Man arrested for allegedly selling meth, vapes to juveniles
[DOWNLOAD: Free WHIO-TV News app for alerts as news breaks]
On March 18, detectives with the Tactical Crime Suppression Unit (TCSU) and Miamisburg police searched three homes in connection to several people believed to be selling methapheatamine and vaping products to juveniles, according to a media release.
TRENDING STORIES:
Firefighters respond to house fire in Miamisburg
Miami Valley set for new Big Boy restaurant following area-wide closures
Family to file lawsuit against sheriff's office after US-35 chase leads to deadly crash
Investigators searched homes on Sycamore Street, Rosina Drive and Lindsey Avenue in Miamisburg.
A weapon, illegal narcotics and drug paraphernalia were found.
Yoseph Almadhagi of Rosina Drive was arrested and will be booked on drug tafficking charges, according to a media release.
Anyone with further information is asked to call the TCSU at 937-901-8462.
[SIGN UP: WHIO-TV Daily Headlines Newsletter]
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
38 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Mexico Nears US Security Deal in Step Toward Trade Pact
Mexico and the US are closing in on a deal to combat drug trafficking and violence, a pact that could quell some of President Donald Trump's chief concerns with his southern neighbor and lead to a wider agreement covering trade. Terms of the deal are still being hammered out, but Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum said they include sharing more intelligence information, reducing the flow of fentanyl precursor chemicals into her country and cracking down on the flow of guns from the US.
Forbes
2 hours ago
- Forbes
How Crypto Boosts America's $67 Billion Shadow Gambling Industry
While traditional gambling companies struggle to turn consistent profits, a parallel universe of crypto casinos has contributed to an empire worth $81.4 billion in gross gaming revenue, according to controversial new research that challenges everything we thought we knew about online gambling. New data from Yield Sec's comprehensive US analysis sponsored by the The Campaign for Fairer Gambling - analyzed the entire US online gambling marketplace – including iGaming, casino, sports betting and crypto reveals an even starker picture domestically: of the $90.1 billion American online gambling marketplace in 2024, a staggering $67.1 billion—74%—flowed through illegal channels, growing 64% year-over-year compared to just 36% growth for legal operators. The Great Crypto Gambling Deception Most industry analysts have been looking at the wrong numbers entirely, according to Vali. Traditional market research firms peddle sanitized reports claiming the global online gambling market sits around $90 billion total. But these figures only capture the visible, regulated slice of a vastly larger pie, he argues. "Everyone makes the same mistake," explains Ismail Vali, founder of anti-crime platform Yield Sec, whose military-grade monitoring technology has uncovered the true scope of illegal gambling. "We legalize and regulate, then assume crime just disappears. That's not how crime works." The reality is far more troubling, if Vali's estimates prove accurate. In any given marketplace, he claims upwards of 70% of gambling activity flows through illegal channels, exploiting regulatory gaps with surgical precision. When New York restricts gambling to sports betting only, offshore operators immediately offer casino games and prediction markets. When jurisdictions impose age limits of 18 or 21, criminal networks target 14-year-olds instead. Online Gambling's Crypto Fueled Gold Rush Yield Sec's state-by-state analysis reveals the true scope of regulatory capture. California and Texas, with no legal online gambling, see 100% illegal market share worth $5.5 billion and $4.5 billion respectively. But legalization offers no panacea—Ohio's legal operators capture just 15% of their $6.2 billion market, while 917 illegal operators target American consumers from offshore havens. FEATURED | Frase ByForbes™ Unscramble The Anagram To Reveal The Phrase Pinpoint By Linkedin Guess The Category Queens By Linkedin Crown Each Region Crossclimb By Linkedin Unlock A Trivia Ladder Cryptocurrency has become the perfect vehicle for this regulatory arbitrage. Unlike traditional payment methods that leave clear paper trails, crypto transactions offer pseudonymity and cross-border fluidity that regulators struggle to track. The scale is breathtaking, assuming the methodology holds up to scrutiny. alone (the largest crypto casino) reported $4.7 billion in gross gaming revenue for 2024, rivaling the biggest traditional operators. The platform claims 25 million users placing 300 billion bets since 2017, accounting for up to 4% of all bitcoin transactions globally. Yet Stake represents just a fraction of the crypto gambling ecosystem, according to Yield Sec's