatory burden with some of the harm reduction measures no longer included - e.g. reducing maximum default trading hours." McKee told RNZ it was regrettable her draft Cabinet paper was leaked. "I won't be discussing a few cherry-picked parts of a draft paper through the media before I've even had an opportunity to discuss the issue with my Cabinet colleagues," she said in a statement to RNZ. "I am extremely disappointed that a draft Cabinet paper has been shared with media. This undermines the integrity of the public service and erodes New Zealanders' trust in public servants." The draft Cabinet paper says restricting opening hours could have had a major impact on violent crime. Photo: RNZ The leaks show that in an early version of her Cabinet paper, McKee proposed to restrict bottle store opening hours to between 9am and 9pm in a bid to reduce violent crime. "I am focused on hazardous drinking which can lead to violent crime. Evidence shows a strong correlation between later opening hours for off-licenses and violent crime," the Cabinet paper originally said. "Ministry of Justice analysis indicates that bringing forward the closing hour to 9pm could see up to 2400 fewer violent victimisations annually." The paper said restricting opening hours would reduce sales revenue for off-licences, as about 20 percent of sales were made between 8pm and 11pm and about 2 percent before 9am. The paper originally said the impacts on business had been "weighed carefully" against the benefits of reducing violent crime. But the leaks show this was changed in a later version. "I am not proposing any changes to the maximum trading hours for license holders," McKee wrote in the updated paper, noting Auckland and Christchurch had already set a 9pm closing time under their Local Alcohol Policies. "I consider that this is sufficient to manage concerns around license hours." McKee would not be interviewed by RNZ, but confirmed her reforms would now focus on making it easier for businesses in the alcohol industry. "My focus is on reducing red tape restricting businesses and New Zealanders who play by the rules. The law Labour left us with is a mess," she said. The draft Cabinet paper obtained by RNZ shows McKee is now proposing to make it easier for clubs and bars to serve alcohol outside normal trading hours when screening major sport or cultural events. McKee's Cabinet paper also proposes giving the alcohol industry more power when faced with objections to liquor licenses. The paper says changes in 2023 allowed any person or group to oppose a liquor license but that McKee wants to overturn this so objections only come from the community impacted. "To better balance community voice and impacts on business I seek agreement to only allow objections to licensing applications by people or groups and organisations in the same territorial authority as the premises." There are also moves to protect businesses impacted by changes to a council's Local Alcohol Policy (LAP) - where communities determine when and how alcohol is sold. "To protect existing businesses if a LAP is adopted or amended I also seek agreement to prevent a DLC (District Licensing Committee) from declining a renewal application if the license would be inconsistent with the relevant LAP." The changes would also give applicants for a liquor license a right of reply to objections received in DLC hearings. Andrew Galloway. Photo: supplied Andrew Galloway, executive director of Alcohol Healthwatch, funded by the Ministry of Health, said reducing trading hours for bottlestores and supermarkets would have had a major impact on reducing alcohol harm. "Off-licences sell over 80 percent of alcohol in Aotearoa and these off-licenses are over-concentrated in the most deprived areas. Restricting off-license supply of alcohol would be especially important in reducing alcohol-related harm." Galloway said that when he became aware the government was looking at restricting off-license trading hours he said to his team "we should prepare for a U-turn" once industry lobbying swung into action. "We will continue to miss every meaningful opportunity to reduce or prevent alcohol harm in New Zealand if we continue to allow unbridled access to power for harmful commodity industries." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
8 minutes ago
- RNZ News
Climate protestor claims Stockton Mine employee fired gun to scare him
Two Climate Liberation Aotearoa protesters used the aerial rope way down to Ngakawau to access a coal bucket for a sit-in protest. Photo: Supplied A climate activist camped in a coal bucket suspended high above the ground near a West Coast mine claims one of the site's workers fired a shotgun to scare him off - but the mining company denies the accusation. For nine days, two activists from the group Climate Liberation Aotearoa had been camped in coal buckets at Stockton Mine , north of Westport. The protest was against plans for the Bathurst Resources mine to expand under the government's fast track approvals legislation. One of the pair, Tamati Taptiklis, told RNZ that at 2:30pm Tuesday three shotgun shots were fired into the air nearby. Taptiklis said he could see a person 250 metres away in a Bathurst Resources uniform. They were walking away and lowering a long, thin object. The activist believed that the person was from the company and intended to fire warning shots to scare the pair and encourage them leave the mine. RNZ put these claims to Bathurst Resources chief executive Richard Tacon, who rejected them. "No firearms were let off at any time." Tacon said the company had strict rules and that he did not believe they employed "anyone stupid enough" to commit such an act. Bathurst Resources chief executive Richard Tacon. Photo: Supplied Taptiklis said that his group had also received an online threat from one of the mine's employees that read: "Angry, upset locals have been busy collecting information on you, your organisation and on those within our community that may have assisted you in your recent industrial sabotage. "I would strongly suggest that it would not be very wise for any of you to be seen within our district over the next few months, years, or if at all ever." Tacon said he was not aware of such a threat and would not condone the behaviour if a worker did write the statement. "We certainly don't use threats and innuendo to try to get where we want to be, so you know I do not condone it. "I can understand that there's a lot of angst because of the really existential threat to their livelihoods." Tacon said that he would talk to the police about the claimed threat and the ongoing protest action. Police told RNZ it was aware of broad threats made against the activists at Stockton Mine, but no reports had been made to the agency. The mine had to transport coal by truck because of the protest - which had so far cost the company $270,000. "We have had to put a trucking road bridge in, we have got about ten trucks hauling coal, additional cost is about $30,000 a day," Tacon said. Productivity levels were quite low at the mine, he said. "Everyone is very worried about what is going on. The main topic of conversation is, are they still there? What are we going to do? How are we going to get them out of there?" He said he would not be putting his staff at risk to rescue the protestors. "They are roped on, they obviously have some experience in that, but one slip and there's no coming back, and we can't help them." Tamati Taptiklis said that the point of safety was "interesting" given the environmental and climate damage expansion of the Stockton Mine would have caused. "The impact of opening this new mine will be a huge number of deaths here in Aotearoa and around the world, there's absolutely nothing safe about that." Tacon said he understood that the protestors wanted the company to withdraw from the fast-track legislation. He acknowledged that Bathurst's mining caused damage to ecosystems, but said the company had solid rehabilitation and offsetting programmes. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
