&w=3840&q=100)
Brics asserts Global South's voice as multilateral order faces strain
Brazil's President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, China's Premier Li Qiang, India's Prime Minister Narendra Modi, South Africa's President Cyril Ramaphosa, Russia's Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov and other leaders, attend the opening meeting of BRICS Summit, at the Museum of Modern Art (MAM) in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Reuters
Leaders of the growing Brics group of developing nations met in Brazil on Sunday, calling for reform of traditional Western institutions while presenting the bloc as a defender of multilateral diplomacy in an increasingly fractured world.
With forums such as the G7 and G20 groups of major economies hamstrung by divisions and the disruptive 'America First' approach of U.S. President Donald Trump, expansion of the Brics has opened new space for diplomatic coordination.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
In his opening remarks at the meeting in Rio de Janeiro, Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva drew a parallel with the Cold War's Non-Aligned Movement, a group of developing nations that resisted formally joining either side of a polarized global order.
'Brics is the heir to the Non-Aligned Movement,' Lula told leaders. 'With multilateralism under attack, our autonomy is in check once again.'
Brics nations now represent more than half the world's population and 40% of its economic output, Lula noted in remarks on Saturday to business leaders warning of rising protectionism.
The Brics group gathered leaders from Brazil, Russia, India and China at its first summit in 2009. The bloc later added South Africa and last year included Egypt, Ethiopia, Indonesia, Iran, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates as members. This is the first summit of leaders to include Indonesia.
'The vacuum left by others ends up being filled almost instantly by the Brics,' said a Brazilian diplomat who asked not to be named. Although the G7 still concentrates vast power, the diplomat added, 'it doesn't have the predominance it once did.'
However, there are questions about the shared goals of an increasingly heterogeneous Brics group, which has grown to include regional rivals along with major emerging economies.
Stealing some thunder from this year's summit, Chinese President Xi Jinping chose to send his prime minister in his place. Russian President Vladimir Putin is attending online due to an arrest warrant from the International Criminal Court.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Still, several heads of state gathered for discussions at Rio's Museum of Modern Art on Sunday and Monday, including Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and South African President Cyril Ramaphosa.
More than 30 nations have expressed interest in participating in the Brics, either as full members or partners.
Growing clout, complexity
Expansion of the Brics has added diplomatic weight to the gathering, which aspires to speak for developing nations across the Global South, strengthening calls for reforming global institutions such as the United Nations Security Council and the International Monetary Fund.
'If international governance does not reflect the new multipolar reality of the 21st century, it is up to Brics to help bring it up to date,' Lula said in his opening remarks.
Lula defended the integrity of Iran's borders, two weeks after the country was bombed by the United States, and highlighted the failure of U.S.-led wars in the Middle East.
The Brics nations will also continue their thinly veiled criticism of Trump's U.S. tariff policy, according to diplomats drafting a joint statement. In April, the bloc's foreign ministers voiced concern about 'unjustified unilateral protectionist measures, including the indiscriminate increase of reciprocal tariffs.'
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Brazil, which also hosts the United Nations climate summit in November, has seized on both gatherings to highlight how seriously developing nations are tackling climate change, while Trump has slammed the brakes on U.S. climate initiatives.
China and the UAE signaled in meetings with Brazilian Finance Minister Fernando Haddad in Rio that they plan to invest in a proposed Tropical Forests Forever Facility, according to two sources with knowledge of the discussions about funding conservation of endangered forests around the world.
The growth of the bloc has also increased the challenges to reaching consensus on contentious geopolitical issues.
Ahead of the summit, negotiators struggled to find shared language for a joint statement about the bombardment of Gaza, the Israel-Iran conflict and a proposed reform of the Security Council, two sources said, speaking on condition of anonymity.
