logo
Map Shows States With Best—and Worst—Quality of Life

Map Shows States With Best—and Worst—Quality of Life

Newsweek17 hours ago
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
New data has revealed the states with the highest, and lowest, quality of life, with states in the Midwest and Northwest ranking highest and states in the South ranking lowest.
CNBC's "America's Top States For Business" study showed that Vermont is the state with the best quality of life, while Tennessee sits at the bottom of the ranking.
Why It Matters
The rankings aim to identify key factors that are important to businesses and companies when making decisions about site selection, as well as what makes states more appealing to workers.
In light of major political changes under the Trump administration, such as the recently passed reconciliation package, the One Big Beautiful Bill, a newly added metric to gauge the data was states' risks from a trade war and a shrinking federal budget, highlighting how economic stability could be a new, but significant, concern for states in coming years.
What To Know
CNBC's study, which first started 19 years ago, scored all 50 states on 135 metrics across 10 broad categories to determine which state was the best in the country for business development.
"Quality of life is measured using dimensions that researchers think matter to a population's life experience for a particular purpose," Leah McClimans, philosophy professor and co-director of the Ann Johnson Institute for Science, Technology and Society at the University of South Carolina, told Newsweek.
In the case of the CNBC study, the focus is on business, meaning researchers "want to measure quality of life in the context of attracting workforce talent," she said.
"They understood this through dimensions of crime, health care, environmental quality, affordability, availability of childcare, protections against discrimination and abortion policies."
Also, as several of the criteria in the quality-of-life ranking included state laws relating to civil rights protections, employee rights against discrimination and reproductive rights, "states with more restrictive laws, so-called red states, will not score as well on the quality-of-life metric," David Cella, medical social sciences professor and director of the Institute for Public Health and Medicine at Northwestern University, Illinois, told Newsweek.
In the study, the top 10 states for quality of life were: Vermont, Maine, New Jersey, Minnesota, Connecticut, Hawaii, North Dakota, Virginia, Nebraska and Massachusetts.
The 10 states at the bottom of the ranking were: Tennessee, Texas, Indiana, Louisiana, Utah, Georgia, Alabama, Arkansas, Oklahoma and Missouri.
While she noted that Vermont, Maine and New Jersey were ranked highly because they do well on a number of the measured criteria, McClimans told Newsweek she was "a little surprised because child care and health care are relatively expensive in these states compared to, say, Texas and even Tennessee."
She added that this could be down to "how the study weighted these dimensions and where they got their data."
Vermont, Maine and New Jersey "clearly do better when it comes to abortion protections and protections against discrimination," McClimans said.
Cella said that he didn't find the list "surprising."
"Vermont and Maine are consistently among the states with the lowest crime rates and best environmental quality," he said, explaining that both factors are major components to what we consider good quality of life.
Although, New Jersey's high ranking is down to different factors, he said, most likely the state's "healthy supply of job opportunities in pharmaceuticals and life sciences, financial services and technology, attracting people to move there."
Additionally, "worker protections against discrimination and protections on reproductive rights will attract a young and diverse workforce," Cella added.
What People Are Saying
Leah McClimans, philosophy professor and co-director of the Ann Johnson Institute for Science, Technology and Society at the University of South Carolina, told Newsweek: "I think quality of life should be measured using dimensions that matter to people living in a particular place, not what researchers think matter to them. One key factor that I think affects quality of life is the time, money and bureaucracy it takes to do the things that matter—go for a walk, find child care, find a good school, get a job, attend a protest. It isn't just whether these things exist, but do they exist in a way that is easy and equitable to access them?
"The rankings can definitely change. They could change tomorrow if you change what dimensions you measure and how you weight them. Keeping the dimensions from this study fixed over time could also result in changes, but for that to happen policy changes would need to come into effect, for example, changes in abortion policy, changes in crime rates and more."
David Cella, medical social sciences professor and director of the Institute for Public Health and Medicine at Northwestern University, Illinois, told Newsweek: "Crime, health and health care, and environmental quality are at the top of my list. Crime rates are measured by county, state and country, in various ways, usually sorting violent and non-violent crime. Health and health care are measured by incidence of serious diseases, individual surveys and health care quality metrics. Environmental quality is measured in various ways, including tracking pollutants, air quality and toxic emissions."
What Happens Next
Quality-of-life rankings are likely to shift in the coming months and years, with tariffs, immigration and climate change potentially having a "big effect on the rankings," Cella said.
"How states respond, or don't respond, to tariffs as they evolve could create both opportunities and challenges," he said.
Cella said that immigration and deportation can have a "dramatic effect on the workforce and business opportunities in those states more affected by them," while climate change effects on air quality, disaster relief and the resulting state economy in those states affected by wildfires, hurricanes, flooding and more could "be substantial in the coming years."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Factbox-Key facts on the US-Japan tariff deal
Factbox-Key facts on the US-Japan tariff deal

