7/11 blasts acquittals: Defence team, Jamiat Ulama-i-Hind's dogged pursuit of justice
It's been a dogged pursuit of justice not only for the accused but a team of defence lawyers that built a case for acquittal that convinced the Bombay high court. Two former high court judges and successful defence lawyers came on board with the help of the Maharashtra branch of the Jamiat Ulama-i-Hind, a prominent organisation of Islamic scholars. Their collective skill, strategies and legal acumen led to the acquittal of the 12 accused, who were incarcerated for 19 years since their arrest in 2006.
Lawyer Ansar Tamboli said that counsel Yug Chaudhry was central to the defence team. With former high court judges S Murlidhar and S Nagamuthu coming on board, the team was fortified.
Lawyers Chaudhry and Payoshi Roy represented all the accused in the case and made common arguments for them during the morning and afternoon sessions of the hearings, respectively. Senior counsels Nagamuthu and Murlidhar, and senior advocate Nitya Ramakrishnan argued for two accused each and made their submissions before the court for two days each.
Tamboli said that the Jamiat footed the litigation expenses. Before the defence team came on board, about five counsels had turned the case down on account of its volume or citing paucity of time, he added.
'We have been working on the case right from the time of the conviction in 2015. The counsels who appeared in the matter agreed to do so because they were convinced that the accused were falsely implicated. We showed them that the matter was full of loopholes and how the evidence fell short,' said Tamboli.
He also said that the case was far more 'bulky' than an average criminal case and required a lot of preparation. 'On average, a criminal case has about 50 witnesses. But in this matter, there were 179 witnesses. There were 52 defence witnesses and two court witnesses. There were 169 volumes of documents, with each volume made of 400-500 pages,' he explained.
The legal cell of the Jamiat Ulama-i-Hind was shocked when only one of the 13 accused was acquitted by the lower court in 2015. 'But our lawyers assured us that we should appeal, that there was nothing in this case,' said a relieved Maulana Halimullah Qasmi, president of the Maharashtra Jamiat.
Desperate for legal representation, but unable to afford it, families of some of the accused had approached the Jamiat for help in 2006. 'We saw their financial condition—some of them had two families living in 10x15-feet rooms,' said Qasmi.
The late advocate Shahid Azmi, known for representing clients he believed were falsely implicated, was also handling some of the 7/11 accused. Among his many clients was Gulzar Azmi, then secretary of the Maharashtra Jamiat. Two of Azmi's sons had been picked up under the draconian Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act (MCOCA) in another case; Shahid managed to get them acquitted. The young lawyer convinced the older man of the need for a legal aid cell to help Muslims. That was how the Jamiat's Legal Aid Cell was born. It has, till now, achieved 192 acquittals across the country.
The Jamiat only takes up cases of those it believes are innocent, said Qasmi. 'Our legal team goes through the case papers. If we suspect that the accused is involved, we don't touch the case,' he said. 'Because, for us, the country comes first. Our maulanas have sacrificed so much in the freedom movement; we cannot support anyone trying to harm our country.'
Known for its fiercely anti-British stand (hundreds of scholars were hanged during the 1857 war of independence; later, many were charged with sedition and executed or sentenced to life), the Jamiat Ulama-i-Hind was formally launched in 1919. It supported Mahatma Gandhi and the Congress and opposed Muhammad Ali Jinnah and Partition. Post-independence, it emerged as the most influential organisation of Muslim clergy.
For the defence of the 7/11 accused, the Jamiat hired a galaxy of well-known names: Wahab Khan, Yug Chaudhry, Sharif Shaikh, Nitya Ramakrishnan from Delhi, and former judges S Murlidhar (former chief justice of the Orissa high court) and S Nagamuthu (Madras high court). 'Most lawyers charge us much less than they would otherwise,' said Qasmi. 'They know we are doing this as a service.'
The funds come from donations that the Jamiat receives, mostly as zakat (charity mandated on all Muslims). 'Because these are zakat funds, we have to use them very carefully,' said advocate Shahid Nadeem, who's been part of the Jamiat's legal team for 10 years. 'So, before taking up a case, we also collect information, through local units of our organisation, about the accused's own record. Also, we only help those who approach us and who are needy.'
