logo
Usha Vance's new life in Trump's Washington

Usha Vance's new life in Trump's Washington

Indian Express11 hours ago

She has settled her three children into new schools, set up play dates and overseen the childproofing of her 9,000-square-foot home.
She takes the children to the second lady's office overlooking the Washington Monument, attends Mass with her family in the Virginia suburbs and hikes on wooded trails around Washington, the Secret Service in tow.
She has a warm relationship with the president of the United States, who marvels over her academic credentials and tells her she is beautiful, a senior administration official said. She gets along with Melania Trump, the first lady, too.
Less than a year ago, Usha Vance, onetime Democrat and the daughter of immigrants, was living a radically different life as a litigator for a progressive law firm while raising her children in Ohio. Many old friends are bewildered by her transformation. She may be the wife of the vice president, they say, but she must be appalled by the Trump administration's attacks on academia, law firms, judges, diversity programs and immigrants.
Others say she likes the respite from her legal career and the glamour and influence of her new role. (Vance, who clerked for Chief Justice John Roberts and was a top editor on The Yale Law Journal, referred to herself at a recent public appearance as a 'former lawyer.') She always supported her husband's ambitions, they note, even if she did not necessarily share them. People close to the vice president, who went from being a vocal critic of now-President Donald Trump to his running mate, argue that Vance went on a similar but less public journey that soured her on the left.
Either way, colleagues say, she is a model, at least for now, of a movement embraced by the White House and pushed by her husband that encourages women to have more children and celebrate the family as the centerpiece of American life.
'I think she's doing a great job as second lady of the United States,' Vice President JD Vance said in March in Bay City, Michigan, with Usha Vance standing behind him. 'And here's the thing: Because the cameras are all on, anything that I say, no matter how crazy, Usha has to smile and laugh and celebrate it.'
Online critics slammed the vice president for sexism. But those who know the couple say that no matter her silence in public, JD Vance leans on his wife's counsel in private.
'Her influence on her husband is incalculable,' said the senior Trump administration official, who has worked with Usha Vance on and off for the past year and asked not to be named in order to speak freely. The official described the second lady as someone who has 'well considered' opinions on marriage, politics and faith, but holds herself at reserve.
If Vance, 39, is not happy with all aspects of the Trump White House, friends say she would never let on. 'Her history and her upbringing suggest it,' the administration official said, 'but she's married to JD, and at some point you have to accept it.'
The Vances have babysitters but no live-in nanny, and JD Vance leaves the West Wing many early evenings to have dinner with his family and help put the children to bed. The Vances have also taken their three children, now 8, 5 and 3, on official international trips, including to Good Friday services at the Vatican and to dinner in New Delhi with the prime minister of India.
Vance declined to be interviewed for this article, as did a large number of relatives, friends and colleagues. More than a dozen who did offer their perspectives did so on the condition of anonymity out of fear of angering her.
Only recently has she tiptoed out on her own and offered a glimpse of herself and the purpose she sees in her new role. On June 1, she announced on social platform X the 'Second Lady's 2025 Summer Reading Challenge' for children, driven by her view that reading is an antidote to modern distractions, including her own.
From the start, back when they first met at Yale Law School, Usha Vance has been her husband's guide to the elite and a cool salve for his hot temper. One friend of the couple said he would not be vice president without her.
'I'm one of those guys who really benefits from having sort of a powerful female voice over his left shoulder saying, 'Don't do that, do that,'' JD Vance told Megyn Kelly in 2020. For a long time it was his grandmother, Mamaw. 'Now it's Usha,' he said.
