logo
2025 Volkswagen ID Buzz Pros and Cons Review: Power of Love Over Logic

2025 Volkswagen ID Buzz Pros and Cons Review: Power of Love Over Logic

The Drive19-06-2025

The latest car news, reviews, and features.
As an automotive journalist, nostalgia-packed cars are simultaneously the best and worst to review. It's easy for the new and cute thing to influence how you feel about it before getting behind the wheel, especially an icon of the car world like a Mazda Miata, Ford Bronco, or a Porsche 911. In the case of the 2025 Volkswagen ID Buzz, its smile-inducing shape and playful two-tone exterior make you want to love it. It's adorable, it's fun, and it tugs your heartstrings even if you weren't a peace-loving teenager in the late '60s.
But then again, this EV isn't your parents' (or grandparents') VW Bus. It's shaped like one, it's colored like one, the marketing folks tell you it's one, but it isn't one. So if friend-shaped, why not friend? Here's why: Jerry Perez
We typically start these reviews with the Pros, but I'm making an executive decision to start this one with the negatives. This way, you wrap up your precious reading time with something positive. See? The ID Buzz's charm is already getting to me.
Let's talk about usability. Over my weeklong test, I struggled to get a sense of what the average ID Buzz owner would do on a daily basis. Are they buying this to transport people, are they hauling stuff, or are they just using it as a nifty Sunday ride? Our editor Andrew Collins recently put an ID Buzz to the test with a bunch of stuff to haul and several of his fur babies. He concluded that while the van offers ample cargo room, it's not exactly easy to adapt on the fly, like a minivan with a disappearing third row or easily removable seats. Jerry Perez
If you're hauling kids, they'll need to be old enough to climb into the ID Buzz on their own, as it sits considerably higher than the average van, and maybe even higher still than the average SUV. Climbing up into the cabin—whether it's the front or rear—is more akin to hopping into a full-size pickup truck.
While the cabin ergonomics are fine , VW's awful window switches strike again. Just like the ID. 4 I previously drove, the ID Buzz has two switches to operate four windows. You must first use a different switch to select which windows you want to operate, front or rear. This is infuriating and stupid, just like the teeny-tiny sliding rear windows, which remind me that family duty ain't this EV's main purpose. Their functionality is more like a vent than a normal window, letting some air into the rear cabin but not big enough to reach out and grab a bag of grub from the drive-thru. Why VW couldn't give it full-size windows like in a normal van is beyond me. The massive sliding door panels certainly have the real estate. Jerry Perez
The Buzz's 231-mile range isn't horrible, but once you factor in possible cold weather and other driving conditions, you're leaning closer to 200 than 250. That isn't ideal for a $70,000 vehicle. Pair this with my test car's inability to connect to a fast charger, and I was having to watch every mile I traveled. Due to a technical malfunction that VW didn't elaborate on, I could physically insert the connector plug into the van's port, but the software prevented it from receiving a charge from a source higher than a 120-volt outlet. This meant my creamsicle-colored ID Buzz could only charge at home.
I know it's been said before, but what a cool-looking ride this is. I'm used to catching stares in exotic machinery, typically low-riding and with two doors, but the ID Buzz is the opposite of that! It's a freaking electric minivan, for Pete's sake. At the end of the day, people like cool cars, but people love cars that make them smile. Who doesn't like to smile? The ID Buzz makes people smile, and that translates behind the wheel, too. Jerry Perez
Then there's the driving experience. Despite it being the size of a cargo container, the driving experience is rather sprightly. The 'little' bus is quick on its feet and provides the driver with enough reassurance to carry speed through a corner and even do a full lap of a roundabout at speed. Despite its long, heavy roof sitting 76 inches off the ground, body roll isn't outrageous, and the firm suspension keeps handling manageable when the road gets twisty.
It's also flat-out comfortable. There isn't a bad seat in the house, whether you're driving, riding shotgun, or sitting on the second-row captain chairs (bench seat also available), or the third-row seats. In fact, the third-row bench is so comfortable, it was actually recalled for being 'too wide.' Unfortunately, due to its range, you likely won't be sitting on any seat for more than a couple of hours at a time, but hey, at least you'll have a nice throne while waiting for it to charge. Jerry Perez
Like a lot of cool cars out there, the 2025 VW ID Buzz has a big question mark hanging over it when it comes to usability and overall purpose. It's an EV with limited range, and it's expensive, but then again, it succeeds on various other fronts, and it makes people smile. How can you hate a car for having a personality, especially nowadays, when there are so many bland cars, both electric and gasoline-powered? I can't recommend you buy one out of necessity, but I can recommend you buy one if you absolutely love the idea of one.
2025 Volkswagen ID Buzz Specs RWD AWD Base Price (as tested) $69,545 ($71,545) Powertrain single-motor rear-wheel drive | 1-speed auto | 91-kWh battery dual-motor all-wheel drive | 1-speed auto | 91-kWh battery Horsepower 282 335 Torque 413 lb-ft 99 lb-ft (front)
413 lb-ft (rear) Seating Capacity 7 6 Cargo Volume 18.6 cubic feet behind third row | 75.5 cubic feet behind second row | 145.5 cubic feet behind first row << Curb Weight 5,968 pounds 6,197 pounds Max Payload 1,113 pounds 948 pounds Max Towing 2,600 pounds 3,500 pounds EPA Range 234 miles 231 miles Max Charging Rate 200 kW << Score 6.5/10
It's unclear to me who would buy one of these, but I'm pretty clear on why they'd buy one.
Email the author at jerry@thedrive.com

