Epstein furore undermines public trust, Republican election hopes, two US lawmakers say
The US President has failed to distract attention from the Epstein controversy six months into his second term.
WASHINGTON - The uproar over disgraced financier and sex offender Jeffrey Epstein could undermine public trust in the Trump administration, as well as Republican hopes of retaining control of Congress in the 2026 midterm elections, two US lawmakers said on July 27.
Republican Representative Thomas Massie and Democratic Representative Ro Khanna, who want the House of Representatives to vote on their bipartisan resolution requiring full release of the government's Epstein files, said the lack of transparency is reinforcing public perceptions that the rich and powerful live beyond the reach of the judicial system.
'This is going to hurt Republicans in the midterms. The voters will be apathetic if we don't hold the rich and powerful accountable,' Mr Massie, a hardline conservative from Kentucky, told NBC's 'Meet the Press' program.
Republicans hope to add to their current 219-212 House majority - with four seats currently vacant - and 53-47 Senate majority in November 2026, although the US political cycle traditionally punishes the party of the sitting president during midterm elections.
The Washington Post reported late on July 27 that Mr Trump was increasingly frustrated with his administration's handling of the furore around Epstein.
Even so, the president was hesitant to make personnel changes to avoid creating a 'bigger spectacle' as his top officials underestimated the outrage from Mr Trump's own base over the issue, the newspaper reported, citing unnamed sources.
Mr Khanna said Attorney General Pam Bondi triggered 'a crisis of trust' by saying there was no list of Epstein clients after previously implying that one existed. The change in position unleashed a tsunami of calls for her resignation from Mr Trump's Maga base.
'This is about trust in government,' the California Democrat told 'Meet the Press.' 'This is about being a reform agent of transparency.'
President Donald Trump, who on July 27
announced an EU trade deal in Scotland , has been frustrated by continued questions about his administration's handling of investigative files related to Epstein's criminal charges and 2019 death by suicide in prison.
Mr Massie and Mr Khanna believe they can win enough support from fellow lawmakers to force a vote on their resolution when Congress returns from its summer recess in September. But they face opposition from Republican leaders including House Speaker Mike Johnson, who sent lawmakers home a day early to stymie Democratic efforts to force a vote before the break.
Mr Johnson, who also appeared on NBC's 'Meet the Press,' said he favours a non-binding alternative resolution that calls for release of 'credible' evidence, but which he said would better protect victims including minors.
'The Massie and Khanna discharge petition is reckless in the way that it is drafted and presented,' Mr Johnson said. 'It does not adequately include those protections.'
Mr Massie dismissed Mr Johnson's claim as 'a straw man' excuse. 'Ro and I carefully crafted this legislation so that the victims' names will be redacted,' he said. 'They're hiding behind that.'
Mr Trump has tried and failed so far to distract attention from the Epstein controversy six months into his second term.
On July 26, Mr Trump repeated his claims without evidence that 2024 Democratic presidential nominee Kamala Harris and other Democrats should be prosecuted over payment for endorsements from celebrities including Oprah Winfrey, Beyonce and the Reverend Al Sharpton.
Last week he
accused former President Barack Obama of 'treason' over how the Obama administration treated intelligence about Russian interference in US elections nine years ago, drawing a rebuke from an Obama spokesperson.
Republican Senator Lindsey Graham, a staunch Trump ally, said on July 27 that Ms Tulsi Gabbard, Mr Trump's director of national intelligence, had found new information that investigators initially discovered no evidence of Russian election interference but changed their position after Mr Obama told them to keep looking.
'I'm not alleging he committed treason, but I am saying it bothers me,' Mr Graham told 'Meet the Press.'
Democratic Representative Jason Crow dismissed Ms Gabbard's claims, telling the 'Fox News Sunday' program that the national intelligence director had turned herself into 'a weapon of mass distraction'.
