2020 Delhi riots: Kapil Mishra given time to reply to Delhi Police's investigation revisions
Special judge Kaveri Baweja granted time to respondents Mohd Iliyas, Kapil Mishra, and others to file a reply on the petitions.
The court has also directed Delhi police to supply a copy of the charge sheet filed in the Delhi Riots larger conspiracy to the respondents.
The court has listed the matter on May 7 for arguments, and the interim stay is to continue till the next date.
On April 9, the court issued notice on the revision petitions moved by Kapil Mishra. He has challenged the order passed by the magistrate court directing further investigation into the North Delhi riots of 2020.
The court had stayed the operation of the order passed by the trial court till the next date of hearing. The court had also called the trial court records.
Meanwhile, the sessions court has stayed the observation made by the Judicial Magistrate (First Class) in relation to the investigation of the Delhi police in the larger Conspiracy case.
During the hearing, Advocate Amit Prasad appeared for the Delhi police, Senior advocate Pavan Narang, along with Advocates Neeraj and Himanshu Sethi, appeared for MLA Mohan Singh Bisht, and Advocate Manya Hashija appeared for Kapil Mishra.
The magistrate court had passed an order for further investigation on the basis of material placed by the Delhi police and the application of one Mohd. Illiyas.
Applicant Mohd Illiyas had sought a direction for registration of an FIR against Kapil Mishra and others.
Senior advocate Pramod Dubey appeared for Kapil Mishra. He argued, "Can a further investigation without having an FIR? Where is the FIR? And there is no identification of the area of the police station."
"In the absence of a FIR direction, an FIR can not be given," Senior advocate Dubey argued.
Dubey also submitted that further investigation can be ordered during the pendency of the Final Report.
"There was no Charge sheet before the MP MLA Court. There should be pendency of charge sheet. For registration of an FIR, a complaint has to be filed before the police first, only after that, an application for registration of an FIR can be filed in the court. One ATR was filed when the matter was pending in the KKD court. Three ATRs were filed by the police. My client was interrogated by Delhi Police," it stated.
Special Public Prosecutor (SPP) Amit Prasad appeared for the Delhi police and raised the question of jurisdiction of the magistrate court, which passed the order under challenge.
He submitted that even this court could not pass this court as it does not have the jurisdiction to deal with an FIR which is already under consideration of a special court, and a charge sheet has been filed.
This application for registration of FIR was filed through Advocate Mehmood Pracha, who was part of the propaganda building team in 2020, and the SPP submitted it before the court. This complaint was given to all officers and even the prime minister. Emails were sent to the prime minister, the home minister, the DCP, and the Commissioner of police. It was not emailed to SHO. This email cannot be treated as the compliance with necessary requirements for registration of FIR, Prasad added.
"A Status report narrating the five incidents was filed by the police," the SPP for Delhi police said.
It was also argued that there was improvisation of the statement of the complainant. First, he said that the vehicles of Muslims and Dalits were stopped, and later on were allowed to go.
Later, the statement was changed to reflect that there was a Road block, damage to the cart of Muslims and Dalits at Kardam Puri road, SPP added.
There was no allegation of violation; the court below embellished the Complaint, the SPP submitted.
He further submitted that we informed the court that we have investigated the role of Kapil Mishra. Advocate Pracha was asked to argue, but he didn't; meanwhile, the roster was changed. We were again summoned and asked to place on record the material.
"We were directed to further investigate on the basis of material we provided in a matter which is before the special court," SPP submitted.
The court asked, "Had you ever investigated the allegations in the complaint before filing the charge sheet in the larger Conspiracy.
"Are there any other complaints alleging the road block by Kapil Mishra?" the judge questioned.
SPP submitted that there are multiple such complaints, but nothing incriminating was found.
He was asked during the recording of that statement whether he had ever visited the place of the incident. He replied that he lives in Yamuna Vihar, and a petrol pump was burnt near his colony, SPP said.
There are 751 FIRs, no FIR talks about damage of vehicles on the same date and time between 3 pm to 6 pm, it added.
It was further submitted by the SPP that he was called to assist the court in the matter of application under section 156(3) and was given direction under section 173( 8) for further investigation, it was not expected.
"I am going to face music every day due to this order," SPP added. All these cases are tried in KKD, you do not get the power to give observation on the police investigation in a case that is before the special court, he added.
He prayed that the observation of the trial court should be stayed.
