What did Nick Kyrgios say after being axed from BBC's Wimbledon coverage?
His reaction was characteristically candid and laced with snarky comments about the broadcaster's decision and his potential replacement.
3
3
Tennis bad boy Nick Kyrgios had been hoping to play at the All England Club for the first time since losing the 2022 final to Novak Djokovic.
However, The 30-year-old confirmed he would not be appearing because of a recurring injury.
What did Nick Kyrgios say?
He said on Instagram: "Just wanted to give everyone a quick update — l've hit a small setback in my recovery and unfortunately won't make it back for grass season this year.
"I know how much you've all been looking forward to seeing me out there, and I'm genuinely sorry to disappoint.
"This is just a bump in the road though, and I'm already working hard to get back stronger than ever.
'Thank you for all your continued support — it means everything to me. See you soon!"
And on June 10, 2025, reports emerged that he won't even be there as a commentator — which he has now confirmed.
Confidence in his own credentials
Guardian: 'I know I'm a great commentator. All I've done for 20 years is play, study and breathe this sport.
'I also think tennis needs commentators who say things that not everyone says'.
He argued that his extensive experience on the professional circuit, including victories over some of the sport's greatest players, sets him apart from other pundits.
Nick Kyrgios breaks silence on split with ex-girlfriend Costeen Hatzi as Wimbledon finalist reveals new look
Criticism of the BBC and his replacement
Nick didn't shy away from questioning the BBC's decision, describing his exclusion as 'unfortunate' and insisting: 'it's probably their loss more than mine'.
Referencing his apparent replacement on the commentary team, Nick said: 'I understand they've got Chris Eubanks, but he hasn't beaten the greatest of all time multiple times.
'When someone's beaten Federer, Nadal, Murray and Djokovic and has incredible insights, it's very strange you wouldn't want that person adding knowledge to tennis fans'.
Eubanks' best run at Wimbledon came in 2023, when he stunned the likes of Cameron Norrie and Stefanos Tsitsipas before losing in five sets to Daniil Medvedev in the quarter-finals.
I know I'm a great commentator. All I've done for 20 years is play, study and breathe this sport
Nick KyrgiosThe Guardian
But Nick hasn't shut the door on working for the BBC again at some point in the future, explaining: "I'm sure our paths will cross again.
"I only ever want to add humour, some knowledge and some great atmosphere."
Nick on Wimbledon
Despite his disappointment, Nick expressed his enduring affection for Wimbledon, recalling his breakthrough on the Grand Slam stage at the event in 2014 and describing it as 'the pinnacle of tennis'.
He also acknowledged feeling somewhat out of place at the tournament, saying: 'I definitely feel like a snowman in the desert there, but I enjoy it'.
Although Nick has now pulled out of this year's Roland Garros and Wimbledon, he is determined to resume playing this year.
He added: "Yes, for sure. I'm definitely playing the US swing and I'll take it one day at a time."
3
Nick's hiring by the BBC in 2024 was met with criticism by senior MPs and women's campaigners.
Women and equalities committee chair Caroline Nokes said the broadcaster should "hang its head in shame".
A BBC statement at the time said: "We are in no way condoning his cited previous actions or behaviours, on and off the court, and he is employed to share his views on tennis only.
"He has provided similar services to other major sports broadcasters in recent months.
"The legal process he was involved in has concluded, is well documented, and he has spoken about it publicly."
In February 2023, Nick admitted to assaulting ex-girlfriend Chiara Passari.
But a magistrate in Canberra, Australia, said the 2021 incident was 'a single act of stupidity or frustration' — sparing the sports star from receiving a criminal record.
The BBC is yet to issue an official public explanation for its decision.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Glasgow Times
12 minutes ago
- Glasgow Times
Dan Evans swept aside as Novak Djokovic reaches 99 not out at Wimbledon
Djokovic, the seven-time champion, is now just one short of a century of match wins in SW19 after a 6-3 6-2 6-0 win of ominous efficiency. Evans was tasked with being this year's plucky Brit to face the Serbian on Centre Court, reprising a role previously played by Jacob Fearnley, Jack Draper, Kyle Edmund and James Ward. Novak Djokovic cruises into his 19th #Wimbledon third round 🫡 — Wimbledon (@Wimbledon) July 3, 2025 It was by no means a flaky performance from the 35-year-old, but he still went the same way as all the others. 'I knew it was going to be a special atmosphere on the court today, a Brit in Britain is never easy to face,' said Djokovic. 'He's a good quality player that possesses a lot of talent. Sometimes you have these kind of days where everything goes your way.' Evans had won their only previous career meeting, in Monte Carlo four years ago. This time he was playing with house money, having arrived at Wimbledon as a wild card with a ranking now down at 154. But Djokovic quickly upped the ante, with Evans having to save nine break points in the first set before succumbing to the 10th to trail 5-3. It was a tough afternoon for Dan Evans (John Walton/PA) It was relentless from the 38-year-old, who held to love with an ace to clinch a first set in which he dropped just three points on his own serve. If that set was impressive, the second was almost impeccable. Djokovic hit 12 winners, made just one unforced error, won every point on his first serve and gave Evans only two on his second. Djokovic, who openly admits this year's Championships is his best chance of winning a record 25th grand slam title, would not take his foot off Evans' throat, completing victory in just an hour and 47 minutes.