Unlike JD Vance, whose roots are in a dysfunctional family of the white underclass captured in his bestselling memoir, 'Hillbilly Elegy,' Usha Vance is the eldest of two daughters of accomplished Indian immigrants, Krish and Lakshmi Chilukuri. They arrived in California in the early 1980s.
The Chilukuris settled in Rancho Peñasquitos, a planned San Diego neighborhood, where their home today is worth $1.4 million. Vance's father, Krish, worked as an aerospace engineer at United Technologies and Collins Aerospace for 30 years and is now a lecturer at San Diego State. Lakshmi, Vance's mother, is a molecular biologist and the provost of Sixth College, an undergraduate school at the University of California, San Diego.
Vance blazed her way through the local Mount Carmel High School, Yale College, a teaching fellowship in China and a prestigious Gates Foundation scholarship at the University of Cambridge in Britain. She wrote in the Gates scholars' yearbook that her interests were 'exploring urban neighborhoods, cooking & green markets, long walks, panicking about law school.'
Whatever worries she may have had, friends describe her as a picture of confidence when she was back at Yale in 2010 to start law school. She and JD Vance were soon assigned as partners on a major writing assignment. He was awestruck.
'She seemed some sort of genetic anomaly, a combination of every positive quality a human being should have: bright, hardworking, tall and beautiful,' he wrote in a widely quoted passage in 'Hillbilly Elegy.'
The feeling was not mutual at first. 'I think it's fair to say that JD was sort of the pedal in the relationship and I was a little bit of the brakes,' she told the crowd at the U.S.-India forum this month. 'Because I was sort of focused on the schooling part of it.'
The two were married in 2014 in an outdoor wedding in Kentucky, near JD Vance's hometown, and spent the next decade crisscrossing the country. Along the way, Usha Vance gave birth to Ewan in 2017, Vivek in 2020 and Mirabel in 2021.
Vance clerked for Judge Brett Kavanaugh in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit and for Chief Justice Roberts, and worked for the law firm Munger, Tolles & Olson in San Francisco and Washington. JD Vance became a partner in a venture capital fund co-founded by Peter Thiel, a Silicon Valley billionaire and major Trump supporter.
In 2017, the couple moved to Cincinnati, where Usha Vance worked remotely for Munger. The couple bought a big $1.4 million Victorian in East Walnut Hills, a liberal-leaning neighborhood. Vance joined the board of the Cincinnati Symphony Orchestra and put Post-it notes on wine bottles to remind her husband which were the good ones to use for guests.
A pivotal moment for Usha Vance came in 2018, when Christine Blasey Ford accused Kavanaugh, by then a Supreme Court nominee, of sexually assaulting her at a high school party nearly 40 years earlier. Kavanaugh denied the accusation and was narrowly confirmed, but friends say that Vance was outraged by Democratic attacks on a man she admired.
'My wife worked for Kavanaugh, loved the guy — kind of a dork,' JD Vance told New York Times columnist Ross Douthat last year. 'Never believed these stories.'
When Vance became Trump's running mate in the summer of 2024, Usha Vance quit her job at Munger and threw herself into the vice presidential campaign. She and the children were often on the trail with him, and colleagues say she was a key part of the preparations for his debate with Gov. Tim Walz of Minnesota.
Usha Vance has largely stayed out of the fray over the administration's political and policy agenda, even as her husband has continued to be a polarizing figure.
The one exception for Usha Vance was in March when she planned a trip to see a national dog sled race in Greenland, which Trump has said he wants to take over from Denmark. Vance made a cheerful video ahead of the trip, but it was ultimately downsized to a brief stop with her husband at a U.S. military base after strong objections from Greenlanders.
In the coming months, Vance says she will continue to roll out second lady projects. For now, she continues to take her children to her office in the Eisenhower Executive Office Building, the one with the view of the Washington Monument.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US mulling $30 billion deal with Iran for civilian nuclear program? Donald Trump answers
US mulling $30 billion deal with Iran for civilian nuclear program? Donald Trump answers

