Ephrata FBLA brings home 14 titles, 28 state qualifiers
"Well, I'm really proud of the fact that we had more regional champions this year than we did last year," FBLA Lead Advisor Scott Sanberg said. "Then I'm also proud that everybody we took qualified in one category or another."
The competitions cover a range of skills depending on the topics students are competing in according to Sanberg. Some of the competitions are tests students take; others are a bit more intricate.
"The competitions vary," Sandberg said. "We have role-play events where students will pick their event. One could be a sales presentation, where they don't really know what they're walking into ... They get a topic (like they're) a car salesman, and they get 20 minutes to prepare, and they try to sell someone a car. Every event is different, though."
Sandberg said they have done better in recent years and last year they took 10 students to nationals and 31 students to state. The year before, two students went to nationals and 21 students to state.
"We've noticed significant improvements over the last three years," Sandberg said. "We've noticed a significant growth in our students."
This year Sandberg said he is optimistic they will have more students competing in the nationals, especially because they did well in the recent competition.
"After feeling really good, we got our scores back today, and based on our scores and how we did, I'm feeling pretty confident that we'll probably have even more national participants this year," Sandberg said.
Champs:
Addy Jo West — first place word processing
Aryz Navarro — first place graphic design (team event with Baylie Broesch and Dayana Nolosco Gomez)
Baylie Broesch — first place in graphic design (team event with Aryz Navarro and Dayana Nolosco Gomez)
Calvin Becker — first place introduction to information technology, first place in network infrastructure and fourth place in cybersecurity
Dawson Davis — first place financial math, first place introduction to financial math, first place personal finance and first place securities and investments
Dayana Nolasco Gomez — first in computer application, fifth place in cybersecurity and first place in graphic design (team event with Baylie Broesch and Aryz Navarro)
Micah Sandberg — first place computer problem solving
Uriel Bustos — first place introduction to programming
Placers:
Caylee Mattson — second in business ethics
Regan Shannon — sixth place business law, fifth place introduction to business communications, fourth place introduction to business communications, fourth place introduction to FBLA and sixth place for journalism
Dayana Nolasco Gomez — fifth place in cybersecurity
Calvin Becker — fourth place in cybersecurity
Leslie Balbuena — fourth place health care administration, second place visual design and third place graphic design
Landon Coe — sixth place in help desk, second place personal finance, second place visual design and third place graphic design
Conner Leasher — sixth place in introduction to FBLA
Chales Poirrier Lundquist — sixth place in introduction to public speaking and fifth place in social media strategies
Paisley Ribble — fifth place for social media strategies
Avery Gault — sixth place for visual design
Kate Maedke — sixth place for both visual design and graphic design
Romeo Arreola Morales — fourth place in visual design
Kassandra Estrada Rangel — fourth place in visual design
Dayana Cartagena Ortega — sixth place in graphic design
Monty Muir — fourth place in impromptu speaking
Alexandria Drake — sixth place in the job interview
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
17-07-2025
- Yahoo
Meta investors, Zuckerberg reach settlement to end $8 billion trial over Facebook privacy violations