The Guardian
16 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Gaza: Doctors Under Attack review – this crucial film is the stuff of nightmares. But the world needs to see it
The biggest, and possibly only, failure of Gaza: Doctors Under Attack is that the circumstances of its broadcast threaten to overshadow its content. A brief recap: this film was first commissioned by the BBC, only to be dropped when another documentary – Gaza: How to Survive a War Zone – sparked a furore over impartiality. The abandonment drew uproar from within the corporation, scorn from the wider media and the inescapable sense that what started as a vital piece of film-making had devolved into yet another navel-gazing referendum on the purpose of the BBC. Thanks to Channel 4 picking it up late in the day, Gaza: Doctors Under Attack now exists in the world, and it has never been more evident that this is a work that demands to be seen. Doctors Under Attack bills itself as a 'forensic investigation' into claims that the IDF has been systematically targeting Palestinian medics in all 36 of Gaza's hospitals. The attacks, according to the United Nations, follow a set pattern. First, a hospital comes under bombardment, then it is besieged. After that, it is raided by tanks and bulldozers and its medical workers are detained. And then, once the hospital has essentially been rendered non-functional, the forces move on and repeat. It's a strategy designed to cripple Gaza for years to come, says one talking head. After all, when a building is destroyed, you can throw up another in its place. But medics require years of training. Rob Gaza of their expertise and you deny its chances of ever rebuilding. This is despite, as the film repeats time and time again, healthcare workers being protected under international law. The power of Doctors Under Attack comes in the unhurried way it chooses to unfurl its thesis. There is no clear manipulation, no central villain. What there is, however, is an unceasing timeline of horrors. We are shown doctors doing their best in overwhelmed hospitals with no water or electricity, racing to treat wounds that have already begun to rot. We are shown them coming under what seem like targeted attacks, being detained in black sites where they will be tortured and interrogated. There is footage of a gang rape by soldiers. We are shown children, injured and dead, in vast numbers. The central part of the film, however, is stories of individual doctors. There is Dr Khaled Hamouda, discussing the direct attack on his home that killed 10 members of his family, and the drone strike that moments later hit the house the survivors escaped to. His wife and young daughter dead, he then took refuge in the grounds of his hospital, which was bombarded and raided. He was detained along with 70 other doctors, and beaten. And then there is Dr Adnan al-Bursh, who was detained, stripped, interrogated, disappeared and tortured. Unlike Hamouda, we do not get to hear his testimonial, because he died in prison. But we do get to hear the calls he made to his family before then, telling his children to look after their mother. To hear their stories is to be filled with utter hopelessness. There have been several muscular documentaries about the Palestinian territories this year, either setting the table of the conflict or – as with the case of Louis Theroux's film The Settlers – trying to understand the psychology behind those who choose to exacerbate it. But Doctors Under Attack is by far the most unsparing. The discussion of what has happened to the detained doctors, verified by an anonymous Israeli whistleblower, is the stuff of nightmares. There are beatings. There is torture. Most unsettlingly of all, there are descriptions of mistreatment by Israeli doctors, who would perform procedures without anaesthetic and inform the prisoners that 'You are a criminal and you have to die.' The BBC dropped Doctors Under Attack due to the risk that it created 'a perception of partiality'. However, it is hard to square that claim with the film that has aired on Channel 4. Clarification has been sought from the IDF at every turn. The events of 7 October 2023 are shown here just as graphically as the footage of injured Palestinian children. The film-makers understand that the slightest sign of bias would collapse the argument. In an open letter before its broadcast, Channel 4's Louisa Compton warned that Doctors Under Attack would 'make people angry, whichever side they take.' She is right. This is the sort of television that will never leave you. It will provoke an international reaction, and for extremely good cause. Forget what got it stopped at the BBC. It is here now and, regardless of how that happened, we owe it to the subjects to not look away. Gaza: Doctors Under Attack is on Channel 4 now. Viewers around the world can access the film here
The Independent
21 minutes ago
- The Independent
Arthur Fery left with few regrets as Wimbledon campaign comes to an end
Arthur Fery has few regrets after his Wimbledon campaign came to an end with a second-round loss to Luciano Darderi. The 22-year-old defeated the Australian 20th seed Alexei Popyrin in the opening round to cross paths with the Italian in a clash scheduled as the last to take place on Court Two on Wednesday evening. Fery had lost the first two sets when the light began to falter and the match was paused, though the French-born Briton felt the interruption was to his advantage as his opponent was firmly on the front foot. Play resumed after midday on Thursday, and though Darderi was made to work hard for his third and final set he eventually prevailed 6-4 6-3 6-3 to knock Fery out of the tournament. 'I did my best, I thought I came out with a pretty good game plan – not too many regrets,' said Fery, whose French father Loic owns Lorient football club. 'I was tired, for sure. That second set yesterday was a physical one. 'It probably was going to help me to stop last night. I was two sets to love down. It was a very close match but still, momentum was on his side and he was playing very well. 'Stopping last night was good for me. I came out this morning, practised, warmed up well this morning. I was going to try and inch my way back into the match. 'Even today I thought he was physical. He's a clay-court player. It was tough at times but I guess it shows me where I can improve. 'There were some matches where you have so many break points, and you come off the court having lost and you're p****d at yourself because you felt like you managed them poorly. 'I'm pretty proud of my performance. Overall it's frustrating. I had a lot of break points but didn't think I did a huge amount wrong. 'I thought he came out very well again today. I tried to use the crowd, I tried to change a few things tactically. It wasn't enough today.'
