logo
Cong slams census notification, demands clarity on caste enumeration

Cong slams census notification, demands clarity on caste enumeration

New Delhi, June 16 (UNI) Senior Congress leader Jairam Ramesh on Monday criticised the Gazette notification issued by the Government on the 16th Census, calling it a "damp squib" that offers no clarity and "remains silent on the inclusion of caste data'.
On his social media handle X, Ramesh said that the notification merely reiterates what was already announced on April 30, 2025, and questioned the government's intent regarding caste enumeration.
Ramesh alleged, 'It is entirely because of the persistence and insistence of the Indian National Congress that the PM surrendered to the demand for a caste census. He had called Congress leaders as urban Naxals for making this demand'.
The Modi government had earlier rejected the idea of a caste census in both Parliament and the Supreme Court, the Rajya Sabha MP alleged.
'Today's Gazette Notification is, however, SILENT on the inclusion of caste in the 16th Census. Is this yet another U-turn by the ustad of U-turns? Or will details be announced later?' Ramesh asked, targetting the PM.
Reiterating the party's demand that the 16th Census adopt the Telangana model, Ramesh said, 'The INC firmly believes that the 16th Census must adopt the Telangana model for not just caste enumeration but also bringing out detailed data information on socio-economic parameters caste-wise'.
The Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) officially notified that the next Census of the population of India will be conducted in the year 2027.
Home Minister Amit Shah yesterday reviewed the preparation for the forthcoming Census of India here with Union Home Secretary, Registrar General & Census Commissioner of India (RG&CCI), and other senior officials.
UNI RBE RN
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘Spare The Sangh From Political Rhetoric': RSS Hits Back At Congress
‘Spare The Sangh From Political Rhetoric': RSS Hits Back At Congress

News18

time33 minutes ago

  • News18

‘Spare The Sangh From Political Rhetoric': RSS Hits Back At Congress

Last Updated: RSS's Sunil Ambekar reiterated that the Sangh's identity has always been of a social and cultural organisation, and it has always focused on 'nation-building' Reacting to the repeated attacks by the Congress—the latest coming from Karnataka minister Priyank Kharge —the RSS said the political parties should 'spare" the Sangh, as it has no interest in engaging with politically driven narratives. 'Spare the Sangh from such political conversations. We are a social organisation committed to constructive work, not political rhetoric. We do our work organically," said Sunil Ambekar, the RSS's Akhil Bharatiya Prachar Pramukh, asserting that an organisation like the Sangh should not be dragged into political controversies. He further reiterated that the Sangh's identity has always been of a social and cultural organisation, and it has always focused on 'nation-building". 'The RSS does not function like a political party and remains committed to its grassroots social work. People support the Sangh's work, and they get associated. Political parties should stop unnecessarily involving the Sangh in their discourse," he added. Centenary preparations A three-day Akhil Bharatiya Prant Pracharak Baithak of the RSS will be held from July 4-6 at Keshav Kunj in Delhi, with a key focus on preparations for the Shatabdi Varsh (Centenary Year) in 2025-26, Ambekar said, addressing the media. While not a decision-making forum, the meeting will review the progress of organisational work across prants (zones) and discuss the functioning of various karya vibhag (sections and zones). Issues related to Operation Sindoor, atrocities on Hindus in Bangladesh, and other geopolitical, social, and border issues, including religious conversion and Khalistani issues in Punjab, will be discussed in the meeting. Two prant pracharaks (in-charges) from Jammu and Kashmir will also join the meeting. Around 46 prant pracharaks from across states and 233 karyakartas will attend the meeting. Responding to a question on the caste census, Ambekar reiterated the Sangh's old stand that it sees no problem with the government collecting data if it is for public welfare. Regarding the recent concerns over the Kanwar Yatra and potential law-and-order issues, Ambekar said, 'Religious events like the Kanwar Yatra happen smoothly every year. Administrative coordination is routine. We also engage with members of the society to ensure peace and harmony." 'Outreach' as the key He further confirmed that extensive preparations are underway for the 100-year anniversary of the RSS, with all states and zones having submitted proposals. The centenary year will officially begin with a grand programme in Nagpur on Vijay Dashami, October 2. Regional and zonal programmes will follow along with 'Hindu Sammelan" across states. RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat will also undertake a pravas (outreach tour) of four major cities—Delhi, Bengaluru, Mumbai, and Kolkata—as part of the centenary outreach. Special initiatives include Grih Sampark Abhiyan (door-to-door contact), Samajik Sadbhav Baithaks (social harmony meetings), and Pramukh Nagrik Goshthis (citizen dialogues) on Hindutva and national vision. Youth engagement will be central, as over 28,571 people registered through the 'Join RSS" portal between April and June. Ambekar also outlined the Panch Parivartan vision for societal transformation—spanning social harmony, environmental consciousness, cultural pride, family bonding, and civic responsibility—which RSS volunteers will promote in collaboration with wider society. About the Author Madhuparna Das First Published: July 04, 2025, 05:12 IST

