Xiaomi Smart Band 10 marketing materials leak, confirming previously outed specs
Yesterday, the specs for Xiaomi's upcoming Smart Band 10 got leaked alongside some official-looking renders. Today, there's a new leak and this time it's all about the marketing materials for the band.
As you can see below, these confirm the device's most important specs. The Xiaomi Smart Band 10 has a 1.72" 60 Hz AMOLED screen with symmetrical ultra-thin bezels (and it's larger than its predecessor's) and 1,500-nit peak brightness, up to 21-day battery life, and more than 150 sports modes with an advanced swimming mode and heart rate broadcast.
Xiaomi Smart Band 10 marketing materials
It will offer "colorful" and "multi-material" "frames" and accessories, designed to "enrich your outfit", and you'll also get enhanced sleep management with personalized guidance.
At the rate the leaks are coming, we expect the Smart Band 10 to be announced very soon.
Source
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
GSM Arena
2 hours ago
- GSM Arena
vivo X200 FE's India launch teased Comments
vivo X Fold5 has the biggest battery (6,000mAh) and best protection (IP59+) of any foldable
Phone Arena
3 hours ago
- Phone Arena
Samsung looks at its past to test future feature for Galaxy Z Flip
Samsung has recently filed for a patent on a display interface on the edge of a phone that looks like a future Galaxy Z Flip model. The application for the patent was submitted to the China National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA). The patent was spotted by 91mobiles and shows a "battery level graphical user interface" on a foldable clamshell flip-style phone. There is a slight curve to the top frame of the flip phone and the interface will remind you of Samsung's curved display phones of the past. The Galaxy Note Edge was launched in 2014 with a curved edge on one side. The illustration included in the patent shows what appears to be an indicator revealing how much battery life remains on the phone. To make it easier for the user to check out the status of the phone's battery, a line made up of a solid color representing the battery percentage remaining on the phone runs up the curved display. At the bottom is the numerical equivalent of the battery percentage remaining. For example, with 90% battery life remaining the illustration in the patent shows a blue line running up the curved display taking up 90% of the complete line. The remaining 10% is in black indicating the percentage of the battery that has been used. The black color will always represent the percentage of the battery consumed while the other color gives you a quick idea about the status of the battery. With 90% battery life remaining, that line is blue indicating that your clamshell flipper has plenty of battery life left. At 50%, the line is in gold, and with 10% battery life remaining that line is in red which is supposed to be like a "red alert" warning. The patent illustration also shows that the bottom of the phone features a USB-C port for charging and data transfers and there are dual speaker grilles. The patent also shows the edge-to-edge cover display and the dual cameras. The device shown in the patent application certainly resembles a Galaxy Z Flip model. Just because Samsung filed this patent application it doesn't mean that we will definitely see a curved display clamshell foldable with a "battery level graphical user interface." If Samsung does decide to go ahead and add this feature to the Galaxy Z Flip, it wouldn't be on this year's model and would probably debut in 2026 at the earliest. Secure your connection now at a bargain price! We may earn a commission if you make a purchase Check Out The Offer
GSM Arena
5 hours ago
- GSM Arena
Poco F7 vs Poco F7 Pro
The Poco F7 Series is here, and as usual, Xiaomi has released not one, but two near-flagship killers - the Poco F7 and the Poco F7 Pro. Both phones promise top-tier performance, premium features, and competitive pricing, staying true to Poco's legacy of delivering exceptional value. But while the regular F7 lands with a bigger battery and slightly larger display, the Pro model brings a sharper screen, superior cameras, and a more powerful chipset to the table. With just €100 between them, it's a tough choice - so which one offers the better deal? The Poco F7 arrives with a single flagship-grade memory option - 12 GB RAM paired with either 256 GB or 512 GB of UFS 4.1 storage, offering a smooth experience and plenty of space for apps, media, and games. In the EU, the 12+256 GB configuration is priced at €449.99, while the 12+512 GB jumps to €499.99, with a similar launch price bracket in India under INR 35,000 (~US $399/449). The Poco F7 Pro offers again 12 GB RAM combined with either 256 GB or 512 GB of UFS 4.1 internal storage. Pricing is set higher, with the global launch starting around US $499 (≈€499) for the 12+256 GB version and US $549 for 12+512 GB. Table of Contents: Design Display Battery Life Charging Speaker Test Performance Cameras Verdict For starters, you can compare the complete specs sheets or directly continue with our editor's assessment in the following text. Size comparison Xiaomi Poco F7 5G Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro There's a modest size difference between the Poco F7 and the Poco F7 Pro. The regular F7 is slightly taller, wider, and heavier than the Pro, likely due to its larger battery and screen. Still, both phones remain comfortably within the slim and lightweight category for large-screen devices. The differences in hand are noticeable but not drastic - if you value a more compact feel, the Pro has the advantage here. Both phones have the same design language, and both have IP68 ingress protection. For materials, the front of both phones is protected by Gorilla Glass Victus. The back of the F7 Pro is made of glass, while the regular F7 uses high-quality plastic, giving the Pro a slightly more premium feel. The middle frame is plastic on both models, though it's finished nicely to resemble aluminum. Connectivity is also identical for the most part. Both phones support dual SIM functionality, Wi-Fi 6E, Bluetooth 5.4, and have USB-C ports. However, the Poco F7 supports DisplayPort video output over USB-C, which is missing on the F7 Pro for some reason. Speaker setup is identical too, with both phones offering stereo speakers tuned for Dolby Atmos. They're using a hybrid stereo arrangement with a shared earpiece and bottom-firing secondary speaker. The setup delivers loud and balanced sound. And both phones also feature a quality haptic motor. Button placement is standard and consistent between the two phones - volume rocker and power key are located on the right side, while the left side remains clean. Both phones use an under-display optical fingerprint reader, so there is no difference there. It's worth noting that both models have an IR blaster, which is located near the camera island on the back instead of its usual location on the top frame. Display comparison Xiaomi Poco F7 5G Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro Both phones feature high-quality AMOLED panels with 120Hz refresh rates and Dolby Vision video support. The Poco F7's is a larger 6.83-inch display with a 2772 x 1280px resolution, while the F7 Pro opts for a slightly smaller 6.67-inch display but with a higher 3200 x 1440px resolution. So in terms of sharpness, the Pro clearly wins with its 526ppi density. Max screen brightness is comparable - 1525 nits on the F7 and 1478 nits on the Pro - so both are excellent in sunlight. It really comes down to whether you value more screen estate or extra pixel sharpness. The bezels around the screens are symmetrical and minimal on both phones. Battery life The Poco F7 has the larger battery of the two, at 6500 mAh, compared to the F7 Pro's 6000 mAh. However, that extra capacity doesn't pay off as the F7 Pro delivers longer or equal battery life performance across all of our tests except gaming, which is the only test in which the F7 takes the win. Charging speed Xiaomi Poco F7 5G 6500 mAh Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro 6000 mAh Charging is equally impressive on both devices, with 90W wired charging supported out of the box. The Poco F7 Pro had a slight advantage in our charging speed test, reaching a full charge in just 34 minutes compared to the F7's 39 minutes. The Pro also manages to hit 53% in 15 minutes versus 50% on the F7. The differences are small and likely come down to battery size, but if we're splitting hairs, the Pro edges it. Speaker test Both phones offer stereo speaker setups and support for Dolby Atmos. In our loudness tests, they scored nearly identically, delivering powerful and well-balanced sound. The Poco F7 has slightly deeper bass presence, while the F7 Pro provides a cleaner midrange. There's not a huge difference, but audio enthusiasts might prefer the Pro's more refined tuning, whereas casual users will be happy with either. Performance The Poco F7 and Poco F7 Pro both aim for flagship-class speed, but they diverge significantly in processing power. The Poco F7 is equipped with the brand-new Snapdragon 8s Gen 4, built on a 4nm process with an all-big-core CPU architecture and peak clock speeds around 3.2 GHz. Despite trailing behind the full Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 inside the Pro, it punches well above its mid-range price, delivering robust performance in everyday tasks and light gaming. The F7 Pro's Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, however, edges ahead with a stronger GPU, and superior sustained performance under intensive workloads. Xiaomi Poco F7 5G Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro Memory-wise, both phones ship with 