Teens ‘completely destroyed' brand new sensory room in Dublin for children with autism
Teenagers completely destroyed a brand new sensory room in Dublin for children with autism, which was "trashed" a week before its unveiling, a court has heard.
A 15-year-old schoolboy pleaded guilty to burglary of the River Valley Community Centre, Swords, which was ransacked on August 18, 2023.
Sentencing was adjourned at the Dublin Children's Court on Tuesday pending the preparation of a pre-sanction report.
Judge Shalom Binchy saw a list of the damaged specialised fixtures and fittings: padded door and wall, foam materials, an ocean effect projector, balls, a sensory tube, a mirror, steps, a railing, and other items in the room.
Garda Jordan Martin described the scene afterwards as "completely destroyed, it was trashed".
The court heard the four youths had gone when gardai went to the centre at 9.40 pm and saw a door had been opened.
Garda Martin said it had been recently refurbished with a new sensory room for children with autism from the locality.
CCTV evidence from the building led to the identification of the accused, then aged 13, and three other boys who gained entry by force; however, there was no footage from inside the sensory room.
Garda Martin said they were responsible for substantial damage, which cost €12,178 to repair.
The room was due to be unveiled the following week, but that had to be delayed.
Defence solicitor Brian Keenan acknowledged the seriousness of the incident, which he added was aggravated by the fact that it was a facility for children who needed it the most. The teenager did not give evidence, but his solicitor said he was apologetic and was pleading guilty.
Mr Keenan pleaded with the judge not to send the case to the Circuit Court, which has greater sentencing powers, and to note his age and level of maturity at the time were important factors. He asked the judge to note that the Director of Public Prosecutions recommended the case be dealt with in the Children's Court, which could consider a maximum one-year term, and which Mr Keenan argued was sufficient to deal with the case.
The boy, who cannot be named because he is a juvenile with the legal right to anonymity, accepted that he "pulled at" some items in the room.
The court heard he was still in school, keeping his head down, not coming to Garda attention, and was engaging with a social care services provider in Dublin.
The other boys involved in the incident avoided a court prosecution after being found eligible for the Garda Youth Diversion Programme, which aims to prevent young offenders and children involved in anti-social behaviour from reoffending.
However, the defendant was not suitable for that approach and was charged.
Dublin Children's Court
Today's News in 90 Seconds - July 2nd
Judge Binchy accepted jurisdiction due to his age at the time, his guilty plea and how gardai dealt with the other participants.
The boy, accompanied to court by his father and a family support worker, was remanded on bail to appear again later this month.
Judge Binchy stressed that it was a very serious matter and expected full compliance from the teenager who was referred to the Probation Service to draft a pre-sentence report.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Journal
7 hours ago
- The Journal
Philip Dwyer loses appeal against trespass conviction at direct provision centre
CAMPAIGNER PHILIP DWYER trespassed at a direct provision centre for International Protection (IP) applicants at Inch in Co Clare where residents were being besieged by protesters outside the property, a court has heard. At Ennis Circuit Court this evening, Judge Francis Comerford upheld the trespass conviction imposed on Dwyer, an anti-immigrant activist, at Magowna House on 18 May 2023. Described in court by his counsel Anne Doyle BL as a 'Citizen Journalist', Dwyer (56) of Tallaght Cross West, Tallaght, Dublin 24 was appealing the district court trespass conviction imposed in March and Judge Comerford also affirmed the district court fine of €500. Dwyer told the court that he was at Magowna House to ask questions in his role as a journalist. Judge Comerford said that Dwyer 'might be entitled to make enquiries and go to someone's door, but he went well beyond it here'. At the time, there were protests at Magowna House where 29 International Protection applicants were being accommodated and there were blockades on local roads which were attracting media attention. Judge Comerford said that a group of people here came to seek refuge 'and were brought by the State to a relatively isolated, rural location where they were alone and away from a lot of resources and facilities'. 'And in effect, they were besieged in the premises they were brought to,' the judge said. 'It was made absolutely clear to them that they weren't welcome and there were protesters outside the property and there were bales of hay blocking access to prevent others joining them.' He said that there were 30 or 40 protesters protesting against their presence. Judge Comerford said that the big difference between Dwyer and protesters outside was that he went inside the property, where the other protesters didn't. Advertisement Judge Comerford said that he accepted the evidence of the Manager of Magowna House at the time, Ahlam Salman who said that Dwyer's presence on the property made her feel 'afraid'. Video footage made by Dwyer was played to the court, where he can be heard saying that he had arrived at a 'people trafficking centre'. In the footage shown in court, Dwyer can be heard saying, 'these are all foreign people telling me what I can't do in my own country'. Dwyer can be seen addressing a Ukrainian man wearing a fluorescent jacket: 'Do you think Irish people are stupid? Do you think we are all idiots? I wouldn't blame you, to be honest with you.' He asks later: 'What is your problem? You are not in Ukraine, this is my country…What are you hiding? I am just asking questions on behalf of the people of Ireland. The people in this country are very concerned about this.' After seeing some men believed to be International Protection applicants staying at the centre, Mr Dwyer asks: 'Why are these people covering their faces….This is Ireland. This is my country.' Counsel for the State Sarah Jane Comerford BL (instructed by State Solicitor for Clare, Aisling Casey) said to Dwyer that his words 'had a menacing undertone' to the people to whom he spoke on the property. In response, Dwyer said: 'I wasn't menacing to anybody.' He said: 'I 100% stand over those comments. We all have to respect one another. I tried to be respectful when I went in there.' He said: 'I was treated very badly. I was treated with hostility… I felt quite intimidated as well. That is part of the job.' He went on to tell the court: 'I have thousands of viewers, sometimes hundreds of thousands.' Counsel for Dwyer, Anne Doyle BL, said that she was not instructed by her client not to enter any mitigation concerning penalty 'as my client stands by his actions', Doyle said that 'he maintains that he was working in the course of his duties and does not accept the verdict'.
