
MPs back move to protect llamas and alpacas from dog attacks
But after a Commons debate, MPs have agreed to add 'camelids' to this list, giving llamas and alpacas in England and Wales similar protections as they have in Scotland.
The Dogs (Protection of Livestock) (Amendment) Bill, which now faces further scrutiny in the Lords at a later date, will also see unlimited fines rolled out in dog attack cases, lifting a £1,000 cap.
'They're no laughing matter, alpacas and llamas,' Labour MP Peter Lamb said.
'The Inca empire never developed the wheel.
'The entirety of that empire was built off the back of alpacas and llamas and, as a result, they are an animal that's worthy of great respect.'
Mr Lamb said he had heard of 'pretty harrowing cases of what happened to that livestock' at a centre in Tilgate Park in Crawley, West Sussex, where he was the borough council leader.
'In one case, a sheep was just literally set on fire whilst still alive and while the Bill does not directly deal with that, I think some of the mentality that goes into disrespecting these animals is worthy of note,' he said.
'But what we have done is very often, far more often than that, had dogs set on these animals, or at least, people have not been in control of these.
'And we've eventually had to remove the sheep entirely from the publicly accessible areas on the basis of that.'
Conservative MP for Chester South and Eddisbury Aphra Brandreth, who proposed the private member's Bill, told the Commons: 'Livestock worrying, as we know, has devastating consequences for both animals and farmers.'
She added: 'The damage of a livestock attack can be horrific, causing brutal injuries which are tragically often fatal.
'There are instances of stress causing pregnant livestock to miscarry, and separation of mothers and young leading to hypothermia or starvation.
'I've seen pictures from farmers in my constituency where attacks have mutilated their calves beyond any hope of keeping them alive.
'The consequences, no matter what the scale of an attack, are profound.'
As part of the draft new law, authorities would get the powers to treat attacking livestock as separate to 'worrying', which includes chasing farm animals in a way which could cause injury, suffering or loss or 'diminution in their produce'.
The Bill would also expand the 1953 Act's scope, which applies on agricultural land, to roads and paths, where animals might be herded.
Labour MP Mike Reader praised Ms Brandreth for her 'responsible and balanced approach'.
The Northampton South MP said it was 'positive that this expands that definition to roads and paths, because it sets clear requirements that when someone is accessing land, particularly throughout Northamptonshire where there're so many paths that run through farmland, there's a clear definition in the law to both protect farmers but also to set clear boundaries for those who are perhaps walking their dogs… when they access farmland'.
Environment minister Emma Hardy said the Government was 'fully committed to supporting this important Bill as it progresses through the other place', before the Bill cleared the Commons at third reading.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Metro
an hour ago
- Metro
The Starmiversary is here - where did it all go so wrong?
On May 22 2024, Rishi Sunak stood outside of Downing Street in the pouring rain and announced he was calling a General Election. Six weeks later, Sir Keir Starmer pulled up in his car to No 10 on July 5. As he stepped out, the sun came out. The metaphor was clear. In contrast to the bleak, miserable end to the Tories' time in charge, here was a new leader promising brighter days ahead. During his first speech, he told the nation: 'If you voted for Labour yesterday, we will carry the responsibility of your trust, as we rebuild our country. 'But whether you voted Labour or not, in fact – especially if you did not, I say to you, directly, my government will serve you.' Looking back at that day a year on, it might not be too hard to argue that optimistic idea about Starmer bringing a warm glow to the country was quite a pathetic fallacy. Craig Munro breaks down Westminster chaos into easy to follow insight, walking you through what the latest policies mean to you. Sent every Wednesday. Sign up here. Labour's polling numbers have collapsed since that day, and the party is now consistently stuck several points behind Reform. The PM himself is doing only marginally better, with a net favourability rating of -34 according to YouGov. On Tuesday, the government suffered its biggest ever rebellion despite gutting its flagship welfare bill. The following day, the Chancellor wept openly during PMQs. By Thursday evening, one of Starmer's MPs, Zarah Sultana, announced she