AAP decries merger of primary schools in UP
The protest addressed the issue of the proposed merger of council schools where student numbers are too few.
The protest, organised across the state under the slogan 'Madhushala Nahin, Pathshala Chahiye' (no liquor shops, we want schools), aligned with the party's objective to address issues affecting rural and marginalised communities in the state, who will be the main participants in the panchayat polls. The party plans to launch a mega membership drive in UP from July 11.
Alleging that state govt's proposal would deprive the rural population of cheap, accessible education, AAP has demanded that govt immediately withdraws the order to close schools. The party insists that govt should provide free education to children aged six to 14 as per the RTE Act. On Wednesday many protestors were detained in Lucknow.
AAP's Ayodhya region president Vinay Patel claimed that UP govt planned to open 27,000 liquor shops, while closing 27,000 govt schools.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
2025 Top Trending local enterprise accounting software [Click Here]
Esseps
Learn More
Undo
He stated that according to govt data, 42 lakh children dropped out of govt schools in four years. "According to a report by the ministry of education, 8 lakh children left govt schools in UP in one year, with 58,000 from Aligarh alone. The move govt has already closed down 26,000 schools, and now 27,000 more are shutting down, which will affect not only children but also impact the appointment of approximately 1.35 lakh assistant teachers, 27,000 principals and thousands of teaching assistants," he said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
15 minutes ago
- Time of India
The Big Beautiful Bill's quiet revolution: Dismantling the federal role in education
While President Donald Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' has drawn noisy debate over taxes and immigration, its most transformative, and potentially divisive, legacy may unfold far from the public gaze: Inside America's classrooms. Formally known as the American Prosperity and Freedom Act, the bill runs 940 pages deep. Nestled in its dense legal language is a radical reimagination of how education is funded, who controls it, and what it's meant to teach. More than a fiscal realignment, the bill signals a cultural and institutional recalibration, a blueprint not just for cutting costs, but for shrinking the federal government's role in shaping educational equity and intellectual freedom. Defunding the foundation At the heart of the legislation lies a nearly 20% cut to discretionary funding for the US Department of Education over five years. This is no administrative trimming. Critical lifelines such as Title I grants, designed to level the playing field for students in low-income districts, and IDEA funds supporting students with disabilities face sharp reductions. In real terms, that means fewer teachers, larger class sizes, shuttered after-school programmes, and thinner support for special education. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Hörspezialisten toben: Dieses 89 €-Gerät geht viral Top Trending News Today Mehr erfahren Undo For under-resourced schools already walking a fiscal tightrope, this isn't reform. It's a retreat. And for districts that rely heavily on federal aid to supplement inadequate state budgets, the message is clear: you're on your own. Choice or abandonment? The bill also elevates a longstanding conservative goal, school choice, by creating a federal tax credit scholarship programme. Under the guise of parental empowerment, the initiative incentivizes donations to private school tuition, effectively subsidizing elite alternatives while siphoning funds from the public system. To supporters, this is freedom in action, a mechanism to spark competition and elevate standards. But critics see something far more corrosive: A public school exodus that accelerates segregation, weakens accountability, and hollows out the very system meant to serve all students. If left unchecked, it could reshape education into a two-tiered model, one privately buoyed and publicly neglected. The return of debt-driven futures Perhaps no provision has sparked more alarm among recent graduates than the rollback of Public Service Loan Forgiveness (PSLF) and the rollback of income-driven repayment schemes. In their place: Increased reliance on private lenders and corporate partnerships to manage student loans. This pivot represents not just a policy shift but a moral disinvestment in those who choose public service, teachers, social workers, and rural doctors. With no promise of debt relief, many will opt out before they even begin. The future will be more indebted, more risk-averse, and less willing to serve. A curriculum draped in red, white, and blue Education, under Trump's bill, isn't just an economic tool; it's a cultural battlefield. Echoing the rhetoric of the 1776 Commission, the bill allocates $500 million toward 'American Values Curriculum Grants,' with an explicit directive: teach US history through a lens of national pride and exceptionalism. What does that mean in practice? A potential erasure of systemic critique, reduced engagement with marginalized histories, and teacher training programs aligned with ideological litmus tests. Supporters hail it as a corrective to 'anti-American bias.' Detractors warn it edges dangerously close to state-sponsored historical revisionism, where patriotism comes at the cost of intellectual honesty. Knowledge under siege The bill's impact on higher education is equally profound. While STEM fields tied to defence and industry are protected, social sciences and environmental research face a 12% funding cut. This selective pruning risks reorienting universities around military-industrial priorities, undermining the pursuit of knowledge that challenges, questions, and enriches democratic society. PhD programs in climate change, sociology, or public health, already vulnerable, may contract or vanish entirely. The academy's capacity to interrogate power, inequality, or the planet's fragility is quietly being starved. Federal hands off, private hands in Across its many chapters, the Big Beautiful Bill weaves a consistent theme: Less federal protection, more market intervention. Public institutions are pushed toward privatized models. Equity-based funding is exchanged for performance-based incentives. Ideological coherence replaces pedagogical complexity. This isn't merely conservative tinkering. It's the architectural undoing of federal involvement in public education, with consequences that will play out over decades, not news cycles. The fight ahead Already, civil rights organizations are preparing lawsuits to challenge the legality of voucher programmes that may breach public education mandates. States reliant on Title I and IDEA funds are lobbying for carve-outs and concessions. But the scaffolding has shifted. What was once a federal promise, that no child's future would be determined by their ZIP code or income bracket, is now being recast as a local gamble and a parental responsibility. Education reimagined, but for whom? Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' may never draw the fiery protests of immigration bans or the coverage of Supreme Court appointments. But it represents something arguably more enduring: A generational redesign of the American education system, not by consensus, but by calculation. What we're witnessing is not just defunding or deregulating, but a deliberate redefinition of what education is for, who it belongs to, and whose history it must teach. For all its patriotism, the bill risks betraying the most essential American promise, that education, in a democracy, is not a privilege. It is a right. Is your child ready for the careers of tomorrow? Enroll now and take advantage of our early bird offer! Spaces are limited.
