logo
Trio of trade deals ‘restored identity' of UK, PM says as trade plan unveiled

Trio of trade deals ‘restored identity' of UK, PM says as trade plan unveiled

Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has said the trio of recent UK trade deals has 'restored our identity' in a 'volatile world', as the Government laid out its new plan to better protect firms from rising threats to global trade.
Since Donald Trump's tariff announcements in April, the UK has reached new agreements with the US, India and the EU.
Sir Keir said the deals showed 'that even in this volatile world, Britain is proudly, unashamedly, defiantly even, open for business, and today's trade strategy builds on that'.
The Government's Trade Strategy aims to boost opportunities for UK businesses, particularly in the service sector, to export internationally, and vows to protect domestic firms from global threats to free trade.
It comes at a time of heightened uncertainty following Donald Trump's tariff announcements in April, which have hiked charges on most US imports in a bid to boost home-grown production and support US businesses.
In the paper, ministers pledge to 'confront the threat that protectionism poses to the UK by significantly upgrading our trade defence toolkit'.
This includes clamping down on unfair trading practices, such as the 'dumping' of goods at low costs in foreign markets, which is believed to disadvantage domestic businesses.
In the wake of the tariff announcements, some British retailers raised concerns that Chinese products were being rerouted from the US and deposited on UK and European online marketplaces like Shein and Amazon.
Meanwhile, the strategy outlines measures to make it easier for UK firms to export, including reducing barriers to trading overseas and improving access to finance.
Sir Keir suggested he would pursue a series of small deals rather than solely focusing on major trade agreements with countries.
'But perhaps most importantly, in this uncertain and challenging world, we will also give ourselves new powers on trade defence,' he said.
'To make sure that if your businesses are threatened by practices like dumping, that we have the right powers to defend you.'
Business and Trade Secretary Jonathan Reynolds said: 'The UK is an open trading nation but we must reconcile this with a new geopolitical reality and work in our own national interest.
'Our Trade Strategy will sharpen our trade defence so we can ensure British businesses are protected from harm, while also relentlessly pursuing every opportunity to sell to more markets under better terms than before.'
In the plan, the Government pledged to introduce new laws to expand its power to respond to unfair trade practices, guarding under-threat sectors such as steel.
Mr Reynolds said that a 'central problem is a lot of global overcapacity, mainly coming from China, and some associated countries' in relation to steel production.
'If we want a steel industry in any Western European economy we've got to take appropriate measures to defend that,' he said.
'We obviously have a relatively smaller steel industry… I'm doing some work on that to make sure it doesn't get any smaller.'
The Government has said it wants to hear from steel producers and businesses across the supply chain about how future trade measures and safeguards should be shaped.
Mr Reynolds stressed that leaders would 'not sit by idly while cheap imports threaten to undercut UK industry'.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Republican doubts delay Trump's tax-cut bill in the House
Republican doubts delay Trump's tax-cut bill in the House

Reuters

time18 minutes ago

  • Reuters

Republican doubts delay Trump's tax-cut bill in the House

WASHINGTON, July 2 (Reuters) - Republicans in the House of Representatives on Wednesday struggled to pass President Donald Trump's massive tax-cut and spending bill as a handful of hardliners withheld their support over concerns about its cost. As lawmakers shuttled in and out of closed-door meetings, House Speaker Mike Johnson said he was trying to convince the holdouts to back Trump's signature bill. "We are working through everybody's issues and making sure that we can secure this vote. I feel very positive about the progress," he told reporters. With a narrow 220-212 majority, Johnson can afford no more than three defections from his ranks, and skeptics from the party's right flank said they had more than enough votes to block the bill. 'He knows I'm a 'no.' He knows that I don't believe there are the votes to pass this rule the way it is,' Republican Representative Andy Harris of Maryland, leader of the hardline Freedom Caucus, told reporters. Trump, who is pressing lawmakers to get him the bill to sign into law by the July 4 Independence Day holiday, met with some of the dissenters at the White House. But with the outcome uncertain, Republican leaders delayed a procedural vote for hours as they worked to shore up support. Representative Steve Scalise of Louisiana, the No. 2 House Republican, said they would wait until several lawmakers who had been delayed by storms arrived from out of town. "We need their votes, and they're going to be here shortly," he told reporters. Republicans in Congress have struggled to stay united in recent years, but they also have not defied Trump since he returned to the White House in January. Any changes made by the House would require another Senate vote, which would make it all but impossible to meet the July 4 deadline. The legislation contains most of Trump's top domestic priorities, from tax cuts to immigration enforcement. The Senate passed the legislation, which nonpartisan analysts say will add $3.4 trillion to the nation's debt over the next decade, by the narrowest possible margin on Tuesday after intense debate on the bill's hefty price tag and $900 million in cuts to the Medicaid healthcare program for low-income Americans. Similar divides exist in the House, which passed an earlier version of the bill in May that carried a lower price tag. The loudest objections come from hardline conservatives angry that it does not sufficiently cut spending. "What the Senate did was unconscionable," said Republican Representative Ralph Norman of South Carolina, one of two hardliners who voted against the bill in an overnight committee hearing. The bill would extend Trump's 2017 tax cuts, cut health and food safety net programs, fund Trump's immigration crackdown, and zero out many green-energy incentives. It also includes a $5 trillion increase in the nation's debt ceiling, which lawmakers must address in the coming months or risk a devastating default on the nation's $36.2 trillion debt. Democrats are united in opposition to the bill, saying that its tax breaks disproportionately benefit the wealthy while cutting services that lower- and middle-income Americans rely on. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimated that almost 12 million people could lose health insurance as a result of the bill. "This bill is catastrophic. It is not policy, it is punishment," Democratic Representative Jim McGovern said in debate on the House floor. The Medicaid cuts have also raised concerns among some Republicans, prompting the Senate to set aside more money for rural hospitals.

