
Starmer defends his record in power as biggest revolt of his premiership looms
The Government's work has focused on giving working people a 'chance to thrive, not just survive', a Downing Street spokesman said, as Labour backbenchers continue to threaten a rebellion over welfare reforms they insist will have a negative impact on disabled people.
The welfare reform Bill will have its first airing in the Commons on Tuesday, and some Labour backbenchers continue to say they will vote to halt the legislation, after a much larger rebellion was quelled by ministers last week.
Sir Keir opened the Cabinet meeting on Tuesday morning by telling senior ministers the welfare reforms are 'designed to help those who can work into employment and ensure dignity and security for those who can't work', a No 10 spokesman said.
'He then reflected on the last year in office, saying we could all rightly look back with a real sense of pride and achievement,' the spokesman added.
Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds is urging MPs to back the reforms (Jordan Pettitt/PA)
No 10 pointed to the three trade deals struck with India, the US, and the EU, the extra investment in the spending review, and a cut in NHS waiting lists among the Government's achievements one year on.
The spokesman added: 'He said the Government's work is all designed and focused on improving the lives of working people and giving them the chance to thrive, not just survive, and the Government should be proud of those achievements as a team.'
Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds had earlier urged Labour MPs to back the reforms package, and warned that retreating entirely from them would mean losing the chance to 'make any changes for the better whatsoever' and undermining 'public support'.
'I'd ask (colleagues) to support the Government on that basis, because clearly what we've got here is something which is better than the existing system,' Mr Reynolds told Sky News on Tuesday morning.
Ministers hope a partial U-turn on the benefit cuts, which will protect existing claimants of personal independence payments (Pip) and the health element of universal credit, are enough to win over Labour rebels.
Ahead of the Universal Credit and Personal Independent Payment Bill's second reading in the Commons on Tuesday evening, 39 Labour backbenchers have signed an amendment aimed at halting its progress.
Leading rebel Rachael Maskell has warned 'many more' have told her they still plan to vote against the Government's plans than those who have signed up.
Asked whether MPs would lose the whip for voting against the Government, Mr Reynolds said he was 'not aware of anything like that' but 'those issues are for the chief whip'.
To see off the threat of far greater rebellion, the Government last week softened the impact of its changes to protect some 370,000 existing Pip claimants who had been set to lose out following reassessment.
MPs will vote on the Bill on Tuesday evening (PA)
Some 126 Labour MPs had signed that previous 'reasoned amendment' proposed by Treasury Committee chairwoman Dame Meg Hillier, which would have stopped the legislation if approved.
Ministers also committed to a review of the system, involving disabled people and led by disabilities minister Sir Stephen Timms, and unfreezing the higher UC rate for those already claiming the health-related element.
But critics have argued the concessions risk creating a 'three-tier' system of disparity between existing and new claimants, as well as any future changes that emerge as a result of the Timms review.
Facing questions from broadcasters on Tuesday morning, Mr Reynolds insisted it was 'entirely normal' for existing entitlements to be 'grandfathered' during major changes to the welfare system.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Record
42 minutes ago
- Daily Record
John Swinney urged not to drop Scotland's ban on cash for weapons in face of Russia threat
The First Minister said he could 'reconsider' the SNP's longstanding policy against directly funding munitions amid the threat from Putin. John Swinney is under pressure not to drop the Scottish Government ban on sending public cash to weapons manufacturing projects. The First Minister last week revealed he could "reconsider" the longstanding policy due to the threat from Russia. It follows an internal review by its business quango, Scottish Enterprise, into its funding of arms companies. Scottish taxpayers have shelled out £8million in grants since 2019 to arms dealers like Leonardo, Raytheon and BAE Systems. The money is not currently allowed to go towards the direct manufacture of munitions, but critics describe the current system of human rights checks as "inadequate". The Scottish Greens and Amnesty International say cash has been awarded to firms involved in manufacture of F-35s and other military tech in Gaza. Greens MSP Patrick Harvie said: 'Scottish tax payers' money should never go towards companies arming regimes that commit war crimes. "In recent years the UK has armed Israel as it engaged in genocide, Saudi Arabia as it pursued a brutal war in Yemen, and Hong Kong and Egypt as they attacked pro-democracy protests. 'The SNP generally falls back on the 'no manufacture of munitions' line to defend the fact that they still fund companies complicit in such crimes. 'Far from retreating from their policy, they should strengthen it by applying human rights checks that actually mean something, instead of the rubber stamp currently applied." He added: 'There are hundreds of projects across the country that provide jobs and positive, productive outcomes for Scotland that would welcome financial support from the government. "There's simply no need to give it to arms dealers and war profiteers.' Swinney had previously said the government's stance against directly funding munitions would remain, with his Cabinet minister Mairi Gougeon previously saying it was based on the party's "principles". But speaking to the Holyrood Sources podcast last week, the SNP chief said: "I'm conscious we are living in a very different context today. The Russian threat is very real. We have to consider these questions." Join the Daily Record WhatsApp community! Get the latest news sent straight to your messages by joining our WhatsApp community today. You'll receive daily updates on breaking news as well as the top headlines across Scotland. No one will be able to see who is signed up and no one can send messages except the Daily Record team. All you have to do is click here if you're on mobile, select 'Join Community' and you're in! If you're on a desktop, simply scan the QR code above with your phone and click 'Join Community'. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. To leave our community click on the name at the top of your screen and choose 'exit group'. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice. Deputy first minister Kate Forbes revealed this week a tighter regime of human rights checks for Scottish Enterprise funding of arms firms following a review, but opponents said it would effectively allow the status quo to continue. Neil Cowan, Scotland director at Amnesty International, said: 'The Scottish public must be assured that this review has not simply swept the issues under the carpet.'


