logo
The dispute between the Trump administration and Harvard University, explained

The dispute between the Trump administration and Harvard University, explained

Yahoo27-05-2025
After six months of work, Shreya Mishra Reddy has a few more weeks and one last learning module standing between her and the credential she's been chasing for more than half her life: Harvard graduate.
The last unit of her executive leadership program at Harvard University resumes on Wednesday. After that, Reddy's booked to fly to Cambridge, Mass., in July to finish her certificate in person and graduate from one of the most prestigious universities in the world — a dream she and her family have shared for well over half her life.
It's also a dream she says has cost her at least $90,000 US.
Last week, Reddy was in the middle of a work meeting at home when she saw a notification pop up on her phone: The Trump administration had banned Harvard University from accepting international students like herself. She studies on an optional practical training visa, which has allowed her to work after finishing her undergrad at Duke University. But that visa expires in January, and though the ban has been temporarily blocked, she said the news made her nervous about boarding her flight this summer.
"It was completely confusing and devastating to read something like that," Reddy, 33, told CBC's As It Happens in an interview from Toronto, where her husband lives.
"If we're not allowed to be back on campus, we're not allowed to graduate ... it takes away so much," added Reddy, who grew up in India. "Studying at Harvard was not really about a degree. It was so much more."
Reddy is one of thousands of international students at Harvard University who say they're in confused, anxious limbo as they watch a legal battle unfold between their school and the Trump administration.
Here's a recap of the conflict.
Last month, U.S. Homeland Security Secretary Kristy Noem asked Harvard for a trove of private student data last month, including every international student's course work and information on any student visa holder's disciplinary and legal history. Noem later expanded her request to include any video footage of international students who had been involved in illegal, dangerous or protest activity over the past five years — whether it be on or off Harvard's campus.
After a few weeks of back-and-forth, Harvard declined part of the request. The Trump administration retaliated by revoking Harvard's Student and Exchange Visitor Program (SEVP), which meant the university no longer had the ability to enrol international students.
The decision could force more than one-quarter of the school's enrolment to change schools or leave the United States.
The government also stripped the university of its authority to sponsor F and J visas for international students and scholars for the 2025-26 academic year.
An F-1 visa is a visa for foreign nationals use to enter the United States and attend an accredited university like Harvard. A J-1 visa is for people taking "approved educational and cultural exchange programs."
Trump has already frozen several billion dollars in federal grants to Harvard in recent weeks, leading the university to sue to restore the funding. The administration has accused the school of not doing enough to curb antisemitism following pro-Palestinian protests that have emerged in the past two years.
Harvard sued the administration last Friday. The claim argued the government violated the university's First Amendment rights to control its own governance and the "ideology" of its students and staff.
"With the stroke of a pen, the government has sought to erase a quarter of Harvard's student body, international students who contribute significantly to the university and its mission," read the lawsuit, filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts. "Without its international students, Harvard is not Harvard."
WATCH | Harvard takes Trump administration to court:
A judge issued a temporary restraining order blocking the Trump administration's move later Friday. Judge Allison D. Burroughs found Harvard has shown the ban would cause the university "immediate and irreparable" harm.
That temporary restraining order is still in effect. Another hearing is scheduled in Boston for Thursday morning to determine whether that order should be extended, according to the university.
Since Friday's temporary order stopped the administration's ban, Harvard can keep enrolling international students and scholars as the legal case works its way through the courts.
Harvard's F-1 and J-1 visa programs were restored, according to the university, so students and scholars can move ahead with their schoolwork "without interruption." Students who are already in Boston with their visas will not have their status revoked or termination, so the school said they do not need to leave the country or change schools immediately.
WATCH | Canadian Harvard student describes the international student turmoil:
The situation is more tenuous for students who don't yet have visas or who found themselves outside the United States when the administration's ban came down. On its website, Harvard said inbound students should be prepared with documentation and a plan to check in with friends and family members throughout their journey, so someone can call Harvard's International Office on their behalf if they don't check in on time.
"We are advised that some of our traveling international students and scholars have been re-admitted to the country without issue, but we also believe that each person needs to assess their own risks and make the choice that is best for them, given their personal circumstances," the university's website reads.
Reddy said she's hoping more information will come up before her flight.
"Right now, it's all up in the air. I'm hoping a resolution is reached soon, but in the meantime, I'm not sure what's going to happen."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Ex-Secret Service director fires back at Rand Paul's accusations she lied about lack of resources given to Trump's Butler rally
Ex-Secret Service director fires back at Rand Paul's accusations she lied about lack of resources given to Trump's Butler rally

