From Product to Practice: What Lawyers Really Want From AI, According to MiAI Law CEO Laina Chan
In the latest interview from Xraised, 'From Product to Practice: What Lawyers Really Want From AI', award-winning barrister and MiAI Law CEO Laina Chan breaks down the gap between traditional legaltech tools and the real-world demands of lawyers. Rather than hype, Chan brings a grounded, legal-first approach to AI—offering a clear vision of how Legal AI Research should serve the legal profession.
MiAI Law: The AI Built by a Barrister, Not Just Engineers
Founded by Laina Chan, a practicing construction law barrister with over two decades at the bar, MiAI Law was developed with one question in mind: What do lawyers actually need from AI?
'It's not just about getting quick answers,' Chan says. 'Lawyers need responses they can trust—rooted in legal principles, backed by citations, and structured to match the way we think.'
With a legal architecture designed by Chan herself, MiAI Law delivers fast, accurate, footnoted answers sourced from primary case law and legislation—removing the guesswork that plagues generic AI tools.
Chan did not build MiAI Law to impress VCs. She built it because she was sick of legal tech that couldn't reason—and wasting hours doing case law the hard way. Most tools were fast but shallow, smart-sounding but legally useless. MiAI Law is different: it thinks like a lawyer because it was built by one, with legal reasoning, traceability, and primary sources at its core—not shortcuts.
Real Legal AI Research, Not Just Flashy Tech
Many AI tools fail lawyers by focusing on form over function. They sound smart but miss legal nuance. MiAI Law changes that. The platform reasons from first principles, traverses full legal databases, and ties every conclusion to a verifiable source.
'Generic models hallucinate. MiAI Law doesn't,' Chan explains. 'It's been trained to think like a barrister, not a chatbot.'
In benchmark testing, MiAI Law answered 30 high-level legal questions in under two hours—research that previously took weeks of manual work. It's not about replacing lawyers. It's about giving them a competitive edge.
What Lawyers Really Want From AI: Speed With Substance
Chan highlights a key misconception: that lawyers simply want faster tools. In reality, MiAI Law focuses on transparency, accuracy, and efficiency—turning AI into a legal research partner, not a risk factor.
Every MiAI Law report includes footnotes and direct hyperlinks to relevant cases or statutes, allowing lawyers to verify and explore results with full context. Whether they're in a mediation, drafting pleadings, or validating strategy, users know exactly where the information comes from.
AI Is Not the Threat—It's the Ally
Chan addresses the lingering fear that AI could replace legal professionals:
'AI won't take your job. But someone using AI effectively might,' she notes. 'I built MiAI Law to help myself—not replace myself.'
Rather than automating legal judgment, MiAI Law frees up time so lawyers can focus on what truly matters: strategy, advocacy, and outcomes. It gives them the capacity to be sharper, faster, and better informed—without compromising ethics or quality.
See the Interview, Explore the Future
Watch the full conversation with Laina Chan and learn how MiAI Law is building the next generation of Legal AI Research:
From Product to Practice: What Lawyers Really Want From AI.
Learn more about MiAI Law's products and legal-first design:
🔗 https://miai.law
Media Contact:
Ethan Hunt
[email protected]
Gianmarco Giordaniello
Xraised
email us here
Visit us on social media:
X
Legal Disclaimer:
EIN Presswire provides this news content 'as is' without warranty of any kind. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright issues related to this article, kindly contact the author above.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Boo Beauty Bar Celebrates Rapid Growth and Commitment to Purposeful Beauty Solutions
MELBOURNE, AUSTRALIA / / August 1, 2025 / Boo Beauty Bar, a vegan and cruelty-free beauty brand born from a passion project during the COVID-19 lockdown, has rapidly grown over the past four years, expanding more than 40 times since its humble beginnings. Founded in 2019 by Betty Lee, Boo Beauty Bar's mission is to provide gentle, effective beauty solutions that not only enhance natural beauty but also make a positive impact on the world. Starting as a small business operated from a modest room, Boo Beauty Bar officially launched its product range and began operating online in 2021. Since then, the brand has become synonymous with beauty that is both powerful and purposeful. Every product is formulated with safe, skin-friendly ingredients, making it ideal for clients with sensitivities. Boo Beauty Bar's commitment to sustainability and ethical practices sets it apart in the competitive beauty industry, with each product being completely vegan, cruelty-free, and designed with the health of both people and the planet in mind. "We're proud to have turned a passion project into a thriving business that not only provides gentle, low-tox beauty treatments but also raises awareness for important causes," said Betty Lee, founder of Boo Beauty Bar. "Every order we send includes a thank-you card featuring QR codes that link to missing persons resources in both Australia and the U.S., helping to bring attention to an issue that touches us all. Our brand is about more than just beauty; it's about making a real difference." Boo Beauty Bar's "low-tox" treatments are particularly appealing to those with sensitive