Charges laid against Mchunu, pressure mounts for Ramaphosa to break act amid national security concerns
The political noose seems to be getting tighter and tighter around the neck of Police Minister Senzo Mchunu.
On Thursday, the DA laid criminal charges against him at the Cape Town police station for allegedly misleading parliament.
Mchunu is accused of lying to the portfolio committee of police after he initially denied knowing Brown Mogotsi, a man accused of playing a role in capturing the South African Police Service (Saps).
In March this year, Mchunu denied knowing Mogotsi. Yet, in a public statement on 9 July, the minister admitted that he does in fact know Mogotsi, describing him as 'a comrade'.
DA deputy Chief Whip, Baxolile Nodada, said Mchunu's contradictory remarks raise grave concerns about his misleading of parliament.
'It is a criminal act to mislead parliament in terms of the Powers, Privileges and Immunities of Parliament and Provincial Legislatures Act.
'The minister committed fraud by knowingly making a false statement with the intent to mislead parliament,' said Nodada.
Nodada said Mchunu has violated the Powers and Privileges Act, which criminalises any attempt to mislead or obstruct parliament or its committees.
'It is simply unacceptable for a sitting minister to evade accountability while surrounded by allegations of corruption, links to criminal syndicates, and efforts to shield politically connected individuals from scrutiny,' he said.
Where is the president?
He criticised President Cyril Ramaphosa's inaction in the face of this growing scandal.
'It is indefensible. Four days after the explosive revelations by KwaZulu-Natal's provincial police commissioner, the president has neither acted against Minister Mchunu nor initiated any credible investigation,' he said.
MK party lays criminal charges against Mchunu
The uMkhonto weSizwe (MK) party also laid criminal charges against Mchunu for the same matter.
'We have opened criminal cases against Minister Mchunu, who is charged with obstructing and defeating the course of justice, abuse of power and criminal conspiracy aimed at undermining lawful investigations,' said party spokesperson Nhlamulo Ndhlela.
The party has also opened a case against Mchunu for unlawfully issuing executive instructions to disband the Political Killings Task Team and using intimidation tactics against whistleblowers and law enforcement officers.
ALSO READ: Ramaphosa urged to act fast amid explosive Saps feud
EFF initiates Parliamentary disciplinary processes
Meanwhile, the EFF has submitted an official affidavit to Parliament's Ethics Committee accusing Mchunu of breaching the Executive Members' Ethics Act and the 2014 Parliamentary Code of Conduct.
'The complaint, filed by EFF Chief Whip Nontando Nolutshungu, calls for a full investigation and accountability at the highest level of executive office,' said the party in a statement.
NOW READ: Mkhwanazi vs Mchunu: Reputation of police now 'dented'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
2 hours ago
- IOL News
SAPS slammed for delays in social media hate speech case
Goolam Muhammed Suliman Vawda, 49, has been using the social media alias @goolammv to discredit and threaten journalists, government officials, entrepreneurs, and politicians from South Africa for six years. Image: Supplied LAW enforcement inefficiencies are once again under scrutiny as the South African Police Service (SAPS) drags its feet in investigating a high-profile social media abuse case involving former Intelligence Minister Lindiwe Sisulu. Sisulu laid a criminal complaint on July 21, 2024, at the Roodepoort Police Station against Goolam Mohammed Sulieman Vawda, who is widely believed to be behind the controversial X (formerly Twitter) handle @goolammv — an account accused of spreading hate speech, cyberbullying, and defamatory statements targeting political figures and private citizens alike. A year later, the case remains stagnant, with no progress communicated by the Gauteng police. SAPS failed to provide any update when approached for comment in May, and has not responded to subsequent queries. This comes despite allegations that Vawda fled the country shortly after the case was opened, allegedly relocating to Mauritius, where he continues to operate the X account. Digital analyst and World Wide Worx CEO Arthur Goldstuck described the state's handling of such cases as deeply concerning. He said the country's Cybercrimes Act and Protection from Harassment Act offer legal pathways to address online abuse, but implementation remains a major hurdle. 'Law enforcement often lacks the digital forensics expertise and dedicated resources to pursue these cases effectively,' said Goldstuck. 'That gap between the legal framework and practical enforcement is where justice collapses.' He warned that unless SAPS is trained and resourced to trace digital footprints and secure admissible evidence, victims will continue to suffer while perpetrators act with impunity. 'It's not just about the law being there. It's about having the ability and the will to use it.' Goldstuck noted that key steps — such as securing digital evidence to link an individual to an online persona — were either ignored or delayed, weakening the potential for successful prosecution. 'If forensic experts had been engaged early on, a proper digital trail could have been established, which is now much harder to reconstruct.' Police have yet to respond despite numerous requests for an update on Sisulu's case.
