What happened to Predator Free 2050?
The vision has been clear – bring back birdsong to every valley, protect the flightless kiwi, and restore what once thrived.
But today, the future of Predator Free 2050 looks uncertain.
Predator Free 2050 Ltd, the Crown-owned company established to drive and fund large-scale eradication and breakthrough science, is now being disestablished, as announced as part of Budget 2025.
Funding for the company will cease by the end of the year, with its responsibilities shifted to the Department of Conservation, which the Government says will reduce duplication, increase efficiency, and save about $12 million.
'People are now worried for this programme,' Newsroom environment editor David Williams tells The Detail.
'They say without ongoing funding, we will not only not go forward, but we will go backwards. This programme needs funding, and that's up to the Government.'
The Government insists the broader goal of predator eradication remains.
But Dr Kayla Kingdon-Bebb, the chief executive of WWF New Zealand, is not entirely convinced.
'New Zealanders believe in the Predator Free 2050 dream, and we want the Government to get behind them too. But I'm not sure this will happen.
'I've not been seeing a lot of enthusiasm for environmental outcomes from this Government, full stop. We describe the Government's policy agenda as a war on nature, and I think it is disappointing that a previous National government got so strongly behind this moonshot objective, and this Government does not seem to care so much.'
Both Williams and Kingdon-Bebb say the country has 'overwhelmingly' backed the Predator Free 2050 initiative, allowing it to 'come a long way, in a relatively short time'.
Already, predator-elimination projects cover more than 800,000 hectares.
'This is a big amount of land,' says Williams. 'And the goal is big … but they have done well.
'They also said they wanted to fund scientific research, and 15 or 20 projects have already had money to try and sort this problem out.
'A lot of community groups have latched on to this – someone said to me that this is the one conservation project that has captured the imagination of New Zealanders more than any other.'
Kingdon-Bebb agrees.
'It has certainly captured the hearts and minds like nothing else,' she says. 'We have seen an explosion of community trapping groups and landscape-scale projects over the last nine years, which has been amazing … now I feel the Government is taking its foot off the pedal.
'What is apparent is that the Government has had a look at the delivery model of the programme as a whole, which is complex.
'So, if it is the case that the Government has reviewed it and determined that a Crown-owned corporation is not the best delivery methodology, I can accept that.
'DoC has a lot of capability … and perhaps it is appropriate for DoC to be coordinating this work, perhaps there was duplication of roles and functions and costs.
'But where I would be concerned is that in the wider scale of what has happened in the last two budgets, the Department of Conservation will see, in total, about 300 million dollars in savings exacted from it.
'So, it does beg the question whether a very stretched department can pick up the leadership of this initiative in a way we would want to see it done.'
Critics say that move will slow momentum, bury innovation under bureaucracy, and confuse local projects already stretched thin.
They also argue that across the country, hundreds of predator-free community groups, many driven by volunteers, will be left wondering what support will look like without the company's funding, research backing, and strategic oversight.
But the Government insists the predator-free projects and contracts funded by the company are not affected, and it is committed to the predator-free 2050 goal.
Check out how to listen to and follow The Detail here.
You can also stay up-to-date by liking us on Facebook or following us on Twitter.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
1News
8 hours ago
- 1News
Youth MPs claim censorship over Govt criticism in speeches
Some Youth MPs say their speeches are being censored if they are critical of the Government, but the Ministry for Youth Development says edits are part of normal protocol. Today is the first day of Youth Parliament 2025, an event that happens every three years. It involves every MP selecting a Youth MP to represent their spot in the House. But some Youth MPs allege they are unable to say what they think about topics currently discussed in Parliament, including the Treaty Principles Bill, changes to the pay equity system, voting rights and climate action. 'We've been told to soften our language, to drop key parts of our speeches and to avoid criticising certain ministers or policies. This isn't guidance, this is fear-based control,' Youth MP Nate Wilbourne told Re: News. Some Youth MPs say they're being censored if they are critical of the Government. (Source: Re: News) ADVERTISEMENT Eighty of the 123 Youth MPs chosen for this year's Youth Parliament were given the opportunity to deliver a speech in the Parliamentary chamber. The Ministry of Youth Development, which is responsible for running the event, said around half of those speakers were given feedback and suggested changes to their speeches. But Youth MP Thomas Brocherie, who is also the co-director of Make It 16, a group campaigning for the voting age to be lowered to 16, said all the speakers received an email from MYD with the subject line 'changes required'. He said this felt like 'blatant editing'. The Youth Parliament event is non-partisan, which means it is not aligned with or opposing any party in Government. Allegations of editing A previous sitting of the Youth Parliament. (Source: NZ Business & Parliament Trust) ADVERTISEMENT Nate Wilbourne, who founded youth organisation Gen Z Aotearoa, said his speech is about the 'war on nature' in which he wanted to call out Ministers Shane Jones, Tama Potaka and Penny Simmonds for their 'assault on te taiao'. He said when he submitted his speech to MYD, it was edited and he was told it 'lacks political neutrality'. 'In any functioning democracy, critique is not only allowed, it is essential. 'When your voices are edited to remove criticism, when ministers are shielded from being named, when we're told that our lived experiences are too political, that is not neutrality – that is protection of the status quo.' Youth MP Sam Allen said their speech included criticism of the Government's Pay Equity Amendment Bill. They said they received suggested edits from MYD on their speech but only some were explained. The line 'I have no idea where you find the audacity to label yourself as a progressive while campaigning for votes, and then cowardly march forward to cut women's pay for our most vulnerable workers' was cut without an explanation, Allen said. The group of Youth MPs also claim a speech about poverty was called 'too anti-rich" and a speech about freedom of speech was also edited. ADVERTISEMENT MYD says it's following protocol MYD general manager John Robertson said the feedback protocol for speeches has been in place since the last Youth Parliament in 2022. 