Iran slams Trump over ‘disrespect'
Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi has accused US President Donald Trump of showing disrespect to the country's leadership, warning that his barbs undermine any potential for renewed negotiations.
In a statement posted on Saturday, Araghchi said that if Trump is sincere about pursuing a nuclear deal with Iran, he must 'put aside the disrespectful and unacceptable tone towards Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, and stop hurting his millions of heartfelt followers.'
Araghchi further warned that Iran would not tolerate threats and insults, asserting: 'If illusions lead to worse mistakes, Iran will not hesitate to unveil its real capabilities, which will certainly end any delusion about the power of Iran.' The foreign minister added that as a result of Iran's recent standoff with Israel, the latter 'had NO CHOICE but to RUN to 'Daddy' to avoid being flattened by our missiles.'
His comments came in response to Trump's claim that he had 'saved [Khamenei] from a very ugly and ignominious death.' He also accused the Iranian leader of 'blatantly and foolishly' lying about prevailing in the conflict with Israel. On top of that, the US leader warned Iran that he would 'absolutely' bomb the country again if he decides that Tehran is developing nuclear weapons.
The war of words followed a 12-day conflict between Israel and Iran that began on June 13 when Israel launched a series of strikes targeting Iran's nuclear sites and top military leadership, triggering a wave of retaliatory attacks by Tehran.
The US joined the hostilities on June 22, deploying heavy bombers against key Iranian nuclear facilities. Trump has since said that the nuclear sites have been 'completely obliterated,' although several media reports have disputed this assessment. While a ceasefire has since been reached, Iran has dismissed the notion of immediately returning to negotiations.
The key stumbling block remains the US demand that Iran completely refrain from uranium enrichment, which Tehran has dismissed as a deal-breaker. Iran maintains it does not seek nuclear weapons and insists the country's nuclear program is solely for peaceful energy purposes.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Russia Today
2 hours ago
- Russia Today
Africa peace deal brokered by Trump tied to US resource push
Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of the Congo have signed a peace agreement to end a decades-long conflict, which US President Donald Trump says gives the US rights to local mineral wealth. Congolese officials have long accused Rwanda of backing militant groups in the mineral-rich eastern DR Congo and smuggling resources. Tensions escalated after M23 militants seized mining hubs, including Goma and Bukavu, reportedly killing thousands. Kigali denied supporting militants, despite UN and international backing for Kinshasa's claims. The agreement was signed on Friday in Washington by both nations' foreign ministers and US Secretary of State Marco Rubio. It pledges a 90-day Rwandan troop withdrawal from the DR Congo, outlines disarmament and reintegration steps, and sets up a joint security mechanism. Rwandan Foreign Minister Olivier Nduhungirehe called the deal a 'turning point.' The DR Congo's Therese Kayikwamba Wagner, however, was more cautious, saying it must be followed by disengagement. GOD BLESS THE PEOPLE OF RWANDA AND THE CONGODR Congo and Rwanda sign Trump-mediated PEACE deal to END conflict Applause breaks out as Rubio, envoys formalize US-brokered agreement@ The agreement also creates a 'regional economic integration framework' linking Rwanda, DR Congo, and the US. Trump, speaking ahead of the signing, said the deal would give the US 'a lot of the mineral rights from the [Democratic Republic of] Congo.' While no specific transfers are mentioned in the text, the agreement promises to 'expand foreign trade and investment' in regional mineral supply chains and launch joint end-to-end 'mineral value chains' that 'link' both countries with the US government and US investors within three months. #rdc#rwanda: President Trump confirms that the United States will obtain "a large portion of Congo's mineral rights" as part of the peace agreement between the DRC and Rwanda signed this Friday. Sources told Reuters that a separate agreement securing new US rights to Congolese minerals is expected at a later date. It reportedly depends on the outcome of Qatar-mediated talks between the DR Congo and M23 in Doha. The talks are separate from US mediation but are seen as key to ending the hostilities, as they involve direct negotiations with M23, a prominent armed group in the region. Qatar reportedly presented a draft peace plan to the DR Congo and M23 earlier this month, with both sides expected to consult their leaders before resuming talks. The mineral-rich region holds the world's largest cobalt reserves, and contains significant deposits of gold, lithium, copper, and coltan. Following the signing, Trump hosted both African envoys in the Oval Office and invited their presidents, Felix Tshisekedi and Paul Kagame, to Washington for a future round of agreements. The deal is part of Trump's broader push to secure critical mineral access by any means, even through conflict mediation efforts. On Thursday, the US struck a deal with China to resume rare-earth exports, which were frozen amid a tariff standoff. The Rwanda-DR Congo agreement also follows another Trump-linked minerals deal with Kiev in April, which was presented as repayment for past US aid in Ukraine's conflict with Russia. Though the repayment clause was dropped from the final agreement, Trump said the US could 'in theory' recover 'much more' than it spent.