By Tom Hals WILMINGTON, Delaware (Reuters) -Mark Zuckerberg and current and former directors and officers of Meta Platforms agreed on Thursday to settle claims seeking $8 billion for the damage they allegedly caused the company by allowing repeated violations of Facebook users' privacy, a lawyer for the shareholders told a Delaware judge on Thursday. The parties did not disclose details of the settlement and defense lawyers did not address the judge, Kathaleen McCormick of the Delaware Court of Chancery. McCormick adjourned the trial just as it was to enter its second day and she congratulated the parties. The plaintiffs' lawyer, Sam Closic, said the agreement just came together quickly. Billionaire venture capitalist Marc Andreessen, a defendant in the trial and a Meta director, was scheduled to testify on Thursday. Shareholders of Meta sued Zuckerberg, Andreessen and other former company officials including former Chief Operating Officer Sheryl Sandberg in hopes of holding them liable for billions of dollars in fines and legal costs the company paid in recent years. The Federal Trade Commission fined Facebook $5 billion in 2019 after finding that it failed to comply with a 2012 agreement with the regulator to protect users' data. The shareholders wanted the 11 defendants to use their personal wealth to reimburse the company. The defendants denied the allegations, which they called "extreme claims." Facebook changed its name to Meta in 2021. The company was not a defendant and declined to comment. On its website, the company has said it has invested billions of dollars into protecting user privacy since 2019. A lawyer for the defendants declined to comment. 'This settlement may bring relief to the parties involved, but it's a missed opportunity for public accountability," said Jason Kint, the head of Digital Content Next, a trade group for content providers. Zuckerberg was expected to take the stand on Monday and Sandberg on Wednesday. The trial was scheduled to run through the end of next week. The case was also expected to include testimony from former Facebook board members Peter Thiel, Palantir Technologies co-founder, and Reed Hastings, co-founder of Netflix. By settling, Zuckerberg and other defendants avoid having to answer probing questions under oath. Sandberg was found during the litigation to have deleted what were likely her most sensitive emails and she was sanctioned, making it harder for her to tell her side of the story in court. The settlement allows plaintiffs to avoid trying a very difficult case. Meta investors alleged that former and current board members completely failed to oversee the company's compliance with the 2012 FTC agreement. The lawsuit also claimed that Zuckerberg and Sandberg knowingly ran Facebook as an illegal data harvesting operation. The oversight allegations are known as Caremark claims, considered the most difficult to prove under Delaware corporate law. It was the first time Caremark claims went to trial, and even if the plaintiffs had gotten a judgment in their favor, the case would have been appealed to the Delaware Supreme Court. That court has reversed major shareholder victories in recent years. The case followed revelations that data from millions of Facebook users was accessed by Cambridge Analytica, a now-defunct political consulting firm that worked for Donald Trump's successful U.S. presidential campaign in 2016. Those revelations led to the FTC fine, which was a record at the time. On Wednesday, an expert witness for the plaintiffs testified about what he called "gaps and weaknesses" in Facebook's privacy policies but would not say if the company violated the 2012 agreement that Facebook reached with the FTC. Jeffrey Zients, a former board member, testified on Wednesday that the company did not agree to the FTC fine to spare Zuckerberg legal liability, as shareholders alleged. The defendants' legal team also showed the court notes that Zients had taken when he was on the board that seemed to show he was urging the board to make user privacy a top priority, which would undercut plaintiffs' claims. The trial settlement marks the second time Zuckerberg avoided testifying in the court. In 2017, Facebook abandoned a plan to issue a new class of stock as a way for Zuckerberg to extend his control over the company while selling his shares. The decision came a week before Zuckerberg was expected to testify in the Court of Chancery to defend the stock plan. "Facebook has successfully remade the 'Cambridge Analytica' scandal about a few bad actors rather than an unraveling of its entire business model of surveillance capitalism and the reciprocal, unbridled sharing of personal data," Kint said. "That reckoning is now left unresolved."