The Department of Justice has said it is forming a strike force to assess Ms Gabbard's claims. REUTERS
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Straits Times
15 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Appeals court allows Trump order that ends union protections for federal workers
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox A ruling by a federal appeals court on Aug 1 authorises a component of US President Donald Trump's sweeping effort to assert more control over the federal workforce to move forward. WASHINGTON – A federal appeals court on Aug 1 allowed US President Donald Trump to move forward with an order instructing a broad swath of government agencies to end collective bargaining with federal unions. The ruling authorises a component of Mr Trump's sweeping effort to assert more control over the federal workforce to move forward, for now, while the case plays out in court. It is unclear what immediate effect the ruling will have: the appeals court noted that the affected agencies had been directed to refrain from ending any collective bargaining agreement until 'litigation has concluded', but also noted that Mr Trump was now free to follow through with the order at his discretion. Mr Trump had framed his order stripping workers of labour protections as critical to protect national security. But the plaintiffs – a group of affected unions representing over 1 million federal workers – argued in a lawsuit that the order was a form of retaliation against those unions that have participated in a barrage of lawsuits opposing Mr Trump's policies. The unions pointed to statements from the White House justifying the order that said 'certain federal unions have declared war on President Trump's agenda' and that the President 'will not tolerate mass obstruction that jeopardizes his ability to manage agencies with vital national security missions.' But a three-judge panel of the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, a famously liberal jurisdiction, ruled in Mr Trump's favour, writing that 'the government has shown that the president would have taken the same action even in the absence' of the union lawsuits. Even if some of the White House's statements 'reflect a degree of retaliatory animus', they wrote, those statements, taken as a whole, also demonstrate 'the President's focus on national security'. The unions had also argued that the order broadly targeted agencies across the government, some of which had no obvious national security portfolio – including the Department of Health and Human Services and the Environmental Protection Agency – using national security as a pretext to strip the unions of their power. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore 60 years of building Singapore World Trump deploys nuclear submarines in row with Russia Singapore Sheng Siong to open first store in Orchard by end August Asia 'This isn't some concubine selection': Why matchmaking events for rich Chinese have drawn flak Life Tastemakers: Burnt-out serial entrepreneur cooks up $16m success with Lau Wang Claypot Delights Sport Spurs captain Son Heung-min says he is leaving the English Premier League club Life The story of you: What might Singapore look like for those born today? Singapore Man in army uniform allegedly vaping on bus released from SAF custody; investigations ongoing The panel sidestepped that claim, writing in the 15-page ruling that 'we question whether we can take up such arguments, which invite us to assess whether the President's stated reasons for exercising national security authority – clearly conferred to him by statute – were pretextual'. The order, they continued, 'conveys the President's determination that the excluded agencies have primary functions implicating national security'. NYTIMES


AsiaOne
an hour ago
- AsiaOne
Cambodia to nominate Donald Trump for Nobel Peace Prize, says deputy PM, Asia News
PHNOM PENH - Cambodia will nominate US President Donald Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize, its deputy prime minister said on Friday (Aug 1), following his direct intervention in halting the Southeast Asian country's recent border conflict with Thailand. Asked via text message to confirm Cambodia's plan to nominate Trump for the prize, Chanthol responded, "yes." Speaking to reporters earlier in the capital, Phnom Penh, Chanthol thanked Trump for bringing peace and said he deserved to be nominated for the prize, the highest-profile international award given to an individual or organisation deemed to have done the most to "advance fellowship between nations". Pakistan said in June that it would recommend Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize for his work in helping to resolve a conflict with India, and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said last month he had nominated Trump for the award. It was a call by Trump last week that broke a deadlock in efforts to end the heaviest fighting between Thailand and Cambodia in over a decade, leading to a ceasefire negotiated in Malaysia on Monday, Reuters has reported. Following the truce announcement, White House spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt said in a post on X that Trump made it happen. "Give him the Nobel Peace Prize!," she said. At least 43 people have been killed in the intense clashes, which lasted five days and displaced more than 300,000 people on both sides of the border. "We acknowledge his great efforts for peace," said Chanthol, also Cambodia's top trade negotiator, adding that his country was also grateful for a reduced tariff rate of 19 per cent. Washington had initially threatened a tariff of 49 per cent, later reducing it to 36 per cent, a level that would have decimated Cambodia's vital garment and footwear sector, Chanthol told Reuters in an interview earlier on Friday. [[nid:719959]]