was leaving the Labour party and would 'co-lead the founding of a new party' with the ex-Labour leader, Jeremy Corbyn. He said discussions were 'ongoing' after the announcement. Outlining her reasons for leaving the party, Sultana accused the Labour Government of failing to improve people's lives, and claimed it 'wants to make disabled people suffer' in reference to ministers' proposals to reform welfare – a claim that was rejected by Home Secretary Yvette Cooper. So where did it all go so wrong? It's impossible to pick a particular moment where the trouble started. But if we were going to have a shot regardless, polls wouldn't be a bad place to start looking. They seem to suggest Starmer's approval rating falls off a bit of a cliff around the end of July 2024 – barely three weeks after he started his new job. What was happening politically around the end of July? Well, one big thing happened on July 29: that was the day Rachel Reeves stood up in Parliament and declared a massive cut to the winter fuel payment. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video In hindsight, it's a little baffling. Starmer's government was still defining itself to voters, trying to project an image about who they were and what they represented. There's an argument that the Chancellor was aiming to get the tough but necessary decisions out of the way as early as possible, so they would have faded to the back of voters' minds by the next general election. But clearly, first impressions matter. Despite the recent backtrack, in which the payment was returned to everyone receiving a pension who has an income below a £35,000 threshold, this might have been the moment many voters made up their mind about the PM and his ministers. And of course, the Winter Fuel Payment was not the only announcement in this vein. There was inheritance tax on farms, and the retention of the two-child benefit cap. All these 'tough decisions' circled around something else mentioned for the first time in that July 29 speech: the '£22 billion black hole' in the public finances that Reeves said she had found left over by the Conservatives. Many of Labour's woes in government can be traced back to this figure. According to the Parliamentary transcript Hansard, the phrase '£22 billion black hole' has been used in the House of Commons no fewer than 287 times since last July, largely in the context of justifying unpopular choices. Plenty of political goodwill has been spent on filling it but, as might be expected from a black hole, everything else has been sucked into it too. Several of the government's policies enjoy broad public support – charging VAT on private school fees to fund state education; closer alignment with the European Union; and expanding free school meals, for example. More Trending But it's the tricky decisions that the government says it must make to get the country on a firmer fiscal footing that really stick with people. As a result, a year after the party's landslide victory, the Labour government has found itself defined more by the things it didn't want to have to do, than the things it did want to do. This week, the sun was blazing again ahead of the first Starmiversary. But the Prime Minister may well have spent those days wondering how much longer it'll be until the clouds clear for him. Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: What we know about Zarah Sultana's new party 'with Jeremy Corbyn' after she quits Labour MORE: From tears to cheers, readers discuss Rachel Reeves and tax rises MORE: Rachel Reeves crying exposes a grim double standard


The Herald Scotland
an hour ago
- The Herald Scotland
The inside story of the battle for control of Edinburgh
There might still have been a second Colinton by-election, because the SNP's Marco Biagi would probably still have left when appointed a government special adviser, and without the Spence controversy the Lib Dems would have won that too, giving them 16 seats. But even with 14, the Lib Dems are in pole position at the head of an informal Stop-the-Nats-and-Crazy-Greens coalition which, with Conservative support, has until now kept the bedraggled Labour administration in place. Read more Labour did surprisingly well, topping first preferences despite national chaos over welfare and winter fuel allowances, as well as bruising allegations of sexual harassment against former council group leader Cammy Day, for which police found no evidence of criminality. While a move to make Cllr Day the new planning convener at the final council meeting before the summer recess was wisely shelved – it would have come immediately before the angry debate over former Scottish Information Commissioner Kevin Dunion's report about how complaints against him were handled – the issue