Bicyclist dies following collision with vehicle in San Rafael
The San Rafael Police Department said the crash happened Saturday at about 3:30 p.m. on Freitas Parkway at Lea Drive in the city's Terra Linda district. Officers and medics with the San Rafael Fire Department responded to the scene and began life-saving measures to the cyclist, who was rushed to the hospital.
The victim, identified as 54-year-old Christopher Brignetti of San Rafael, was later pronounced dead from his injuries.
In a statement, City Attorney Rob Epstein said the cyclist was traveling eastbound on Freitas Parkway when he struck a vehicle making a left turn from Freitas onto Lea Drive.
"So far as the City is aware, there were no witnesses to the accident other than the involved parties," said Epstein. "The cause of the accident remains under investigation. Our hearts go out to the victim's family. "
Police said drugs and alcohol are not a factor, and no arrests were made.
Anyone with information about the collision was asked to call San Rafael Police at (415) 485-3000. Tips can also be made online at http://www.srpd.org/tips.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Ex-agent of Gareth Bale denies allegations of human trafficking, torture and rape in American court case
Barnett accused of trafficking, torture and repeated sexual assault CAA allegedly assisted abuse but both parties deny all claims Lawsuit casts shadow over decades-long football agency career WHAT HAPPENED? An unnamed woman, who has identified as Jane Doe in a complaint filed in California, accused Barnett of trafficking her from Australia to the United Kingdom in 2017, keeping her as a "sex slave" for six years, and raping her more than 39 times. The lawsuit also alleges that CAA helped facilitate Barnett's actions. Barnett and CAA have both categorically denied the claims. Advertisement TELL ME MORE TELL ME MORE The complaint describes "institutional abuse at the highest level," claiming Barnett "owned" the complainant and used threats, violence, and coercive control to silence her. It also alleges CAA knew or should have known what was happening and enabled the abuse. The court filing includes detailed claims of physical torture and financial control. The complaint read: "This is a case about institutional abuse at the highest level. This case is about how one of the world's most powerful men in sports openly kept a sex slave for years, with the assistance of his employees, accountants, emissaries, and family members, and used his money and power to maintain coercive control over her and keep her in fear for her life and the lives of her children." Advertisement WHAT BARNETT AND CAA'S STATEMENT SAID In a statement made on Thursday, Barnett said: "The claims made in today's complaint against me have no basis in reality and are untrue. We will vigorously defend this lawsuit through the appropriate legal process. I am looking forward to being entirely vindicated and exonerated." CAA's statement read: "While the complaint attempts to connect these allegations to CAA's business, Ms. Doe has never been an employee, consultant, or contractor of CAA, ICM, or Stellar, nor has she ever had any business connection to CAA, ICM, or Stellar. CAA takes any allegations of this nature seriously, and through counsel, promptly urged Ms. Doe to contact law enforcement in the United Kingdom." THE BIGGER PICTURE THE BIGGER PICTURE Barnett, who retired last year, was behind major transfers including Bale to Madrid. He sold his agency, Stellar Group, to ICM in 2020, which was later acquired by CAA in 2022. The lawsuit threatens to cast a long shadow over the agencies involved and their due diligence processes. Advertisement WHAT NEXT? Barnett and CAA have 20 days to formally respond to the lawsuit in court. If the case proceeds, further evidence and testimony may be presented. The court process is expected to be lengthy and closely watched, given Barnett's high-profile status in global football.