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Bad value? Fair value? Still a bargain? Up 43% in weeks, here's how I see Tesla stock today
Bad value? Fair value? Still a bargain? Up 43% in weeks, here's how I see Tesla stock today

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Bad value? Fair value? Still a bargain? Up 43% in weeks, here's how I see Tesla stock today

It has been a roller-coaster ride for shareholders in Tesla (NASDAQ: TSLA). When? Take your pick! Tesla stock has soared 43% since late April alone. It is up 66% in a year and 413% in five years. But there have been some dizzying drops too. Even after its recent rise, the share price is a quarter below where it stood in December. Clearly, owning Tesla is not for the faint-hearted. But, as the share price has demonstrated over the long term, risks can sometimes come hand in hand with brilliant returns. So at its current price, could Tesla be a bargain for me to add to my portfolio? Only time will tell. A bargain is something that has been bought for less – ideally a lot less – than it turns out to be worth. There are two elements to that. One – what Tesla stock would cost me now – is crystal clear, not just to me but to everyone in the market. The second element – what it is actually worth – is far, far harder to gauge. Some shares actually trade for less than a sum of the parts. For example, Scottish Mortgage Investment Trust (itself a long-term Tesla shareholder) sells at a discount of around 10% to its net asset value. By contrast, at the end of the first quarter, Tesla's net asset value was well under 10% of its current market capitalisation. On that basis, the Tesla stock price certainly does not look like a bargain. However, that is only one way of valuing a company. A different approach than a hard, cold look at the balance sheet as it stands today is to consider what value those assets might help the company create for shareholders in future. I think it is fair to say this is how many investors have long valued Tesla stock. It has proven adept at growing sales and turning losses into profits over time. That is thanks to assets it still has, including its brand, proprietary technology, a vertically integrated manufacturing and marketing model, and some very talented employees. They could help propel the company even further in future. It has ambitions in high-potential, fast-growing business areas including artificial intelligence (AI) and robotics. It also has ambitions to expand into both trucks and self-driving taxis at a commercial scale. If it can do well enough even in just some of those areas, while performing solidly in its existing business, today's Tesla stock price may yet come to be seen as a bargain. However, while the potential reward part of that storyline attracts me, the actual risks do not. For one thing, a lot of the potential businesses are little more than that. Tesla has yet to prove it can roll them out at scale, let alone profitably. Meanwhile, the base business is struggling. Tesla's power generation unit has been performing strongly and has ongoing growth potential. But the car business saw sales fall slightly last year, while in the first quarter of this year, they slumped. In a highly competitive electric vehicle (EV) market, there is a risk of a permanent shift. Meanwhile, competition could squeeze profit margins. I do not think the current Tesla stock price adequately reflects such risks, so I will not be investing. The post Bad value? Fair value? Still a bargain? Up 43% in weeks, here's how I see Tesla stock today appeared first on The Motley Fool UK. More reading 5 Stocks For Trying To Build Wealth After 50 One Top Growth Stock from the Motley Fool C Ruane has no position in any of the shares mentioned. The Motley Fool UK has recommended Tesla. Views expressed on the companies mentioned in this article are those of the writer and therefore may differ from the official recommendations we make in our subscription services such as Share Advisor, Hidden Winners and Pro. Here at The Motley Fool we believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. Motley Fool UK 2025 Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