of his fitness for a return to a senior position has not gone away. The 11-strong Labour group – it would only have been ten had it not been for Ms Spence's resignation – is unstable because they cannot rely on Leith councillor Katrina Faccenda, already suspended once for voting against the whip, who has refused to accept Cllr Day's return after the end of his suspension. The plan for Cllr Day to be appointed at the next meeting in August after things have settled down presumes all Lib Dem and Conservative councillors will vote in favour, but also if the Lib Dems stick with their previous position of turning down the opportunity to lead the administration. This increasingly looks untenable. The Lib Dems can't continue to stand on a ticket of delivering better services, win the trust of voters and then refuse to take charge, ostensibly because too many of their councillors have other work commitments. Until now, the Conservative group has grudgingly accepted the situation to keep the SNP and their Green friends out of administration, which after the experience of 2017-22 is understandable. Lib-Dems celebrate their surprise victory (Image: free) But the SNP is running out of steam locally and nationally – beaten into fourth in last week's by-election – and in what were once Conservative heartlands they do not present a threat. Conversely, since the 2022 elections and all subsequent by-elections bar the unusual circumstances of the Colinton re-run in January, the Lib Dems are not just eating the Tories' lunch, but their breakfast and supper too, and Reform is taking home the leftovers in a doggy bag. It is therefore not in the Conservative interest for the Lib Dems to continue evading responsibility for running the city and being held to the promises in their many election leaflets. The three Conservative councillors who were around in 2007 when the Lib Dems formed a coalition with the SNP will remember just how hard they found it, and five years later the 17 Lib Dem councillors were reduced to three. But there are those in the Conservative group who cannot see past the old constitutional battle lines, failing to accept voters once prepared to lend them their support have moved on from prioritising the threat of independence. No longer the main alternative to Labour or the Nationalists, Edinburgh Conservatives now face an existential threat from both left and right, yet it appears some councillors would rather not force the Lib Dems into administration and instead approve a £40,000 a year convenership for Cammy Day to keep the SNP out. Like Cllr Faccenda, several Conservatives and Lib Dems have a significant problem with welcoming back Cllr Day as if nothing had happened, and the lack of any sign of contrition from the ex-leader has not helped. If not quite a full split, there is now a high chance of serious division in the Tory group, and as it stands if just four Conservatives oppose Cllr Day's appointment it will fail. The obvious solution is for the Lib Dems to step up to the plate, and with the next full council meeting not till August 28 they have all summer to reach a decision, time they intend to take, with nothing ruled in or out, and that presumably includes some being prepared to reduce their other commitments. Read more Labour won't give up a raft of convenerships and the accompanying responsibility payments – up to the £71,500 the leader Jane Meagher receives – without a fight, but they might have no option with a revived pact with the SNP ruled out by the national leadership. It's either that or letting the SNP lead a chaotic minority administration which will probably be unable to pass a budget. But if the Conservatives are to survive as a council force in 2027, the Lib Dems need to be prised out of the same comfort zone enjoyed by the SNP at Holyrood for so long, of taking responsibility for nothing and credit for everything and making electoral gains across swathes of middle-class Edinburgh simply by not being the Conservatives. It all seems such a long time since 2017 when the Conservatives took just short of 30 per cent of first preference votes and returned 18 councillors compared to just six Lib Dems, but that was before Partygate, Liz Truss and Reform. It's the same situation across the country, and former Morningside councillor Mark McInnes, now Lord McInnes of Kilwinning and the UK Conservatives' newly appointed chief executive, has his work cut out. John McLellan is a former Edinburgh Evening News and Scotsman editor. He served as a City of Edinburgh councillor for five years for the Conservatives. Brought up in Glasgow, McLellan has lived and worked in Edinburgh for 30 years


BBC News
2 hours ago
- BBC News
Labour's first year: How has the North East and Cumbria fared?