To overcome differences among African nations regarding the representation on a reformed Security Council, the group agreed to endorse seats for Brazil and India while leaving open which country should represent Africa's interests, a person familiar with the talks told Reuters.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
36 minutes ago
- Business Standard
India may soon finalise US trade deal, but must tread carefully: GTRI
India could be among the countries expected to finalise a trade deal with the US soon, as President Donald Trump steps up pressure by issuing formal tariff letters to several nations, but New Delhi must tread carefully, economic think tank GTRI said on Tuesday. "Trump's model isn't a free trade agreement, it's a YATRA - Yielding to American Tariff Retaliation Agreement," the Global Trade Research Initiative (GTRI) said. The US has extended the deadline for countries to finalise bilateral trade deals with the US from July 9 to August 1, giving a final three-week window before sweeping country-specific tariffs come into force, it added. The extension is part of a broader trade offensive launched on April 2, when Trump identified about 60 countries for special tariffs unless they signed new deals aligning with American trade interests. So far, only the United Kingdom and Vietnam have complied. A temporary ceasefire deal with China is also in place. "Now, Trump is escalating the pressure. On July 7, he signed formal letters to 14 countries, outlining the tariffs they will face from August 1 if they fail to conclude a deal," GTRI Founder Ajay Srivastava said. On Monday, Trump-administration announced 25 per cent tariffs on Japan, South Korea, Kazakhstan, Malaysia, Tunisia; 30 per cent on South Africa, Bosnia and Herzegovina; 32 per cent on Indonesia; 35 per cent on Bangladesh, Serbia; 36 per cent Cambodia, Thailand; and 40 per cent tariffs on Laos, Myanmar. Srivastava said that these warnings, described by the White House as 'final notices', leave countries with a stark choice to sign a deal on US terms or face punitive duties. He added that the tariff hike is expected to disrupt trade flows, increase consumer prices in the US, and cause broader supply chain complications globally. US imports from China were down by 35 per cent in May 2025 over the previous period. "With the clock ticking, India is seen as a top candidate for a deal announcement in the coming New Delhi must tread carefully," he said. With the US showing willingness to override agreements and impose unilateral conditions, for example, on BRICS members, India must weigh the strategic value of engagement against the risks of an imbalanced deal, he cautioned.
Time of India
39 minutes ago
- Time of India
Kenya's July 7 protest legacy: 'We reclaimed our voice'
AP Image July 7 became the date Kenyan protesters in the 1990s used to steer the country clear of autocracy and toward political accountability. In 2025, that spirit may be more relevant than ever. "The striking similarity between the Gen Z protests of 2024-25 and the Saba Saba protests of the '90s is that both were centred on a clamor for better leadership," analyst Mutuma Kithinji tells DW. "It was the day people came out in open defiance of a brutal dictatorship," says human rights activist Wanjira Wanjiru. "It was a day we reclaimed our voice." By 1990, Kenya had known just two leaders, despite gaining independence on December 12, 1963. Daniel arap Moi had led Kenya for 12 years by exploiting intense ethnic-based rivalry, and Kenya effectively became a one-party state increasingly known for kleptocracy, corruption and state abuse. A response to Kenya's despotic rule But extensive protests, the end of the Cold War, and a stagnating economy tempered Moi's grip on power. When two cabinet ministers, Kenneth Matiba and Charles Rubia, were detained without trial, the first Saba Saba protests erupted in July 1990. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 21st Century Skills Start with Confident Communication Planet Spark Learn More Undo Twenty people were arrested and 1,056 people were charged, although no law enforcement officials faced prosecution. Protesters wanted a multi-party democracy, and despite state repression, Moi caved. While the resulting 1992 and 1997 elections were marred by violence and vote rigging, Moi's seemingly untouchable power was checked. Nairobian Eliza Njoroge says the Saba Saba protests remain influential to ordinary Kenyans. "They were disruptive, but made people very confident. They definitely changed Kenya, and the people realized they can speak up and that they have the power," she told DW. For analyst Kithinji, many of the problems from 1990 are still prevalent today. "The Gen Zs feel the leadership does not address their issues: accountability, economic injustice, corruption, disappearance of people, extrajudicial killings, among others," he told DW. A view widely held, including by Kithinji, is that while the Saba Saba protests of 1990 had definitive political leadership figures such as Rubia and Mathiba, the Gen Z-led demonstrations today are a grassroots movement without defined leaders or ethnic affiliations. Echoes of Saba Saba in 2024 The Kenya Finance Bill protests of 2024 exploded in June after the government approved unpopular legislation that would have significantly increased taxation of ordinary Kenyans. President William Ruto was forced to shelve the bill. "We are doing the same things we did in 1990. The causes are the same, except that this time it's in a technologically different environment," says David Kyule of the University of Nairobi. A key factor, he says, is that young Kenyans today are better educated than the protesters in the 1990s, partly due to education rights enshrined in Kenya's 2010 constitution. "They have come of age in a time of widespread suffering and unmet expectations," Kyule explains. But while the protestors have changed, their core grievances have not. And neither, arguably, has the attitude of the politicians in power, and how they have used force to respond. The mid-2024 demonstrations saw more than 50 people killed when police and security forces