IOL News
9 hours ago
- IOL News
News you should know tonight: Top 5 stories you may have missed on July 11, 2025
uMkhonto weSizwe (MK) Party are livid with President Cyril Ramaphosa for not firing Police Minister Senzo Mchunu, following explosive allegations made by KZN police boss Lt-Gen Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi, while he dismissed DA Deputy Minister Andrew Whitfield for an unapproved trip. Good evening, IOL News family! It's Friday, July 11, 2025, and it's time for a wrap of the biggest headlines making waves in South Africa and beyond. Don't forget to join the IOL WhatsApp Channel to stay in tune, informed, and in the know. Ramaphosa's crucial meeting with Mchunu and Mkhwanazi: What to expect on Sunday 'You will have to wait for Sunday.' That is what President Cyril Ramaphosa told journalists when asked about his decision on Police Minister, Senzo Mchunu, following the explosive claims made by KZN Police Commissioner Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi. To read on, click here. SIU thwarts R33 million claim and recovers R67 million from Kroucamp Plumbers The Special Investigating Unit (SIU) has secured a victory for the state, recovering R67 million from Kroucamp Plumbers (Pty) Ltd after the Special Tribunal reviewed and set aside unlawful contracts awarded by the Department of Public Works and Infrastructure. To read on, click here. Close family member arrested in tragic murder case of 11-year-old Jayden-Lee Meek Police have arrested a 31-year-old 'close family member' in connection with the murder of 11-year-old Jayden-Lee Meek. To read on, click here. Ramaphosa rallies nation behind bold new dialogue for South Africa President Cyril Ramaphosa has called on South Africans to rally behind a bold new initiative to rebuild the country through inclusive national dialogue, warning that the time for honest reckoning and collective action is now. To read on, click here. MK Party fuming over Ramaphosa not firing Mchunu, while he fired DA's Whitfield over a trip uMkhonto weSizwe (MK) Party are livid with President Cyril Ramaphosa for not firing Police Minister Senzo Mchunu, following explosive allegations made by KZN police boss Lt-Gen Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi, while he dismissed DA Deputy Minister Andrew Whitfield for an unapproved trip. To read on, click here. Get your news on the go, click here to join the IOL News WhatsApp channel. IOL News
IOL News
9 hours ago
- IOL News
Labour court grants high-ranking police officer interim relief following ‘unlawful' dismissal
In its application, the Police and Prison Civil Rights Union, on behalf of Major-General Deena Moodley, said his termination was unlawful and contrary to his employment conditions with the SAPS. Image: Supplied A HIGH-RANKING police officer, who claimed he was 'unfairly' dismissed after he failed to attend a fitness inquiry due to ill-health, approached the Labour Court of South Africa in Johannesburg for urgent interim relief, which was granted. In its application, the Police and Prison Civil Rights Union (Popcru), on behalf of Major-General Deena Moodley, said his termination was unlawful and contrary to his employment conditions with the SAPS. Moodley sought interim relief, which included being reinstated without loss of remuneration or benefits such as medical aid, pending the outcome of a review application that the decision of the SAPS to convene a Fitness Board of Inquiry in terms of section 34(1) of the South African Police Services Act No. 68 of 1995 was unlawful. The outcome of the review would also declare that his dismissal was in breach of his conditions of employment and therefore invalid. Moodley sought that the matter be heard on an urgent basis because 'he was seriously ill, required medical attention, and his medical aid membership had been terminated as a result of the SAPS' unlawful conduct'. According to the judgment recently handed down by Judge Reynaud Daniels, Moodley served in the SAPS for more than 30 years until his dismissal on May 14, 2025. At the time of his dismissal, Moodley was a senior member of the SAPS. He had been the Head of SAPS Crime Intelligence: Collection until he was transferred to the Divisional Inspectorate on October 20, 2023. Moodley previously served as the head of Crime Intelligence in KwaZulu-Natal. According to the court papers, shortly thereafter, Moodley felt unwell and consulted a medical practitioner. His medical condition persisted. 'The applicant (Moodley) was absent from work for varying periods between late 2023 and 2025, apparently submitting medical certificates from time to time. As a result of his absences from work, on or about April 4, 2025, the SAPS issued a notice to the applicant in terms of section 34(1) of the SAPS Act. 