New York Post

time25 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Ex-Secret Service director fires back at Rand Paul's accusations she lied about lack of resources given to Trump's Butler rally

Former Secret Service Director Kimberly Cheatle was adamant that she directed 'additional assets to be provided' for President Trump's Butler, Pa., rally a year ago and refuted Sen. Rand Paul's blistering report. Paul (R-Ky.) alleged that Cheatle had not been truthful to Congress when she testified that the Secret Service didn't deny Trump's team resources it requested for the Butler, Pa. rally. 'The Director of the Secret Service is not typically directly engaged in the approval or denial of requests for support,' she said in a statement Sunday, released by her attorney. 'For the Butler rally, I actually did direct additional assets to be provided, particularly in the form of agency counter-snipers.' Advertisement 'Any assertion or implication that I provided misleading testimony is patently false and does a disservice to those men and women on the front lines who have been unfairly disciplined for a team, rather than individual, failure.' Cheatle's attorney confirmed to The Post that her statement was directed at Paul's report and his 'defamatory comments on Face the Nation' earlier in the day on Sunday. 3 Kimberly Cheatle vehemently refuted allegations that she gave misleading testimony to Congress. The Washington Post via Getty Images Advertisement 3 Sunday marks the one-year anniversary of the Butler, Pa., assassination attempt. AP Paul, chairman of the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, released his scathing report on the one-year anniversary of the assassination attempt against Trump. It concluded based on documents that there were 'at least two instances of assets being denied' by the Secret Service related to the Butler rally. That entailed a request for more Counter-Unmanned Aircraft Systems (C-UAS), which are used to counter drones, which was 'unfulfilled due to the lack of manpower to support the request.' Additionally, the Secret Service did not provide a Counter Assault Team liaison to coordinate between its operation and the local team, according to testimony from the advance agent. Advertisement Paul's report found that broadly speaking, there were at least 10 major requests for more resources from the president's team during the 2024 campaign cycle that were either denied or unfulfilled. Cheatle had testified to the House Oversight Committee nine days after the assassination attempt last year that 'for the event in Butler, there were no requests that were denied.' 'She did not tell the truth,' Paul told CBS News' 'Face the Nation' on Sunday. 'The primary request that was made by both Trump's Secret Service detail, as well as his campaign, was for counter-snipers. 'Counter-snipers were denied until Butler. So, thank God, on that day in Butler County, Pennsylvania, that was the first time he was allowed counter-snipers.' Advertisement The former Secret Service director revealed that she read through some of the report, was 'aware of certain congressional criticism,' and agrees that 'mistakes were made and reform is needed.' 3 Sen. Rand Paul had ripped into former Secret Service Director Kimberly Cheatle in his report on the assassination attempt. AFP via Getty Images She stressed that her testimony to the Oversight Committee was based on 'information provided to me by personnel from Headquarters' as well as current Secret Service Director Sean Curran, who helmed Trump's detail at the time. Cheatle also paid tribute to the families impacted by the deadly shooting at the rally. 'The tragedy that occurred on July 13, 2024, remains a profound event that deeply affected our nation,' she said. 'My thoughts and heartfelt condolences continue to be with all those impacted.' Cheatle resigned as Secret Service director a day after she testified before the House Oversight Committee. Acting director Ronald Rowe briefly took her place during the months that followed. Trump appointed Curran as Secret Service director shortly after taking office again back in January. Multiple investigations from lawmakers in Congress, as well as law enforcement, have uncovered a myriad of shortcomings in the run-up to the assassination attempt. Advertisement Despite the concerns, Trump has said that he still retains 'great confidence in these people.' 'They should have had somebody in the building [Crooks shot from], that was a mistake,' he told Fox News' 'My View With Lara Trump' in an interview that aired Saturday. 'They should have had communications with the local police, they weren't tied in. 'So there were mistakes made … But I was satisfied in terms of the bigger plot, the larger plot,' he added. 'I have great confidence in these people. I know the people. And they're very talented, very capable. But they had a bad day. And I think they'll admit that. They had a rough day.'

