9 things we learned about 'hard b*****d' Keir Starmer from Trump to family life
The Prime Minister has been branded a "hard b****d" as he prepares for his second year in power.
In an interview with the BBC's Political Thinking podcast, Keir Starmer admitted that the past week has been "tough" - but maintained he has not "lost the dressing room". Mr Starmer also opened up about his relationship with Donald Trump, saying he understands what "anchors" the President.
He vowed to "keep punching through" after a difficult first 12 months in Downing Street, and said he is proud of what Labour has achieved. But he admitted mistakes have been made - including failure to engage with disgruntled backbenchers over welfare changes.
The PM also threw his support behind Chancellor Rachel Reeves, who was seen crying in the Commons on Wednesday.
Here we look at some of the stand-out things he told host Nick Robinson in the wide-ranging interview.
Whether he's a hard b****d
The PM was told by Mr Robinson: "One of your friends who plays football with you, he says his words, you're a hard b******. Now, being this far behind in the polls with a Chancellor who people lack confidence in, with a Labour Party that's denied you a Parliamentary majority on something you believe in, are you a hard enough b****** to look in the mirror and say, I've got to change the party's got to change something serious has to change."
The PM replied: "We'll keep on punching through. I'm a hard enough b****** to find out who it was who said that so I can have a discussion with him."
'I've not lost the dressing room'
After a difficult few days, Mr Starmer said he has not "lost the dressing room".
He said: "Yes, it's been tough. I'm the sort person that then wants to reflect on that, to ask myself what do we need to ensure we don't get into a situation like that again. And we'll go through that process
"But I also know what we will do, and that is we will come through it stronger. And that's what I've always done."
He later added: "A s we go through the long list of things that we've achieved this year the Labour dressing room, the PLP (Parliamentary Labour Party) is proud as hell of what we've done."
What went wrong on welfare
The Prime Minister admitted he should have engaged with Labour backbenchers better as concerns came to light. But he said the need for reform remains.
He was forced to roll back on his plans after MPs refused to back plans to cut access to personal independence payments (PIP) and health aspects of Universal Credit.
The PM said: "We didn't get the process right. As I say Labour MPs are absolutely invested in this. It matters to them to get things like this right. And we didn't get that process right. We didn't engage in the way that we should have done."
On Rachel Reeves' tears
The interview happened hours after Chancellor Rachel Reeves was seen crying in the Commons chamber at PMQs.
He denied it was anything to do with political matters. He said: "She's made it clear it's a personal matter and I'm not going to go into the personal matter of a colleague."
And he continued: "She's done a fantastic job. She and I work together, we think together... We're in lockstep."
"It's got nothing to do with politics, nothing to do, with any discussion between me and Rachel, nothing to do with the matters of this week... She will be Chancellor for a very long time to come."
Why changed view on grooming gangs
The Prime Minister described himself as a "pragmatist". He said: "So just to very briefly guve the example of grooming gangs., way back 15 years ago I prosecuted the first of these cases of the grooming cases.
"So I know firsthand what it means for victims and calling for things like mandatory reporting in these cases for a very, very long time. And it matters to me that we get it right.
" Having had lots of inquiries, I thought we should get on with implementing the recommendations that we had. But I did ask Louise Casey to do an audit check for me, that that would help me out."
He went on: "I asked Louise, I said, I need to be sure that we're in the right place on this. Louise Casey has got a reputation for getting to bottom of matters. She did an audit..
"I read it through, from end to end. And she herself had actually gone into the review thinking we didn't need a national inquiry. She then uncovered things which changed her mind.
"I went through that and I decided the right thing to do was to follow her recommendation."
Spending too much time overseas?
The Prime Minister defended the amount of time he has been spending overseas, amid questions about whether it is affecting domestic policy. Mr Starmer shot back that good relations with world leaders brings real-world benefits to Britons.
He said: "It is important to have a good relationship with, President Trump, rooted in the national interest, but it also helped us when we were negotiating a trade deal, which wasn't good. So why don't you do it?"
The PM added: "The car manufacturing industry was likely to be hit with a hefty tariff if we didn't get a trade deal of 27.5%." He went on: "Building those relationships with international leaders is hugely important. Getting to know people, what their instincts are, that is in the national interest."
The PM said he'd had "a glass of wine" with French President Emmanuel Macrobn which paved the way for a trade agreement with the EU. "That helped when we got to the reset that delivered for us and the SPF agreement, which means that the prices will come down in a supermarket near you," he said.
Secret visits to Leeds Hospital to see dying brother
Before and after the general election, Mr Starmer secretly visited his brother Nick, who died on Boxing Day. He would use the porters' lift in order to evade being spotted, he revealed.