confronted protesters. "We have the current President (Ruto), who was there in those days, and many know him as a student of Moi," Kithinji told DW. "The government responded with force in the 1990s and today." But according to Wanjira Wanjiru, another key concern is the unknown number of protesters who have been forcibly disappeared. "The abductions and extrajudicial killings happening today are more rampant. The blatant disregard for human rights is shocking. So is the disregard for rule of law," she told DW. 2025 sees more protests and more killings in Kenya Kenya, and particularly Nairobi, has already seen large, youth-led protests, initially to commemorate the deadly demonstrations of 2024. The unexplained death of blogger Albert Ojwang in police custody sparked more anti-police brutality demonstrations. In response, Kenya's Interior Minister Kipchumba Murkomen claimed the demonstrations were an attempted coup, and issued a "shoot to kill" directive for officers if they were attacked. The Kenyan government has also tried to cast protestors as a destabilizing force, mirroríng the approach of Moi's government in 1990. "There's no credible evidence suggesting that this is the case in either era," says Kithinji. "Labelling the protestors as destabilizing is more about political control." David Kyule told DW that police responses have appeared to worsen the situation, with the ensuing chaos suggesting violence and destruction, rather than the initial, peaceful demonstrations. As for alleged attempts to intimidate protesters through abductions, Wanjiru says: "People have completely lost their fear. In fact, any attempt to bring back fear to the people kind of inspires more resistance and has the opposite effect," she told DW. Kenyan lawmakers ponder restricting protests With the Saba Saba protests seemingly inevitable, Parliament has introduced a bill to restrict protests within 100 meters of key government institutions, such as the parliament, state house and courts. "These are all attempts at cracking down [on] the people's voice and to evade accountability. Instead of addressing the demands of the protesters, they're looking to crack down on democracy further," Wanjira told DW. Others remain unconvinced that there will be justice for the scores of people already killed. A young Kenyan woman, who asked to remain anonymous, told DW: "Albert Ojwang's case is still in court. And Rex Masai, the first person we lost during last year's protest, his case is still in court. When you go to the streets to seek justice for those people, we lose more people. Will they get justice at any time?" Steve Marsha, a trainee journalist, said it remained important for Kenyans to stand up for their constitutional rights, and pointed to Ruto's government trying to ban coverage of the protests. "We are on the edge from where the country will probably plunge to a place that we will not be able to get ourselves out," he told DW.
First Post
43 minutes ago
- First Post
Brics Rio summit: A double espresso shot for big effort ahead
Brazil, as the current chair, and India, as the next chair of Brics, should collaborate to devise a way to bring the US and European Union closer to the Rio formulations read more The 17th summit of Brics was held in Rio de Janeiro from 6 to 7 July under trying circumstances, with Israeli and US military strikes against Iran—a new Brics member—dominating the immediate backdrop. Furthermore, the failure of the Brics foreign ministers to produce a joint statement at their April meeting had raised doubts about whether Rio would succeed in crafting a joint declaration at all. In this light, Brazil, as the chair and host, scored a notable success, delivering an impressive summit. Prime Minister Narendra Modi, therefore, commended President Lula for the summit's excellent organisation, which gave Brics cooperation 'fresh momentum and vitality.' Modi added, 'And let me say—the energy we have received isn't just an espresso; it is a double espresso shot.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Besides the Rio Declaration, the summit produced three other important documents: on climate finance, the global governance of artificial intelligence, and the partnership for the elimination of socially determined diseases. To appreciate the value and importance of what was achieved at Rio, it is necessary to analyse the summit declaration and then assess the potential for its implementation in the future. Declaration – Key Elements With its 126 paragraphs, the Rio Declaration is longer than the declaration of the Johannesburg Summit (2023) but shorter than the declaration of the Kazan Summit (2024), which had 134 paragraphs. Right at the outset, the latest declaration reiterates the commitment to 'the Brics spirit', encompassing 'mutual respect and understanding, sovereign equality, solidarity, democracy, openness, inclusiveness, collaboration, and consensus.' It refers to the grouping's three pillars of cooperation: political and security, economic and financial, and cultural and people-to-people connect. Brics aims to enhance strategic partnership through the promotion of peace, a fairer international order, a reinvigorated and reformed multilateral system, and sustainable development. The declaration is divided into five sections. The first section on strengthening multilateralism and reforming global governance highlights the need for comprehensive reform of global governance institutions, particularly the UN, the World Bank, the WTO, and the WHO. Para 6 deals with the reform of the UN Security Council. It represents some improvement from India's perspective. Deviating from the Kazan Declaration, it stresses the support of China and Russia as permanent members of the Security Council for 'the aspiration of Brazil and India to play a greater role in the United Nations, including its Security Council'. In contrast, the Kazan formulation referred to 'Brics countries', not Brazil and India specifically, in this context. The underlying spirit of the Rio Summit was to strengthen cooperation among the Global South countries. Para 8 emphasised the importance of the Global South 'as a driver for positive change', especially in light of geopolitical tensions, rapid economic downturns, and technological changes. The summit participants were fully cognisant of the need for a 'collective global effort' to establish suitable AI governance. