logo
Test-Driving The Impressively Efficient 2025 Porsche Macan Electric

Test-Driving The Impressively Efficient 2025 Porsche Macan Electric

Forbes5 days ago
The entry-level Porsche Macan is a surprisingly efficient electric SUV
At last, an electric car that goes as far as it says it will. That's the Porsche Macan in a nutshell. Crucially though, this is the base, entry-level, bottom-of-the-food-chain Porsche Macan. It's the cheapest one. Not the Turbo or the 4S or even the 4. It's simply the Macan Electric.
It isn't hugely powerful or particularly quick, but it goes well enough when you put your foot down and, most importantly of all, it goes a very long way. More than that, it reliably goes a long way. Its range indicator is truthful, and it always covers more than three miles per kWh; sometimes even four.
To contextualize that one, I borrowed a Genesis GV60 for six months last year and, as lovely as it was, I very rarely saw more than 3.0 miles per kWh. After a week and 500 miles with the Macan, many of them at 70 mph on the motorway, typically where EVs struggle to drive efficiently, it never once fell below 3.0. Most of the time, even after three hours of highway driving, it was returning around 3.5 m/kWh. Multiply that by the capacity of the 95 kWh battery, and you get an approximate real-world range of 332 miles.
Porsche estimates 315 miles of range in the US using the EPA test cycle, while here in the UK it states between 333 and 398 miles.
Unlike pricier models, the base Porsche Macan has a single motor and is rear-wheel-drive.
When you finally have to visit a charger – which I didn't until driving from London to Devon and part-way back – the Macan fills its battery quicker than almost any other EV on the road. Porsche claims a maximum charge rate of 270 kW, but in typical Porsche fashion that figure is conservative. Within seconds of plugging in, my Macan shot up to 274 kW. A top-up from 15 percent (47 miles indicated) to 60 percent (190 miles indicated) took just 15 minutes.
This is how electric cars should work. They don't need to distort their driver's face every time he or she presses the accelerator. They should provide a satisfying surge of power and torque at low speed – enough to raise a smile when exiting a junction, overtaking or joining a highway – then settle down and return many, many miles per kilowatt-hour.
What else? Performance aside, the base Macan is just like every other model in the range. It looks the same, inside and out, and that means typically smart, sophisticated and thoughtful Porsche design. The interior is a triumph, neatly blending technology and tactility so that the driver can keep their eyes on the road while adjusting key controls, like interior temperature, by feel. It's not a particularly exciting cabin, but it's one that feels smart, premium and reassuringly well-made.
The interior features a mix of modern tech and tactile switchgear.
There's adjustable ambient lighting (but not too much), a bright, sharp and responsive touchscreen in the middle, an all-digital driver display that can be made to look like a classic Porsche instrument cluster, and a secondary display that gives you physical toggle switches for the climate control. There are even proper, physical buttons on the steering wheel too. No haptic track pads, and it's all the better for it. In a world where some automakers are obsessed with equipping cars with low-quality iPads instead of proper switchgear, at Porsche common sense prevails.
I said earlier how this base-level Macan isn't particularly quick. But it still has 360 PS in European-speak (about 355 old-fashioned horsepower), 563 Nm of torque (415 ft-lb) and can sprint to 60 mph in 5.4 seconds. That's about the same as a 996-generation Porsche 911 Carrera.
To spend a long, meandering paragraph on how the entry-level Macan handles on a tight and challenging road would be to miss the point. It's fine. More than fine, in fact. It handles surefootedly, steers precisely, rides comfortably and never breaks traction.
There's a dial on the steering wheel for changing drive mode, but in reality you'll leave it in the default setting. Sport mode is there if you really want it, and technically the quoted 0-60 time is only achievable with launch control enabled (press both pedals when stationary and release the brake like you've stood on a Lego brick). But in the real world you'll drive about knowing you're in a high-end, German electric SUV. You'll occasionally glance down at the Porsche badge on the steering wheel and smile, then you'll look at the range and efficiency readout, and smile even more.
Although not remarkably quick, the entry-level Macan still drives nicely.
I'd also like to praise the UK's EV charge network, which in just a few years has grown and matured significantly from the days when chargers were slow and frequently broken. Both top-ups with the Macan were completely painless, with no queue at either station and no faulty chargers either. This seamlessness is aided by Porsche's charge network subscription, which gives drivers access to a wide range of chargers, and its route-planning app, which creates a charging strategy for every long journey. I particularly like how Porsche offers a branded key fob with an integrated RFID chip; tap this on the charger instead of using the charge station's own app, and the top-up will be billed to the credit card on your Porsche account.
Tesla has offered such a service for a decade with its Supercharger network, but it's nice to see other manufacturers offering a similar service now too, and in many cases providing access to many more chargers than those installed by Tesla.
Porsche isn't alone, of course. Electric cars are quickly becoming ever-more efficient, and charging faster than ever. Public charging is still expensive, especially compared to plugging in at home, and depreciation is still a concern. But the whole infrastructure is finally starting to work as promised – and the Macan, even in entry-level form, is a prime example of an EV done right.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Martin Lewis explains how millions could still get car finance payouts after Supreme Court ruling
Martin Lewis explains how millions could still get car finance payouts after Supreme Court ruling