Business Times
an hour ago
- Business Times
India aghast at Donald Trump's ‘dead' economy jibe, 25% tariffs
[MUMBAI] Shock, dismay and angst swept across India as businesses, policymakers and citizens digested US President Donald Trump's sharp remarks and a surprise 25 per cent tariff rate earlier this week. While Indian government officials weighed a response and business groups tallied the cost of the trade barrier, the local social media flared up with users protesting Trump's comments and criticising Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi for not speaking up. It started with Trump saying that India's trade barriers were the 'most strenuous and obnoxious', in a Truth Social post on Jul 30. He added the US may also impose a penalty for New Delhi's purchase of Russian weapons and energy. Less than a day later, he ripped into India again for aligning with Russia, calling them 'dead economies' in another post. With no imminent trade deal, the 25 per cent tariffs kicked in as at Friday. India is hardly alone in facing Trump's trade wrath, and not the subject to the very highest rates, but the news left business and political leaders wondering how to cope with the fallout. 'Blunt-force' message 'Overnight, the US-India trade equation shifted from tense to turbulent,' said Akshat Garg, assistant vice-president at Choice Wealth, a Mumbai-based financial services firm. The levies 'feel less like structured policy and more like a blunt-force political message'. Complicating the narrative around the India trade deal, or the lack of it, was the US pact with its traditional rival Pakistan that came through on the same day. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up As the US released rates across the world on Aug 1, India's relative disadvantage to competitor exporting countries became more apparent, dampening moods and stoking tempers further. 'The biggest blow is that Pakistan and Bangladesh got a better rate than us,' V Elangovan, managing director at SNQS Internationals, an apparel maker in the southern Indian manufacturing hub of Tirupur, told Bloomberg News. 'We were expecting something in the 15 to 20 per cent range.' India's annoyance can be traced back in part to Trump declaring himself the peacemaker that helped broker a ceasefire in the armed conflict between India and Pakistan in May. The move was seen as an effort to upstage Modi and put the two South Asian neighbours on an equal footing, despite India's larger military and economy. The events of this week have cemented that impression further in the eyes of some Indian observers. When the tariff rate news first dropped in late Wednesday evening in India, Ashish Kanodia recalls being 'very disturbed'. A director at Kanodia Global, a closely held exporter that gets over 40 per cent of its revenue from the US selling home fabrics to toys, the entrepreneur already has two of its largest US customers seeking discounts to make up for the levy. 'The next six months are going to be difficult for everyone,' Kanodia said, adding that profit margins will be squeezed. If the pain continues for 'months and months', he said that he will have to start cutting his workforce. The US is India's largest trading partner, with the two-way trade between them at an estimated US$129.2 billion in 2024. Compared with India's 25 per cent, Bangladesh was subjected to a 20 per cent tariff, Vietnam got a 20 per cent levy and Indonesia and Pakistan each received 19 per cent duties. 'We know that we have got a deal that is worse than other countries,' said Sabyasachi Ray, executive director at The Gem and Jewellery Export Promotion Council. 'We will take it up with the government.' Trump's actions mark a 180-degree turn for New Delhi's hopes of preferential treatment over regional peers. It was among the first to engage Washington in trade talks in February, confident of hammering out a deal sooner than others. Trump had called India's Prime Minister Narendra Modi 'my friend' in a Feb 14 post on X and the bond between the two countries 'special'. India is now weighing options to placate the White House, including boosting US imports, Bloomberg News reported, citing sources familiar with the matter, and many hope that the bilateral relationship and the tariff rate can still be improved. 'It is a storm in the India-US relationship at this moment, but I think there's a good chance that it will go away,' Vivek Mishra, deputy director of the Strategic Studies Programme at Delhi-based Observer Researcher Foundation, told Bloomberg News. Indian business and trade groups are supporting the government's stance on the deal as the negotiations for a US-India trade deal continue. Negotiating tactic Jewellery businesses 'are worried but they are not panicking' because they hope a more favourable deal can be worked out, said Ray of the gems export body. 'The negotiation that should be happening should be a win-win, not a win-lose.' The abrupt announcement by Trump over social media when negotiations with India were ongoing 'seems like a knee-jerk reaction', according to Rohit Kumar, founding partner at public policy research firm The Quantum Hub. 'This appears to be a negotiating tactic aimed at unresolved discussion points,' Kumar said. BLOOMBERG