analysis. The firm claims to have identified tens of thousands of crypto casinos worldwide, each exploiting the same regulatory loopholes with devastating efficiency. The Method Behind The Madness Of Illegal Online Gambling How do you measure an industry that operates in shadows? Yield Sec claims to have adapted counter-terrorism technology originally designed to track ISIS content online, repurposing it to monitor gambling audiences across eight key platforms: search engines, websites, streaming services, mobile apps, affiliate networks, social media, and emerging AI language models. The breakthrough came through what Vali calls 'value per visit': calculating exactly how much money users spend based on their browsing behavior, time spent on gambling pages, and registration patterns. This methodology has, by Vali's account, proven remarkably accurate, correctly predicting Super Bowl and March Madness betting volumes within margins of error that would make pollsters weep with envy. "We've been right every year for three years on those two events," Vali notes. "If we're right legally, we have to be right illegally, because it's the same methodology." The Human Cost Of Crypto Gambling The implications extend far beyond market share battles between Flutter and DraftKings. Crypto casinos typically require minimum deposits 10 times higher than regulated sites, targeting committed gamblers rather than casual players. They offer virtually unlimited product selection, from celebrity death pools to war zone territorial betting, content designed to generate social media engagement that funnels users toward more profitable casino games. Perhaps most disturbing, according to Yield Sec's research, is the deliberate targeting of vulnerable populations. During Brazil's social welfare crisis, Vali's team estimated 25% of public benefits payments flowed directly into gambling sites, a figure the government later confirmed was accurate, lending some credibility to the firm's broader claims. The pandemic revealed crypto gambling's true adaptability. When professional sports shut down, illegal operators didn't panic—they created their own content. "Sports betting farms" now produce streams of amateur basketball games, table tennis matches, even snail racing, all to maintain the content pipeline that drives user acquisition. The Pushback Against Crypto Gambling Industry critics argue Yield Sec's numbers are impossibly high, and their skepticism isn't without merit. Tanzanite, a competitor analytics firm, published a detailed rebuttal claiming crypto gambling represents only $10-11 billion globally. Their methodology relies heavily on blockchain analysis and self-reported figures from major operators—arguably more transparent sources than behavioral inference. But this criticism misses a crucial point, Vali counters: criminal enterprises don't accurately report their revenues. "Do you really believe companies that operate illegally when they're shaking that bag of money saying we're only making this much?" he asks. 'No one is that dumb in the criminal world.' Still, the massive gap between Yield Sec's estimates and those of established research firms raises questions about methodology and potential bias in a company whose business model depends on convincing clients that illegal gambling represents an existential threat. Traditional Casinos Fighting Crypto Casinos In The Shadows Traditional gambling companies find themselves in an impossible position. They spend billions on compliance, taxation, and responsible gambling measures while competing against operators who offer the same products without any of these constraints. Flutter and DraftKings have captured over 80% of the legal US sports betting market, yet both companies have struggled with profitability. The American online gaming industry has produced exactly one profitable quarter in seven years of operation—a stunning indictment of an industry supposedly worth billions. Meanwhile, crypto casinos operate with minimal compliance costs, no meaningful customer protection requirements, and access to markets where traditional operators face outright bans. They've turned regulatory differences into competitive advantages. The Regulatory Maze of Crypto Gambling The numbers expose the fundamental failure of America's patchwork legalization approach. States with fewer legal operators consistently show lower gambling losses as a percentage of income. Oregon, Maine, and Arkansas—with an average of just 2 legal operators each—register below the national average for states with no legalization at all. Meanwhile, in major markets like New York, illegal operators capture 72% of the $7.4 billion market despite legal sports betting being available. The legal landscape remains deliberately murky. Most crypto casinos maintain licenses in jurisdictions like Curaçao or Malta. They are less interested in complying with local laws, but rather