Trump Mount Rushmore Proposal: Will President's face get added to monument? See if it is a possibility or not
Trump Mount Rushmore Proposal: Will President's face get added to monument? See if it is a possibility or not

Economic Times

timean hour ago

  • Economic Times

Trump Mount Rushmore Proposal: Will President's face get added to monument? See if it is a possibility or not

AP Trump Mount Rushmore Proposal is back in news. Mount Rushmore with the four presidents' faces is the center of new political debate over potential expansion. Then-President Donald Trump stands at Mount Rushmore National Memorial on July 3, 2020, near Keystone, S.D. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon, File) Trump Mount Rushmore Proposal has hogged the limelight again as a renewed political push has emerged to add a fifth face to Mount Rushmore, this time that of President Donald Trump. Rep. Andy Ogles (R-Tenn.) has formally requested that Interior Secretary Doug Burgum study the feasibility of the addition. However, experts and park officials continue to emphasize the structural and philosophical Ogles wrote a letter to Secretary Burgum urging the Department of the Interior to consider expanding the Mount Rushmore National Memorial. He pointed to Trump's domestic policy bill, which passed Congress on Thursday, and the administration's ongoing border security efforts. Ogles also posted his proposal on social media, writing that the monument should evolve to include recent moments in US history. Also Read: Big Beautiful Bill Passed: What's in Trump's megabill and when will it go into effect? These Republicans voted against it The Department of the Interior did not directly comment on the expansion proposal. A spokesperson said the agency reviews all correspondence from Congress seriously and thoroughly. The National Park Service, which manages Mount Rushmore, did not issue a fresh statement in response. In the past, NPS officials have stressed that the rock surrounding the current sculpture is unsuitable for new acknowledged the difficulties involved in modifying Mount Rushmore. He suggested a feasibility study involving the public and experts to address technical, legal, and cultural concerns. Mount Rushmore sits on sacred Lakota Sioux land, a source of ongoing dispute with Indigenous argued that recognizing Trump's accomplishments would increase the site's importance and visitor numbers, benefitting South Dakota and local officials and geologists have repeatedly warned that the monument cannot safely accommodate another face. Maureen McGee-Ballinger of the NPS stated in 2020 that no suitable rock remains near the sculpted area.A long-standing engineering partner, RESPEC, supports this view, saying any new carving could destabilize the existing engineer Paul Nelson said removing more material could harm the support of the monument, possibly risking structural damage. Also Read: Michael Madsen Net Worth: Actor's cause of death, financial success, movies list, iconic roles and career Mount Rushmore's original sculptor, Gutzon Borglum, made several changes to his design due to the rock's poor quality. Jefferson's first face had to be blasted away and moved. Roosevelt's face was carved in a narrow space near a crack, and Lincoln's face is held by the 1990s, scientists mapped over 140 fractures across the site, showing it is already fragile. Park rangers even angled Jefferson's gaze to avoid a Ogles, Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-Fla.) has introduced legislation to begin carving Trump's face on the mountain. The bill has not yet received a past interviews, Trump expressed interest in being added to the monument. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem once said Trump told her it was his sculptor Borglum's granddaughter said the monument was not intended to celebrate individuals but ideals. Past suggestions to include other presidents were never acted on. What are the main reasons experts oppose adding Trump to Mount Rushmore? Experts say the rock is unstable. Carving more faces risks damage to the existing sculpture and could make the entire structure unsafe. Has anyone else supported adding Trump to Mount Rushmore? Yes, Rep. Anna Paulina Luna introduced a bill in January to carve Trump's face, but it has not advanced in Congress.

