
Bengaluru's street vendors protest their eviction, demand dignity and rights
2
Bengaluru: More than 500 street vendors gathered at Freedom Park Tuesday, staging a protest against what they called indiscriminate evictions by BBMP.
Triggered by a recent statement from deputy chief minister DK Shivakumar, the protest was organised by Karnataka Pragatipara Beedhi Vyaparigala Sangha, affiliated with the All India Central Council of Trade Unions (AICTU), and drew political leaders and civil society groups.
Chanting slogans and raising placards with messages such as "Street vendors demand a zero eviction policy" and "Footpath is meant for pedestrians and street vendors," the demonstrators accused BBMP of flouting procedures and ignoring their rights under the Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending) Act, 2014.
You Can Also Check:
Bengaluru AQI
|
Weather in Bengaluru
|
Bank Holidays in Bengaluru
|
Public Holidays in Bengaluru
"We also have the right to live. Don't we vote? Don't we pay taxes? Aren't we citizens? My shop is also on the list for removal," said G Nagaraj, 41, a clothing vendor from Jayanagar.
The protest was also marked by emotionally charged testimonies from long-time vendors. "I've been with my pushcart in the streets for 30 years; they can't suddenly come and tell me to go away," said Aarai Krishnamoorthy, a vegetable seller from Vijayanagar.
While BBMP maintains that it is only acting within the purview of the 2014 Act — which mandates vending only in designated zones — vendors allege the implementation is flawed and unjust.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Giao dịch vàng CFDs với sàn môi giới tin cậy
IC Markets
Tìm hiểu thêm
Undo
"Those identified in the BBMP survey must be given identity cards, and those left out must also be included," said S Babu, president of the union. According to the civic body, a citywide survey in 2025 identified 27,000 vendors, but unions claim the actual number exceeds 70,000.
BBMP officials insist the current evictions are confined to the no- vending zones, particularly areas where footpaths are less than 12ft wide.
"Though we've identified vending zones and spots, right after the ID cards are ready, we will have Town Vending Committee elections to finalise them. Even with ID cards, vending is not permitted in no-vending zones," BBMP special commissioner (welfare) Suralkar Vikas Kishor said.
Vendor unions remain unconvinced, pointing out that ID card distribution is yet to begin and no alternative vending zones have been declared operational.
"If you're removing them, what are the alternatives? Because these are very poor people, 90% come from depressed, suppressed, and oppressed classes," said Mavalli Shankar of Dalit Sangarsha Samiti.
Some vendors were allegedly excluded from the survey for having multiple carts in the same family — a violation of BBMP's one-vendor-one-licence policy. "Though there's no such clause in the Act about local identity, we used Karnataka ration cards to verify families," said Kishor.
Amid mounting tensions, BBMP has promised subsidised vending carts, including electric and manual options, to promote mobile vending. However, only one cart type — for ice cream vending — has passed technical checks so far.
During Tuesday's protest, BBMP officials visited the site and invited leaders to meet with the special commissioner in the evening. Following the meeting, protesters said many of their demands were not addressed, and they were merely told that a meeting with the chief commissioner would be scheduled.
Protesters have warned they will escalate their agitation if the authorities fail to respond meaningfully in the coming days. "We aren't against development — we want to be part of it," said Sasikala Nagaraj, 51, who has been selling clothes for over three decades. "But for that, we need basic infrastructure: Toilets, clean water, shelter, and dignity. Include us in the city's progress."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
26 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Punjab becomes first to empanel sign language experts under juvenile law
Punjab has become the first state in India to empanel sign language interpreters, translators, and special educators under the Juvenile Justice Act, 2015 to ensure accessible and sensitive justice for all, particularly children with hearing and speech impairments. The announcement was made by Dr Baljit Kaur, Minister for Social Security, Women and Child Development. These experts will be deployed district-wise to provide support services to children in need. This landmark step, undertaken under the leadership of Chief Minister Bhagwant Mann, is designed to empower children with special needs by eliminating communication barriers in legal, educational, and daily life settings. The move is also aligned with the provisions of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, 2012. Dr Kaur said the empanelled professionals will support children during court proceedings and other official matters, thereby promoting fair, impartial, and sensitive outcomes. She emphasised that the initiative reflects the state government's strong commitment to building an inclusive society where every child, regardless of ability, feels heard, understood, and protected. The professionals will be deployed across districts and compensated in accordance with the relevant legal provisions. Their timely assistance will be ensured in both routine and urgent cases involving children with special needs. Highlighting Punjab's pioneering approach to inclusive governance, the Minister noted that the state has already taken a significant step by broadcasting proceedings of the Punjab Vidhan Sabha in sign language--an effort aimed at improving accessibility for the speech and hearing impaired. This latest initiative further strengthens the government's mission of removing systemic barriers and ensuring equal participation for all. It marks a major milestone in the state's ongoing efforts to uphold the rights and dignity of children with disabilities and promote justice that is both accessible and compassionate. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