12 GB of LPDDR5X RAM, ensuring smooth multitasking and future-proof headroom. Storage configurations are generous, offering 256 GB or 512 GB of UFS 4.1 memory. Benchmark performance In synthetic benchmarks, the two phones are almost neck and neck in the compound AnTuTu test and even in the Geekbench CPU test. But the GPU-heavy 3DMark Wild Life test reveals a significant gap in performance - 4,795 vs. 3,953. In short, the two phones perform around the same and deliver more than enough speed for most users. However, the F7 Pro is the better performer in graphics-heavy scenarios like games. This, however, clearly comes at the expense of battery efficiency, as the F7 was able to last longer in our game battery test. Camera comparison Although both Poco F7 models deploy a 50 MP main camera with optical image stabilization and phase-detect autofocus, they actually use different sensors. The ultrawide cameras are identical on both phones: an 8 MP camera with a 15 mm lens focal length (read: not terribly wide). Neither camera supports autofocus, which is typical for a budget ultrawide sensor like this one. Selfies are captured by a 20 MP front camera (OmniVision OV20B, f/2.2) on both phones. There's no autofocus here either. Front-facing video is limited to 1080p. Speaking of video, both phones are capable of recording up to 4K at 60fps from the main camera. Ultrawide video remains capped at 1080p and lacks stabilization. Image quality In daylight, the Poco F7 Pro's main camera produces ever so slightly crisper photos. The F7 Pro also has better dynamic range with highlights coming out better preserved. The ultrawide cameras have quite a different output, despite using the same camera hardware. The Poco F7 appears to take less processed ultrawide photos, but we prefer the more sharpened look of the F7 Pro. As for the 2x shots, the ones by the vanilla F7, look decidedly better with superior sharpness and contrast than the Poco F7 Pro. Poco F7: 0.6x • 1x • 2x Poco F7 Pro: 0.6x • 1x • 2x In low-light photography, the two trade blows again. The F7 Pro's ultrawide camera really outshone the F7's with much sharper photos. But when it comes to the main cam, we'd give the nod to the Poco F7 this time around for its sharper output - a difference, which is visible upon closer examination. The F7's advantage continues at 2x zoom, too. Poco F7: 0.6x • 1x • 2x Poco F7 Pro: 0.6x • 1x • 2x Both the Poco F7 and F7 Pro are equipped with the same 20MP front-facing camera, and as expected, selfie image quality is quite similar, but we did spot slightly better highlight retention by the F7 Pro. Poco F7 selfie Poco F7 Pro selfie Video quality Both phones can record up to 4K at 60fps from the main camera, but stabilization and image clarity are better on the F7 Pro. The Pro's footage exhibits better detail, more natural colors, and better dynamic range. The same holds true in low light as well. The F7 isn't far behind, but the Pro model offers slightly better video quality across the board. Below we have a few framegrabs from the videos taken by the two phones at each focal length, so it's easier to compare to one another. Poco F7: 0.6x • 1x • 2x • 1x low light Poco F7 Pro: 0.6x • 1x • 2x • 1x low light Verdict The Poco F7 and Poco F7 Pro are both compelling offerings, delivering flagship-grade hardware at midrange prices. Each phone focuses on different priorities, which makes choosing between them a matter of preference and use case rather than a clear-cut winner. The Poco F7 stands out between the two with its larger 6.83-inch display and lower price tag. It manages excellent performance thanks to the Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 chipset and offers very good main camera performance with some great 2x digital zoom shots. The Poco F7 Pro, on the other hand, offers a more refined overall experience. It's also a bit lighter and more compact, and has a glass back instead of a plastic one. Its higher-resolution QHD+ AMOLED display is crisper, its Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 delivers slightly better performance, and its cameras are slightly more dependable with better HDR processing and better ultrawide performance at night. Video quality is also superior across all cameras. Ultimately, both phones are a great choice and rely on the same formula to provide a great user experience. The Poco F7 Pro is slightly more refined, and it's worth the extra cash if you value the stuff it does better. For everyone else, the F7 delivers some great value that's hard to beat. The larger display. The longer gaming battery life. The better 2x zoom shots. The identical user experience. The lower price. The slightly lighter and more compact body. The higher-res display. The slightly better chipset performance. The better camera HDR (highlight retention). The better ultrawide in low light. The superior video quality.