News18
18 minutes ago
- News18
'Is BJP Running Panchayat In Phulera?': Atishi Slams Rekha Gupta Govt Over Fuel Ban U-Turn
Last Updated: Atishi criticised the BJP in Delhi for reversing its fuel ban on overage vehicles, accusing them of troubling people and colluding with car manufacturers. Atishi, Leader of Opposition in the Delhi Assembly, on Thursday questioned the BJP government in Delhi for taking a U-turn over its fuel ban policy for overage vehicles. The Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) leader asked if the BJP is running a government or a panchayat in Phulera, apparently referring to a popular web series 'Panchayat." 'Is the BJP running a government or a panchayat in Phulera? One day they issue an order, the next day they say they are writing a letter to withdraw it. Why are they troubling people? The BJP, along with car manufacturers and dealers, is working hand in glove. Because of this alliance, they want to scrap 62 lakh vehicles and buy new ones," she told news agency PTI. Earlier in the day, the Delhi government had written to the Commission for Air Quality Management (CAQM), saying the fuel ban on overage vehicles is not feasible due to technological challenges and complex systems. Addressing a press conference, Delhi Environment Minister Manjinder Singh Sirsa on Thursday said that there was discontent among people due to this move and the government stood with them. The government has suggested that the ban should be implemented across the National Capital Region (NCR), he added and slammed the previous AAP regime for fixing 'strong norms" for overage vehicles. The Delhi government from July 1, banned fuel for end-of-life vehicles — 10 years or older for diesel vehicles and 15 years or older for petrol vehicles — that are deregistered and not allow to ply on the roads as per the court's orders. The transport department and traffic police are impounding end-of-life vehicles (ELVs) reaching at the petrol pumps for refuelling after the implementation of the ban. (with inputs from PTI) First Published: July 03, 2025, 20:43 IST
Time of India
20 minutes ago
- Time of India
‘Sanatan Mahakumbh a call for cultural unity'
Buxar: Former Union minister and senior BJP leader Ashwini Kumar Choubey visited Buxar on Thursday as part of a Janjagran Abhiyan to promote the upcoming Sanatan Mahakumbh, scheduled for July 6 at Gandhi Maidan in Patna. Addressing a press conference, Choubey said the event was more than a religious gathering. "The Mahakumbh is a socio-cultural Mahayagna for national awakening. It aims to revive Sanatan values, promote social harmony and reinforce India's cultural unity," he said. "If Sanatan exists, the nation exists and so do political parties. All Hindus and Muslims in this country are Sanatanis," he added. Choubey confirmed that the event would see participation from Shankaracharyas, Mahamandaleshwars, religious leaders and cultural organisations nationwide. Jagadguru Ramanandacharya Swami Shri Rambhadracharya Ji Maharaj and the heads of major Akhadas and Vedic institutions are also expected to attend. A key highlight will be an ideological seminar on the theme 'Waiting for Lord Parashuram'. "The theme represents an awakened social consciousness, one that stands against injustice, upholds equality and furthers nation-building through Sanatan culture," Choubey said. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Giao dịch CFD với công nghệ và tốc độ tốt hơn IC Markets Đăng ký Undo He urged people from Bihar, Uttar Pradesh and Rajasthan to attend and bring conches (shankhs) from home. "When thousands of conches are blown together at Gandhi Maidan, it will be a sight to behold," he said. Reiterating an earlier demand, Choubey called for a grand statue of Lord Ram to be installed in Buxar, his Karmabhoomi. He also revealed that renovations of the long-neglected Light and Sound House near Ramrekha Ghat are nearing completion. With Rs 6 crore sanctioned by the ministry of tourism, the site will soon feature a laser and light show based on epics like the Ramayana.