A year ago Labour won all but two of north-east England and Cumbria's 32 constituencies in a landslide election that swept Sir Keir Starmer into Downing after a bumpy 12 months is Labour's rose still proud, or a little wilted?Time to see whether July 2025 marks a happy or unhappy anniversary. Giving us more power Happy anniversary: One of Labour's strongest areas. Within days of taking office, Sir Keir Starmer invited the country's elected regional mayors into 10 Downing Street, including the North East's Kim McGuinness and the one Conservative mayor, Tees Valley's Lord PM was keen to enlist them in his plan for economic growth and so far Labour has largely been good to its word, with regular meetings between ministers and has offered more powers and more freedom, while more money is also on the way. The test will be if it is sustained, but even Ben Houchen says he cannot find fault in the approach to anniversary: A lack of devolution has seen Cumbria miss out on any available pots of money. But that could change next year when the county is due to get an elected mayor, which will unlock its own devolution deal. Getting us moving Happy anniversary: The biggest boost to that devolution process was the release of almost £2.8bn for the mayors to spend on local projects (£1bn for Tees Valley, £1.8bn for the rest of the North East).And that means Kim McGuinness can now promise a long-awaited extension of the Tyne & Wear Metro to Washington. Other investments planned include trams in Teesside and work on Middlesbrough only problem for Labour is that travellers won't see the results of some of this investment until well after the next election. Unhappy anniversary: Labour has been less keen on big road projects. A scheme to dual a 13-mile section of the A1 in Northumberland was scrapped in Rachel Reeves' first Budget, even though the previous government had spent £68.4m preparing the over "budget" alternatives have started, but it is not the first time a plan for the A1 has failed to come to campaigners are also still waiting to find out the fate of the £1.4bn plan to upgrade the remaining single carriageway sections of the A66 between Scotch Corner and Penrith. It has been officially paused with a decision apparently imminent. Making us healthier Happy anniversary: The latest waiting list figures had some encouraging news. Since Labour came to power the numbers on the list in the North East and Yorkshire regional NHS area have fallen by more than 19, anniversary: There is a long way to go if Labour is to meet its election target of 92% of patients waiting no more than 18 weeks. It is a target that has not been reached since 2015 and none of our hospital trusts managed to reach it in the latest is performing the best with 79.5% waiting no more than 18 weeks, but North Cumbria performs below the national average with only 56.5% treated within that time. Labour has pledged to meet the target by March 2029. Making us wealthier Happy anniversary: In terms of tackling poverty, a 6.7% increase in the National Living Wage paid to over-21s stands to benefit a significant number of people in a region which has the lowest pay in the UK. Thousands of children will also benefit from a decision to broaden the entitlement to free school meals to all families claiming Universal Credit, though that will not kick in until next year. Breakfast clubs in some of the area's schools will come sooner and new nurseries will help parents with anniversary: There is still a great deal of uncertainty about the government's plans to reform Personal Independence Payments and reduce the entitlement for some. Nothing now looks likely to change until after a review concludes next year but, as the region with the highest take up of the disability benefit, any change could have a significant impact. The U-turn on winter fuel payments for older people will mean more now qualify, but of course thousands lost out in the first winter of this government.A decision on whether to scrap the two-child cap on some benefits has yet to come. It is something campaigners in the North East say could make the biggest difference to child poverty, but with the government now searching for money to replace the savings sacrificed with the winter fuel and welfare change rethinks, it may have made the change less likely. Boosting our businesses Happy anniversary: There was a welcome in the North East business community for the government's recently-published 10-year industrial strategy. It offers the potential of support and investment in sectors where the region is strong, from manufacturing and green energy to the creative will be moves to help businesses like Nissan and the chemical industry with high energy bills, though not till 2027. A promise to invest in nuclear power will be of interest in Cumbria and was a big boost for Hitachi in County Durham, with new work to build trains delivering on the prime minister's pre-election pledge to secure its future. Unhappy anniversary: Some businesses have faced extra costs because of Labour's decision to raise their National Insurance Cumbria there has been concern that tourism and hospitality did not feature in the industrial the recent decision by a major investor to pull out of plans to develop a film studio in Sunderland was a reminder that no amount of strategy can cover every the protests over changes to inheritance tax, it is probably best not to ask our farmers whether they have enjoyed Labour's first year! Electoral prospects Happy anniversary: Just before July's General Election, Labour's Kim McGuinness became the first North East Mayor and her presence in the region offered a chance for a politician from the party to deliver in lockstep with the government and champion the least Labour scraping home in the North Tyneside mayoral election this May shows it can still win here. And they do not have to call another general election until 2029. Unhappy anniversary: The continuing rise of Reform UK since the party polled well in the region last July poses a big political threat. Its sweeping victory in this year's Durham County Council election shows just how serious the challenge even if the Conservatives are still struggling, the Liberal Democrats and Greens have also been looking to pick off the party's voters. Next year's local elections offer fresh challenges and, on current polling, Labour's longstanding command of the councils in Newcastle, Sunderland, South Tyneside and Gateshead could well be over. Follow BBC North East on X and Facebook and BBC Cumbria on X and Facebook and both on Nextdoor and Instagram.