Yahoo

time32 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Martin Lewis explains how millions could still get car finance payouts after Supreme Court ruling

Millions of drivers potentially owed compensation over hidden commission payments in car finance schemes could still be able to claim – but they need to 'be patient' for a potential automatic repayment scheme, money expert Martin Lewis said. The founder of Money Saving Expert said motorists with 'secret commission payments' could potentially be reimbursed by an automatic redress scheme by the end of the year. It comes after the Supreme Court ruled that car finance lenders would only be liable for the hidden commission payments in the most 'unfair' cases. 'Nobody should be doing anything right now. You need to sit on your hands. 'People need to be patient. It is the sensible thing to do,' Mr Lewis said. 'While you may have a claim, we are potentially going to see the regulator put in an automatic redress scheme meaning you do not have to put in a claim to get your money. 'So if you were to sign up to a claim's firm on the back of this news, there is a chance you could get money paid to you, and the claim's firm could ask for 25 per cent of it even though it has done nothing.' Mr Lewis said payouts could come by the end of the year, but people should 'wait to see' exactly what the Financial Conduct Authority redress scheme would be. Two lenders, FirstRand Bank and Close Brothers, went to the UK's highest court to challenge a Court of Appeal ruling which found commission payments paid by buyers to car dealers as part of finance arrangements made before 2021 – without the motorist's fully informed consent – were unlawful. The ruling in October last year found three motorists, who all bought their cars before 2021, should receive compensation after they were not told either clearly enough or at all that the car dealers, acting as credit brokers, would receive a commission from the lenders for introducing business to them. Lawyers for the lenders told the Supreme Court at a three-day hearing in April the decision was an 'egregious error', while the Financial Conduct Authority intervened in the case and claimed the ruling 'goes too far'. The three drivers, Marcus Johnson, Andrew Wrench and Amy Hopcraft, opposed the challenge. Giving a summary of the Supreme Court's ruling on Friday, Lord Reed, one of five justices who heard the case, said: 'For the reasons set out in detail in a judgment published today, the Supreme Court allows the appeals brought by the finance companies.' He continued: 'However, we uphold Mr Johnson's claim that the relationship between him and the finance company was unfair, and we allow the appeal in his case only because the Court of Appeal made a number of mistakes in reaching its decision. Retaking the decision on a proper basis, we award him the amount of a commission plus interest.'

6 ridiculous promises we were sold about 5G
6 ridiculous promises we were sold about 5G

