logo
Former VAO gets seven years of RI in graft case

Former VAO gets seven years of RI in graft case

Time of India4 days ago
1
2
Madurai: The Madurai special court for cases under the Prevention of Corruption Act on Monday found a former village administrative officer (VAO) guilty of demanding and accepting a bribe for issuing a patta to a man in Madurai district in 2015.
Judge R Barathiraja sentenced former Vadivelkarai VAO D Jeyabharathi to undergo seven years of rigorous imprisonment and imposed a fine of 2,000 on her.
Manikandan, a resident of Vadivelkarai, approached Jeyabharathi in June 2015, seeking a patta for the house in which his mother was residing. Jeyabharathi demanded 1,000 as bribe for completing the task. Manikandan lodged a complaint with Madurai Directorate of Vigilance and Anti-Corruption officials in this regard.
DVAC officials set up a trap and arrested Jeyabharathi red-handed when she received 1,000 from Manikandan.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Cop, clerk held in graft case
Cop, clerk held in graft case

Hindustan Times

time29 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

Cop, clerk held in graft case

State Vigilance and Anti-Corruption Bureau on Friday arrested a clerk of a private school in Sonepat while accepting a graft of ₹30 lakh on the behalf of a Delhi Police inspector from the complainant. The accused were booked under various sections of the Prevention of Corruption Act. (Shutterstock) The accused clerk has been identified as Sandeep Kumar. The state vigilance and anti-corruption bureau also nabbed inspector Sunil Jain and the duo will be produced before a local court in Sonepat on Saturday. In a complaint to Rohtak unit of State Vigilance and Anti-Corruption Bureau (earlier Anti-Corruption Bureau), Sonepat's Badwasni village resident Vipin Kumar said that his relative Praveen Lakra was booked in two separate cases over some dispute with another property dealer at Delhi's Alipur police station. 'The inspector Sunil Jain, who was probing the cases demanded ₹1 crore to remove my relative's name from one FIR and he assured us to take back some sections in another FIR. The deal was finalised at ₹70 lakh and we informed the vigilance team about the same,' he added. Inspector Pramila of the state vigilance and anti-corruption bureau from the Rohtak unit said that the clerk was working in a school owned by the inspector's brother. The accused were booked under various sections of the Prevention of Corruption Act.

Lax monitoring by TNCSC emboldens traders to sell paddy at DPCs: Farmers
Lax monitoring by TNCSC emboldens traders to sell paddy at DPCs: Farmers

New Indian Express

time29 minutes ago

  • New Indian Express

Lax monitoring by TNCSC emboldens traders to sell paddy at DPCs: Farmers

MADURAI: Farmers have alleged that inadequate monitoring by the Tamil Nadu Civil Supplies Corporation (TNCSC), traders starting to sell paddy illegally at Direct Procurement Centre's (DPCs) have delayed the procurement process. They have also urged the government to take action against the issue. However, refusing the allegations, official sources from TNCSC said that frequent inspections are being done by the department. With the summer paddy cultivation nearing completion, the TNCSC has opened nearly 18 DPCs for procuring the summer paddy in Madurai. The farmers have raised allegations about issues in selling their paddy at these centres. Speaking about the issue, Manikandan, a farmer leader from Usilampatti, said, 'Despite submitting a series of petitions about issues in DPCs, including traders selling their paddy, no actions were taken by the department concerned. Even now, many farmers are forced to wait for nearly a week to sell their paddy at DPCs.

Karnataka high court quashes bribery case against Bescom contract driver
Karnataka high court quashes bribery case against Bescom contract driver

Time of India

time8 hours ago

  • Time of India

Karnataka high court quashes bribery case against Bescom contract driver

Bengaluru: The high court has quashed proceedings in a bribery case against a Bescom contract driver, charged as second accused in the Nov 2023 incident. "He (the petitioner) was unnecessarily brought into the frame of the crime merely because he was present and obeying his superior by placing the bag (containing the bribe amount) in the car boot," Justice M Nagaprasanna noted in his order on a plea filed by petitioner, R Murali Krishna. The petitioner joined Bescom on Oct 17, 2023, as a contract driver and was named in the case barely a month later. It pertained to a city-based electrical contractor's complaint to Lokayukta police about a bribery demand by Bescom chief general manager ML Nagaraja. You Can Also Check: Bengaluru AQI | Weather in Bengaluru | Bank Holidays in Bengaluru | Public Holidays in Bengaluru The contractor accused Nagaraja of demanding Rs 10 lakh, later reduced to Rs 7.5 lakh, for converting commercial electric supply tariffs to industrial tariffs in an installation. During the subsequent trap, the Bescom driver was allegedly instructed to place a bag containing the cash in the car boot, leading to his arrest in the case. The Bescom driver claimed he had been hired recently and lacked awareness about office matters. Lokayukta police, however, contended that a third party accepting bribes on behalf of public servants is punishable under Section 7(a) of Prevention of Corruption Act, even while acknowledging that the main accused had allegedly made the demand for the bribe. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Luxury 2–4 BHKs in Pune's Iconic Green Township Shapoorji Golfland Vanaha Enquire Now Undo After perusing materials on record, Justice Nagaprasanna observed that evidence showed there was no case against the petitioner. The recordings demonstrated that the transaction of cash occurred between the main accused and the complainant, with the petitioner merely following instructions to place a bag in the boot of a car, the judge added. The court emphasised that demand and acceptance are crucial elements under Section 7 of Prevention of Corruption Act, and the petitioner had neither demanded nor accepted any bribe. The judge found the prosecution's stance insufficient to implicate an uninformed contract driver.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store