Yahoo

time20 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Factbox-Key facts on the US-Japan tariff deal

TOKYO (Reuters) -U.S. President Donald Trump and Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba on Wednesday said they had struck a trade deal that will include a 15% tariff on imports from Japan. Here's what we know so far. THE DEAL In a post on Truth Social, Trump said the deal would include $550 billion of Japanese investments in the United States, improved market access into Japan for American goods including automobiles, rice and other agricultural products. The U.S. will also lower a punishing 25% tariff on Japanese automobiles to 15%, government and industry sources said. Trump made no comment on vehicle imports, which account for more than a quarter of all the country's exports to the U.S. The White House has yet to provide details of the agreement, Ishiba said he will scrutinize the deal made by his tariff negotiator Ryosei Akazawa in Washington before releasing the contents. TARIFF DEADLINE Akazawa has traveled to the U.S. eight times since April for trade talks with U.S. officials including Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick. The latest visit came days before an August 1 deadline when the Trump Administration said it would impose a 25% tariff on all Japanese imports. The U.S. is Japan's biggest export market. Economists had estimated that Trump's tariffs could lower Japan's GDP by as much as a percentage point. ELECTION FALLOUT The tariff agreement comes three days after Ishiba's administration lost its upper house majority in an election, triggering calls for his resignation including from within his own ruling Liberal Democratic Party, according to local media reports. In the wake of that election defeat, Ishiba said he would stay in place to push for a trade agreement with the U.S. and to tackle Japan's looming economic problems. MARKET REACTION Japanese automaker shares led the Nikkei share average higher, which rose by 2% in early trading following the announcement. Toyota Motor Corp's shares jumped by 10% with Honda Motor Co up by 9%. The benchmark 10-year Japanese bond futures tumbled as much as 0.92 yen to 137.68 yen, the lowest since March 28.

Among the trove of new photos is one showing Epstein with Trump and his young children, Eric and Ivanka.
Among the trove of new photos is one showing Epstein with Trump and his young children, Eric and Ivanka.

Yahoo

time20 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Among the trove of new photos is one showing Epstein with Trump and his young children, Eric and Ivanka.

New photos and footage of Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein have been unearthed offering fresh insight into the pair's relationship despite the president's repeated attempts to distance himself. Epstein and Trump appear in a number of pictures surfaced by CNN and aired Tuesday night. Among them are images showing Epstein as a guest at the president's wedding to Marla Maples. CNN's KFILE uncovered two photos showing the disgraced financier at Trump's December 1993 wedding at the Plaza Hotel in New York. It also obtained footage from a 1999 Victoria's Secret runway event in New York, showing Trump, accompanied by his future wife Melania Trump, chatting to Epstein.