NASCAR's Cup Series to debut In-Season Challenge as $1 million backdrop to points race for title
NASCAR's Cup Series to debut In-Season Challenge as $1 million backdrop to points race for title

Washington Post

timean hour ago

  • Washington Post

NASCAR's Cup Series to debut In-Season Challenge as $1 million backdrop to points race for title

HAMPTON, Ga. — The debut of NASCAR's In-Season Challenge in Saturday night's Cup Series race in Atlanta generated differing opinions and expectations from drivers. After all, there's a points race to attend to. Every team's top priority is qualifying for the playoffs and trying to win the championship. Some drivers acknowledge they simply haven't paid attention to the new race within the race. Joey Logano says he sees no reason to view the new tournament as a distraction. 'If there's something to win, you want to go win it,' Logano said Friday before winning the pole for Saturday night's race in his Team Penske Ford. Denny Hamlin is the No. 1 seed in the 32-driver In-Season Challenge, a five-race, bracket-style tournament. Chase Briscoe, who held off Hamlin for his first win for Joe Gibbs Racing last week at Pocono Raceway, is the No. 2 seed. A $1 million prize awaits the winner as part of a new media rights deal that includes TNT. Briscoe said Friday he felt 'definitely a sigh of relief, you know, just a weight off your shoulders' following last week's win. He said that sense of relief was shortlived. 'I'm expected to win multiple races, not just one,' Briscoe said. 'It's a sense of relief, but also more pressure because now they know you can win.' NASCAR hopes the tournament generates mid-season interest. The single-elimination format cuts the field to 16 at Chicago, eight at Sonoma, four at Dover and the final two at Indianapolis Motor Speedway. Many drivers expect their interest in the tournament will increase after Saturday night's race. 'I think some of the drivers have been kind of dismissive over the bracket challenge,' said Brad Keselowski, who enters the race No. 30 in the points standings and in need of a win in Atlanta to earn a playoff spot in his RFK Racing Ford. 'I think it'll become a lot more real, whether it be for the drivers or for the media or the fans, as it progresses into the later rounds over the next few weeks,' Keselowski said. Added Ricky Stenhouse, who is 24th in the points race, of the new tournament: 'It's cool. I think after this weekend you'll have a little better idea of what you have. Our main goal in Atlanta is winning and getting into the playoffs.' Team Penske claimed four of the top five qualifying positions and Ford claimed all of the top five spots. Logano was first at 178.960 mph, tying Josh Berry, who drives for Wood Brothers but has a technical alliance with Team Penske. Ryan Blaney qualified third and Austin Cindric was one spot back for Team Penske, while Ryan Preece, in another Ford for RFK Racing, was fifth. 'It definitely helps at the start for sure,' Logano said. 'Being at the front and controlling the race is the thing for sure.' Briscoe is facing No. 31 seed Noah Gragson in the first bracket. He says it's a difficult matchup, in part because 'he's actually probably my best friend on the circuit … and my son's favorite driver.' Briscoe said his 3-year-old son, Brooks, thinks of Gragson 'like that uncle that just you take your kid to, and he has Pop-Tarts and ice cream and everything else when he's with them.' Added Briscoe: 'Hopefully I'll win. If not I'll never here the end of it from Noah or my son.' Briscoe posted a photo on his X account of his son's bracket . The photo shows the smiling Brooks holding a bracket with his father's No. 19 winning every round of the tournament. Chase Elliott has a special paint scheme on his No. 9 Hendrick Motorsports Chevrolet that was designed by 11-year-old cancer patient Rhealynn Mills. Elliott chose Mills' design to highlight his foundation's efforts to raise money for Children's Healthcare of Atlanta. Elliott said the 'Design to Drive' program has raised $500,000 for the children's hospital. 'The only bad thing is I feel like we've crashed every time we've done it,' Elliott said, adding his sponsor, NAPA Auto Parts, deserved credit 'for giving up the car' so the paint scheme could instead feature Mills' design. EchoPark Speedway is the new name for the track that was still known as Atlanta Motor Speedway in February when Christopher Bell won while leading only the final lap in overtime. It's the home track for Elliott, from Dawsonville, Georgia, and he acknowledged seeing the name change and the new green paint 'was different for me. I think it's fine.' Ryan Blaney is the favorite (+800) to win the race, per BetMGM Sportsbook. Joey Logano and Austin Cindric, each at +1000, were next. ___ AP auto racing:

