New data being considered in family harm and gender based violence research
A report into deaths from gender based violence from the National Mortality Review Committee has found there's been no significant reduction in the number of victims between 2009 and 2022.
Photo:
Unsplash/ Kristina Flour
Maternal suicide, perinatal deaths and non-family homicides have all been included in a new report to try and get a full picture of violence against women and children in New Zealand.
This is the ninth report on gender based violence for the National Mortality Review Committee.
Dr Nicola Atwool, the chair of the Family Violence Death Review expert group, told
Nine to Noon
, that the reports have traditionally looked at family harm deaths, but in this report they were looking at the broader issue of femicide.
She said little was known about some of these areas, including when women were killed by a non-family member, maternal suicide, and perinatal death.
Maternal suicide is death while pregnant or within a year of giving birth.
Perinatal death is the death of a baby during pregnancy or within 42 days after birth.
Dr Atwool said there was a clear correlation with family harm for both maternal suicide and perinatal death.
In the case of maternal suicide, Atwool said 63 percent of the women had recorded cases of family harm. But she said that was likely to be an undercount, because people often did not disclose family harm at the time it was happening.
The report shows there were 41 cases of maternal suicide between 2006 and 2023, and of these, 26 (63 percent) had a police-reported family harm.
Atwool said the report found that appropriate interventions during the period of pregnancy and after a baby is born could significantly reduce the number of lives lost.
This was one of the areas they would be investigating further with other agencies.
Dr Atwool said she also noted the ongoing inequities for wāhine and kōtiro Māori (Māori women and girls), compared with non-Māori.
"We identified inequities in the rates of family violence homicide for wāhine and kōtiro Māori compared with non-Māori women and girls between 2018 and 2022. Had these inequities not existed, there would be approximately 25 more wāhine and kōtiro Māori alive today."
NZ Police data showed that of the 1169 homicides in New Zealand between 2007 and 2022, 34 percent of victims were women, and more than half of those women (58 percent) had a family relationship to the offender.
Dr Atwool said that despite a range of programme and efforts to address family violence there had been no significant decline in the number of homicides against women.
"There are fluctuations, but no significant downward trend."
The full report
can be found here
.
If it is an emergency and you feel like you or someone else is at risk, call 111.
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter
curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
4 hours ago
- RNZ News
Ozempic makes its NZ debut
From tomorrow, Tuesday 1 July, New Zealanders will be able to access weight-loss drugs Wegovy and Ozempic by prescription in their local pharmacies. Professor of public health Grant Scofield joins Emile Donovan to discuss the effectiveness of these drugs and whether the funding settings are right - with a month of Wegovy estimated to cost $450 to $600 per month. Weight loss medication Wegovy will be available in New Zealand from July. Photo: THOM LEACH / SCIENCE PHOTO LIBRA / TLE / Science Photo Library via AFP
RNZ News
5 hours ago
- RNZ News
Dentist criticised for 'supervised neglect' of some patients
The care of one patient was described as a case of "supervised neglect" over a period of 25 years. Photo: A dentist working in sole practice for three decades has been criticised for sloppy record-keeping and "supervised neglect" of some patients. Deputy Health and Disability Commissioner Dr Vanessa Caldwell has just issued her findings in relation to seven patients of the dentist 'Dr C'. The problems came to light in November 2021, when Dr C had a break from practice and two other dentists treated his patients. Dr Angela McKeefry, an expert advisor to the HDC, described his care of one patient - Ms D - as a case of "supervised neglect" over a period of 25 years. She had about 18 appointments in that time, but never had any X-rays taken, even before having teeth removed. Another dentist who saw her in February 2022 because her front teeth were sore said she was "in complete shock" to learn she had severe periodontal disease, as she had been seeing Dr C for regular cleaning. An X-ray showed dead gum tissue, abscess and "severe bone loss" around some teeth. Dr McKeefry admitted that even with specialist treatment, the patient could still have lost all her upper teeth, but she was "effectively given no opportunity to try and prevent this from happening". "The lack of radiographs, periodontal pocket depth charting, diagnosis, offer of specialist referral or satisfactory clinical notes would be found to be shocking by most dentists." Dr C told the commission that after providing dental care to the community for 30 years "this complaint has been a source of shame and stress for him". He acknowledged his record-keeping was significantly below standard for all these patients and that there were deficiencies in the care provided, and said that he was sorry for this. For many of these patients, the treatment he provided allowed them to keep their teeth for longer than they otherwise would have, he said. He maintained he discussed treatment plans with his patients, but accepted his poor record-keeping meant this could not be confirmed. "Dr C also acknowledged that he should have been more assertive with some patients, setting out holistic, permanent options for treatment as opposed to quick-fix solutions that would only prolong the inevitable." The dentist said he had taken various steps to improve his practice, and has had no complaints since 2021, including doing extra training, working with a supervisor and hiring more staff to do administration. Dr Caldwell said due to the severity of the breaches and number of patients affected, she had considered prosecution. "However, given the measures that have since been put in place by the Dental Council, the time that has elapsed since these events, and that some of the consumers did not support a referral, I have decided not to proceed with a referral to the Director of Proceedings in this instance." Instead, she has recommended Dr C do some additional training, an audit of his records, and apologise to the patients involved. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
7 hours ago
- RNZ News
Concern over chemicals in mass sewage discharges into Shotover River
Otago Regional Council is at loggerheads with Queenstown Lakes District Council over a series of large discharges of sewage into the Shotover River by the district council. Photo: RNZ / Tess Brunton Wastewater being discharged into Queenstown's Shotover River could breach national ammonia limits, Otago Regional Council says. In March, the Queenstown Lakes District Council (QLDC) used emergency powers to begin pumping treated effluent into the river each day from its wastewater treatment plant - the equivalent of nearly five Olympic-sized swimming pools a day. It retrospectively applied for consent in May, then last week applied for the case to be handled by the Environment Court. However, a letter now published online shows Otago Regional Council (ORC) had already assessed the application, and placed it on hold due to several concerns. In the letter dated 19 June, Consents Processing Planner Hannah Goslin said QLDC needed to provide more evidence to support its claim the discharge would have "less than minor" impacts. "The application relies on a small amount of monitoring data to support the conclusions reached in terms of the scale and significance of effects," she said. ORC raised concerns about ammonia and phosphorus concentrations observed in the river. It said monitoring at five sites suggested "potential for the discharge to cause exceedances of the national bottom line for ammonia", and it asked why QLDC had not set a discharge quality limit for phosphorus. It said QLDC claimed the river would dilute the treated wastewater by 15 to 25 times - but had not backed that up with any hydraulic modelling, dye tests, or flow calculations. ORC also wanted more evidence to support QLDC's claim there was an initial "flush" of germs when the discharge began. It also called for a public health risk assessment to evaluate the likelihood of illness from disease-causing microorganisms in the treated wastewater - particularly given the river's "suitability for bathing." ORC gave QLDC until 11 July to respond to its letter. "If the information you provide raises more questions, your application will remain on hold until sufficient information has been provided to enable processing to continue," Goslin said. On Friday, QLDC said the Environment Court was already familiar with the Shotover discharge situation and "would help to provide an efficient and comprehensive decision from a neutral arbiter." However, ORC would still oversee public notification, submission timeframes, and the technical assessment of the application, it said. RNZ has approached QLDC and ORC for comment. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