The PM said: "It's really hard to lose your brother, to cancer. He was a very vulnerable man. He had difficulties when he was growing up and never really had security in his life.
"That's why I do understand firsthand what it means to have respect and security. That's why it's hard wired into my politics. And he was that diagnosed, with stage four lung cancer.
"I wasn't sure how he would cope with that. I made it my business to be there in the hospital when he was told so I could begin to help look after him. I don't think he would have wanted or withstood any public, knowledge of where he was at, and I wanted fiercely to protect him. And that's why, both before the election and after the election, I went secretly to see him in hospital.
"He was intensive care for a long time." The PM said this often involved using a porters lift so he was not spotted. "The staff there were absolutely brilliant, as they always are," he said.
Flat is 22 seconds from office
The PM said it is really important for him to spend time with his family despite the pressures of his job.
He said: "There is, an upside (to living in Downing Street) because the flat is 22 seconds from my office. I've timed it, but it means I can see the children, I can pop up when they're around.
"And I do, because it is really important. Because, look, my family really means a huge amount to me. My wife Vic is an absolute rock. by my side and my kids are my pride and joy."
Wouldn't swap worst day in power for opposition
The Prime Minister said that he found being in opposition frustrating - and he wouldn't swap the worst day in power for his old life.
Mr Starmer said: "I came into politics to change lives, having had nine long years in opposition, frustrated that we were in opposition, unable to change lives. I wouldn't swap a single day of the last year with opposition. And we've done some fantastic things ."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scottish Sun
31 minutes ago
- Scottish Sun
Fury as woke Labour council bans Army vehicles – including open-top Jackal – from ARMED FORCES DAY parade
Labour's veterans minister Al Carns, who won a Military Cross in Afghanistan, slammed the decision Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) A COUNCIL sparked outrage by banning Army vehicles including an open-top Jackal from Armed Forces Day celebrations today. The Labour authority's leader in York said the decision was due to 'residents' concerns' and fears of protests — and 'reflects our city's diverse views'. 1 A council sparked outrage by banning Army vehicles including an open-top Jackal from Armed Forces Day celebrations Credit: Crown Copyright/MoD But soldiers from local reserve unit the Queen's Own Yeomanry withdrew from the event in protest, defence sources told The Sun. One said: 'It was like asking the cavalry to come without horses. It is humiliating. 'They wanted to attend with the Jackal but they were told that they were not welcome.' A whistle-blower told the Fill Your Boots military blog that the council was worried about 'triggering a protest'. READ MORE ON ARMED FORCES SUNEMPLOYMENT How to join the Armed Forces and quick march into a rewarding military career But Labour's veterans minister Al Carns, who won a Military Cross in Afghanistan, said: 'The only reason people have the right to protest is because our military provide the freedoms to do so.' Tory MP Kevin Hollinrake slammed the ban as 'plain bonkers'. He said: 'This is a snub on our servicemen and veterans to appease a tiny minority. 'We shouldn't be ashamed of our military showing off their equipment and uniform, it's something we should be proud of.' Council chief Claire Douglas claimed it was 'a mutual, local decision'. Instead, the authority has promoted a new 'family friendly' Armed Forces Day Trail taking in the city's key military sites.
Leader Live
39 minutes ago
- Leader Live
MPs back move to protect llamas and alpacas from dog attacks
Dog owners already face a fine if their pet attacks or worries farm animals listed in the Dogs (Protection of Livestock) Act 1953, such as cattle, sheep, pigs and horses. But after a Commons debate, MPs have agreed to add 'camelids' to this list, giving llamas and alpacas in England and Wales similar protections as they have in Scotland. The Dogs (Protection of Livestock) (Amendment) Bill, which now faces further scrutiny in the Lords at a later date, will also see unlimited fines rolled out in dog attack cases, lifting a £1,000 cap. 'They're no laughing matter, alpacas and llamas,' Labour MP Peter Lamb said. 'The Inca empire never developed the wheel. 'The entirety of that empire was built off the back of alpacas and llamas and, as a result, they are an animal that's worthy of great respect.' Mr Lamb said he had heard of 'pretty harrowing cases of what happened to that livestock' at a centre in Tilgate Park in Crawley, West Sussex, where he was the borough council leader. 'In one case, a sheep was just literally set on fire whilst still alive and while the Bill does not directly deal with that, I think some of the mentality that goes into disrespecting these animals is worthy of note,' he said. 'But what we have done is very often, far more often than that, had dogs set on these animals, or at least, people have not been in control of these. 'And we've eventually had to remove the sheep entirely from the publicly accessible areas on the basis of that.' Conservative MP for Chester South and Eddisbury Aphra Brandreth, who proposed the private member's Bill, told the Commons: 'Livestock worrying, as we know, has devastating consequences for both animals and farmers.' She added: 'The damage of a livestock attack can be horrific, causing brutal injuries which are tragically often fatal. 'There are instances of stress causing pregnant livestock to miscarry, and separation of mothers and young leading to hypothermia or starvation. 'I've seen pictures from farmers in my constituency where attacks have mutilated their calves beyond any hope of keeping them alive. 'The consequences, no matter what the scale of an attack, are profound.' As part of the draft new law, authorities would get the powers to treat attacking livestock as separate to 'worrying', which includes chasing farm animals in a way which could cause injury, suffering or loss or 'diminution in their produce'. The Bill would also expand the 1953 Act's scope, which applies on agricultural land, to roads and paths, where animals might be herded. Labour MP Mike Reader praised Ms Brandreth for her 'responsible and balanced approach'. The Northampton South MP said it was 'positive that this expands that definition to roads and paths, because it sets clear requirements that when someone is accessing land, particularly throughout Northamptonshire where there're so many paths that run through farmland, there's a clear definition in the law to both protect farmers but also to set clear boundaries for those who are perhaps walking their dogs… when they access farmland'. Environment minister Emma Hardy said the Government was 'fully committed to supporting this important Bill as it progresses through the other place', before the Bill cleared the Commons at third reading.
