The Best Exercise for Your Personality Type, According to a New Study
A new study suggests that tailoring it to your personality might help.
You're more likely to make exercise a habit if you enjoy doing it.Establishing new habits is hard (to say the least). It takes mindset work and consistent practice to make any new habit stick. But there are a few tricks that can be employed to help make the process easier—like working out according to your personality type.
Researchers from the United Kingdom sought to determine whether certain personality types were more drawn to or enjoyed specific intensities of exercise. They published their findings in Frontiers in Psychology. Let's break down what they found.
Researchers initially recruited 132 participants from the general public for this study; 86 of the 132 completed the entire protocol. Participants first completed an online questionnaire that included demographic information, the Perceived Stress Scale 10 items (PSS-10), and a modified version of the Big Five Inventory 10 items (BFI-10). The PSS-10 is designed to assess people's perceived stress levels, and the BFI-10 is a shortened version of a longer assessment for determining personality traits.
The big five personality traits assessed with the BFI-10 include extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, emotional stability and openness. Emotional stability relates to neuroticism. For example, people who score high in emotional stability are considered low in neuroticism. They tend to be calm and resilient with more positive attitudes and moods. People who score low in emotional stability tend to have more neurotic traits, including anxiety, irritability and moodiness, and tend to have stronger reactions to stress.
Following the online assessments, participants were brought into an exercise lab for baseline fitness testing. This included body composition, which is a measured ratio of lean tissue to fat tissue, and strength tests that included push-ups, planks and jumping in place with hands on hips. Participants' aerobic capacities were also tested on a stationary bike, first with a 'lab low-intensity' ride, and then, after a 30-minute rest, a high-intensity ride on the same bike was used to measure VO2peak. VO2peak is the highest oxygen consumption measured during an exercise test. It basically measures how efficiently your body is at using oxygen during intense exercise. After each exercise session, participants were asked to rate their level of enjoyment from 1 to 7, 1 being not enjoyable and 7 being extremely enjoyable.
Following the baseline tests, participants were randomly assigned to either the intervention or control group. The control group was instructed to maintain their normal lifestyle and was given a plan of weekly 10-minute stretching exercises.
The intervention group was provided with a heart rate monitor and a home-based 8-week cycling and strength training program that included 'rides' of three varying intensities—low, threshold and high-intensity interval training (HIIT). Each ride would be completed once per week for a total of three rides per week. The overall intensities gradually increased over the 8-week intervention. They were also instructed to do one strength training workout a week, which included 3 sets of 8 repetitions of squats, lunges, push-ups, sit-ups, calf raises and glute bridges. Participants were asked to rate their level of perceived enjoyment of each exercise session over the entire intervention period.
Based on the pre-intervention testing:
Extraversion was predictive of having higher VO2peak, anaerobic threshold and peak power output.
Conscientiousness predicted completing push-ups, longer plank times, more weekly hours of physical activity and lower body fat percentage.
Neuroticism predicted poorer heart rate recovery times (how quickly your heart rate comes back down to pre-exercise levels), regardless of fitness level.
Those who were part of an endurance club (like a running club) were more extraverted and conscientious.
Regarding exercise enjoyment:
Those who scored higher in neuroticism reported less enjoyment of the low-intensity lab session and threshold ride.
Extraversion predicted enjoyment of the VO2peak test and the HIIT sessions.
Both openness and agreeableness predicted more enjoyment for the long, easy ride.
Regarding program adherence and participation:
Intervention group participants who scored higher in neuroticism were less likely to record their heart rate data during the 8-week intervention.
Extraverted participants were less likely to attend post-intervention testing.
Those scoring high in openness were more likely to attend post-intervention testing.
The 8-week intervention revealed that:
Those who scored high in neuroticism were the only ones who noted a decrease in stress from the intervention.
All participants in the intervention group, regardless of personality traits, exhibited a significant increase in weekly hours of exercise, VO2peak, peak power output, number of push-ups and duration of planks.
Conscientious participants showed smaller improvements in peak power output.
Those with extraversion traits had a greater increase in RERpeak (respiratory exchange ratio, a measure of intensity and effort during an exercise test).
There were a few limitations to this study. First, 70% of the participants were found to be open-minded, conscientious and emotionally stable, presenting some bias in the sample of participants. While this study included the Big Five personality traits, it did not consider subtraits or other personality factors, like grit or anxiety. Lastly, this study only included cycling and body weight exercises. This limits participants' responses to just those exercises. So if you already know you hate cycling, chances are you're not going to enjoy any of the variations in intensity either.
This study suggests that certain personalities may enjoy certain intensities of exercise more than others. "We found some clear links between personality traits and the type of exercise the participants enjoyed most,' says Flaminia Ronca, Ph.D., one of the study authors in a press release, 'which I think is important because we could potentially use this knowledge to tailor physical activity recommendations to the individual—and hopefully help them to become and remain more active."