Hindustan Times

time25 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

US mulling $30 billion deal with Iran for civilian nuclear program? Donald Trump answers

US President Donald Trump has rejected reports of there being a $30 billion deal in works between American and Iran for the establishment of non-military nuclear facilities. President Donald Trump dismissed reports of the US wanting to give Iran $30 billion for setting up non-military nuclear facilities. (AFP) "Who in the Fake News Media is the SleazeBag saying that 'President Trump wants to give Iran $30 Billion to build non-military Nuclear facilities.' Never heard of this ridiculous idea," Trump said in a post on Truth Social. The US President's dismissal came after a CNN report said that the Trump administration had explored possible economic incentives for Iran so it builds a non-enrichment nuclear program. For this, as much as 20-30 billion US Dollars could be invested, and several proposals were floated, the report said. This investment, however, wouldn't come directly from the US, but from America's Arab partners, the CNN report had said, citing an official. 'Big investment, lift on sanctions' Besides a potential $30 billion investment for civilian nuclear facilities in Iran, the CNN report also claimed that some sanctions on Iran could be removed. This meant the restrictions on Tehran from using the $6 billion sitting in foreign bank accounts could be lifted, the report said. According to the report, officials from the US and the key players in the Middle East were in talks with Iranians for two weeks, even when Iran and Israel were striking each other, and even after Trump announced a ceasefire. Be it the big investment into non-military nuclear facilities or the lifting of sanctions on Iran, all were attempts to get Tehran back to the nuclear programme negotiations, the report said. Trump, however, dismissed such reports, calling them "just another hoax" with the intention to demean. "These people are SICK!!!" Trump wrote. Trump's fresh attack on Iran Donald Trump also slammed Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei for "blatantly and foolishly" lying that Tehran won the 12-day war with Israel. Referring to the strikes on Fordow, Natanz and Esfahan nuclear facilities, Trump reiterated that Iran's nuclear establishment was "obliterated" in the US strikes. "I knew EXACTLY where he (Khamenei) was sheltered, and would not let Israel, or the U.S. Armed Forces, by far the Greatest and Most Powerful in the World, terminate his life," Trump said in a post on Truth Social. Trump also claimed that he saved Khamenei from an "ugly and ignominious" death. He also said he had convinced Israel to 'bring back a very large group" of aircraft that it had sent towards Tehran. Trump's remarks against Khamenei came after the Iranian Supreme Leader claimed that the Islamic republic won in the conflict with Israel, and said that this had dealt 'a severe slap to the face of America'.

Trump wins as Supreme Court curbs judges, but may yet lose on birthright citizenship
Trump wins as Supreme Court curbs judges, but may yet lose on birthright citizenship

Time of India

time38 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Trump wins as Supreme Court curbs judges, but may yet lose on birthright citizenship