Android Authority

time34 minutes ago

  • Android Authority

6 ridiculous promises we were sold about 5G

Kris Carlon / Android Authority Despite some speed and network coverage improvements, 5G hasn't really lived up to the hype. You know it, I know it, and deep down, even the carriers know it. In fact, a few of the industry's bigwigs would probably rather we all forget about some of the absolutely outlandish claims and overenthusiastic visions they tried to sell us about 5G. But the internet never forgets, so it's time for us to play 'where are they now' with some of the worst nonsense from the turn of the decade. Augmented reality everywhere Edgar Cervantes / Android Authority A lot of 5G marketing went in one ear and out the other with me, but I distinctly remember UK carrier EE teaming up with Kevin Bacon to launch the 5G-equipped Apple iPhone 12 Pro in an ad showcasing not only a drone delivery but an augmented reality Rita Ora 'live' performance atop the London skyline. I've never taken delivery by drone, but Amazon offers it in some places, and emergency services increasingly use drones in rural areas. However, this relies on GPS/GNSS and LiDAR, rather than 5G. And while it's true that we've seen concerts and shows take place in virtual worlds, these certainly haven't required 5G networks or AR goggles for access. Qualcomm CEO Cristiano Amon was also bullish on AR back then. In 2021, he noted, 'once you have the 5G network built,' he promised, 'the phone is going to evolve to allow the element of augmented reality glasses. If you look at what's happening with (VR), we're getting to scale. I think it's just the beginning of an inflection point.' While it might be harsh to call this prediction absolutely wrong, augmented reality in our pockets remains a pipe dream. The best we still have today is the overpriced, heavily tethered $3,500 Apple Vision Pro or smart glasses like the Ray-Ban Meta Wayfarer that are far more limited in scope. In both cases, 5G hardly factors into their appeal. A more convenient night's stay Aamir Siddiqui / Android Authority Back when HUAWEI was a player in Western markets, it was one of the biggest proponents of 5G. In partnership with China Telecom, the two pledged to build the world's first 5G smart hotel at the InterContinental Shijiazhuang. Between facial recognition login, VR rowing machines in the gym, and robots to guide guests to their rooms and patrol the perimeter, this was billed as the future of hotel convenience. However, I'm not sure removing the personal touch is exactly the experience that five-star patrons are looking for. The smart hotel idea also boasted more mundane prospects, such as 5G-powered conferencing, hotel room Wi-Fi (which would no doubt be insanely expensive powered by 5G), and cloud gaming. Nothing we can't already accomplish with a trusty Ethernet port, then? Smart cities While using your XR-ready phone for shopping or staying in a robot-infested hotel might be quite personal experiences, others wanted to get in early to upsell their big-picture potential. Vodafone UK took a 'pragmatic' approach in the early years, claiming that heavily connected smart cities could leverage IoT across heating, cooling, and lighting systems to monitor energy use and identify efficiencies to save up to £580 million of public money. That's a considerable lump of cash the current administration would love to find down the back of the sofa. The US's Verizon published similar ideas in a white paper, covering everything from energy and traffic management to smart buildings and even 'smart government.' According to the company, autonomous cars, smart communities, industrial IoT, remote healthcare — they all will rely on 5G. But outside of a few demos, we're still waiting. While some aspects of smart cities may eventually become a reality with the adoption of non-standalone networks and 5G Advanced, hyping these up decades before they can conceivably become a reality remains laughably disingenuous. On-the-road automotive updates Damien Wilde / Android Authority The promises of hugely connected smart cities, autonomous taxis, and roaming drone deliveries are undoubtedly the most memorable tropes trotted out to build hype in 5G, and none have to pass. Back in 2019, Intel's General Manager of 5G Strategy, Rob Topol, was incredibly enthusiastic about just how powerful fast inner city networks would be. 'You could pull up to a stop light and a mmWave antenna can provide a burst download or update to the car. It can give you 100GBs within just a few seconds while you're sitting at the intersection.' It sounds great, but obviously, it's still a far-flung fantasy all these years later. But let's be generous and do the math for 100GB while stopped at a light for 30 seconds. That would require data speeds in the region of 27Gbit/s, a good 100x faster than the 240Mbps or so that US consumers see on the fastest 5G networks. No consumers see anything close to those speeds even when standing next to an mmWave tower. It was a fanciful claim back then and seems downright ridiculous now. mmWave all the things David Imel / Android Authority Clearly, 5G hinged far too many hopes and promises on the mass rollouts of far more ultra-fast spectrum, known as mmWave. While mmWave certainly exists in parts of the US and other countries, it's turned out to be widely expensive and limited in its potential coverage area. While the carriers were obviously big on it, mmWave was all the talk at mobile chipset vendors too. MediaTek's Finnbar Moynihan noted that 'mmWave is the foundational fundamental technology that's going to shape a lot of things that we can't even imagine yet, because of the new spectrum, the big wide bandwidth it opens up, the latency,' Qualcomm was equally optimistic, highlighting that '5G NR mmWave is a new frontier for mobile' after successfully testing its first 5G modem on 28GHz spectrum. But how many consumers are actually using mmWave today? Globally, very few. Even flagship smartphones rarely include mmWave components outside the US, while mid-range models continue to avoid support altogether. While mmWave has certainly helped accelerate data speeds in areas where it's available, its lack of widespread availability is a significant factor in 5G's failure to hit its data speed and latency promises. If anything, it's rather amusing to see Verizon blend its short-range mmWave coverage claims into wide-area 4GHz C-band deployment under the guise of 'ultra wideband' to make its coverage map look a lot better. What started as a mmWave-only brand morphed into a catch-all for anything faster than basic 5G. Build it and they will come Kris Carlon / Android Authority Perhaps one of the more mind-blogging talking points around the rollout of 5G was excitement for the unknown. Instead of telling us what 5G would do, many execs shrugged and said, 'Let's just build it and wait for the magic.' It was blind optimism at scale — expensive, undefined, and overmarketed. Speaking all the way back in 2018, US carriers were already hyping up 5G without any real specifics. For example, Hans Vestberg, Verizon, speaking in 2018, claimed that 5G would usher in the 'fourth industrial revolution,' while Marcelo Claure of Sprint opined, 'Going from 4G to 5G is like going from black-and-white to color TV.' That sounds exciting but is ultimately meaningless, and so it turned out to be. Marc Allera, CEO of BT's Consumer brands also remarked: 'When we launched 4G back in 2012 nobody called Netflix, Uber, and the explosion in social media platforms. What we do see is that when we build faster, better, more reliable networks, app developers can do more things, consumers can do more things, and the imagination of developers in serious applications, as well as fun, is unlimited.' Likewise, MediaTek's Kevin Keating offered: 'Until you actually start using [5G] and see what you can do with it, you can't really imagine how you're gonna change markets and industries with technology you don't have in your hands.' While it's fair enough to admit that you can't predict the exact things anyone will do with any new technology, hoping for others to fill in the gaps seems like a rather massive oversight. Especially given that 5G rollouts are expensive and have yet to provide consumers with any truly new and compelling use cases. Browsing Insta and consuming Shorts run just as well on 4G. Of course, not everyone was wrong about 5G. Plenty of CEOs and pundits observed that 5G, particularly early non-standalone rollouts, might have been a solution looking for a problem. A pat on the back for everyone who correctly identified that progress was likely to be more gradual rather than a significant leap. Still, those who sold 5G as a technological golden age in waiting were undoubtedly wrong, and maybe a little cynical. With 6G hype already on the horizon, here's hoping the next revolution comes with fewer empty promises and more actual progress. Follow