skin, offering beauty solutions that enhance natural beauty without relying on harsh chemicals. The company's commitment to creating safe, effective beauty solutions has helped it quickly gain the trust of its customers. In addition to providing quality products, Boo Beauty Bar is dedicated to giving back to the beauty community. The company has trained countless aspiring professionals, empowering them to enter the beauty industry and create new income streams. With its unwavering commitment to kindness, sustainability, and social impact, Boo Beauty Bar moves forward with a dedication to innovate, inspire, and prove that beauty can be both powerful and purposeful. For more information, or find them on Instagram. About Boo Beauty Bar Founded in 2019 by Betty Lee, Boo Beauty Bar is a vegan, cruelty-free beauty brand dedicated to providing gentle, low-tox beauty solutions that are safe for even the most sensitive skin. The company's products are formulated with skin-friendly ingredients, helping people enhance their natural beauty without harsh chemicals. In addition to its focus on beauty, Boo Beauty Bar is committed to raising awareness for missing persons, with every order featuring a QR code linking to resources in both Australia and the U.S. Boo Beauty Bar is also dedicated to training aspiring beauty professionals, empowering them to enter the industry and build their own careers. Media DetailsCompany Name: Boo Beauty BarContact person name: Betty LeeEmail: admin@ Melbourne, AustraliaWebsite: SOURCE: Boo Beauty Bar View the original press release on ACCESS Newswire Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Brookfield Infrastructure Partners LP (BIP) Q2 2025 Earnings Call Highlights: Record Capital ...
Funds from Operations (FFO): $638 million or $0.81 per unit, up 5% year-over-year; 9% increase excluding foreign exchange effects. Utilities Segment FFO: $187 million, slightly ahead of the prior year. Transport Segment FFO: $304 million, slightly ahead of the prior year after adjustments. Midstream Segment FFO: $157 million, a 10% increase over the previous year. Data Segment FFO: $113 million, a 45% increase compared to the prior year. Capital Recycling Proceeds: $2.4 billion secured to date in 2025. Australian Export Terminal Sale: $280 million in proceeds, 22% cumulative return, 4 times capital multiple. European Data Center Platform Sale: $200 million in proceeds, finalizing a 90% sell-down. Global Intermodal Logistics Operations Sale: $115 million in proceeds, two-thirds of the portfolio sold. UK Port Operation Sale: $385 million in proceeds, 19% IRR, 7.5 times capital multiple. New Investments: $1.3 billion capital deployment in data, transport, and midstream segments. Hotwire Acquisition: Up to $500 million equity purchase cost, closing expected late Q3 2025. Railcar Leasing Platform Acquisition: $300 million equity contribution, closing anticipated Q1 2026. Colonial Pipeline Acquisition: $9 billion acquisition, $500 million equity consideration, closing today. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 10 Warning Signs with BIP. Release Date: July 31, 2025 For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript. Positive Points Brookfield Infrastructure Partners LP (NYSE:BIP) reported a 5% increase in funds from operations (FFO) to $638 million, or $0.81 per unit, compared to the previous year. The company's data segment saw a significant 45% increase in FFO, driven by acquisitions and new capacity commissioning. BIP successfully executed its capital recycling strategy, securing $2.4 billion in sale proceeds, setting an annual record. The Canadian midstream segment experienced a 10% increase in FFO, supported by strong organic growth and higher customer activity. BIP made significant new investments, including a $9 billion acquisition of Colonial, the largest refined products pipeline system in the U.S., expected to yield a mid-teen cash return. Negative Points The sale of the Mexican regulated natural gas transmission business partially offset the strong performance in the utilities segment. Foreign exchange effects negatively impacted the overall FFO growth, which would have been 9% without these effects. The transport segment's FFO was only slightly ahead of the prior year after adjustments for capital recycling and foreign exchange. There is uncertainty in the regulatory approval process for the NS and UP merger, which could impact BIP's rail operations. The liquidity position, while strong, does not account for the $1.3 billion in new investments, potentially affecting future flexibility. Q & A Highlights Q: What has prompted the acceleration in deal velocity for Brookfield Infrastructure Partners (NYSE:BIP) in 2025 compared to 2024? A: Sam Pollock, Chief Executive Officer, explained that while operating conditions have remained consistent, there was a lull in transaction activity last year. The current acceleration is likely due to investors returning to the market, driven by strong capital markets and significant dry powder. BIP is optimistic about the current market, particularly with the impact of AI infrastructure on their businesses. Q: Are there opportunities to monetize partial stakes in Canadian midstream businesses, given the attractive backdrop? A: Sam Pollock, CEO, indicated that while there are always opportunities to sell down stakes, the focus is primarily on organic growth opportunities. However, bringing in partners to fund growth is a possibility, and there is significant interest in the Canadian midstream sector from both retail and