Leader Live
39 minutes ago
- Leader Live
Sally Rooney will remain ‘committed supporter of Palestine Action', court told
The Irish author said in court documents that the ban would prevent her from speaking at future public events as she 'could not in good conscience disguise or lie about my principles' if it comes into effect at 12.01am on Saturday as planned. If the ban does come into effect, it would make membership of, or support for, Palestine Action a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison. Rooney has provided support for a legal claim by Huda Ammori, the co-founder of Palestine Action, against the Home Office, over the decision to proscribe the group under the Terrorism Act 2000. Ms Ammori asked a High Court judge on Friday to temporarily block the move from becoming law over the weekend, ahead of a bid to be given the green light to challenge the Government's decision later this month. But in a ruling, Mr Justice Chamberlain refused to block the ban, stating that any harm caused is 'insufficient to outweigh the strong public interest in maintaining the order in force'. Barristers for Ms Ammori are seeking to appeal against the ruling on Friday evening. In her witness statement, cited in Mr Justice Chamberlain's judgment, Rooney said the 'cultural effects' of Palestine Action becoming proscribed 'could not be easily mended'. She said: 'Though I am based in Ireland, my work is published in the UK. My novels regularly appear in bestseller lists, and I often travel to Britain to speak in public about my work. 'I am and will continue to be a committed supporter of Palestine Action. 'If… that support is criminalised, I will effectively be prevented from speaking at any future public events in the UK, since I could not in good conscience disguise or lie about my principles in public. 'If I continue to voice support for Palestine Action from my home in Ireland, what are the likely consequences? Will I be denounced publicly by the Prime Minister? 'Will bookshops go on stocking the work of an author the Home Secretary has branded a 'terrorist' simply for supporting a protest group? 'The BBC has adapted two of my books for television; both series are presently promoted on the iPlayer service. Normal People, which I co-wrote and produced, was the BBC's most-streamed series in 2020, with over 62 million views. 'My beliefs have not changed since the making of that series, and I have done nothing but continue to express them. 'If the expression of those beliefs becomes a terror offence under UK law, would the BBC continue to screen and promote my work? 'Is it likely that I could ever again collaborate with British public institutions like the BBC as I have done in the past? 'The cultural effects of proscription could not be easily mended, even if the Home Secretary later changed her mind. 'For any public figure to be labelled a 'supporter of terrorism' by the state would have serious consequences. 'It would likely end or severely restrict the careers of many emerging artists. ''Terrorism' is not a trivial word.' In written submissions for Friday's hearing, Raza Husain KC, for Ms Ammori, said that Rooney 'will continue to voice her support from Ireland' for the group. He said: 'Given her public support for Palestine Action… she is concerned that being labelled a 'supporter of terrorism' would have serious impacts on her ability to collaborate and publicise her work.' He continued: 'Ms Rooney notes that 'countless artists, writers and members of the public support direct action against complicity in what Israel is doing in Palestine', including Juliet Stevenson, Paul Weller, Tilda Swinton, Brian Eno, and other signatories to an open letter dated 30 June 2025.' If Palestine Action loses its bid to temporarily block the move, it is due to become a terrorist organisation on Saturday, after the order was signed by the Home Secretary, Yvette Cooper. Ms Cooper announced plans to proscribe the direct action group last month, after two Voyager planes were damaged at RAF Brize Norton in Oxfordshire on June 20, an action claimed by Palestine Action.