Forbes
16-07-2025
- Forbes
Meta Privacy Lawsuit: What To Know About $8 Billion Trial Against Zuckerberg Over Cambridge Analytica
Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg, former COO Sheryl Sandberg and other billionaires tied to Facebook will go on trial in Delaware on Wednesday, as a week-long trial determines whether the company's past and present leadership will be forced to pay $8 billion in damages for knowingly violating a privacy agreement, which led to the Cambridge Analytica scandal. Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg arrives to testify before a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on Capitol ... More Hill in Washington on Jan. 31, 2024. Copyright 2024 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. Facebook shareholders sued the company's leadership in 2018, alleging they knowingly violated an agreement with the Federal Trade Commission by sharing data about users' friends with third-party apps without those friends' knowledge. Facebook, which rebranded to Meta in 2021, signed a consent order with the FTC in 2012, in which the company agreed to create a 'comprehensive privacy program' to address privacy concerns arising from its products. The FTC prohibited Facebook from misrepresenting how it maintains and shares 'covered information' about its users—such as their names, addresses, emails, or physical locations—and what controls users have over the privacy of that information. Zuckerberg, Sandberg and other Facebook leadership knowingly didn't comply with that agreement, the plaintiffs allege, as they still allowed third-party apps to collect app users' data about their friends and those friends' personal information, even if the friends didn't consent to using the app themselves. That issue came to light with the Cambridge Analytica scandal, in which millions of users' Facebook data was harvested through a third-party app, and that data was allegedly used to influence major political events such as Brexit and the 2016 election. The plaintiffs also allege Facebook entered into agreements with specific companies that granted them access to users' friend data, even after Zuckerberg said Facebook was making that data sharing more secure—making those agreements with companies run by venture capitalists Marc Andreessen and Peter Thiel and Netflix CEO Reed Hastings, who all also served on Facebook's board. The trial begins Wednesday in Delaware Chancery Court—as Meta is incorporated in the state—and will last for eight days. There's no jury in the trial and the judge will issue the verdict in the case. That will likely come out in the weeks or months following the trial, rather than when the trial wraps up. Zuckerberg, Sandberg, Thiel, Andreessen and Hastings are all expected to testify, according to Reuters. Who Are The Key Players Being Sued? Defendants in the lawsuit include Zuckerberg, Sandberg and former Facebook Partnerships VP Konstantinos Papamiltiadis, whom the lawsuit alleges knowingly made deals with third-party apps that violated the 2012 FTC agreement. The lawsuit also names Andreessen, Thiel and Hastings, who were board members at the time and allegedly knew about the non-compliance with the FTC consent order, given their companies were given favorable agreements that allegedly violated it. Other Facebook board members named in the complaint are former Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation CEO Dr. Susan Desmond-Hellman, eBay CFO Peggy Alford and former American Express CEO Kenneth Chenault. The lawsuit additionally names two former White House chiefs of staff as defendants based on their roles on Facebook's board: Erskine Bowles, who served during Bill Clinton's presidency, and former chief of staff to President Joe Biden, Jeff Zients, who served on the board prior to his role at the White House. $8 billion. That's how much the shareholders are asking for the defendants to pay in damages, which they said reflects the amount Facebook had to pay in costs as a result of the leaders' allegedly unlawful activities. What Else Does The Lawsuit Allege? The shareholders bringing the suit make a number of allegations suggesting the defendants in the case knew that they were not in compliance with their privacy obligations. Facebook allegedly moved a notice to users that their privacy could be shared with third-party apps to be more noticeable after reaching the consent order with the FTC, for instance, only to then move it back to the less-prominent place it was in before the order, allegedly with Zuckerberg's knowledge. Facebook's privacy head Yul Kwon also allegedly warned Zuckerberg and Sandberg in 2015 that the company was not doing enough to address privacy concerns, warning Facebook's 'privacy program was disorganized and under-resourced' and the company hadn't properly 'prioritized' privacy concerns, which was causing a 'colossal problem.' Zuckerberg and Sandberg allegedly didn't implement Kwon's suggestions for the improving privacy infrastructure until after Cambridge Analytica, however, and Kwon testified the company may have avoided that scandal had they heeded his advice. The plaintiffs also take issue with Facebook's board of directors approving a $5 billion settlement with the FTC in 2019, arguing they paid a higher-than-required rate in order to protect Zuckerberg and shield him from legal liability. The lawsuit separately details Zuckerberg selling approximately $5 billion in Facebook stock in 2018, which the plaintiffs allege he did because he knew about the company's non-compliance with its privacy obligations. What Do The Defendants Argue? The defendants strongly deny any claims of wrongdoing, alleging in a court filing the plaintiffs do not have any evidence to back up their claims of officials acting unlawfully and, 'To the contrary, the evidence will show that under the board's leadership, Facebook worked effectively to comply with the 2012 order.' 