Interim finance chief at cash-strapped university quits after days in post
Interim finance chief at cash-strapped university quits after days in post

The Herald Scotland

time20 minutes ago

  • The Herald Scotland

Interim finance chief at cash-strapped university quits after days in post

Dundee University is grappling with a financial crisis which has resulted in the Scottish Government using special powers to award a further £40 million to the institution. Faced with a £35 million deficit, the university is looking to cut hundreds of jobs. Professor Nigel Seaton, Dundee's interim principal and vice chancellor, confirmed Mr Reilly's departure in a message to staff – saying the institution is 'moving quickly' to replace him. Prof Seaton, who himself only took on the role after the previous interim principal quit last month, said Mr Reilly's replacement would help take the university through the 'next steps' of its recovery plan. Previous interim principal Professor Shane O'Neill quit the post in June after a report by former Glasgow Caledonian University principal Professor Pamela Gillies was critical of him and other former senior Dundee University figures for their actions before the scale of the crisis became public. That report found members of the university executive group, which included the 'triumvirate' of Prof O'Neill, former principal Professor Iain Gillespie and ex-chief operating officer Jim McGeorge, had 'failed' to 'properly respond to the worsening situation' with the institution's finances in 2024.

Judge blocks order barring asylum access at border and gives administration two weeks to appeal
Judge blocks order barring asylum access at border and gives administration two weeks to appeal

The Independent

time24 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Judge blocks order barring asylum access at border and gives administration two weeks to appeal

A federal judge said Wednesday that an order by President Donald Trump suspending asylum access at the southern border was unlawful, throwing into doubt one of the key pillars of the president's plan to crack down on migration at the southern border. But he put the ruling on hold for two weeks to give the government time to appeal. In an order Jan. 20, Trump declared that the situation at the southern border constitutes an invasion of America and that he was 'suspending the physical entry' of migrants and their ability to seek asylum until he decides it is over. U.S. District Judge Randolph Moss in Washington said his order blocking Trump's policy will take effect July 16, giving the Trump administration time to appeal. Moss wrote that neither the Constitution nor immigration law gives the president 'an extra-statutory, extra-regulatory regime for repatriating or removing individuals from the United States, without an opportunity to apply for asylum' or other humanitarian protections. The Homeland Security Department did not immediately respond to a request but an appeal is likely. The president and his aides have repeatedly attacked court rulings that undermine his policies as judicial overreach. The ruling comes after illegal border crossings have plummeted. The White House said Wednesday that the Border Patrol made 6,070 arrests in June, down 30% from May to set a pace for the lowest annual clip since 1966. On June 28, the Border Patrol made only 137 arrests, a sharp contrast to late 2023, when arrests topped 10,000 on the busiest days. Arrests dropped sharply when Mexican officials increased enforcement within their own borders in December 2023 and again when then-President Joe Biden introduced severe asylum restrictions in June 2024. They plunged more after Trump became president in January, deploying thousands of troops to the border under declaration of a national emergency Trump and his allies say the asylum system has been abused. They argue that it draws people who know it will take years to adjudicate their claims in the country's backlogged immigration courts during which they can work and live in America. But supporters argue that the right to seek asylum is guaranteed in U.S. law and international commitments — even for those who cross the border illegally. They say that asylum is a vital protection for people fleeing persecution — a protection guaranteed by Congress that even the president doesn't have the authority to ignore. People seeking asylum must demonstrate a fear of persecution on a fairly narrow grounds of race, religion, nationality, or by belonging to a particular social or political group. In the executive order, Trump argued that the Immigration and Nationality Act gives presidents the authority to suspend entry of any group that they find 'detrimental to the interests of the United States.' Groups that work with immigrants — the Arizona-based Florence Project, the El Paso, Texas-based Las Americas Immigrant Advocacy Center and the Texas-based RAICES — filed the lawsuit against the government, arguing that the president was wrong to equate migrants coming to the southern border with an invasion. And they argued that Trump's proclamation amounted to the president unilaterally overriding '... the immigration laws Congress enacted for the protection of people who face persecution or torture if removed from the United States.' But the government argued that because both foreign policy and immigration enforcement fall under the executive branch of government, it was entirely under the president's authority to declare an invasion. 'The determination that the United States is facing an invasion is an unreviewable political question,' the government wrote in one argument. ___

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store