CBS News
17 minutes ago
- CBS News
Human remains found at California fireworks warehouse explosion site, officials say
Authorities say human remains have been found after the Tuesday explosion and fire at a fireworks warehouse in the Northern California community of Esparto. On Friday, Yolo County officials announced that human remains were located after coroner's division personnel were allowed to access the site for their investigation. No positive identifications of the remains have been made at this time, officials said. Officials have said seven people were "unaccounted for" after the July 1 incident at Devastating Pyrotechnics. The Yolo County Sheriff's Office confirmed the building was a fireworks warehouse in the area of county roads 23 and 86A. Several structures on the property caught fire after the explosions, with the flames spreading into multiple grass fires with a combined burn area of approximately 80 acres, the Esparto Fire Protection District said. The initial explosion happened around 5:50 p.m. on Tuesday. Here's a look at the facility before and after the explosions. On Thursday, CBS Sacramento confirmed through public records that a Yolo County sheriff's lieutenant was listed as an owner of the property. An Esparto volunteer firefighter was also tied to a fireworks business license with the same address as the facility, records show. CBS Sacramento reached out to both for comment but has not received a response. As of Thursday evening, investigators were finally able to enter the property, but information remained limited. Officials also said they were using drones to understand the scene and improve coordination across teams due to the presence of explosive materials. Crews are also working to cool any remaining hotspots. Esparto Fire Chief Curtis Lawrence said two people were injured and received medical care. He said no firefighters have been injured. Yolo County officials issued mandatory evacuations for a one-mile stretch on the south side of the facility that remained in effect Thursday. Law enforcement officials said streets around the evacuation zone and leading into the facility were shut down. Cal Fire will be taking the lead in the investigation. Yolo County said Wednesday that the federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) was called in to assist with the investigation. Who are the seven people unaccounted for? CBS Sacramento has spoken to people who said they had loved ones believed to have been inside the facility at the time of the incident, but they have not been able to contact them. Cal Fire said late Wednesday morning that seven people were not accounted for and that first responders are working to determine their whereabouts. Syanna Ruiz, 18, said her boyfriend and his two brothers are missing. She said that her boyfriend, Jesus Ramos, 18, had his first day on the job at the facility on the day of the explosions. She identified Jesus' brothers as Johnny Ramos, 22, and Junior Melendez, 28. "We last spoke to them around 2 or 3 when they were supposed to be leaving, and then we found out about it through a report or something on Instagram and we came instantly," Ruiz said Wednesday. "Praying to God that they're alive and maybe they just need medical attention." A fourth individual was identified by family members to CBS Sacramento as Carlos Rodriguez. The remaining three people were not yet identified. Officials have not confirmed the identities of the seven people unaccounted for. What we know about Devastating Pyrotechnics . Devastating Pyrotechnics has an active fireworks license through the state as an importer and exporter, according to state records. It also has an active license through the state for public displays. The Esparto warehouse was cited as a storage facility for commercial fireworks. However, Stephanie Cormier, the director of the Yolo County Planning Commission, confirmed to CBS Sacramento late Thursday afternoon that Devastating Pyrotechnics has no local licenses to store fireworks on the property or a business license. Cormier said it is an agricultural property that is limited to agricultural use at the local level. Fire officials said they have been to the Esparto warehouse for safety checks in the past, but did not provide information on whether there were any safety concerns or when the last time the business was checked. Devastating Pyrotechnics released the following statement on Wednesday on its website: "Our hearts and thoughts are with those we lost, their families, and everyone impacted in our community. We are grateful for the swift response of law enforcement and emergency personnel. Our focus will remain on those directly impacted by this tragedy, and we will cooperate fully with the proper authorities in their investigation." Aside from the two injuries reported by law enforcement, there have been no confirmed deaths. A previous version of the website stated the business has another location in San Francisco and has been serving Northern California for 30 years. The website now only shows the statement released by the business. The statement also refers all further inquiries to a lawyer. CBS Sacramento reached out to the lawyer for further comment but received the same statement that was posted to the website. Where are Esparto and Yolo County located in California? Yolo County borders the west side of Sacramento County. Esparto is a small, rural town located about 14 miles west of the city of Woodland in Yolo County and about 35 miles northwest of the city of Sacramento. Some residents of the area told CBS Sacramento that windows to their homes were rattled by at least two separate explosions. Some described their house shaking like during an earthquake, with explosions going off seemingly every five minutes. Nearly 2,200 Pacific Gas and Electric customers in the area were left without power due to the incident. PG&E said only 33 customers remained without power as of Thursday evening. Smoke plume from the explosion and fire CBS News San Francisco CBS Sacramento's First Alert Weather Team confirmed the smoke plume from the initial explosion reached between 10,000 and 15,000 feet in elevation.
