
Gen Z's declining patriotism worries me. Partisanship shouldn't define us.
Show Caption
A Gallup poll reveals a growing partisan divide in American patriotism, with Republicans expressing significantly more pride than Democrats.
Democratic patriotism appears tied to the party in power, fluctuating with presidential administrations.
Generation Z exhibits the lowest levels of patriotism compared to previous generations.
Every year, Gallup conducts a poll on the patriotic leanings of Americans across all sorts of demographics. In recent years, this poll has produced worrying results.
There is now a massive generational and partisan divide in how much pride people have in being American. I don't know how to solve it, but I know why those who are losing faith in America are wrong.
In the 2025 iteration of this poll, a staggering 92% of Republicans were 'extremely' or 'very' proud to be American, whereas just 53% of independents and 36% of Democrats reported feeling the same.
Until 2016, Democrats and Republicans remained rather similar in their patriotism, with both reaching values above 80% before the election of President Donald Trump. However, modern patriotism among Democrats is dependent on who is in the White House, rather than any genuine love of America.
During the time that Joe Biden was in the White House, Republican pride in being American bottomed out at 84%. Over the same period, Democrats rose to a peak of just 62%.
One significant driver of this decline is Generation Z, born between 1997 to 2012, whose patriotism lags far behind previous generations. Just 41% of Gen Z is extremely or very proud to be American, and among young Democrats, that falls to just 24%.
Partisanship is getting in the way of patriotism for Democrats
Being proud to be American has absolutely nothing to do with being proud of our current leaders. In their fluctuations in pride depending on who is in the White House, Democrats have lost sight of this.
I am one of the most critical people of our government out there, and I think of that as being borne out of my patriotism. Criticizing the government when it does not strengthen America's foundational principles is a patriotic act.
My fellow columnist Rex Huppke has the right idea. 'We can love this country and loathe the people in charge,' he wrote in a recent column. 'We can be simultaneously proud of this country and embarrassed of the things being done in its name.'
Now, obviously, I am no Democrat, but it saddens me that this same principle apparently does not hold for many of them. To many Democrats in modern times, it seems as if their love for this country is contingent on their preferred candidates being in power.
Interestingly, this seems to be a problem unique to Democrats. While some Republicans seemingly faltered in their patriotism over the previous four years, they did not see the massive swing between the Biden and Trump presidencies that Democrats saw over the same period.
This is all evidence of the fact that Democrats have attached their pride to a political movement, rather than to a love of America's founding principles. For some, this is a problem of them simply being blinded by partisanship. For others, however, it marks a much deeper problem.
America's failures to live up to her founding principles at times are not evidence of those principles being bad; they are evidence of human nature being imperfect.
Gen Z doesn't know how good we have it
Much of Gen Z has been captured by the progressive left, many of whom do genuinely believe that America's institutions and system of government need to be torn down completely. These revolutionaries are responsible for the complete lack of patriotism among Gen Z.
Gen Z doesn't realize how lucky we are. We live in the greatest country and in the greatest time in history. There is no collective group that has it better at any point in history than we do right now.
Many will disagree with me on this point, but they are mistaken. There is no place better constructed to safeguard your individual liberties than here. While we are very obviously imperfect in that goal, no other nation on earth is better equipped to pursue liberty through the freedoms that our Constitution protects.
Tearing down the system that has led to such a wonderful place would be a mistake. Within a framework designed to preserve liberty is the best place to enact whatever political change it is that you want, unless your goal is not liberty.
Those who advocate against America's foundation might feel entitled ‒ in the sense that they believe it is the job of government to provide for them ‒ have taken the freedoms that we have for granted or are delusional about how good others have it.
I do not know how to solve the problem of restoring patriotism to those who have lost it. I am sympathetic to the frustrations young Americans have with the state of our politics, and I am hopeful that Gen Z will learn that they are better off trying to change this country, rather than destroy it.