People who scored high in either neuroticism or extraversion:
Enjoyed the higher-intensity workouts more than the lower-intensity ones.
Researchers note that those with neurotic tendencies may tolerate a HIIT workout better than a long, vigorous workout because the latter may allow for more anxiety, worry and negative self-talk to creep in and affect performance.
People who scored high in conscientiousness:
Engage in physical activity for the health benefits.
They're also goal-oriented. So if they've set a goal to complete 6 months of training for a marathon, they're likely to achieve it.
While research offers a glimpse into the what and why of topics, you probably don't need a personality test and a study to tell you what types of physical activity you find enjoyable. But these results do provide you with possible reasons why you might not enjoy certain types of physical activity. And you can now use your personality as the scapegoat if someone tries pushing you to do an activity you don't like.
There are a few other things to consider when finding activities that you'll enjoy. For example, do you like doing things as a team or group, or are you more of an individual player? If you like doing things as a team, consider group fitness classes. Choose the type and intensity based on your personality and fitness level. Group personal training is another option. Or you can join a community sports team or running or cycling club.
If you're more independent and aren't into the group thing, consider activities you can do on your own or with a friend. You may also enjoy one-on-one personal training.
This study suggests that personality traits may determine which types of physical activities will be most enjoyable. Ultimately, the best types of physical activity for you are ones you'll enjoy and stick with. And while guidelines are important—like getting a minimum of 150 minutes of moderate or 75 minutes of vigorous physical activity per week—any amount of physical activity is better than none, and it all counts. Start where you're at and what you're comfortable with, and make intentional decisions to move more throughout the day, even if it's in small spurts. Over time, as your body gets used to moving more, you may naturally increase the amount. And before you know it, you'll be crushing those guidelines (in a good way).
Read the original article on EATINGWELL
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
That dread you feel on Mondays is real — and it's doing more damage than you think, new study finds
Hate Mondays? Turns out your body does, too. A new study from the University of Hong Kong found that older adults who felt anxious on Mondays had 23% higher levels of stress hormone cortisol in their body up to two months later, compared to those who reported anxiety on other days. And that Monday-specific stress could be quietly damaging your health — no matter your age, job status or daily routine, experts said. The study, published in the Journal of Affective Disorders, analyzed data from more than 3,500 adults over age 50 in England. Participants first reported how anxious they felt and what day of the week it occurred. One to two months later, researchers collected hair samples to measure cortisol — a marker of how much stress had accumulated over time. Cortisol helps humans stay alert and respond to threats — but when it stays high for too long, it can weaken the immune system and raise the risk of heart disease, anxiety and other chronic problems. Monday anxiety was the only day linked to a lasting cortisol spike likely because the day carries a sense of 'uncertainty, danger or dread,' said Modupe Akinola, a professor at Columbia Business School who studies stress and performance. This effect showed up even in retirees, a sign that years of Monday stress may leave a lasting imprint on the brain and body. The stress response is partly psychological — driven by our expectations — but shifts in sleep, eating and activity on weekends can also throw off the body's internal clock, making Monday morning feel even worse, Robert Sapolsky, a biologist and neuroscientist at Stanford University who studies stress, told The Post. 'Cortisol is not just reactive — a lot of what it does is anticipatory,' said Sapolsky, author of 'Why Zebras Don't Get Ulcers.' 'Expectation of stress can drive cortisol levels even higher than the stress itself.' The jolt from weekend to weekday responsibilities makes Mondays feel harder, noted Akinola. 'There is something effortful about Mondays — you have to get up, get dressed, get focused, deal with traffic, when over the weekend you typically don't deal with these things,' Akinola said. 'All of those extra demands that come on Monday make it feel like you may not have the resources to cope … and your body's stress system is telling you to get ready to battle.' That stress buildup may help explain why heart attacks are more common on Mondays — a pattern documented in previous studies linking the start of the week to increased cardiovascular risk. This repeated psychological strain, especially the kind built into our daily routines, can gradually wear down the body and leave it more vulnerable to long-term health risks, Sapolsky said. Akinola recommends a weekly 'stress inventory' — spotting what you're dreading before your body kicks into fight-or-flight mode. 'People typically don't even realize they are stressed, let alone have clarity on what is stressing them out and how their body might respond,' Akinola said. 'A daily or weekly stress inventory … will help stress move from being background noise to top of mind and when this happens, you can actually take control.'