The Supreme Court has limited the use of nationwide injunctions, a move seen as a victory for Donald Trump, though his birthright citizenship order remains challenged. While the ruling restricts judges' power to block policies nationwide, it allows challengers to pursue class-action lawsuits. This could lead to varied enforcement across states, creating uncertainty for families regarding their children's citizenship status. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads A HOST OF POLICIES Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads STATES CHALLENGE DIRECTIVE The U.S. Supreme Court 's landmark ruling blunting a potent weapon that federal judges have used to block government policies nationwide during legal challenges was in many ways a victory for President Donald Trump , except perhaps on the very policy he is seeking to executive order that the Republican president signed on his first day back in office in January would restrict birthright citizenship - a far-reaching plan that three federal judges, questioning its constitutionality, quickly halted nationwide through so-called "universal" the Supreme Court's ruling on Friday, while announcing a dramatic shift in how judges have operated for years deploying such relief, left enough room for the challengers to Trump 's directive to try to prevent it from taking effect while litigation over its legality plays out."I do not expect the president's executive order on birthright citizenship will ever go into effect," said Samuel Bray, a Notre Dame Law School professor and a prominent critic of universal injunctions whose work the court's majority cited extensively in Friday's executive order directs federal agencies to refuse to recognize the citizenship of children born in the United States who do not have at least one parent who is an American citizen or lawful permanent resident, also called a "green card" three judges found that the order likely violates citizenship language in the U.S. Constitution's 14th directive remains blocked while lower courts reconsider the scope of their injunctions, and the Supreme Court said it cannot take effect for 30 days, a window that gives the challengers time to seek further protection from those court's six conservative justices delivered the majority ruling, granting Trump's request to narrow the injunctions issued by the judges in Maryland, Washington and Massachusetts. Its three liberal members ruling by Justice Amy Coney Barrett, who Trump appointed to the court in 2020, emphasized the need to hem in the power of judges, warning against an "imperial" judiciary. Judges can provide "complete relief" only to the plaintiffs before them, Barrett outcome was a major victory for Trump and his allies, who have repeatedly denounced judges who have impeded his agenda. It could make it easier for the administration to implement his policies, including to accelerate deportations of migrants, restrict transgender rights, curtail diversity and inclusion efforts, and downsize the federal government - many of which have tested the limits of executive the birthright citizenship dispute, the ruling left open the potential for individual plaintiffs to seek relief beyond themselves through class action lawsuits targeting a policy that would upend the long-held understanding that the Constitution confers citizenship on virtually anyone born on U.S. said he expects a surge of new class action cases, resulting in "class-protective" injunctions."Given that the birthright-citizenship executive order is unconstitutional, I expect courts will grant those preliminary injunctions, and they will be affirmed on appeal," Bray of the challengers have already taken that path. Plaintiffs in the Maryland case, including expectant mothers and immigrant advocacy groups, asked the presiding judge who had issued a universal injunction to treat the case as a class action to protect all children who would be ineligible for birthright citizenship if the executive order takes effect."I think in terms of the scope of the relief that we'll ultimately get, there is no difference," said William Powell, one of the lawyers for the Maryland plaintiffs. "We're going to be able to get protection through the class action for everyone in the country whose baby could potentially be covered by the executive order, assuming we succeed."The ruling also sidestepped a key question over whether states that bring lawsuits might need an injunction that applies beyond their borders to address their alleged harms, directing lower courts to answer it challenge to Trump's directive also included 22 states, most of them Democratic-governed, who argued that the financial and administrative burdens they would face required a nationwide block on Trump's order. George Mason University constitutional law expert Ilya Somin said the practical consequences of the ruling will depend on various issues not decided so far by the Supreme Court."As the majority recognizes, states may be entitled to much broader relief than individuals or private groups," Somin Jersey Attorney General Matthew Platkin, a Democrat who helped lead the case brought in Massachusetts, disagreed with the ruling but sketched out a path forward on Friday. The ruling, Platkin said in a statement, "recognized that nationwide orders can be appropriate to protect the plaintiffs themselves from harm - which is true, and has always been true, in our case."Platkin committed to "keep challenging President Trump's flagrantly unlawful order, which strips American babies of citizenship for the first time since the Civil War" of experts said they expect a lot of legal maneuvering in lower courts in the weeks ahead, and the challengers still face an uphill to injunctions in individual cases, class actions are often harder to successfully mount. States, too, still do not know whether they have the requisite legal entitlement to sue. Trump's administration said they do not, but the court left that debate the 30-day clock is ticking. If the challengers are unsuccessful going forward, Trump's order could apply in some parts of the country, but not others."The ruling is set to go into effect 30 days from now and leaves families in states across the country in deep uncertainty about whether their children will be born as U.S. citizens," said Elora Mukherjee, director of Columbia Law School 's immigrants' rights clinic.

Trump's ‘Big Beautiful Bill' faces major blow as 3 Republicans defect. Who are they?
Trump's ‘Big Beautiful Bill' faces major blow as 3 Republicans defect. Who are they?

Hindustan Times

timean hour ago

  • Hindustan Times

Trump's ‘Big Beautiful Bill' faces major blow as 3 Republicans defect. Who are they?

Jun 29, 2025 06:52 AM IST Donald Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' is hanging in balance after three Republicans close to oppose it – Ron Johnson of Wisconsin, Thom Tillis of North Carolina and Rand Paul of Kentucky. The Senate held a key test vote on the bill Saturday evening, June 28. The White House recently said in a statement that a failure to pass the bill would be the 'ultimate betrayal,' according to CBS News. Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' faces major blow as 3 Republicans defect (AFP) 'The One Big Beautiful Bill Act reflects the shared priorities of both the Congress and the Administration. Therefore, the Congress should immediately pass this bill and send it to the President's desk by July 4, 2025, to show the American people that they are serious about 'promises made, promises kept,'' the statement said. 'President Trump is committed to keeping his promises, and failure to pass this bill would be the ultimate betrayal.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store