
Newzroom Afrika confirms Aldrin Sampear on 'indefinite leave'
This follows serious allegations that he physically assaulted a woman driver during a reported road rage incident in Johannesburg last week.
Newzroom Afrika has confirmed that news anchor Aldrin Sampear will be taking an indefinite leave of absence with immediate effect following a road rage incident in Johannesburg.
The news broadcaster announced the decision on Tuesday as it conducted an internal review of the incident.
'Newzroom Afrika is aware of an incident involving anchor Aldrin Sampear last week. Sampear will take a break from his broadcast duties with immediate effect, pending an internal review of the matter.
'Newzroom Afrika takes the allegations very seriously and we will work swiftly to address the concerns raised,' the broadcaster said.
Road rage
This follows serious allegations that he physically assaulted a woman driver during a reported road rage incident in Johannesburg last week.
The incident sparked widespread outrage after a video recorded by a 20-year-old woman identified as Laricia Augusto went viral on social media.
Augusto told The Citizen that she was travelling to university on Jan Smuts Avenue at the time of the incident. She has laid charges against Sampear.
WATCH the video here:
Charges of assault have been laid against Newsroom Afrika anchor Aldrin Sampear following a road range incident in Randburg earlier on Thursday @TheCitizen_News pic.twitter.com/gWLp9Q5XFx — Hein Kaiser (@heinkaiser) April 17, 2025
ALSO READ: TV news anchor Aldrin Sampear claims road rage video was edited, denies assault
Assault
In the video, a distressed Augusto can be heard accusing Sampear of physical aggression.
'He grabbed my arm. I immediately started recording him. That's when I realised this wasn't just a fender bender and that this was something else.'
In the video, Sampear accused Augusto of flipping a middle finger at him, which she admitted to. 'You can see him pointing in my face, shouting nonstop. He pushed me, grabbed me again, and hit me,' she said. 'I was terrified and genuinely afraid he might seriously hurt me, but I tried not to show it. I kept as calm as I could.'
Video edited
Sampear denied assaulting Augusto during a phone call with The Citizen a few hours after the incident, but admitted that there was 'some truth' to other aspects of the encounter.
However, Sampear alleged that the video she made of the incident was edited.
'I'm horrified to see an edited version of the video because I actually went to my car to go fetch my phone and license to share with the driver,' he responded to The Citizen in a text message on WhatsApp.
'At no point did I assault the driver. We have exchanged details. I have reported the matter to the police, and my legal team will deal with this factually and honestly,' Sampear added.
Five years ago, the broadcaster admitted that he had assaulted women before.
Additional reporting by Hein Kaiser
ALSO READ: TV news anchor Aldrin Sampear charged with assault

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The South African
17 minutes ago
- The South African
Molefe and Gama's arrests are ‘witch hunt', says MK
uMkhonto weSizwe (MK Party) has slammed the arrests of its members of parliament, Brian Molefe and Siyabonga Gama, calling it a political witch hunt. The pair, along with Anoj Singh and Thamsanqa Jiyane, were arrested in connection with the multibillion-rand Transnet corruption case. They face 18 charges including, fruad and corruption. MK Party national spokesperson Nhlamulo Ndhlela accused authorities of using the arrests to intimidate and criminalise Black intellectuals associated with the party, rather than genuinely pursuing justice. Ndhlela said Molefe and Gama's arrests mirror the 'vilification' of party president Jacob Zuma. He claims Zuma remains a target for the 'captured' justice system. Ndhlela described the country's justice system as a two-tiered structure that favours the elite and politically connected. In a statement, the MK Party accused the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) of operating under external political influence. Ndhlela stated that the party has consistently called for accountability in state-owned enterprises and institutions such as the NPA. 'It is clear that when the MK Party raises legitimate questions about institutional bias and political capture, the response is swift and punitive. This is not justice; it is a witch-hunt,' said Ndhlela. The party called for citizens and civil society organisations to reject what it called 'selective justice' and restore integrity to institutions. The Palm Ridge Specialised Commercial Crime Court granted bail of R50 000 each to the Molefe and the three other former Transnet executives. The court postponed the matter to Monday, 6 October for further investigations. Investigating Directorate Against Corruption (IDAC) spokesperson Henry Mamothame said the case shows that services were misused and billions of rands were made without being used for the rail modernisation project. He said the arrests show how people in trusted and powerful positions got involved in corruption to benefit themselves instead of helping the country and its infrastructure. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 11. Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news