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Numerous Fossils Reveal Jurassic Fish Killed in Same, Bizarre Way
An extinct genus of ray-finned fish that lived during the Jurassic period seems to have had quite the penchant for overreaching. A new analysis of fossilized Tharsis fish reveals that the carnivorous marine animals seem to have frequently met their end with large cephalopods known as belemnites lodged quite fatally in their gullets. According to paleontologists Martin Ebert and Martina Kölbl-Ebert of Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich in Germany, Tharsis fish found in the 152 million-year-old Solnhofen Plattenkalk (limestone) formation in Germany appear in multiple instances to have died while attempting to swallow a belemnite nearly as long as themselves. "A recent review of collection material … uncovered several specimens of Tharsis from the Late Jurassic Plattenkalk deposits of the Solnhofen Archipelago with belemnites wedged in mouth and gill apparatus," they write in their paper. "In all cases, the rostrum [beak] reexits through the gill apparatus, whereas the broad phragmocone [internal shell] of the belemnite is firmly lodged in the mouth opening." Related: Ancient Tyrannosaur's Last Victims Can Still Be Seen Inside Its Stomach Tharsis fish were what are known as micro-carnivores; animals that eat very small animals such as larvae and zooplankton, in this case by using suction to gulp down their food. Their fossils are quite common. Belemnites, which resembled squid with a long hooded body and multiple arms, lived in the open ocean, left far fewer fossils. Interestingly, the belemnite fossils found in the Plattenkalk basins of Eichstätt and Solnhofen often consist of an internal shell overgrown with bivalves – suggesting that the belemnite was dead, kept buoyant in the water column by a gas-filled shell colonized by other animals, such as clam-like molluscs, feasting on the decaying soft tissue. Tharsis fish were unlikely to be looking for food amid the hostile conditions of the seafloor, nor would the fish have been preying directly on the belemnites – but the researchers believe they know why the dead, drifting cephalopods may have posed such a choking hazard for the hapless fish. "Apparently, these micro-carnivore fish were in the habit of sucking remnants of decaying soft tissue or overgrowth such as algae or bacterial growth from floating objects, but when a streamlined floating belemnite rostrum accidentally was sucked into the mouth, they were no longer able to get rid of these deadly objects," the paleontologists write in their paper. "Even though the fish tried to pass the obstructive item through its gills, there was no way of getting rid of it, leading to death by suffocation." Sounds deeply unpleasant, really. The research has been published in Scientific Reports. 'Ball Lightning' Caught on Film After Storm in Canada Expired Cans of Salmon From Decades Ago Contained a Huge Surprise Melting Glaciers Could Reawaken Hundreds of Earth's Volcanoes
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Researchers explore next-gen twin batteries that could solve concerning problem with EVs: 'A promising approach'
Electric vehicles are transforming transportation for the better, but producing their batteries comes with high costs — a trade-off that researchers at engineering firm IAV may have found a solution for. IAV, a firm focused on the future of mobility, has developed a twin-battery design that pairs two different but complementary chemistries to reduce the cost and environmental impact of manufacturing EV batteries, reported. Instead of relying on lithium-ion cells, the design combines sodium-ion (SIB) and lithium iron phosphate solid-state (LFP-SSB) batteries. SIBs are low-cost and easier to recycle, while LFP-SSBs offer long cycle life and strong energy density. The system reuses waste heat from one battery to optimize the performance of the other. Combining the two types creates an energy-saving system that could boost range and efficiency without the high costs of cooling, heating, or mining for lithium-ion batteries, according to IAV also designed and developed the new battery with minimal waste. Using COMSOL Multiphysics, IAV engineers were able to tweak parameters and simulate the batteries' real-world thermal, chemical, and mechanical behavior. This validated the effectiveness and efficiency of the battery system without the need for multiple prototypes, per which sped up development while slashing costs and resource waste. Jakob Hilgert, a technical consultant at IAV, considers the use of diverse cell chemistries "a promising approach to respond to market fluctuations and at the same time minimize system costs," per IAV is also exploring other innovations, like the use of bipolar technology to maximize volume utilization of lithium-ion batteries. There are also other companies pursuing similar breakthroughs. For instance, Watt Electric Vehicle Company is developing a solar-powered closed-loop production system. Other automakers are also investing in research and development for better EV chargers and infrastructure. If you were going to purchase an EV, which of these factors would be most important to you? Cost Battery range Power and speed The way it looks Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. Energy solutions like these can make EVs more affordable. They could help drive EV adoption, going far beyond the 17.3 million electric cars produced in 2024 alone. For drivers looking to save even more, pairing an EV with home solar can drastically reduce charging costs. Platforms like EnergySage make it easy to compare quotes from vetted vendors, and can help you save up to $10,000 while minimizing environmental impact. While there's no firm rollout date yet, IAV's approach could contribute to a smarter, cleaner, and more accessible EV future. Join our free newsletter for weekly updates on the latest innovations improving our lives and shaping our future, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.