an hour ago
- Business Standard
Pollution control boards can seek bank guarantees for damage, says SC
The Supreme Court on Monday ruled that environmental regulators, such as the Pollution Control Boards, can impose environmental compensation and seek bank guarantees from polluting entities as part of their preventive measures against potential environmental damage. 'We hold that the environmental regulators, the Pollution Control Boards, can impose and collect as restitutionary and compensatory damages fixed sums of money or require furnishing bank guarantees as an ex-ante measure towards potential environmental damage in exercise of powers under Sections 33A and 31A of the Water and Air Acts,' the Supreme Court said. A Bench of Justices PS Narasimha and Manoj Misra held that such actions by State Boards are lawful and fall within their powers. However, the Bench stressed that this authority must be exercised fairly and transparently. 'While we hold that the Boards have the power to direct the payment of environmental damages, we make it clear that this power must always be guided by two overarching principles. First, that the power cannot be exercised in an arbitrary manner; and second, the process of exercising this power must be infused with transparency,' the judgment said. The court emphasized that such action must be distinguished from a penalty. 'There is a distinction between a direction for payment of restitutionary and compensatory damages as a remedial measure for environmental damage or as an ex-ante measure towards potential environmental damage on the one hand; and a punitive action of fine or imprisonment for violations under Chapters VII of the Water Act and VI of the Air Act on the other hand.' The Bench also referred to the polluter pays principle in Indian environmental jurisprudence, stating that actual environmental degradation is not a prerequisite for demanding compensation. Instead, the potential for environmental harm is sufficient. 'The actual degradation of the environment is not a necessary condition for the application of the polluter pays principle, as long as the offending activities have the potential of degrading the environment," the judgment said. The Court also echoed the view taken by the National Green Tribunal in Swastik Ispat Pvt Ltd, where the tribunal had upheld the use of bank guarantees as a lawful method of securing environmental compliance. In the present case, the Delhi Pollution Control Committee had appealed against the judgment of the Division Bench of the High Court, which had held that it was not empowered to levy compensatory damages under Section 33A of the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974, and Section 31A of the Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981. The High Court ruled that such action amounted to a penalty under Chapters VII and VI of the respective Acts, and as such, the procedure for imposing and collecting compensatory damages outlined thereunder should be the only method available.


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
'Hottest' ad out there: Trump jumps into row, backs Sydney Sweeney; takes surprise jibe at Taylor Swift
US President Donald Trump has thrown his full support behind actress Sydney Sweeney and her controversial American Eagle jeans advertisement, calling it the 'HOTTEST' ad currently on the market and praising her for being a registered Republican. 'Sydney Sweeney, a registered Republican, has the 'HOTTEST' ad out there,' Trump posted on Truth Social. 'It's for American Eagle, and the jeans are 'flying off the shelves.' Go get 'em Sydney!' Sweeney, known for her roles in Euphoria and White Lotus, has become the centre of political and cultural debate after her denim campaign stirred controversy over perceived racial implications and the use of wordplay involving 'genes' and 'jeans.' Public records confirm that she registered with the Republican Party in Florida in June 2024, which Trump cited as a reason for endorsing her. During a stop in Pennsylvania on Sunday, Trump had said: 'If Sydney Sweeney is a registered Republican, I think her ad is fantastic.' Trump contrasted Sweeney's campaign with what he called 'disasters' from other brands, writing: 'On the other side of the ledger, Jaguar did a stupid, and seriously WOKE advertisement, THAT IS A TOTAL DISASTER!' He claimed the CEO had resigned 'in disgrace' and compared the fallout to Bud Light's infamous backlash after a marketing misstep, adding, 'BILLIONS OF DOLLARS SO FOOLISHLY LOST.' by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Live Update: The Strategy Uses By Successful Intraday Trader TradeWise Learn More Undo He didn't stop there. Trump took also took a fresh swipe at pop star Taylor Swift, sayin, 'Just look at Woke singer Taylor Swift. Ever since I alerted the world as to what she was by saying on TRUTH that I can't stand her (HATE!). She was booed out of the Super Bowl and became, NO LONGER HOT.' He concluded his post with a potshot at the democrats: 'The tide has seriously turned — Being WOKE is for losers, being Republican is what you want to be.'