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD In the second section on promoting peace, security, and international stability, the grouping articulated its consensus view on several global and regional issues, including the conflicts in Ukraine and West Asia. It condemned the military strikes against Iran, without naming the authors. Para 34 contains a 'strong condemnation of any act of terrorism'. Bearing India's imprint, the Rio Declaration condemned 'in the strongest terms the terrorist attack in Jammu and Kashmir.' It renewed the call for the finalisation and adoption of the Comprehensive Convention on International Terrorism, which remains elusive. The third section relating to deepening international economic trade and financial cooperation welcomed the results of the 'Strategy for Brics Economic Policy 2025'. It encouraged the ongoing expansion of the New Development Bank's (NDB) membership and the strengthening of its governance framework. Para 50 makes it clear that the work on the 'Brics Cross-Border Payments Initiatives' will continue. The plan is to realise the potential for 'greater interoperability of Brics payment systems'. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The last two sections, which pertain to combating climate change and promoting sustainable, fair, and inclusive development, as well as partnership for the promotion of human, social, and cultural development, contain a wealth of ideas for ongoing and new projects based on cooperation within the expanded Brics family and beyond. Focus on the Founders The thoughts of the Bricsleadership were also reflected in the statements of their key leaders. President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva's opening remarks at the first session, devoted to peace, security, and reform of global governance, drew international attention. He called Brics 'an heir of the Non-Aligned Movement'. Pointing out that in 2025 Brazil hosted the fourth Brics summit, he added, 'Of all of them, this one is taking place amid the most adverse scenario,' marked by 'an unprecedented collapse of multilateralism.' He made a strong plea for investment in reform and peace. Regretting that it was always easier to invest in war than in peace, he noted, 'It is easier to designate 5 per cent of the GDP to military spending than to allocate the 0.7 per cent that has been provided for Official Development Assistance.' He believed that the world still has the opportunity to lay the groundwork for 'a reinvigorated governance model'. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Remarks at the same session by Prime Minister Narendra Modi were brief but crisp. From West Asia to Europe, he said, the world is surrounded by disputes and tensions. 'The path to peace is the only option for the good of humanity,' he stated. On reform, he said that global institutions without adequate representation for the Global South are 'like a mobile phone with a SIM card but no network'. He devoted utmost attention to the scourge of international terrorism, asserting, 'Condemning terrorism must be a matter of principle and not just of convenience.' The media made an unnecessary play of the absence of President Xi Jinping. Premier Li Qiang represented China well. He expressed his nation's readiness to work with fellow Brics members to make global governance 'more just, equitable, efficient, and well-ordered'. Delivering an online address, President Vladimir Putin argued that it was important for Brics to continue expanding the use of national currencies in mutual payments as well as to create 'an independent payment and monetary system within Brics'. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Critical Assessment Evaluation of the summit needs to address several facets of the present and future of Brics. First, the expanded grouping (with 11 members, 10 partners, and other attendees) has indeed become more influential than before. It reflects the collegiate leadership of the Global South, although not all nations may accept China and Russia as integral parts of the Global South. Second, while the Brics does have a wise agenda, backed by considerable unity, it is not in a strong position to garner the world's support for it. The fissures within the G7, the tensions between the US and Europe, and the unilateralism of Washington combine to leave little room for Brics to develop an international consensus on the issues agreed at Rio. Finally, even if a reasonable consensus were to emerge on the issues of peace and security, reform of global institutions, economic cooperation, and climate change, the real challenge would be to mobilize the political will of the G7 economies and others to translate their commitments into action. That is a tall order! STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Therefore, it is suggested that Brazil, as the current chair, and India, as the next chair of Brics, should collaborate to devise a way to bring the US and EU closer to the Rio formulations. Should there be some success in this endeavour, these two nations could then work together with South Africa, the current president of the G20. The Rio Declaration has emphasised the G20's key role as the premier global forum for international economic cooperation. This larger forum has the best chance of devising a consensus on the vital issues of our time. However, first, there is the daunting challenge of persuading the US President and his advisers, who continue to view Brics in rather negative terms. Clearly, more coffee and hard work may be required. Rajiv Bhatia is a Distinguished Fellow at Gateway House, a former Indian Ambassador with extensive diplomatic experience in regional and global groupings, and the author of three books on Indian foreign expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect Firstpost's views. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