'The notice informed the applicant that a Fitness Board of Enquiry would be convened on 24 and 25 April to determine his fitness for duty, in accordance with section 34(1)(b), (c) and (e) of the SAPS Act. The applicant, being unwell, consulted with a specialist psychiatrist who issued a medical certificate, booking him off from 7 April to 7 May,' it read. On April 16, Popcru wrote a letter to Colonel SB Ntuli, in his capacity as the chairperson of the inquiry. They advised him that Moodley had been booked off until May 7. In the letter, Popcru requested that the inquiry be postponed. 'Despite the request for a postponement, the hearing was convened on April 24. Popcru attended the hearing, but the applicant was absent, and presented the chairperson with a medical certificate and an affidavit from the medical practitioner. 'By agreement, the hearing was postponed to May 5, despite the chairperson being advised that the applicant was booked off until May 7. The chairperson required the parties to make written submissions by May 5,' it read. From April 29, Popcru and Moodley's attorneys attempted to secure an undertaking from the SAPS that the hearing would not proceed, to no avail. By May 5, Moodley had failed to make any representations, and the chairperson of the inquiry considered only the representations from the SAPS, the court papers read. On May 6, Moodley launched an urgent review application, which came before Acting Judge Matyolo on May 13. 'The court accepted that the matter was urgent but dismissed the application on the basis that the application was premature because no finding had yet been made by the fitness board. On the following day, the applicant was notified that he had been dismissed. 'In the minutes of the inquiry, the chairperson, Colonel SB Ntuli, despite the absence of the applicant found, on or about 10 May, that the applicant was unwilling to fulfill his employment contract, and unwilling to repent for his lengthy absences from work. In addition, the chairperson stated that the applicant is unconcerned with the employer's operational needs and values,' it read. According to the court papers, on May 13, the Divisional Commissioner Crime Intelligence, which is the convening authority, decided to terminate Moodley's services. In addition, the Divisional Commissioner Crime Intelligence, found inter-alia that Moodley had been absent from work since his transfer in late 2023. 'He noted that the applicant had submitted medical certificates which covered only part of the period of his absence, that the applicant had not secured the security clearance required to perform his duties, and that the applicant had been absent from duty without leave. 'The minutes of the Board, and the recommendations of the chairperson, were not forwarded to the applicant. The applicant, therefore did not make representations to the convening authority regarding the recommendations of the Board,' it read. In handing down judgment, Daniels said it was common cause that a section 34(1) inquiry was not a substitute for a disciplinary procedure. 'The respondents contended that the Board has a discretion to convert the inquiry into a disciplinary hearing. This is incorrect, for several reasons. The Disciplinary Regulations are clear that the alleged conduct of the applicant, absence without reason or permission, constitutes misconduct. This must therefore be dealt with in a disciplinary process. 'The (police) minister has not published any guidelines in terms of section 34(3) of the SAPS Act catering for the circumstances under which such an inquiry may be converted or deemed to have been converted into disciplinary proceedings,' he said. Daniels said by proceeding with the inquiry and failing to refer the issue to a disciplinary hearing to be conducted in accordance with the Discipline Regulations, the respondents breached Moodley's contract of employment. He said among the requirements for the granting of an interim interdict, an applicant must establish a prima facie right even if it is open to some doubt. 'The applicant has proven his prima facie right. The papers reveal that there is a reasonable apprehension of irreparable harm. Absent his medical aid, and continued income, the health of the applicant will be in jeopardy,' he said. Daniels said Moodley had also proven the breach of his employment contract. He said pending the final determination of the review application, an order was granted declaring that the respondents' dismissal of Moodley was in breach of his conditions of employment and therefore unlawful. Daniels also ordered that Moodley be reinstated into his previous position without loss of remuneration or benefits. THE POST