America is a wonderful place, and you would do best to fight for your political causes within her structure of liberty, rather than attempting to tear it down.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Politico
31 minutes ago
- Politico
Summers, Miran highlight worst- and best-case scenarios for Trump's megabill
'These higher interest rates, these cutbacks in subsidies to electricity, these reductions in the availability of housing, the fact that hospitals are going to have to take care of these people and pass on the costs to everybody else, and that's going to mean more inflation, more risk that the Fed has to raise interest rates and run the risk of recession, more stagflation, that's the risk facing every middle-class family in our country because of this bill,' Summers told host George Stephanopoulos on ABC's 'This Week.' The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimates the law will increase the national deficit by $2.8 trillion over the next decade, taking into account the legislation's impact on inflation, interest rates and economic growth. Miran, whose interview followed Summers', called his response to the law 'doom-mongering,' echoing comments from National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett who told CBS' Weijia Jiang on 'Face the Nation' Sunday the CBO's estimate is misguided. 'It's the same combination of policies, tax cuts, deregulation, trade renegotiation, and energy abundance that gave us astounding economic growth in the president's first term, 2.8 percent until the pandemic,' Miran said. 'And that's exactly what we forecast again, very similar numbers.' Summers called Miran's council's forecast projecting $11 trillion in deficit reduction from the bill 'respectfully, nonsense,' arguing that scaled back federal funding for education and research and development will have a negative impact on economic growth. 'There is no economist anywhere, without a strong political agenda, who is saying that this bill is a positive for the economy,' said Summers, who served as director of the National Economic Council in 2009-10. 'And the overwhelming view is that it is probably going to make the economy worse.' Miran also defended the law's controversial cuts to Medicaid, which the CBO predicts will result in 11.8 million more Americans becoming uninsured by 2034. Democrats have gone on the offensive against the law's Medicaid provisions, rolling out attack ads bashing Republican lawmakers who voted for the bill and recruiting candidates to challenge them in next year's midterm elections. 'The best way to make sure people are insured is to grow the economy, get them jobs, get them working, get them insurance through their employer,' he said. 'Creating jobs, creating a booming economy is always the best way to get people insured.'
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
After Texas Floods, GOP Leaders Offer Prayers — But Few Plans
Some of the country's most powerful Republicans are getting blasted for their limp response to the deadly floods which ravaged Texas on Friday. Asked what Congress is doing to help disaster victims during 'Fox News Sunday,' House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) said, 'In a moment like this, we feel just as helpless as everyone else does ... all we know to do at this moment is pray.' Vice President JD Vancehad a similar message in a Saturday morning post on X, writing, 'Our nation's heart breaks for the victims in Texas and their families. Just an incomprehensible tragedy.' Sending the nearly 70 people killed in the floods 'the prayers of my family, and of millions of Americans,' he quoted an invocation that said, 'Eternal rest grant unto them, O Lord, and let perpetual light shine upon them. May the souls of all the faithful departed, through the mercy of God, rest in peace.' Mike Johnson on Texas floods: "In a moment like this, we feel just as helpless as everyone else does ... all we know to do at this moment is pray." — Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) July 6, 2025 Our nation's heart breaks for the victims in Texas and their families. Just an incomprehensible tragedy. I hope everyone affected knows they're in the prayers of my family, and of millions of Americans. ***Eternal rest grant unto them, O Lord,and let perpetual light shine… — JD Vance (@JDVance) July 5, 2025 Heidi and I continue to lift up in prayer the families of the is imperative that all Texans heed the warnings and guidance of law stay safe. — Senator Ted Cruz (@SenTedCruz) July 5, 2025 Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) also turned to X, writing that he and wife Heidi Cruz are continuing 'to lift up in prayer the families of the victims.' 'It is imperative that all Texans heed the warnings and guidance of law enforcement,' his post continued. 'Please stay safe.' Online, many people slammed the men for only offering hopes and prayers after gutting government agencies tasked with warning citizens about severe weather and responding to natural disasters. Hundreds of staffers working for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration were fired earlier this year, leaving the agency severely understaffed and weather forecasting services without many senior meteorologists. Tom Fahy, legislative director of the National Weather Service's Employees Organization, told NBC News that while forecasting offices had 'adequate staffing and resources as they issued timely forecasts and warnings leading up to the storm,' vacant leadership positions were 'clearly a concern.' The U.S.' Federal Emergency Management Agency, meanwhile, is set to lose $664 million of funding from the Republican party's so-called 'big, beautiful bill' which passed on Thursday after President Donald Trump previously announced he was planning to 'wean off FEMA' after this year's hurricane season ends. Though Trump announced he had signed a 'major disaster declaration' for Kerr County, Texas, Sunday on Truth Social, many worry that the agency will be strapped for resources during future recovery efforts. Texas Officials Face Scrutiny Over Response To Catastrophic And Deadly Flooding Floods Turned Beloved Texas Camp Into A Nightmare Texas Floods Leave At Least 51 Dead, 27 Girls Missing As Rescuers Search Devastated Landscape