As the dollar slides, the Euro is picking up speed
As the dollar slides, the Euro is picking up speed

Boston Globe

time21 minutes ago

  • Boston Globe

As the dollar slides, the Euro is picking up speed

'We are witnessing a profound shift in the global order: Open markets and multilateral rules are fracturing, and even the dominant role of the U.S. dollar, the cornerstone of the system, is no longer certain,' she wrote last month. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up The dollar's role as the world's reserve currency gives the United States an 'exorbitant privilege' — a term coined begrudgingly by a French politician in the 1960s. Because investors, governments and central banks around the world seek the safe, predictable returns of dollar-denominated assets such as Treasury bonds, there is a robust, built-in demand for dollars. That makes it easier for the U.S. government to borrow and boosts the spending power of American consumers. Advertisement The eurozone, which is made up of the 20 countries that use the euro and rivals the United States in terms of size and wealth, has never attracted investors in the same way. The euro ranks a distant second to the dollar in global use. Advertisement The euro's recent rise is a major reversal from just three years ago, when it dropped to parity with the dollar because investors feared the damage of surging inflation and Russia's invasion of Ukraine. And it is a world away from the eurozone debt crisis last decade, when at times the currency union seemed at risk of crumbling. As welcome as the euro's recovery from those episodes has been — the euro is trading near a record high against the currencies of dozens of major trading partners — it is also possible to have too much of a good thing. As money flows into the euro and euro-denominated assets such as German government bonds, economists and executives warn that the currency's strength could hurt exporters. They are already contending with Trump's tariffs, which make their goods more expensive for buyers abroad, as well as increased competition from Chinese rivals in key markets. 'Further euro strength is likely to be self-defeating,' said Valentin Marinov, a currency strategist at Crédit Agricole, a French bank. Exports were already likely to weaken and become a drag on the eurozone economy because of U.S. tariffs and European government policies that would encourage more imports. After a surge in energy prices led to years of fighting to bring inflation down, the European Central Bank, which sets interest rates for the eurozone, now faces the prospect that inflation could be too low. The bank forecasts inflation to average 1.6% next year, notably below its 2% target. That's partly because of the impact of a strong euro, which makes imports cheaper. Advertisement Some policymakers have said there is a risk that sluggish inflation will become entrenched, which is a familiar problem for the region. For nearly a decade until 2021, the central bank kept its key interest rates below zero in hopes of spurring faster economic growth and encouraging prices to rise steadily. That, policymakers hoped, would feed through to higher wage growth and better living standards. ECB officials are expected to keep interest rates steady when they meet this week, but analysts are adding to bets they could cut rates again later this year, if the economic outlook darkens or the euro's strength pushes inflation forecasts even lower. Reducing interest rates tends to weaken a currency, but the euro's recent strength has come, notably, as the ECB cut rates eight times in a year. Luis de Guindos, the vice president of the central bank, said that if the euro climbed above $1.20, that 'would be much more complicated.' Some big European companies have warned about the effect of the strong currency on their earnings, especially in export-heavy Germany. SAP, a software firm that recently became Europe's most valuable public company, said every 1-cent increase in the euro-dollar exchange rate results in a 30 million euro decline in revenues, without currency hedges. Adidas, the sportswear brand, said a strong euro had 'negative translation effects' on its overseas sales. Daimler, a truck maker, said fluctuations in the euro-dollar rate 'could significantly impact' its financial performance. Where the euro goes next is hard to predict. Analysts surveyed by Bloomberg expect the euro to continue strengthening, to $1.21 next year. But Marinov said he believed that traders had gotten ahead of themselves: He expects the euro to fall back toward $1.10 next year. Advertisement The currency's rally this year does not necessarily mean there will be a lasting shift toward the euro, in which it accounts for a larger share of central banks' reserves or is used in more cross-border payments. Lagarde said seizing the moment for a 'global euro' would take a concerted effort to bolster the bloc's fragmented economy, streamline its governance and deepen its capital markets, among other things. 'A step towards greater international prominence for our currency will not happen by default: It must be earned,' she said. This article originally appeared in .

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store