institutional investors. Q: What protections does Brookfield have in place for the Intel JV, and when is it expected to start generating returns? A: Sam Pollock, CEO, stated that the arrangement with Intel is largely financial and contractual, with no commercial risk on capital cost overruns or product commercialization. Contributions from this investment are expected as early as the end of next year or early 2027. Q: How might the potential east-west mergers of Class 1 railroads impact Genesee & Wyoming? A: David Joynt, Managing Partner, noted that while the merger is subject to regulatory review, Genesee & Wyoming operates as a neutral party in the rail network, providing first-mile and last-mile access. They are in a unique position to maintain a competitive market and will engage with merger parties and regulators. Q: Why is the US considered one of the most attractive investment geographies for BIP currently? A: Sam Pollock, CEO, explained that the US is attractive due to the AI infrastructure boom, which drives opportunities in power, transmission, and midstream investments. While other countries are also investing in AI, the US currently leads in deployment, creating significant opportunities for BIP. For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
The disastrous Leftie legacy of Jacinda Ardern is being swiftly erased. Fortunate Kiwis
It is hard to think of a political leader who has had their legacy so fundamentally dismantled by their immediate successors than former New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern. The successful passage this week of legislation to undo her ban on off-shore oil and gas exploration is the most recent example of her well-meaning but often economically illiterate policy agenda being undone by her conservative successor, former businessman Chris Luxon. Ardern came into office somewhat unexpectedly, finishing a distinct second in 2017 but, thanks to New Zealand's proportional voting system, was able to form a government that stretched from the far-left Green Party to the populist-right New Zealand First. Her agenda seemed to, like Justin Trudeau in Canada, follow whatever the current right-thinking mindset thought was important, including anti-car legislation (such as the 'Ute Tax' and significantly lower nationwide speed limits), radical race relations policies (particularly around so-called co-governance, giving Maori a disproportionate role in government decision making and entrenching race-based constituencies at every level) and climate alarmism. There are certainly plenty of examples of well-meaning but economically or socially harmful policies. A major light rail infrastructure project that after five years had created more paperwork than track laid. A child poverty action plan that had 4,500 more children in poverty at the end of her time in Government than at the start. A crime policy that repealed the previous conservative government's 'Three Strikes' law that resulted in higher (and rising) violent crime rates at the end of Labour's time in office. A foolhardy approach to public finances which an economist at New Zealand's largest bank called a 'debt-fuelled spending spree' that was projected by the Government's own figures to result in a permanent structural deficit. Ardern's announcement of her resignation in 2023 came as a shock to many, but probably should not have done. Her leadership had become unpopular, and the Labour Party was struggling to break 30 per cent in polling, comparable to the level of polling Labour was at when she replaced her predecessor in 2017. And it did not take long for her party to start undoing her agenda in an attempt to appeal to the voters in advance of the General Election held later that year. Controversial schemes around water regulation and management (always a touchstone issue in a country with a major agricultural sector), welfare reform, lowering the voting age and hate speech legislation were either shelved or put on the back burner until after the General Election. Her replacement, Chris Hipkins, said his plan was instead to focus on the 'bread and butter issues facing New Zealand families'. While nothing overt was said, the implicit comparison with the focus of his predecessor as Labour leader and Prime Minister could not have been stronger. Despite Labour's best efforts (and deliberately keeping Ardern out of the campaign), Labour went down to a devastating defeat later in 2023, losing almost half their vote and seats from 2020. Since then, Luxon and his National-led government have worked hard to undo even more of the Ardern legacy. Gone are the often absurd efforts to incorporate Maori tradition into modern governance and science. Punitive taxes on cars and fuel have been abolished. Spending is falling (slower than some might like, but the country is on track to balance the books) and taxes are lower. But fundamentally the difference is one of mindset. Ardern's government represented the nadir of the idea that outcomes were less important than intentions. This was exemplified by the idea that having a policy called a 'child poverty reduction strategy' and spending large amounts of borrowed money on it was more important than measuring the results. It is interesting that during the six years Labour was in power the yearly benchmarks that the previous government introduced on health, crime, education and economic outcomes were quietly shelved, Ardern preferring to rely on vibes than statistics. The approach by the hard-headed Luxon could not be more different. Vibes are out, results are in.