A Shocking Amount of People Say Car Cupholders Are ‘Difficult to Use'
A Shocking Amount of People Say Car Cupholders Are ‘Difficult to Use'

The Drive

time2 hours ago

  • The Drive

A Shocking Amount of People Say Car Cupholders Are ‘Difficult to Use'

The consumer insight researchers at J.D. Power and Associates run an annual Initial Quality Survey (IQS) on new car buyers. It yields a comparative list of how satisfied people are with new cars from all of our market's major brands. It also exposes features and trends that buyers like and don't. And this year, one of the biggest jumps in car-owner complaints was about cupholders. J.D. Power's IQS press release lays it out like this: 'While it seemed like manufacturers had cupholders figured out, given that owners are now bringing more reusable containers into their vehicles, manufacturers are struggling to keep up with being able to accommodate all the different shapes and sizes that are increasingly available. Consequently, owners are again citing more problems in this area, with the expectation that their vehicle should be able to hold different sizes of containers.' I got some more context for us on that from Frank Hanley, J.D. Power's Senior Director, Auto Benchmarking. 'When looking at the top 10 problems for the [industry] 'cupholders – difficult to use' went from being the [seventh] most problematic issue for the vehicle to the [third] most reported this year,' he explained over email. Third-most-problematic sounds high, no? Elaborating, Hanley added [sic]: 'In the survey we ask owners about 227 specific areas where they can report issues with their vehicles across 10 categories. Owners also have the ability to write in any problems that are not listed. Cup holders this year was the 3rd most reported of those 227 items.' 'Everything a customer does mark a problem we ask additional follow up questions that pertain to the issue including having them write in a comment. When reading these comments it was clear that more customers are complaining about the cup holders not being able to hold the larger cup sizes being brought into the vehicles well like Yetis and Stanley mugs. The larger cups are also intruding on access to other areas in the center tunnel like storage spaces and controls in the center stack depending on the positioning of the cup holders.' As a lover of both old cars and giant coffee cups, I feel this pain deeply. Driving my 20-year-old manual-shift BMW with a drink in the center console is equally hilarious and annoying. But I'm a little surprised people are having this issue with new cars—a lot of the press loaners I'm in seem to accommodate cups well enough. Or, maybe, is it possible that I just don't have a big enough coffee cup? It's funny to think of product planners at car companies trying to track the next trend in travel mugs as they spec out center console cupholder designs. I remember talking to somebody at a German automaker years ago, with a question along the lines of 'why aren't the cupholders bigger,' and his frustration at the concept of cupholders at all was not well hidden. He said something like, 'Why do you need to drink while you drive? Just stop at a cafe.' Trust, if I could spend my days sipping cappuccinos at roadside rest stops in Europe, that's exactly where I'd be writing this from right now. But here in America, I have to drive 100 miles through the mud, uphill both ways, just to get my groceries. And I'm not about to sit anywhere for that long without a little coffee to suck on, goshdang it. Jokes aside, I very much do like to sip a beverage while cruising, and a good cupholder does go a long way in interior ergonomics. So while it does sound silly that so many people would complain about something as trivial as beverage storage, I kind of get it. And I guess it's good news that one of America's biggest issues with their new cars could be solved by simply switching to a smaller cup? As for automakers trying to keep up with cup trends, here's a free pitch: Cupholder adapters.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store