First Published: 21 Apr 2025, 12:12 PM IST
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Pradyot slams Delhi cops for calling Bengali ‘B'deshi language'
Agartala: Expressing concern over referring to Bengali as a 'Bangladeshi language' allegedly by Delhi Police , founder of Tripura BJP's ally Tipra Motha Pradyot Kishore Debbarman denounced the manifestation on Monday. He opposed the imposition of any language on any community and said, as Indians, everyone must uphold respect for all our languages. Pradyot, who is also a royal scion, said referring to Bengali as a 'Bangladeshi language' by Delhi Police is deeply concerning. The party has been raising its voice against illegal immigrants entering Tripura and other northeastern regions. "Today it is Bengali, tomorrow it can be any other language. There is no such thing called Bangladeshi language! How can we forget that even our national anthem 'Jana Gana Mana' was originally composed in Bengali by Tagore?" Pradyot wrote on social media. He said these actions by Delhi Police give space to extremist views. "Yes, I remain firmly opposed to the imposition of any language on any community. But as Indians, we must uphold respect for all our languages — be it Kokborok, Bengali, Tamil, Assamese, Mizo, Bodo, Hindi, or even English," he added.
The Hindu
3 hours ago
- The Hindu
BJP leader's ‘no language called Bengali' jibe sparks outrage, leaves Trinamool fuming
A day after a communication from the Delhi Police, describing Bangla as 'Bangladeshi language', evoked strong criticism from the Trinamool Congress (TMC), Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) leader Amit Malviya's remarks on Monday that there was no language called 'Bengali' sparked further outrage in the political and social circles of West Bengal. Mr. Malviya, who heads the BJP's IT cell and is the party's co-observer in West Bengal, justified the Delhi Police's description in a social media post. 'There is, in fact, no language called 'Bengali' that neatly covers all these variants. 'Bengali' denotes ethnicity, not linguistic uniformity. So when the Delhi Police says 'Bangladeshi language', it's shorthand for the linguistic markers used to profile illegal immigrants from Bangladesh — not a commentary on Bengali as spoken in West Bengal,' Mr. Malviya said. The remarks left the Trinamool Congress leadership fuming, with several leaders of the party condemning them strongly. The TMC accused the BJP of 'systematically promoting xenophobia and othering, with Bengalis being deliberately targeted across states'. 'Such dangerous narratives must be condemned and resisted at every level,' the party said. Trinamool Congress spokesperson Kunal Ghosh equated the remarks to 'linguistic fascism'. 'The BJP is hellbent on erasing one of the richest, oldest, Constitutionally-recognised languages of India just to whitewash the Delhi Police's bigoted profiling tactics. This is linguistic fascism, plain and simple. We dare the BJP to say this on the floor of the Parliament. We dare them to erase Bengali from the Eighth Schedule of the Constitution. We dare them to call Kobiguru's [Rabindranath Tagore] Jana Gana Mana a foreign song,' Mr. Ghosh said. West Bengal Minister Shashi Panja described the BJP leader's assertions as an attempt to erase, belittle, and vilify the culture, history, and pride of Bengal. 'In his usual cocktail of arrogance, ignorance, and deep-seated hatred, @BJP4India's certified troll and keyboard mercenary @amitmalviya has now declared that 'there is no language called Bengali'. This is a calculated attempt to erase, belittle, and vilify the culture, history, and pride of Bengal,' Dr. Panja said. 'The BJP is threatened by Bengal. By its intellect. By its spine. By its refusal to bow down. And so, they try to delegitimise our language, our people, and our very existence,' she said. Apart from leaders of the ruling party, prominent people of the State criticised the BJP leader's comments. The controversial remarks have come at a time when the TMC has been raising its pitch in protest against the alleged targeting of migrants from the State over the past few months. The party has called for a 'language movement', and invoked Bengali asmita (identity) over such protests. More migrants return In another development, a group of migrant workers hailing from West Bengal's Dakshin Dinajpur district returned from Delhi. In a video shared on social media by the State's ruling party, the workers said that some men in uniform wanted money from them. The Trinamool Congress said they were being subjected to brutal torture simply for speaking in Bangla. 'They were beaten, abused, and extorted by @DelhiPolice, which allegedly demanded bribes of ₹5-7 lakh for their release. These are Indian citizens, targeted solely for their language and identity. This is a hate-driven crackdown on the Bengali identity, enabled and emboldened by the Bangla birodhi (opposed) BJP regime,' the party posted on social media. A few days ago, 12 youths, of whom 10 were from Pingla, and the remaining two from the Sabang police station area of Paschim Medinipur district, returned from Gujarat and alleged torture by the Gujarat Police.