Daily Maverick
6 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
Tribunal hears Judge President Selby Mbenenge could not take ‘no' for an answer
Eastern Cape Judge President Selby Mbenenge was persistent in his demands for nude photographs from court secretary Andiswa Mengo, the tribunal has heard. The mammoth Judicial Service Commission (JSC) Conduct Tribunal probing allegations of sexual harassment against Eastern Cape Judge President Selby Mbenenge heard expert evidence on Monday of his relentless persistence and harassment. Mbenenge (64) communicated various demands, including for nude photographs, in 47 WhatsApp conversations with the complainant, court secretary Andiswa Mengo (41), it was revealed on Monday, 30 June. The conversations have been entered as evidence and have not been contested. On Monday, Dr Lisa Vetten, a renowned expert on gender-based violence and sexual harassment, interpreted the depth and extent of Mbenenge's workplace transgressions. Advocates Musi Sikhakane and Griffiths Madonsela, for Mbenenge, have claimed the 'relationship' between the Judge President and the secretary had been 'consensual'. Bible verses to ward off approaches Mbenenge, who is also a pastor, was not even put off by a Bible verse, Psalm 1, Verse 1, sent to him by Mengo after he had suggested they physically meet. Vetten set out how, before this, the Judge President had bombarded her with requests for photographs and had asked her 14 times to discuss her favourite sexual position, to which she did not respond. Even a response by Mengo that her 'exhaustion was extreme' and that she was still at work did not deter her pursuer, testified Vetten. Mbenenge continued, after hours, to intrude upon her personal space, often late at night, sexually harassing her. Defining future office life While Sikhakane and Madonsela had objected to the late bringing of Vetten's expert testimony, the chairperson, retired Judge Bernard Ngoepe, allowed this. Evidence leader advocate Salomé Scheepers and Mengo's counsel, advocate Nasreen Rajab-Budlender, have put up a gargantuan case which will define future workplace relations, depending on this ruling. It will also highlight the responsibilities that come with status and control for men in positions of power. Vetten clearly set out in no uncertain terms the definitions of sexual harassment in the workplace and the codes and norms that governed these. She said that the 2022 Code of Good Practice on the Elimination and Prevention of Sexual Harassment in the workplace encompassed four types of contact and behaviour. 'This includes physical, unwanted, touching, rape, verbal (as in spoken) and non-verbal (in terms of sending pictures or creating a hostile work environment) and then quid-pro-quo, which amounts to coercion,' she said. To qualify, she added, there needed to be a persistence about the behaviour. 'Jokes, whistling, persisting in asking someone out on a date. However, some egregious acts need only occur once, like the grabbing of a crotch, which is grossly offensive'. In an 'ideal world', Vetten said, 'we should all be able to say no, stop, this makes me uncomfortable' and the code recognised that this was not always possible'. Power matrix One of the reasons sexual harassment was so difficult to tackle and deal with, said Vetten, was because of gender power imbalances, which needed to be carefully examined in each case. 'Was someone in a position to say 'no' to clearly communicate and tell someone to stop? In law, those kinds of situations do occur,' she told the tribunal. She noted there was a difference between 'submission' and 'consent'. In the case of a rape when a victim begged her rapist to wear a condom, this could not be considered consent. 'One can say 'yes' because saying 'yes' might be less worse than two terrible choices – facing violence and a sexually transmitted disease'. Also, consent to one type of behaviour did not necessarily imply consent to any other behaviours that followed, she said. Added to the mix were the swirling stereotypes of men and women in society, which exist and which have 'clouded thinking'. 'There is this idea that men and women have different sexual urges, men more urgent. The other idea that has developed is that men pursue, and it is up to women to say 'yes' or resist'. We lived in a society which viewed men as more active sexually and women as 'far more passive, waiting for men to approach them'. Active sexuality in men was recognised and admired, and the general idea was that men 'must persist because women are in need of a bit of persuasion is real'. Gender inequality also manifested in a range of other ways, including who performed what work. Workplaces were governed by codes of conduct, regulations and hierarchies which inform workplace structures. 'If you look at the CEOs, they will predominantly be men. Who is likely to hold what position, and what we associate with this, matters. A secretary might make tea or be on the service side, there to listen and carry out instructions.' 'This is why we have workplace law to determine who is overstepping their mandate. Workplaces in different industries have different norms, but they are highly structured.' Saying 'no' to someone who is your senior 'is difficult', said Vetten. 'Then, if the person has a lot of status and credibility, who is more likely to be believed or seen as more credible? Whose word will carry more weight?' Silence and evasion Many of Mbenenge's suggestions and propositions were deferred or ignored by the complainant in an attempt to escape them. At times, there were even long silences. Asked whether, in this instance, there had been a blurring of workplace boundaries, Vetten replied, 'Very much so. To begin with, contacting her after hours after their very first contact, which follows as a result of [him] seeing her earlier in the day with her child and asking about its father.' This grooms her for further questions with regard to the number of children she had and whether 'I can trust you'. 'Why would that be relevant?' Vetten asked. Why would the Judge President, after this, request nude photographs of her upper body as proof that he could trust her? 'Why would you ask for a personal picture? She is a secretary, and you are asking for pictures without explaining why you want them. This is an expression of power – people who can demand things of others without explanation.'


Eyewitness News
13 hours ago
- Eyewitness News
Wits Researcher sheds light on Mengo's fear in rejecting Mbenenge's sexual advances
JOHANNESBURG - Research associate at Wits University, Lisa Vetten, has testified that High Court secretary, Andiswa Mengo, used different strategies to communicate her reluctance and unwillingness to entertain the advances made by Eastern Cape Judge President Selby Mbenenge. Vetten is testifying before the judicial conduct tribunal in Sandton, which is investigating the sexual harassment complaint Mengo laid against Mbenenge in 2023. Vetten has told the tribunal that there were 47 conversations between the pair, with the judge president sending the junior staffer 526 messages on the social media platform, WhatsApp, while Mengo only sent the top judge 311 texts. The gender expert is shedding light on gender and power dynamics in the workplace in the context of sexual harassment. In January this year, Mengo – in her evidence in chief – testified that she was scared of saying no to the top judge's sexual advances, given his seniority and influence. Vetten looked at the pair's WhatsApp messages and zoomed in on how Mengo responded to Mbenenge's request. 'She used what I have characterised as deflection. She tried to turn the subject away from something else and start talking about something else. She used evasion, so she wouldn't necessarily give a direct answer. She also used silence, just did not respond. She also used what I described as accommodation, where she would try to accommodate or engage with a request. And she also used active resistance, no.'