interested in securing banking relationships and payment processing services. These "crappy offshore licenses" cost as little as $20,000 but provide zero authorization to target customers in major markets. When challenged, operators retreat behind claims of "gray market" legitimacy. But as Vali puts it bluntly: "There is no gray market. If you're licensed somewhere but taking money from everywhere, you're a thief." Recent developments suggest the regulatory tide may be turning. The UK Gambling Commission has issued 287 cease-and-desist notices to crypto gambling operators since April 2024. Several US states are pursuing legal action against Kalshi and other prediction market platforms that claim federal derivatives regulation supersedes state gambling laws. The Future of Crypto Gambling What emerges from this data is a picture of an industry in transition, though the true scale remains hotly debated. The old model of geography-based regulation is crumbling under the weight of borderless technology and sophisticated criminal enterprises. Yield Sec's research suggests the solution isn't more regulation but better enforcement of existing laws. The technology exists to identify and track illegal gambling operators in real-time, Vali argues. What's missing is the political will to deploy it systematically. The stakes couldn't be higher. As crypto adoption accelerates and regulatory frameworks struggle to keep pace, the illegal gambling industry continues its explosive growth, whether that's measured in tens of billions or hundreds of billions of dollars. Without decisive action, the shadow empire may soon eclipse its legal counterpart entirely. The Campaign for Fairer Gambling's Derek Webb argues that proponents of legalization owe legislators an apology for their 'misleading representations.' With illegal gambling revenue now comparable to America's trade deficits with China or Mexico, the choice facing regulators is stark: implement systematic enforcement using available technology or watch helplessly as the shadow empire completes its conquest of American gambling.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump ally calls for big tech 'united front' to fight online safety laws
A "united front" of US social media giants could try to "fight off" regulation implemented in Europe, an American politician has suggested. The idea that big tech companies like Meta, Apple, Microsoft and others could work together against both the UK and EU law was made by Republican senator Scott Fitzgerald, who is chair of the judiciary subcommittee and an ally of President Donald Trump. He was part of a trip that US politicians made to this side of the Atlantic recently around the topic of online regulation. This included meetings with both the UK, EU and European member states, as well as discussions with big tech companies. Speaking to journalists, Mr Fitzgerald said he asked Facebook owner Meta whether the businesses had been working together - but said they "wouldn't confirm that". He added: "There may be some value in some type of united front in trying to fight these things off in Europe." This was in reference to both the UK's Online Safety Act, and similar European regulation. Mr Fitzgerald went on to say that he thinks the White House "certainly is interested in finding out" what the delegation discovered. "I'm not sure if it can be elevated to a level of something that the president would talk about publicly and on the global stage, but this stuff is dangerous. "And I think it needs to be addressed, and so I certainly expect to talk to the platforms and talk to the White House as well." Read more As well as Mr Fitzgerald, Republicans Jim Jordan and Kevin Kiley were also on the trip - both of whom are politically close to Mr Trump. In a recent thread on social media, Mr Jordan accused the UK government of trying to censor US tech companies last summer during the riots that took place after the Southport killings. He shared emails the committee obtained from tech organisations showing the UK government asking for information and wanting to know what was being done by the companies during the rioting. A report by the UK Commons Science and Technology Committee into the events last year found that "social media business models incentivise the spread of content that is damaging and dangerous, and did so in a manner that endangered public safety in the hours and days following the Southport murders".But Mr Jordan said that the government asking for companies to tell them what was being done to tackle reports of a "two-tiered system" was concerning. He added that such an attempt by the UK government to get information from technology companies would "chill speech". Mr Jordan and the delegation met the UK Technology Secretary Peter Kyle on Wednesday. The topic of the impact of UK law on American companies came up, in what is understood to have been a polite meeting.