No lawyer has yet refused a case, and most of the high-profile lawyers who've appeared for the Jamiat have been Hindus, said Qasmi. Have they ever been criticised for the work they do? 'If someone questions us, we point out that arrest doesn't make anyone a terrorist. That needs to be proved in court,' he said.
In the Nagpur session of the Maharashtra assembly in December 2014, BJP MLA Ashish Shelar had accused the Jamiat of promoting terrorism, asked for a ban on it, and made allegations against Gulzar Azmi. 'We had met chief minister Devendra Fadnavis and had those remarks expunged,' said advocate Nadeem.
Despite the nature of the cases they take up, they face no pressure, revealed Qasmi. 'Everyone knows us as the organisation that opposed Partition. We believe that all those who live in this country are part of one qaum (community); religion does not define nationhood.'
The only man acquitted by the lower court in the case, Abdul Wahid Shaikh, has spent the last 10 years spreading awareness about the innocence of his fellow accused. He became part of the Jamiat's legal team, and also worked with the Innocence Network, a coalition of organisations that provide legal aid for those they believe have been wrongly accused.
Today was a vindication of Abdul's crusade, but the acquittal isn't enough, said lawyer Sharif Shaikh. 'There must be a public apology from the state and compensation for those who lost 19 years of their life,' he added.
'We believed in the innocence of the accused, and our hopes were realised,' said Qasmi. 'But the question remains: who carried out those blasts? The families of those who died need an answer that the investigating agencies must provide.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
4 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
‘If you don't pull up cops for falsifying evidence, what stops them from doing so again?'
Advocate Yug Chaudhry who led the defence of the 7/11 blasts accused acquitted last week, speaks to Jyoti Punwani about the significance of the Bombay High Court's judgment and how the victims can seek justice. 'If you don't pull up cops for falsifying evidence, what stops them from doing so again?' The fact that they were held innocent has not been stayed. Nor has their release. That's because the judgment is very sound. The stay has been granted only because of the effect this judgment would have on other MCOCA trials currently on. Because the court agreed with our argument that for MCOCA to be applied, an accused must have been charge sheeted in two cases where the punishment is a minimum of three years, not a maximum of three years. That finding could derail other MCOCA trials. Not just the accused, for me personally as well. This judgment is that light I will look to when I am sunk in despair. It has restored not just my faith in the judiciary but in humanity and courage, in kindness and above all in human decency. Appellate judges seldom reverse convictions in terror cases. You have to scale a very high mountain to get a terror conviction reversed. It is only because the judges were legally and morally convinced of the innocence of the accused that they did so. What convinced them was the utter blatant fabrication of evidence against the accused and the very obvious fact that the investigation and prosecution of the case lacked integrity, credibility and honesty. The evidence produced was an insult to the intelligence. That's what I can't understand. No ideologically driven party can have a vested interest in the miscarriage of justice. I would request these parties: please see the evidence for yourself. Ask yourself, how can copy paste confessions by different accused given to different DCPs be genuine? Why were the CDRs destroyed? These CDRs were relied upon to get police remand of the accused; the police claimed the CDRs showed they were in touch with each other and with the LeT. Yet, not only were they not used by the prosecution, when we got an order that they should be handed to us, the prosecution said they've been destroyed! The senior officer investigating the case kept saying he won't answer to all questions we asked (when pressed about the CDRs), the IO kept saying, 'I can't remember, I don't know.' Is this how an honest investigation is run? They must urge the government to set up an SIT with high-ranking members: judges, bureaucrats and members of civil society to look into the entire case again, especially the evidence submitted by Rakesh Maria, which pointed towards the IM having done it. 189 persons have died; this needs an honest investigation. The NIA today has the monopoly of investigating terror. On its website, the train blasts have been attributed to the IM. Not only the NIA, the police in Andhra Pradesh, Gujarat, Delhi have all said that the train blasts were executed by the IM. By insisting on the rule of law, and by ensuring accountability of the police for their misdeeds. If you don't pull up the police for falsifying evidence, what stops them from doing so again? If there is a judicial finding about evidence having been fabricated, those doing so must be pulled up.