The Journal
11 hours ago
- The Journal
Dublin pensioner admits blackmailing woman after finding sexual images on second-hand phone
A DUBLIN PENSIONER has admitted recovering pictures of a woman engaged in sexual acts from her old phone to 'blackmail' her years later. Anthony Nolan, 84, of Richmond Road, Fairview, was charged with harassment from 8 May 2021, until 10 May 2022, under section 10 of the Non-Fatal Offences Against the Person Act. He pleaded guilty when he appeared at Dublin District Court before Judge Michele Finan today. The court heard the woman, who was known to the accused, gifted the pensioner her old phone in 2009, which she had used for four years. Three years later, Nolan discovered some content on the phone, including personal messages and 'photos showing the injured party in sexual activities and he attempted to blackmail her in relation to that'. Advertisement Judge Finan noted that defence solicitor Andrew Molony said his client was attending psychiatric treatment and he needed time to obtain a report. The woman was not present for the hearing. Adjourning sentencing until September, Judge Finan requested that a victim impact statement be prepared for the next hearing. She also extended legal aid for a psychiatric report on Nolan. The accused was remanded on continuing bail and was not required to testify. It followed a preliminary hearing in April to consider whether the case should be sent up to the Circuit Court, which has wider sentencing powers. Jurisdiction was accepted, keeping it in the District Court. The judge had heard that before the victim gave Nolan the phone, 'she wiped the phone clean of personal data.' The evidence against him also included an accusation that, having discovered the messages and images, he refused to return the phone. Judge Finan heard the complainant tried to 'block' him, but he continued to harass her by electronic means and with messages.
Sunday World
13 hours ago
- Sunday World
Pensioner admits bid to ‘blackmail' woman over sex photos on old phone
Anthony Nolan, 84, of Richmond Road, Fairview, was charged with harassment from May 8, 2021, until May 10, 2022, under section 10 of the Non-Fatal Offences Against the Person Act A Dublin pensioner has admitted recovering pictures of a woman engaged in sexual acts from her old phone to "blackmail" her years later. Anthony Nolan, 84, of Richmond Road, Fairview, was charged with harassment from May 8, 2021, until May 10, 2022, under section 10 of the Non-Fatal Offences Against the Person Act. He pleaded guilty when he appeared at Dublin District Court before Judge Michele Finan on Monday. The court heard the woman, who was known to the accused, gifted the pensioner her old phone in 2009, which she had used for four years. Three years later, Nolan discovered some content on the phone, including personal messages and "photos showing the injured party in sexual activities and he attempted to blackmail her in relation to that". Judge Finan noted that defence solicitor Andrew Molony said his client was attending psychiatric treatment and he needed time to obtain a report. The woman was not present for the hearing. Adjourning sentencing until September, Judge Finan requested that a victim impact statement be prepared for the next hearing. She also extended legal aid for a psychiatric report on Nolan. The accused was remanded on continuing bail and was not required to testify. It followed a preliminary hearing in April to consider whether the case should be sent up to the Circuit Court, which has wider sentencing powers. Jurisdiction was accepted, keeping it in the District Court. The judge had heard that before the victim gave Nolan the phone, "she wiped the phone clean of personal data." The evidence against him also included an accusation that, having discovered the messages and images, he refused to return the phone. Judge Finan heard the complainant tried to "block" him, but he continued to harass her by electronic means and with messages. Anthony Nolan. Photo: Today's News in 90 Seconds - July 7th