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Patel and Ratcliffe try to bolster claims that FBI and CIA conspired against Trump
The release of formerly classified FBI and CIA documents this week illustrates how President Donald Trump's appointees at both agencies are trying to use the levers of government to prop up his long-standing assertions that intelligence agencies conspired against him. The FBI released emails on Tuesday that purport to show an effort by the bureau's leaders in 2020 to cover up a source's claim that there was a Chinese plot to throw the presidential election to Joe Biden. In a statement to the Daily Mail, Trump's FBI director, Kash Patel, said the emails reveal that bureau leaders 'chose to play politics and withhold key information from the American people.' And CIA Director John Ratcliffe released an internal agency analysis related to the 2020 election that he argued showed that Democratic appointees 'manipulated intelligence and silenced career professionals — all to get Trump.' Patel's and Ratcliffe's claims went beyond the information contained in the released documents. The documents do not describe definitive evidence that any official acted out of political motive or engaged in anything beyond the good-faith debate that is typical of the intelligence verification and analysis process. The emails do show that at least one FBI official raised the concern that the report conflicted with congressional testimony at the time by Director Christopher Wray, who said the FBI was not aware of any Chinese attempt to interfere in the presidential election. A former FBI official told NBC News that Wray does not recall being made aware of the report. A former senior FBI official said he was not aware of the report either. The former official, who requested anonymity, noted that the bureau produces hundreds of reports every day based on such tips, which do not always pan out. Patel also promoted an article by the right-wing journalist John Solomon than mentioned that U.S. Customs and Border Protection had seized fake licenses that were arriving mostly from China and Hong Kong around the time the FBI received the tip. According to a 2020 news release from CBP, 20,000 fake licenses were seized in Chicago between that January and June. It said 'most were for college-age students,' a population that has historically sought licenses with fake birthdays so underage students can purchase alcohol. The FBI did not respond to a request for comment from Patel regarding the fake licenses. Dozens of judges, including Trump appointees, have found no evidence of widespread or systemic voter fraud affecting the 2020 election, despite allegations promoted by Trump and his allies since he lost that year's presidential race. The day after Patel released the emails, though, Trump appeared to mention them during a press conference where he talked about 'China and the license plates' and claimed that 'tens of thousands of cards' were used to vote in the 2020 election. The emails released by Patel offer a window into the deep concern among senior career FBI analysts about an intelligence report from an agent in the Albany field office based on a single, unvetted source making a historic allegation: that the Chinese government sent thousands of fake IDs to help people fraudulently vote for Biden. The report was ultimately withdrawn over concerns about its veracity. Two FBI officials familiar with the matter told NBC News that the tip was not credible intelligence and never should have been sent out in an intelligence report. The CIA analysis cited by Ratcliffe found procedural faults with how the agency crafted its assessment that Russia tried to denigrate Hillary Clinton and help Trump get elected in 2016. But it didn't question that broad conclusion — one echoed by two exhaustive congressional investigations. Yet Trump appointees and allies quickly argued the documents vindicated Trump's long-running claims that he had been wronged by intelligence agencies investigating foreign election interference. The CIA review found that 'Obama's Trump-Russia collusion report was corrupt from start,' read the headline of a New York Post piece by conservative columnist Miranda Devine. A press release from the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, Chuck Grassley of Iowa, said the 'bombshell' FBI emails showed 'FBI headquarters interfered with [an] alleged Chinese election interference probe' to shield then-Director Christopher Wray 'from political blowback.' The FBI emails show that senior career public servants at the bureau had concerns about the reliability of information from a confidential human source who claimed that the Chinese Communist Party planned to use fake IDs to cast ballots for Biden in the 2020 election. The information came from