Trump Mount Rushmore Proposal: Will President's face get added to monument? See if it is a possibility or not
Trump Mount Rushmore Proposal: Will President's face get added to monument? See if it is a possibility or not

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

Trump Mount Rushmore Proposal: Will President's face get added to monument? See if it is a possibility or not

Ogles Cites Trump's Achievements Interior Department Response to Trump Mount Rushmore Proposal Live Events Trump Mount Rushmore Proposal Technical and Cultural Challenges Can Mount Rushmore Have More Faces? Mount Rushmore Rock's Poor Quality Trump Mount Rushmore Proposal Political Support and Resistance FAQs (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel has hogged the limelight again as a renewed political push has emerged to add a fifth face to Mount Rushmore, this time that of President Donald Trump. Rep. Andy Ogles (R-Tenn.) has formally requested that Interior Secretary Doug Burgum study the feasibility of the addition. However, experts and park officials continue to emphasize the structural and philosophical Ogles wrote a letter to Secretary Burgum urging the Department of the Interior to consider expanding the Mount Rushmore National Memorial. He pointed to Trump's domestic policy bill, which passed Congress on Thursday, and the administration's ongoing border security also posted his proposal on social media, writing that the monument should evolve to include recent moments in US Department of the Interior did not directly comment on the expansion proposal. A spokesperson said the agency reviews all correspondence from Congress seriously and thoroughly. The National Park Service, which manages Mount Rushmore, did not issue a fresh statement in the past, NPS officials have stressed that the rock surrounding the current sculpture is unsuitable for new acknowledged the difficulties involved in modifying Mount Rushmore. He suggested a feasibility study involving the public and experts to address technical, legal, and cultural concerns. Mount Rushmore sits on sacred Lakota Sioux land, a source of ongoing dispute with Indigenous argued that recognizing Trump's accomplishments would increase the site's importance and visitor numbers, benefitting South Dakota and local officials and geologists have repeatedly warned that the monument cannot safely accommodate another face. Maureen McGee-Ballinger of the NPS stated in 2020 that no suitable rock remains near the sculpted area.A long-standing engineering partner, RESPEC, supports this view, saying any new carving could destabilize the existing engineer Paul Nelson said removing more material could harm the support of the monument, possibly risking structural Rushmore's original sculptor, Gutzon Borglum, made several changes to his design due to the rock's poor quality. Jefferson's first face had to be blasted away and moved. Roosevelt's face was carved in a narrow space near a crack, and Lincoln's face is held by the 1990s, scientists mapped over 140 fractures across the site, showing it is already fragile. Park rangers even angled Jefferson's gaze to avoid a Ogles, Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-Fla.) has introduced legislation to begin carving Trump's face on the mountain. The bill has not yet received a past interviews, Trump expressed interest in being added to the monument. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem once said Trump told her it was his sculptor Borglum's granddaughter said the monument was not intended to celebrate individuals but ideals. Past suggestions to include other presidents were never acted say the rock is unstable. Carving more faces risks damage to the existing sculpture and could make the entire structure Rep. Anna Paulina Luna introduced a bill in January to carve Trump's face, but it has not advanced in Congress.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store