Russia Today
4 hours ago
- Russia Today
Iran slams Trump over ‘disrespect'
Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi has accused US President Donald Trump of showing disrespect to the country's leadership, warning that his barbs undermine any potential for renewed negotiations. In a statement posted on Saturday, Araghchi said that if Trump is sincere about pursuing a nuclear deal with Iran, he must 'put aside the disrespectful and unacceptable tone towards Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, and stop hurting his millions of heartfelt followers.' Araghchi further warned that Iran would not tolerate threats and insults, asserting: 'If illusions lead to worse mistakes, Iran will not hesitate to unveil its real capabilities, which will certainly end any delusion about the power of Iran.' The foreign minister added that as a result of Iran's recent standoff with Israel, the latter 'had NO CHOICE but to RUN to 'Daddy' to avoid being flattened by our missiles.' His comments came in response to Trump's claim that he had 'saved [Khamenei] from a very ugly and ignominious death.' He also accused the Iranian leader of 'blatantly and foolishly' lying about prevailing in the conflict with Israel. On top of that, the US leader warned Iran that he would 'absolutely' bomb the country again if he decides that Tehran is developing nuclear weapons. The war of words followed a 12-day conflict between Israel and Iran that began on June 13 when Israel launched a series of strikes targeting Iran's nuclear sites and top military leadership, triggering a wave of retaliatory attacks by Tehran. The US joined the hostilities on June 22, deploying heavy bombers against key Iranian nuclear facilities. Trump has since said that the nuclear sites have been 'completely obliterated,' although several media reports have disputed this assessment. While a ceasefire has since been reached, Iran has dismissed the notion of immediately returning to negotiations. The key stumbling block remains the US demand that Iran completely refrain from uranium enrichment, which Tehran has dismissed as a deal-breaker. Iran maintains it does not seek nuclear weapons and insists the country's nuclear program is solely for peaceful energy purposes.
Russia Today
13 hours ago
- Russia Today
When opportunity turns to uncertainty: Indian migrants under fire in Israel
When sirens wailed across Israeli cities and missiles from Iran struck Israeli territory, about 150 Indian construction workers from the Bahraich district in the northern Indian state of Uttar Pradesh found themselves caught in an increasingly dangerous situation, desperately seeking a way home. The workers, who traveled to Israel over the past year seeking better economic opportunities, faced a harsh reality: trapped between the promise of steady income and the very real threat of becoming casualties in a regional conflict. Sandeep, a resident of the Mihipurwa area, spoke to his family on the phone from Hadera, painting a grim picture of daily life under fire. 'Missiles are falling here, but we get alerts before they hit,' he explained to worried relatives back home. 'When the sirens start, we run to the bunkers and hide. These daily situations are affecting our work, and now we just want to come home.' The situation created a painful dilemma for the workers and their families. While the income from Israel has provided unprecedented financial stability – with workers earning around 160,000 rupees (about $1863) per month, compared to much lower wages in rural India – the escalating violence made the cost of this prosperity potentially too high to bear. Kamlavati, whose husband Gopal has been working in Israel for a year, captured the anguish felt by families back home. 'My husband has been working safely in Israel for a year, and in this situation, we demand from the government that he be sent back home safely,' she said. 'Because now, seeing the conditions in Israel, we are getting scared.' The irony of their situation is not lost on the families. Kamlavati described how the money from Israel has transformed their lives – they've been able to build a new home and provide better opportunities for their children. Her daughter has started attending school, while her younger son is still very small. But the fear for her husband's safety has overshadowed these material gains. 'We are getting money – he gets 160,000 rupees and keeps sending money home regularly, which helps run the household,' she explained. 'But now, seeing the new house being built doesn't feel good. We just want the children's father to come back.' The workers are part of a larger Indian diaspora in Israel. According to Indian Minister of State for External Affairs Kirti Vardhan Singh, as of December 4, 2024, 6,583 Indian workers had reached Israel for employment, recruited by Israeli authorities and deployed across 195 Israeli companies. Of these workers, 2,325 were engaged in building construction, 1,906 in iron bending, 1,578 in plastering, and 774 in ceramic tiling – all essential skills for Israel's construction industry. Mihipurwa has been particularly affected by this migration. Local official Shravan Kumar Madeshia revealed that 250 people from the area had filled out application forms for work in Israel, with 150 being selected and currently working there. This represents a significant portion of the area's working-age population, making tensions in West Asia a community-wide concern. The families of brothers Sandeep and Sanjay exemplify the collective anxiety gripping the region. 'Both brothers have been living in Israel for a year, but now seeing the terrible war between Iran and Israel, we want our sons to return home safely,' their relatives said. The conflict escalated dramatically before the countries agreed to a ceasefire on Tuesday. Recent Iranian missile attacks hit residential areas in Tel Aviv, bringing the war directly to neighborhoods where many of the Indian workers live and work. The tense environment presents a stark contrast to the hopes these workers had when they first arrived in Israel. For many from rural Uttar Pradesh, the opportunity to work in Israel represented a chance to escape poverty and provide for their families in ways that would have been impossible at home. The monthly salary is several times what they could earn in similar work in India. However, the reality of living in a war zone has quickly overshadowed these economic benefits. The workers described a daily routine of constant vigilance – working while listening for air raid sirens, knowing that at any moment they might need to run for shelter. The psychological toll of this existence is evident in their desperate pleas to return home. The absence of available flights made their situation even more precarious. Commercial aviation has been severely disrupted due to the conflict, with many airlines suspending or limiting services to and from Israel. This has left the workers with no clear path home, despite their growing desperation to leave. The Indian government faces a delicate diplomatic challenge in the Middle East. India maintains strong relationships with both Israel and Iran, and has refused to join international condemnations of Israeli actions. New Delhi is accustomed to balancing ties with rival states during crises, but the most recent presented a particularly difficult test. For the families in Bahraich, the geopolitical complexities matter little compared to their immediate concern: bringing their loved ones home safely. The transformation of their economic fortunes has come at an unexpected cost – the constant fear that their primary breadwinners might become casualties in a conflict that has nothing to do with them. With hundreds of people requiring hospital treatment, the Indian workers found themselves in an increasingly untenable position. They were neither combatants nor civilians in the traditional sense, but economic migrants caught in the crossfire of a regional conflict. During the recent crisis, when families in rural India waited anxiously for news from their loved ones, and workers huddled themselves in bunkers to the sound of sirens, one could not help but be reminded that in our interconnected world, no conflict is truly local, and its human toll extends far beyond the immediate theater of war.