a source that an FBI agent based in Albany, New York, had just met, who in turn got it from a separate unnamed source. The emails say the source in Albany also repeated a claim made on social media that the Chinese government was intentionally spreading Covid in the U.S. — an allegation that has never been corroborated. One email released by the FBI said the information had not been verified through other intelligence-gathering methods. The emails say top bureau intelligence analysts Nikki Floris and Tonya Ugoretz ordered the intelligence report recalled because it lacked corroboration. Floris was forced out of the FBI earlier this year, and Ugoretz — who was promoted to become the FBI's top intelligence official — was recently placed on leave. The FBI has not said why. Floris and Ugoretz did not respond to requests for comment. The emails lay out an internal debate over the reliability of the intelligence, which former FBI agents say is typical. The Albany office, backing its agent, sought to prevent the report from being recalled. Senior FBI officials, meanwhile, pushed for corroboration of the source's allegations. In a Sept. 25, 2020, email, an assistant section chief in the Criminal Intelligence Branch said the claim about Chinese election interference was 'getting a lot of attention from all HQ divisions.' The assistant section chief added, 'We know that the source is first contact and hasn't been re-interviewed. Are you considering recalling the [intelligence report] until you can track the source down and re-interview? Everything election is getting scrutiny, and we just want to be sure we have reliable sourcing.' In a Sept. 28 email, another official noted that the allegation that China was trying to influence the election in favor of Biden, as well as previous seizures of fake driver's licenses imported from China, 'were all documented in some fashion on open sources.' The official added that 'Given the lack of specifics we received in the initial reporting, my first opinion was that the [confidential human source] wants to help and is probably supplementing his reporting via open sources.' Ultimately, the emails show, an FBI official who specializes in Chinese foreign interference instructed the Albany office that 'we have not approved a re-issue' of the report 'specifically because of our concerns that the reporting is not authoritative.' The new head of the FBI's Office of Congressional Affairs is Marshall Yates. A former Republican aide on Capitol Hill, Yates has ties to figures that have long backed Trump's false claim that the 2020 election was stolen. Yates was chief of staff to former Rep. Mo Brooks, R-Ala., on Jan. 6, 2021, when Brooks spoke at Trump's rally in support of efforts to overturn his election loss. Yates then went on to work for the Election Integrity Network, a project headed by Republican lawyer Cleta Mitchell, a key figure in the efforts to overturn the 2020 election. In a 2022 speech in New Mexico, Yates said the 'election objection did not go as we wanted in 2020, on Jan. 6,' but that 'luckily' it had 'sparked a grassroots movement across the country for election integrity.' The FBI did not reply to a request for comment about Yates' involvement. The internal review released by Ratcliffe last week examined how the CIA put together a 2017 intelligence assessment that concluded that Russia interfered in the 2016 election to help Trump defeat Hillary Clinton. The review found some deviance from standard procedures, but it defended the assessment's overall findings. The report disclosed that two senior leaders of a CIA mission center focusing on Russia objected to the conclusion that Russia's goal was to help secure Trump's victory but agreed that Putin hoped to denigrate Clinton and undermine the U.S. democratic process. The review also cited complaints by some CIA officers that they felt rushed by a tight deadline to produce the assessment. The CIA director at the time, John Brennan, was a Democratic political appointee who has since become an ardent Trump critic. In a second post on X, Ratcliffe argued that the complaints about the process were evidence the 'assessment was conducted through an atypical & corrupt process under the politically charged environments' of Brennan and then-FBI Director James Comey. The CIA declined to comment when asked to explain the basis for Ratcliffe's accusation. A special counsel appointed during the first Trump administration looked extensively into how the CIA crafted its assessment but filed no criminal charges and reported no clear evidence that political bias tainted the process. A bipartisan Senate Intelligence Committee investigation in 2020 concurred with the 2017 intelligence assessment and found no reason to dispute its conclusions. This article was originally published on