Secret Service did not 'act on direct threats' before Trump shooting, Senate report says
Secret Service did not 'act on direct threats' before Trump shooting, Senate report says

USA Today

time28 minutes ago

  • USA Today

Secret Service did not 'act on direct threats' before Trump shooting, Senate report says

WASHINGTON — Stunning failures and inexcusable negligence by the Secret Service allowed then-Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump to be shot at during a Pennsylvania rally last year, according to a scathing Senate committee report released on the anniversary of the assassination attempt. The Secret Service did not act on credible intelligence and failed to appropriately communicate with local law enforcement and Trump's protective detail ahead of the July 13, 2024, event in Butler, Pennsylvania, the report released by Homeland Security Committee Chairman Rand Paul said. "This was not a single lapse in judgment. It was a complete breakdown of security at every level—fueled by bureaucratic indifference, a lack of clear protocols, and a shocking refusal to act on direct threats," Paul, a Republican U.S. senator who represents Kentucky, said. "We must hold individuals accountable and ensure reforms are fully implemented so this never happens again.' The report details threats against Trump and errors that the committee said resulted in the near assassination of a major party's presidential candidate, the death of rallygoer Corey Comperatore, and injuries to two other attendees. The committee assessed that the failures culminated in a "preventable tragedy," for which the agency has been insufficiently held accountable. Sen. Paul on Trump shooting: 'It was a cultural cover-up for the agency' Secret Service director Kimberly Cheatle resigned, and six individuals received disciplinary action in the wake of the shooting that injured two additional attendees, the report said. But no one was fired, and the penalties were weaker than what the committee said it would have recommended. "Some of these people could be in charge of security for another presidential candidate. And really, that's a danger. That's not right," Paul said on the CBS show "Face the Nation." In the appearance, Paul said Cheatle "did not tell the truth" when she told Congress that no assets that were requested for the Butler rally were denied. He also said that counter-snipers were denied until the Butler rally. The report said that at least 10 requests by the division protecting Trump were denied or left unfulfilled during the presidential campaign. "I think it was a cultural cover-up for the agency. They did not want to assess blame. They did not want to look internally. And they wanted to discount any of their actions that might have led to this," Paul said on the CBS program. 'Saved for a reason': How Trump's second term is full of assassination attempt reminders Secret Service director: Agency 'implemented substantive reforms' after shooting In response to the report, Secret Service Director Sean Curran said in a statement provided to USA TODAY that the agency would continue to cooperate with the committee. "Following the events of July 13, the Secret Service took a serious look at our operations and implemented substantive reforms to address the failures that occurred that day," Curran said. The agency last week acknowledged "breakdowns in communication, technological issues, and human failure, among other contributing factors, led to the events of July 13." The attack was "nothing short of a tragedy" and "represents an operational failure," the Secret Service said. Since then, the agency said it has revised and streamlined its practices and requested additional resources to address recommendations made by Congress.

'What did the president know—and when did he know it?' the former CNN host said on MSNBC Sunday.
'What did the president know—and when did he know it?' the former CNN host said on MSNBC Sunday.

Yahoo

time34 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

'What did the president know—and when did he know it?' the former CNN host said on MSNBC Sunday.

Former CNN White House Correspondent Jim Acosta says President Donald Trump is shaking in his boots amid fallout over the infamous 'Epstein files.' 'You know, I've been around Donald Trump. I've been up close with him. I think I know when he's worried, and he is freaking out right now over these Epstein files,' Acosta said on MSNBC Sunday. 'He's twisted himself into a pretzel on this.' Acosta's comments follow after news broke late last week that the Department of Justice (DOJ) and Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) have determined that, contrary to the long-cherished beliefs of MAGA conspiracy theorists, disgraced financial Jeffrey Epstein died by suicide while awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges in 2019, rather than being murdered, and kept no 'client list' of superwealthy co-conspirators.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store