India Today
4 hours ago
- India Today
Legal arrest, linguistic misstep: Delhi Police FIR stirs 'Bangladeshi language' row
A legitimate arrest of an illegal immigrant in Delhi has spiralled into a politically charged controversy, after an internal communication by the Delhi Police allegedly referred to Bengali as a "Bangladeshi language". The error, though seemingly minor, stirred a political storm, especially in poll-bound West Bengal, where language and identity are deeply intertwined. The alleged error pitted the Centre and the Trinamool Congress against each LANGUAGE THAT DOES NOT EXISTThe controversy erupted with an internal police note during the investigation of an FIR registered on March 11, 2025. The document referenced evidence in the "Bangladeshi language" — a term that has no linguistic basis. The official language of Bangladesh is Bengali, which is also widely spoken in Indian states like West Bengal, Tripura, and parts of semantic slip was swiftly politicised. West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee took to X (formerly Twitter), writing, "See now how Delhi police, under the direct control of the Ministry of Home, Government of India, is describing Bengali as 'Bangladeshi' language!"THE FIR THAT SPARKED ROW The case involves 27-year-old Mohammad Jewel Islam, a Bangladeshi national arrested from the Bhogal–Jangpura area in South Delhi. According to the FIR filed at Lodhi Colony Police Station, Islam had entered India illegally in 2021 via the Cooch Behar border in West Bengal, without valid interrogation, Islam submitted a Bangladeshi National ID (No. 3325183683) and the identity cards of his mother and brother, confirming his Bangladeshi citizenship. He had procured an Aadhaar and PAN card in Delhi using allegedly forged documents, with the help of an agent from Hazrat has since been booked under the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, the Foreigners Act, and the Aadhaar Act. Seven more individuals were arrested in connection with similar document-related GAP THAT'S OVERSHADOWING THE CASEWhile the arrest and evidence appear legally sound, the fallout from the language misstep has dominated headlines. The mention of "Bangladeshi language" was not part of the FIR, but a note accompanying a translation request. However, it has become the focal point of political argue that such errors reflect a lack of cultural and linguistic awareness within enforcement bodies. Film personalities and community leaders across the Bengali diaspora have condemned the terminology as reductive and harmful, particularly in a country as linguistically diverse as VS PROFILING: WHERE'S THE LINE?The case has raised uneasy questions about how identity is perceived in law enforcement. While the FIR process demonstrated procedural diligence, the reference to language has sparked concerns over ethnic is no language called "Bangladeshi." Bengali, the official language of Bangladesh, is also a constitutionally recognised Indian language. Dialects such as Sylheti, Rarhi, Rajbanshi, and Chittagonian are spoken across both India and Bangladesh, often with indistinguishable warn that using language as a proxy for nationality is dangerous. In a multilingual country like India, dialects don't follow borders. A resident of Cooch Behar or Malda may speak in a dialect nearly identical to someone from across the border in Rajshahi or Khulna. Mistaking that for evidence of foreignness risks criminalising speech and misidentifying OF SPEECH: WHY DIALECT CAN'T DECIDE CITIZENSHIPThe Bangladeshi national's arrest was based on tangible documents, not speech. Yet, the fallout underscores a deeper flaw: the assumption that language can denote citizenship. This case highlights the urgent need for training law enforcement in linguistic and cultural competence.A speaker's dialect cannot serve as biometric data. As experts and politicians have pointed out, legitimate Indian citizens across Tripura, Assam's Barak Valley, and Meghalaya speak dialects like Sylheti, which are also common in POLICE'S SILENCE, BJP'S REBUTTALThe Delhi Police has not issued a formal statement on the language error, allowing political parties to dominate the narrative. The BJP defended the terminology, with National Information in-charge Amit Malviya writing on X, "Nowhere in the Delhi Police letter is Bangla or Bengali described as a 'Bangladeshi' language."advertisementMalviya added, "Delhi Police is absolutely right in referring to the language as Bangladeshi in the context of identifying infiltrators.' However, his comment that 'dialects like Sylheti are nearly incomprehensible to Indian Bengalis" triggered Susmita Dev responded sharply: 'Now BJP calls Sylheti a Bangladeshi language... We have lived in this region since 1874 as part of Assam, and before that, Bengal. Zero knowledge of history.' Congress's Gaurav Gogoi also joined in, saying, 'Today the BJP IT cell insults the Bengali language spoken by lakhs of people in Tripura, Meghalaya and the Barak Valley of Assam.'WHAT THIS COMES AROUND ASThis case underscores how fragile public trust becomes when administrative errors collide with questions of identity. In the context of West Bengal's politics, where language is central to cultural and political identity, such a mistake is seen as more than a bureaucratic enforcement agencies acknowledge the complexity of India's linguistic landscape, and communicate with greater precision, even a misused word risks overshadowing legitimate law enforcement work — turning proof into politics and mistakes into movements.- EndsMust Watch
