Anthony Albanese sends a very unsubtle message to Trump in incendiary speech: 'The Australian way'
Speaking in Sydney on Saturday night to mark 80 years since Curtin's death, Albanese said Labor would pursue Australia's interests, even where they differ from those of the US.
The PM drew on Curtin's resistance to British and American pressure to deploy troops to Burma, now Myanmar, following the fall of Singapore during World War II.
Curtin at the time said the region's security could not be 'outsourced to London ', demanding foreign strategy be 'anchored in strategic reality, not bound by tradition'.
'Curtin's famous statement that Australia "looked to America" was much more than the idea of trading one strategic guarantor for another. It was a recognition that Australia's fate would be decided in our region,' Albanese said on Saturday night.
'Yet our alliance with the US ought to be remembered as a product of Curtin's leadership in defence and foreign policy, not the extent of it,' he said.
'Then, and now, we championed the rights and the role of middle powers and smaller nations. Then, and now, we recognised that our region's security depends on collective responsibility.
'Then, and now, we strive for a world where the sovereignty of every nation is respected and the dignity of every individual is upheld. Then, and now, Australia backs our words with deeds.'
Albanese said the government was rebuilding Australia's position as a leader in the Pacific region and working to stabilise its relationship with China.
Albanese is due to visit China this month for his fourth meeting with President Xi Jinping and used the Curtin anniversary to reaffirm Australia's broader foreign policy direction.
The 'Australian way', Albanese said, required support for strong multilateralism and adherence to a rules-based order.
It also included support for smaller and mid-sized regional powers and the rejection of 'great power peace' for the basis of Pacific stability.
He said Australia was currently involved in rejuvenating the region's leadership, stabilising ties with China, and deepening the nation's economic engagement in the Asia-Pacific.
Albanese took the chance to promote initiatives strengthening co-operation with local powers including Indonesia, India and Papua New Guinea.
'While the nature of global uncertainty evolves, this fundamental truth remains: Australia cannot predict, or control the challenges we will face,' he said.
'But we can determine how we respond. We can choose the way we engage with our region and deal with the world.
'The stability and prosperity we build and defend with our partners, the peace and security we seek for ourselves. Above all, we can choose the nation we strive to build here at home.'
Albanese said Australia's alliance with the US was regarded as 'a pillar of our foreign policy' and the nation's 'most important defence and security partnership'.
The comments come as Albanese faces growing calls to strengthen ties with Trump's administration, which is pressuring allies to boost defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP.
Albanese has spoken with the US President three times by phone, but is yet to meet him in person after talks scheduled at last month's G7 summit were cancelled amid tensions in the Middle East.
Critics have taken the speech to imply a divide between Canberra and Washington's strategy and interests.
Hudson Institute senior fellow Dr John Lee told the Australian Albanese's speech would be more credible if it was matched with more investment in national defence.
'Calling for a more independent foreign policy would be understandable and credible if we are prepared to spend more to meet our defence needs rather than rely as much on American capacity, technology and presence as we currently do,' he said.
'It does not appear that the Albanese government is prepared to do that.
'Therefore, if Albanese is really serious about a strategic divergence away from the US, this will leave Australia more isolated and vulnerable.'
He said the comments were unlikely to influence the outcome of the US's 30-day AUKUS review but could shape how Washington responds to its findings.
The White House response, he said, would be swayed by their own assessments of Australian intent and readiness to carry its own weight.
He said Australia has become an outlier internationally, with NATO countries – bar Spain – and Asian allies all increasing spending on defence.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
27 minutes ago
- The Guardian
How will Australia's under-16s social media ban be enforced, and which platforms will be exempt?