Time of India
12 hours ago
- Time of India
Life term or 7-yr jail: SC gives man, 67, choice in 1979 college clash verdict
NEW DELHI: Some may call it a burning example of a snail-paced justice delivery system while others may term it as "law catching up with the culprit when he is at his weakest". However one may describe it, a person who committed the crime as a hot-headed college student, now dreads spending the rest of his life as an ailing senior citizen behind bars. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The SC has now given him the option between life term or seven years in jail. A union election-related fight between two students of LokManya Inter College in Deoria district of in 1979 led to 21-year-old Hari Shankar Rai stabbing a 19-year-old Krishna Kumar, who died of injuries on Dec 14, 1979. The trial court in 1983 found Rai guilty under Section 304-I of IPC and sentenced him to four-year imprisonment. A person lost his life, there should be adequate punishment for the crime: SC The Allahabad HC took 41 years to decide the appeal filed by the state challenging the trial court decision and seeking his conviction for murder. Rai had appealed against his conviction. In May last year, the HC found the evidence strong enough to convict Rai under Section 302 and awarded life imprisonment. Rai appealed against the HC judgment before the SC. A bench of CJI B R Gavai and Justice K Vinod Chandran told the 67-year-old Rai that even if his conviction for murder is altered to that under Section 304-I, he cannot escape with a punishment of mere four years imprisonment. "A person lost his life and whatever may be, there should be adequate punishment for the crime," the CJI said. His counsel said the man is now 67-year-old suffering from ailments and pleaded for mercy on the ground that his wife is suffering from cancer, needing constant care. But the bench remained firm and refused to grant him bail during the pendency of his appeal in the SC. Refusing to show mercy and warning the convict's counsel that arguing for acquittal, in the face of a well-reasoned HC judgment, would result in dismissal of the appeal, CJI Gavai said, "If you are agreeable, we will convert the conviction under Sec 302 to that under Sec 304-I (culpable homicide not amounting to murder) with seven year imprisonment." SC also asked the state counsel Tulika Mukherjee to take instructions regarding the present relationship between the families of the victim and the accused.
India Today
16 hours ago
- India Today
Special investigation: Shady madrasas mushrooming along Indo-Nepal border
A special investigation by India Today has unearthed a widespread network of unregulated and illegal madrasas operating on both sides of the Indo-Nepal border, raising serious concerns around illegal foreign funding, radical teachings, and internal investigation reveals how madrasas in Bihar and neighbouring Nepal are accepting money routed through illegal hawala channels — mostly from Gulf countries — and, in many instances, are reportedly involved in teaching content that promotes extremist what the India Today Special Investigation Team uncovered:BIHAR: FOREIGN FUNDING, RADICAL CONTENT, NO OVERSIGHT In Bihar, several madrasas along the Nepal border were found to be functioning without government recognition. These include institutions in Muzaffarpur, Sitamarhi, and remote locations like Bajpatti and Muzaffarpur's Jamia, Nuria Merajul Uloom, a teacher who has been with the madrasa for over two decades openly admitted to accepting funds via hawala. He was also open to the idea of using that money to create a separate faculty to indoctrinate students with jihadi narratives. "We will brainwash them step-by-step," he told the undercover Sitamarhi's Bajpatti region, another illegal madrasa — Madrasa Islamia Mehmoodia — was found operating out of a tin shed with no signage. Its administrator, Azruddin Dilkhush, spoke freely about receiving hawala money from Gulf countries via Nepal and disguising it as donation box collections. He also confirmed that fake Indian IDs could be used to enrol undocumented children, including those of Bangladeshi same pattern was found at Madrasa Islamia Darul Quran in Deema village, operating from a government community hall. Here, videos of controversial Islamic preacher Zakir Naik were shown to students, and a controversial textbook, Taaleem-ul-Islam, which refers to non-Muslims as "kafirs" (infidels), was being taught from Class 1 OPEN DOORS TO FOREIGN INFLUENCE, JIHADI MESSAGINGAcross the border in Nepal, the investigation found similar trends of foreign funding and radical influence. In Mahottari district, Mohammad Shahid Hussain of Madrasa Ahsania admitted on camera to accepting Gulf-funded hawala money. Shahid said people from countries like Lebanon and Pakistan came to deliver motivational speeches in local halls, targeting students and youth for ideological Dhanusha district, another madrasa run by Naimuddin was also found to be a willing participant in disseminating jihadi literature. He told undercover reporters that he would distribute books on jihad and mujahideen to children and that "preparing Muslims for jihad" was part of their ecosystem. However, he also admitted that due to the area being Hindu-majority, such teachings were conducted discreetly.- EndsMust Watch