'Our advice was generally focused on supporting them to convey their arguments clearly and effectively, and in keeping with the non-partisan approach of Youth Parliament.' He added: 'We also advised some Youth MPs that changes were required to their speeches to avoid putting themselves at risk.' "Youth MPs are not protected by Parliamentary privilege. This means young people could be held liable if the contents of their speech raise concerns around defamation, copyright, privacy, contempt of court, or broadcasting standards." Youth Minister James Meager said: 'We do not censor the speeches of Youth MPs.' James Meager (Source: Getty) ADVERTISEMENT 'We have been clear to all Youth MPs that they make the final decision about the content of their speech.' But the group of Youth MPs who have spoken out said MYD is in a position of power so young people feel pressured to comply with its suggestions. Meager said he's enjoyed the debates so far, which have been challenging to Government policy, and hasn't seen anything which concerns him in terms of censorship. Labour leader Chris Hipkins told Re: News 'the whole point of Youth Parliament is to give young people, who are often massively underheard, the chance to speak up". 'Asking them to censor their views just because they're critical of the Government is completely out of step with that spirit." Youth Parliament won't be livestreamed this year File image of the steps outside Parliament (Source: 1News) ADVERTISEMENT The past two Youth Parliaments have been fully livestreamed, but this year's is not. MYD said this was due to resource constraints, and that parts will be recorded and shared with the Youth MPs after the event has ended. Youth MP Lincoln Jones said he remembers speeches from previous Youth Parliaments which have been controversial and thinks the lack of live streaming this year is to 'ensure that speeches that don't fit the narrative of this government are not getting out to the general public'. Thomas Brocherie remembers watching Youth Parliament live when he was younger. 'No 14-year-old is going to have that same excited feeling I did because they literally cannot see it,' he said. Youth MPs say they're no longer feeling excited about Youth Parliament While Meager said everyone is 'thoroughly enjoying' Youth Parliament, some Youth MPs said their excitement for the event has now fizzled out. Brocherie said it's 'sad and disheartening' to see Youth Parliament being 'used wrongly' and that his perspective on Youth Parliament has been changed as a whole. Allen said 'people have gone from what should be a really exciting event just feeling quite scared' that they might get into trouble for what they chose to say.
Scoop
8 hours ago
- Scoop
Government Signs First MOUs Kickstarting City And Regional Deal For Auckland
Press Release – New Zealand National Party This is a major opportunity to get real traction on the infrastructure and development Auckland needs. It means a stronger voice at the decision-making table, better coordination, and faster delivery of the projects that will make a difference, Upper Harbour MP … The Government has signed the first Memoranda of Understanding (MOU) to negotiate a City and Regional Deal with Auckland – marking a significant step towards delivering long-term growth and development opportunities for Auckland, Upper Harbour MP Cameron Brewer says. 'City and Regional Deals are designed to boost economic growth, unlock housing, and better manage local infrastructure. They bring central and local government together to agree on priorities, plan and implement the projects that will bring the most value to our city,' Mr Brewer says. 'This is about backing Auckland's potential. We can now negotiate a 10-year strategic partnership between local and central government in Auckland – focused on driving growth, cutting red tape, and investing in what matters most to our communities. 'The partnership will deliver tangible outcomes for Aucklanders, particularly in fast-growing areas like Upper Harbour. 'This is a major opportunity to get real traction on the infrastructure and development Auckland needs. It means a stronger voice at the decision-making table, better coordination, and faster delivery of the projects that will make a difference. 'It's a chance to shape Auckland's future – attracting investment, growing jobs, improving transport, and delivering better services for local families.' The Government and Auckland Council will work together to agree on priorities and deliver projects – including transport, water infrastructure, housing, and other services – that will support economic growth and improve quality of life. Negotiations are now underway, with the first City and Regional Deal expected to be finalised by the end of 2025.
Scoop
9 hours ago
- Scoop
Government Signs First MOUs Kickstarting City And Regional Deal For Auckland
The Government has signed the first Memoranda of Understanding (MOU) to negotiate a City and Regional Deal with Auckland – marking a significant step towards delivering long-term growth and development opportunities for Auckland, Upper Harbour MP Cameron Brewer says. 'City and Regional Deals are designed to boost economic growth, unlock housing, and better manage local infrastructure. They bring central and local government together to agree on priorities, plan and implement the projects that will bring the most value to our city,' Mr Brewer says. 'This is about backing Auckland's potential. We can now negotiate a 10-year strategic partnership between local and central government in Auckland – focused on driving growth, cutting red tape, and investing in what matters most to our communities. 'The partnership will deliver tangible outcomes for Aucklanders, particularly in fast-growing areas like Upper Harbour. 'This is a major opportunity to get real traction on the infrastructure and development Auckland needs. It means a stronger voice at the decision-making table, better coordination, and faster delivery of the projects that will make a difference. 'It's a chance to shape Auckland's future – attracting investment, growing jobs, improving transport, and delivering better services for local families.' The Government and Auckland Council will work together to agree on priorities and deliver projects – including transport, water infrastructure, housing, and other services – that will support economic growth and improve quality of life. Negotiations are now underway, with the first City and Regional Deal expected to be finalised by the end of 2025.