Australians using a range of social media platforms including Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, Snapchat and X will need to have their age checked to ensure they're 16 or older when the social media ban comes into effect from early December. Sign up: AU Breaking News email How will it work? And what information will people need to hand over? From 10 December, new laws will apply to platforms that meet the government's definition of an 'age-restricted social media platform', which has the sole or significant purpose of enabling social interaction with two or more users, and which allows users to post material on the service. The government has not specified by name any platforms that will be included in the ban, meaning any site that meets the above definition could be included except if they meet the exemptions released on Wednesday. The prime minister, Anthony Albanese, has said that the covered platforms include – but are not limited to – Facebook, Instagram, X, Snapchat, and YouTube. The communications minister, Anika Wells, said these platforms would be expected to take reasonable steps to deactivate accounts for users under 16, prevent kids registering new accounts, check ages, and also prevent workarounds to bypass the restrictions. The government said platforms would be exempt if they had the primary purpose of: Messaging, emailing, voice calling or video calling. Playing online games. Sharing information about products or services. Professional networking or professional development. Education. Health. Communication between educational institutions and students or their families. Facilitating communication between providers of healthcare and people using those providers' services. It will be up to the eSafety commissioner to determine which platforms meet the criteria for an exemption. In practice, this means that LinkedIn, WhatsApp, Roblox, and Coursera would likely be exempt if assessed to meet the criteria. LinkedIn had previously argued to the government it was not of interest to children. In theory, it could also mean YouTube Kids could be exempt from the ban if it meets the criteria for an exemption, given it does not allow comments on videos. But the government has not confirmed this, and YouTube has not commented on whether it would seek an exemption for its service designed for children. Platforms that have not been named by the government but do not meet the exemption criteria will also need to consider whether they need to bring in age assurance by December. This would include services like Bluesky, Donald Trump's Truth Social platform, Discord and Twitch. A common misconception about the social media ban is that it will only apply to children. In order to ensure teens remain off social media, the platforms will need to check the ages of all user accounts in Australia. How they will do that is not prescribed, but it will be informed by the outcome of the age assurance technology trial, the full report of which is due in August. The government has legislated that although ID checks can be one form of age assurance, it can't be the only one accepted. It's expected Australia will follow a similar path for age assurance that launched in the UK in July, which includes options such as: Allowing banks and mobile providers to confirm a user is over 18. Asking site users to upload a photo that is then matched with photo ID. Use of facial age estimation technology. In addition to that, platforms could potentially infer user ages based on account behaviour or age. For example, if you signed up for Facebook in 2009, you would be over 16 by now. YouTube has also flagged it will use artificial intelligence to determine user ages. Albanese has compared the social media ban to alcohol restrictions, and said there will no doubt be children who manage to get around the ban, but he argued it was still worth doing. In the UK, where age verification was brought in this week for accessing pornography websites, there has been a surge in people using virtual private networks (VPNs), which hide a user's real location, enabling access to blocked websites. Four of the top five free apps on the Apple app store in the UK on Thursday were VPN apps, with Proton, the most popular, reporting a 1,800% increase in downloads. The Australian government has said it expects the platforms will implement 'reasonable steps' to account for how teens may seek to avoid the ban. Platforms that do not take what the eSafety commissioner determines to be 'reasonable steps' to keep kids off their service can face a fine of up to $49.5m that will be determined in the federal court. What 'reasonable steps' means will be up to the commissioner to determine. When asked on Wednesday, Wells said: 'I think reasonable steps is reasonable.' 'These are meant to be working rules, and they also need to sort of correct any errors as they arise. Because these are not set-and-forget rules, these are set-and-support rules. They are world-leading. But this is manifestly too important for us not to have a crack.'
Daily Mail
27 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Australia's intelligence boss reveals the common act that is putting the country at risk - so are YOU guilty of it?
Australia's intelligence boss has warned that people who boast about their access to sensitive information are openly painting themselves as targets for foreign spying operations. ASIO director-general Mike Burgess chided people who held security clearances or who had access to classified information openly promoting themselves on social media at the annual Hawke lecture at the University of South Australia on Thursday. More than 35,000 Australians indicated they had access to classified or private information on a single professional networking site, he said, adding 7000 referred to working in the defence sector and critical technologies. Nearly 2500 boasted about having a security clearance, he said. 'All too often we make it all too easy,' he said. Almost 400 people explicitly said they worked on the AUKUS project, under which Australia will acquire nuclear-powered submarines as the keystone of its military power. Mr Burgess put the cost of espionage - including the theft of intellectual property resulting in lost revenue and responding to incidents - at $12.5 billion in 2023/24. This included cyber spies stealing nearly $2 billion of trade secrets and intellectual property from Australian companies. The number came from a conservative Australian Institute of Criminology analysis that took into account details for ASIO investigations, he said. Hackers stealing commercially sensitive information from one Australian exporter gave a foreign country a leg up in a subsequent contract negotiation, 'costing Australia hundreds of millions of dollars', Mr Burgess said. The director-general also revealed details of multiple espionage operations as he warned officials, businesses and the general public about interference threats and the impact of lax security. Russian spies were deported in 2022 after an ASIO investigation found they were 'recruiting proxies and agents to obtain sensitive information, and employing sophisticated tradecraft to disguise their activities', he said. Russia, China and Iran were singled out as adversaries but 'you would be genuinely shocked by the number and names of countries trying to steal our secrets', he said. ASIO, the nation's domestic intelligence agency, disrupted 24 major espionage and foreign interference operations in the last three years, more than the previous eight years combined. Mr Burgess said spies used a security clearance-holder to obtain information about trade negotiations and convinced one state bureaucrat to log into a database to obtain details of people a foreign regime considered dissidents. The director-general also detailed how a foreign intelligence service ordered spies to apply for Australian government jobs, including at national security institutions, to access classified information. Another example included a visiting academic linked to a foreign government breaking into a restricted lab with sensitive technology and filming inside, he said. 'They are just the tip of an espionage iceberg,' Mr Burgess said. Foreign companies tied to intelligence services had also tried to access private data, buy land near military sites and collaborate with researchers developing sensitive technology. 'In recent years, for example, defence employees travelling overseas have been subjected to covert room searches, been approached at conferences by spies in disguise and given gifts containing surveillance devices,' Mr Burgess added. Hackers had also broken into the network of a peak industry body to steal sensitive information about exports and foreign investment, as well as into a law firm to take information about government-related cases, he said.