an hour ago
New details emerge on Gaza ceasefire proposal as Netanyahu heads to White House
DEIR AL-BALAH, Gaza Strip -- New details of the Gaza ceasefire proposal emerged on Sunday as Israel sent a negotiating team to Qatar ahead of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu 's White House visit for talks toward an agreement. Inside the territory, hospital officials said Israeli airstrikes killed at least 38 Palestinians. 'There are 20 hostages that are alive, 30 dead. I am determined, we are determined, to bring them all back. And we will also be determined to ensure that Gaza will no longer pose a threat to Israel,' Netanyahu said before departing, emphasizing the goal of eliminating Hamas' military and governing power. A person familiar with the negotiations shared with The Associated Press a copy of the latest ceasefire proposal submitted by mediators to Hamas, and its veracity was confirmed by two other people familiar with the document. All three spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the sensitive talks with the media. The document outlines plans for a 60-day ceasefire during which Hamas would hand over 10 living and 18 dead hostages, Israeli forces would withdraw to a buffer zone along Gaza's borders with Israel and Egypt, and significant amounts of aid would be brought in. The document says the aid would be distributed by United Nations agencies and the Palestinian Red Crescent. It does not specify what would happen to the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, the American organization that has distributed food aid since May. Israel wants it to replace the U.N.-coordinated system. As in previous ceasefire agreements, Palestinian prisoners held in Israeli facilities would be released in exchange for the hostages, but the number is not yet agreed upon. The proposal stops short of guaranteeing a permanent end to the war — a condition demanded by Hamas -- but says negotiations for a permanent ceasefire would take place during the 60 days. During that time, 'President (Donald) Trump guarantees Israel's adherence' to halting military operations, the document says, adding that Trump 'will personally announce the ceasefire agreement.' The personal guarantee by Trump appeared to be an attempt to reassure Hamas that Israel would not unilaterally resume fighting as it did in March during a previous ceasefire, when talks to extend it appeared to stall. Trump said last week that Israel had agreed on terms for a 60-day ceasefire, but it was unclear if the terms were those in the document reviewed by the AP. Hamas has requested some changes but has not specified them. Separately, an Israeli official said the security Cabinet late Saturday approved sending aid into northern Gaza, where civilians suffer from acute food shortages. The official, speaking on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the decision with the media, declined to give more details. Northern Gaza has seen just a trickle of aid enter since Israel ended the latest ceasefire in March. The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation's closest distribution site is near the Netzarim corridor south of Gaza City that separates the territory's north and south. Israeli strikes hit two houses in Gaza City, killing 20 Palestinians and wounding 25 others, according to Mohammed Abu Selmia, director of Shifa Hospital, which serves the area. Israel's military said it struck several Hamas fighters in two locations in the area of Gaza City. In southern Gaza, Israeli strikes killed 18 Palestinians in Muwasi on the Mediterranean coast, where thousands of displaced people live in tents, said officials at Nasser Hospital in nearby Khan Younis. It said two families were among the dead. 'My brother, his wife, his four children, my cousin's son and his daughter. ... Eight people are gone,' said Saqer Abu Al-Kheir as people gathered on the sand for prayers and burials. Israel's military had no immediate comment on those strikes but said it struck 130 targets across Gaza in the past 24 hours. It claimed it targeted Hamas command and control structures, storage facilities, weapons and launchers, and that they killed a number of militants in northern Gaza. Ahead of the indirect talks with Hamas in Qatar, Netanyahu's office asserted that the militant group was seeking 'unacceptable' changes to the ceasefire proposal. Hamas gave a 'positive' response late Friday to the latest proposal. The militant group has sought guarantees that the initial truce would lead to a total end to the war and withdrawal of Israeli troops from Gaza. Previous negotiations have stalled over Hamas demands of guarantees that further negotiations would lead to the war's end, while Netanyahu has insisted Israel would resume fighting to ensure the group's destruction. The war began when Hamas attacked Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, killing some 1,200 people and taking 251 others hostage. Most have been released in earlier ceasefires. Israel responded with an offensive that has killed over 57,000 Palestinians, more than half of them women and children, according to Gaza's Health Ministry. The ministry, which is under Gaza's Hamas government, does not differentiate between civilians and combatants. The U.N. and other international organizations see its figures as the most reliable statistics on war casualties.