UK parliamentary crypto group reformed amid push for regulatory clarity
UK parliamentary crypto group reformed amid push for regulatory clarity

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

UK parliamentary crypto group reformed amid push for regulatory clarity

On Monday, the All-Party Parliamentary Group, or APPG, for crypto and digital assets was relaunched as the industry is clamouring for regulatory clarity. While it's not part of the official legislative machinery, the group functions as a forum for Members of Parliament to liaise with government regulators over crypto regulations. The group will be supported by CryptoUK, a notable crypto lobby organisation that represents over 150 market stakeholders. The cross-party coalition will be chaired by Gurinder Josan, a Labour Party MP, and Ed Vaizey, a Conservative member of the House of Lords, according to an announcement. Vaizey is a former government minister for the digital economy. 'Our goal is to make the UK the safest place for consumers and the best place for businesses to invest and build,' Josan said. 'That means establishing robust, fair and future-focused rules.' With crypto ownership in the UK on the rise, according to research by the Financial Conduct Authority, the relaunched APPG says it wants to explore ways to close the gap between the expanding crypto adoption in the UK and the lack of a fully operational regulatory regime for digital assets. The newly reformed group comes as market participants are still waiting for concrete moves from the government in terms of crypto regulations. In April, UK Chancellor Rachel Reeves published draft legislation for crypto regulations and invited public comments. Still, industry participants in Britain have become even more anxious for clear-cut crypto regulations, especially with developments on that front happening in the US and the EU. In May, HMRC, the UK's tax authority, announced plans to enact new reporting requirements for crypto companies from next year. Regulators have also tightened crypto ad rules. Some have criticised the proposed rules as being too strict on the background checks that they'll force crypto firms to comply in order to operate in the UK. Su Carpenter, executive director of CryptoUK, has hit back against that criticism. 'If you didn't expect that you would have to be in this position to meet these levels of compliance and to operate within these frameworks — where have you been for the last few years?' Carpenter told DL News in May. Crypto market movers Bitcoin has dropped 0.5% in value over the past 24 hours and is trading at $117,893. Ethereum also shed 1.6% in the same period to $3,760. What we're reading revenue falls to 10-month low amid competition, memecoin slump — DL News Interactive Brokers Considers Stablecoin Launch: Report — Unchained Why this 'dead' token isn't dead— Milk Road Plasma Public Sale Ends With $373 Million in XPL Commitments — Unchained Ethereum investors want treasuries to buy more Ether. BitMine just hinted at the opposite — DL News Osato Avan-Nomayo is our Nigeria-based DeFi correspondent. He covers DeFi and tech. Got a tip? Please contact him atosato@

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store