Daily Record
42 minutes ago
- Daily Record
Bosses at Glasgow council live entertainment firm awarded nearly £120,000 in bonuses
Bosses at a live entertainment firm owned by Glasgow council pocketed nearly £120,000 in bonuses at a time of cuts to services. Executives at Scottish Event Campus Ltd were awarded the top up payments as council tax for locals was jacked up by 7.5%. SEC Ltd is majority owned by the city council and runs money-spinning venues like the Armadillo and the Hydro. Performers coming to the Hydro later this year include Lewis Capaldi, Katy Perry and Alanis Morissette. Despite the SNP -run council facing huge budget pressures, the latest accounts show bonuses were again paid to senior SEC figures. Managing Director Deborah McWilliams received a £32,979 bonus as part of a £216,799 remuneration package. Colin Hartley, Director of Operations, earned £147,330 in salary which was boosted by a £27,993 bonus. He received £194,258 all in. Director of Exhibition Sales Daniel Thurlow's £193,511 salary and allowances deal included a £27,256 top up. Kathleen Warden, Director of Conference Sales, was awarded a £29,466 bonus which took her full package to £195,721. Green MSP Maggie Chapman said: 'It is abysmal that people already receiving a yearly salary that's more than four times higher than the average salary, are then given massive bonuses by councils on top of that. It is even more abysmal that this is happening while public services are crying out for a much-needed cash boost, but being told the purse strings must be tightened.' 'In Glasgow, every secondary school is at risk of losing their librarians next year due to council budget cuts to try and save £100k. Yet, there are top earners in the city, if not the country, receiving £117k in bonuses between them. 'We are in a housing emergency, a health and social care crisis, and residents in Glasgow and across Scotland are suffering under the costs of living. "I don't believe this is an appropriate message to be sending to the city - that SEC bosses can get a bonus of this scale from the local council, while public services are crumbling.' An SEC spokesperson said: "The SEC is an integral part of Glasgow's economy and culture. The campus welcomed 1.8 million visitors in 2024 generating £468 million in economic impact for Glasgow and the wider Scottish economy. 'As a self-funding private limited company, we recognise and reward performance in line with industry standards. This year, our directors received a performance-related bonus as part of their overall remuneration package, as determined by the Board's Remuneration Committee and guided by external benchmarking." The cash-strapped council has cut services in recent years and effectively remortgaged signature buildings to pay for equal pay claims. It comes as a former chief executive at a firm owned by Edinburgh council was handed a £22,343 bonus in his last year. The top up for ex EICC boss Marshall Dallas came as councillors landed local residents with an 8% council tax rise. The EICC, ultimately owned by the Labour -run council, operates at arm's length as a conference venue. Dallas announced last year he would be leaving the organisation after a decade in charge.


Sky News
2 hours ago
- Sky News
Why govt's promise of 'biggest boost to affordable housing in a generation' may be overblown
Angela Rayner is set to announce plans to build 180,000 new social homes in the next decade, as the government seeks to "turn the tide on the housing crisis". It would be six times greater than the number of social homes built in the 10 years up to 2024 - and forms part of a drive to build 300,000 new social and affordable properties by 2035. The plan is backed by a £39bn investment announced by Chancellor Rachel Reeves in last month's spending review. 2:29 The deputy prime minister called on the social housing sector to "work together to turn the tide of the housing crisis", and said the investment was "the biggest boost to social and affordable housing in a generation". "We are seizing this golden opportunity with both hands to transform this country by building the social and affordable homes we need, so we create a brighter future where families aren't trapped in temporary accommodation and young people are no longer locked out of a secure home," she said. Ms Rayner's target for social and affordable housing is part of a wider long-term plan - also due to be published on Wednesday - setting out how the government will build both more houses and improve housing standards. Here, Sky News looks at what the plan will mean for the country, how it compares to previous programmes, and how it could be affected by the increased cost of construction. 3:17 Crunching the numbers The £39bn 10-year Affordable Homes Programme is an ambitious investment in affordable housing, representing a real terms increase from the previous programme of over £1bn annually. However, claims of the "biggest boost in a generation" may be slightly overblown. When factoring in inflation, the annual investment of £3.9bn falls short of the equivalent £4.5bn annually from 2008 to 2011 under the previous Labour government. This was however a notably short-term uplift, and the sector will welcome the stability of the new settlement which secures funding for 10 years - compared with five years or fewer under previous programmes. The programme sets out to deliver 30,000 affordable homes per year on average, with at least 18,000 of those being for social rent, rather than other tenures such as shared ownership. This would be more than twice the number under the previous programme, which is estimated to have delivered about 8,000 homes annually for social rent by its completion. Similarly, however, it is fewer than were delivered by the previous Labour Affordable Homes Programme, which was over 30,000 a year from 2008 to 2011. A further challenge to the government's goal of a "generational" uplift is the increasing cost of building, meaning they may face diminishing returns on their investment. The previous Affordable Homes Programme initially aimed to deliver 180,000 homes, which was revised down significantly to between 110,000 and 130,000 due to increasing costs and delays. This government can expect to face a similar economic landscape, particularly with an ambition to deliver a greater share of socially rented homes - the most expensive type of affordable housing to build.