The Guardian
27 minutes ago
- The Guardian
On issues from Aukus to recognising Palestine, Victorian Labor's base is determined to be heard
Scrap Aukus. Recognise Palestine. Save public housing. Overhaul childcare. On paper, the urgency resolutions up for debate at Victorian Labor's state conference this weekend lay out a roadmap for progressive, nation-shaping reform. But how much sway do grassroots members and unions really have on the increasingly cautious federal and state Labor governments? The premier, Jacinta Allan, on Wednesday, said conference provides the 'policies and programs that shape the Labor agenda of the future'. But then, when some of the proposed policies became public a day later, she was quick to distance her government. 'It's government that sets policy,' she said on Thursday. Rank-and-file party members spend months of their own time drafting the urgency resolutions, or motions, lobbying for votes and hoping that – while non-binding – their proposals influence the party's direction. But many say that since state conference returned in 2023 – after a four-year gap marked by lockdowns and a federal intervention in the branch – it's started to feel a bit like political theatre. Sign up: AU Breaking News email 'It's all a big, stage-managed performance really,' one Labor member says, claiming most controversial motions are vetted in advance by the premier, prime minister or relevant ministers' office, with their wording softened and criticisms blunted. Another member says there's a 'strange paradigm' at play, where ministerial staff 'sometimes dismiss the backbone of the movement' while at the same time 'put so much effort into making sure conference is clean'. (That is, no public bust-ups or headlines that might cause trouble for the government). Some Labor MPs who have been around for decades though insist it's just the way it has always been. 'It's just that we've come off a federal election win and everyone is ambitious to set the agenda,' one state MP said. Indeed, this weekend's gathering at Moonee Valley racecourse marks the first major meeting of Labor party members since the federal election. Prime minister Anthony Albanese won't be in attendance, leaving Allan to rally the room of 600 delegates, split evenly between party members and affiliated unions. The delegate mix will lean more progressive this year, partly due to the Health Workers Union sitting it out and the CFMEU being unable to participate, making it easier for some motions to get across the line. (Though one state Labor MP quipped that the party was 'always more progressive than the government, just as the Liberal party conference is more conservative'). On the draft agenda, there are two motions calling for a review of the Aukus submarine deal, including one from Labor Against War, which urges a withdrawal from the partnership, citing US president Donald Trump as a 'clear and present danger to peace and security'. 'We shouldn't rely on the unstable Trump administration for our defence … Victoria must ensure we are protected from Trump's chaos and division,' it reads. The group is optimistic it will pass. Two motions deal with the childcare crisis, sparked by allegations of child sexual abuse against a Victorian worker, with one calling for stricter staffing ratios, tighter regulation and funding reform to 'restrict and eliminate profiteering'. The other proposes a centralised Working With Children Check database, real-time alerts, psychometric testing for workers and the creation of a childcare worker integrity unit. There's a motion rejecting the Allan government's proposed protest laws, arguing they 'would serve only to stifle freedom of expression' and are 'anti-democratic and regressive'. Labor for Housing is also pushing the state government to commit to keep all 44 public housing tower sites slated for redevelopment publicly owned. 'If this resolution is endorsed by conference it is a clear and unambiguous statement that the Labor government does not have the support of its movement to sell the land,' Julijana Todorovic, the Labor for Housing co-convener and co-founder says. 'We have an opportunity to tell a good story about Labor's value for public assets and ensuring wealth is shared by all Victorians.' Todorovic said while the motion isn't binding 'it would be extraordinary for a government to act contrary to the will of those it will rely on to get re-elected next year'. A pointed warning. The sentiment is shared by the unions, who provide much of the party's volunteer base. The Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union and the Health and Community Services Union are calling on the state government to follow through on past commitments – including a $12m 2022 election pledge to deliver a worker-led drug, alcohol and gambling service that, three years on, 'remains unopened, with no confirmed land, construction or seed funding'. Tony Piccolo from the AMWU said unions 'work very hard with their members to generate very good ideas to bring to conference' only for some to 'sit on a shelf' for years. 'You would think with the state debt level so high that unions offering to fund a health initiative would be embraced as it helps budgetary pressures.' Most anticipated though are motions put forward by Labor Friends of Palestine demanding the federal government 'immediately' recognise a Palestinian state and impose sanctions on Israel – their strongest push to date on the issue. The issue flared up at last year's conference, with protesters attempting to storm the building. Security has been ramped up this year as a result, with another protest planned for Saturday. This year's conference is also firmly focused on policy, with committees submitting final reports that will help shape Victorian Labor's 2026 election platform. Proposals include replacing stamp duty with an annual land tax, introducing a new tax on land sale super-profits, establishing a state-owned and regulated cannabis industry, mandating 12 days of reproductive health leave per year and creating a political disinformation register. But the reports show few, if any, ministers, parliamentary secretaries or caucus representatives actually showed up at committee meetings, raising questions about how seriously they're treated within government ranks. If the mood on the ground is anything to go by, the base is no longer willing to be sidelined. Benita Kolovos is Guardian Australia's Victoria correspondent