'The evidence will show that Facebook implemented a robust system of privacy controls' and consistently updated the FTC on its efforts, the defendants argued, claiming the evidence in the case 'negates plaintiffs' pleaded portrait of a company indifferent to compliance.' The defendants also allege their deals with specific companies allowing them to access more data did not violate the 2012 FTC order and that Zuckerberg's sale of his stocks was in compliance with the law and was done in order to fund his charitable pursuits. They also deny the Cambridge Analytica scandal reflects any wrongdoing on Facebook or its officials' part, alleging that while the scandal was 'decidedly a traumatic event' for the company, 'it was the product of Cambridge Analytica's studied deceit—not remotely the product of the bad faith inattention of Facebook's fiduciaries.' Forbes Valuation Forbes estimates Zuckerberg's net worth at $242.3 billion as of Wednesday afternoon, making him the third-richest person in the world. Many of the defendants named in the lawsuit are among the richest people in the world, including Sandberg (valued at $2.4 billion as of Wednesday), Andreessen ($2 billion), Thiel ($22.7 billion) and Hastings ($6.8 billion). Sandberg has already been punished as part of the lawsuit, as the ex-Facebook COO was sanctioned by the court in January for allegedly deleting personal emails that were material to the lawsuit. That could make it more difficult for her to prove her innocence at trial, Reuters noted, and information about the emails will not be used at trial. The former exec alleged she rarely used her personal email and that other users were copied on any now-deleted messages, so that the information was preserved. What Is The Cambridge Analytica Scandal? Cambridge Analytica was a voter-profiling company that obtained data from Facebook users through Cambridge University professor Dr. Aleksandr Kogan, who created a quiz on Facebook that was used to harvest data about users who opted into it and, by extension, their friends. That data was then shared with Cambridge Analytica, and The New York Times and The Intercept reported the firm used that data and other records to create 'psychographic profiles' for approximately 30 million people—despite only some 270,000 actually opting into using Kogan's app. Cambridge Analytica, which had ties to Trump adviser Steve Bannon, then used that data to work on various political campaigns in the ensuing years, including Brexit, the 2014 U.S. midterms and the 2016 presidential election, in which President Donald Trump's campaign and Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, worked with the firm, according to the Times. The news of Cambridge Analytica's use of such vast Facebook data was first reported by The Guardian in 2015, which alleged Cruz was using the data. Further reports by The Guardian and The New York Times in 2018 then detailed the wider scope of the firm's work, thanks to a whistleblower exposing the firm. Those reports set off a series of investigations and legal actions, including the shareholder lawsuit. Facebook and Zuckerberg apologized for their role in the scandal after it came to light and imposed new privacy controls, and Zuckerberg testified to Congress, admitting the company 'didn't do enough to prevent these tools from being used for harm' and saying about the data breach, 'It was my mistake, and I'm sorry. I started Facebook, I run it, and I'm responsible for what happens here.' Cambridge Analytica filed for bankruptcy in 2018, and in addition to the $5 billion fine from the FTC, Facebook has also faced consequences for the scandal including paying a $100 million fine from the Securities and Exchange Commission, a $725 million legal settlement and a £500,000 (approximately $645,000) fine from the U.K. Information Commissioner's Office. Further Reading Meta ex-COO Sandberg sanctioned in investor lawsuit for deleting emails (Reuters) Meta Trial Over Cambridge Analytica Scandal Tests Chancery Court (Bloomberg) As Facebook Raised a Privacy Wall, It Carved an Opening for Tech Giants (New York Times)
Business Insider
09-07-2025
- Business Insider
Kepler Capital Sticks to Their Buy Rating for Wallenstam AB (0R7Y)
In a report released on July 7, Albin Sandberg from Kepler Capital maintained a Buy rating on Wallenstam AB, with a price target of SEK57.00. The company's shares closed last Monday at SEK46.82. Don't Miss TipRanks' Half-Year Sale Take advantage of TipRanks Premium at 50% off! Unlock powerful investing tools, advanced data, and expert analyst insights to help you invest with confidence. Make smarter investment decisions with TipRanks' Smart Investor Picks, delivered to your inbox every week. According to TipRanks, Sandberg is an analyst with an average return of -4.3% and a 46.61% success rate. Sandberg covers the Real Estate sector, focusing on stocks such as Dios Fastigheter AB, Pandox AB, and Wallenstam AB. The word on The Street in general, suggests a Moderate Buy analyst consensus rating for Wallenstam AB with a SEK57.00 average price target. The company has a one-year high of SEK61.10 and a one-year low of SEK39.08. Currently, Wallenstam AB has an average volume of 136.4K.
