Leaks and algae caused by energy scheme to be fixed
The work was done on 42 homes in four villages in the Arfon area 10 years ago, and has caused leaks and green growth over the gables of the houses.
"All this green algae started to come through after a year of the work," said Kerry Roberts, one of the residents affected from Deiniolen, Gwynedd.
The Welsh government said it allocated £3.5m to repair the properties following a "review process last year".
Botched insulation homes still awaiting repairs
Homes' 'green slimy' marks after insulation fitted
Most homes will need heat pumps, Welsh government says
The Arbed scheme helped homeowners in disadvantaged areas to make houses more energy efficient for free.
New windows and boilers were installed and external walls were painted and sealed to improve insulation.
But the problems soon became apparent and questions were asked about the quality of the work.
"[The house] just looks dirty and you don't want the first impression of our home to be like this," Mr Roberts told Newyddion S4C.
'It's a bit embarrassing to be honest."
His neighbour Margaret Roberts, who had the same work done on her home, said "after a year the errors started to show".
"It's been a very big mental worry," she said.
"We're angry, it annoys you and we just couldn't get anyone to take notice.
"Finally... we're happy that something is being done because it puts you down when you see the standard of the house outside," Ms Roberts added.
Arfon MS Sian Gwenllian said residents had to wait "far too long".
"People put their faith in this plan, a plan proposed by the government that was supposed to improve their homes but all kinds of problems appeared due to faulty work," she said.
"But now there is light at the end of the tunnel so hopefully now the work will be resumed".
The Welsh government has said the repairs will start soon and are expected to be finished over the next few years, depending on the weather.
"Residents have received letters with more information about the process and households will also have an opportunity to opt out if they no longer want the work to be done," a spokesperson said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
02-07-2025
- Yahoo
‘Species could be wiped out' if new solar farm is built in Wales, planners told
Species could be wiped out if a new solar farm is built in the Gwent Levels, planners heard on Wednesday. Plans for a solar farm at Wentlooge on the Levels south of Newport are being considered this week by Planning and Environment Decisions Wales (PEDW). The application has been submitted by Wentlooge Farmers Solar Scheme Ltd, funded by Next Energy Capital, and would cover 318 acres of the levels landscape. If approved it will be there for 40 years. Wildlife such as lapwings, skylarks, geese, and shrill carder bees are among the hundreds of species to use the Wentlooge site, which falls within the levels site of special scientific interest (SSSI), and on Wednesday the hearing heard there was still uncertainty over how solar panels in the ground would affect biodiversity there. READ MORE: The best photos as people enjoy Barry Island on hottest day of the year so far READ MORE: Welsh opera star Stuart Burrows dies aged 92 The hearing is of particular importance because Wentlooge is one of seven renewable energy parks planned for the Gwent Levels by developers. If they are all approved it would significantly change the landscape for decades and campaigners who say this planning decision could set a precedent for development on the levels and argue the land will never recover. So far there is one solar farm on the levels – the Llanwern solar park near Nash where it is clear that since panels went into the ground five years ago the population of lapwings has diminished considerably. While planning inspector Melissa Hall urged caution in drawing comparisons between the apparent 'failures' in mitigation efforts at the Llanwern site and what might happen if the site at Wentlooge was to be covered in panels as the only viable case study the Llanwern solar park did form the basis of much discussion during the first day of the hearing on Wednesday. The Wentlooge developer, represented by Stephen Humphreys, told the hearing there are lapwings at the Llanwern site, albeit the land specifically covered by panels has seen a decrease in lapwings. They asked to be given time and said the project was only in its fifth year out of 40 years. The developer's ecologist Jon Garner, who has also worked for the developer at Llanwern, took exception to the inference that the Llanwern solar park had failed in its mitigation attempts for lapwings. He said: 'Just to reiterate this is early days. We are only looking at four years of results [for the Llanwern site]. It's too early to establish the long-term impact on species. 'It's fair to acknowledge that the results haven't been brilliant. But lapwings have continued to breed around the scheme. On a positive note this year our surveys have shown breeding within the panels from lapwings for the first time.' Dr Michael Bowes, representing Friends of the Gwent Levels, said: 'I'm confused by that approach. It seems a wait and see approach would clearly favour the applicant. How long [to wait]? It's very unclear. You may have a species here which may or may not be wiped out. We have a lot of uncertainty here. 'This is a moving target. This hearing is not about giving the applicant flexibility to learn. To proceed despite doubt would be inconsistent with the planning policy.' SSSI land covers 12% of all land in Wales. The Welsh Government's own planning policy guidance states developing on a SSSI should only be approved if there is wholly exceptional need and if the development is considered necessary for the management of the SSSI. Developers targeting the Gwent Levels for renewable energy are arguing that the current chase to reach net zero by the end of the decade is a global emergency. This map shows how applications for renewable development would cover the levels: Mr Humphreys said: 'From a 'wholly exceptional' point of view it's important to highlight that the policy describes renewable energy as being of 'paramount importance'. ''Paramount' means 'more important than anything else' or 'supreme'. That is a specific use of that word. It's incredibly important and perhaps the most important point within the planning policy.' Wentlooge Farmers Solar Scheme Ltd argue that the SSSI at Wentlooge is currently failing its targets. The developer said its solar panels would not only mitigate but 'enhance' biodiversity. Mr Humphreys said: 'The suggestion seems to be that this scheme would cause harm to the SSSI. The developer absolutely refutes that. 'Natural Resources Wales agrees that mitigation and restoration should lead to the improved condition of the SSSI. The current state of the SSSI is poor.' Lindy Marshall, senior development planning advisor for Natural Resources Wales (NRW), clarified what NRW thinks. She said: 'We don't believe this development is necessary for the overall management of the SSSI.' She also described the current performance of the Wentlooge site as 'suboptimal' rather than poor. The land at the Gwent Levels is being targeted by developers because of its flat geology and proximity to the grid hookup. Mike Webb of the Gwent Wildlife Trust asked the hearing why other areas which are not SSSI areas had not been looked at. He said: 'There are many developments in the pipeline on the Gwent Levels. Can they all be exceptional? The developer goes on to say the nature emergency is wholly exceptional. "It's becoming more apparent that the developer is a minority of one in saying this development isn't damaging.' Prior to the hearing CEO of the Gwent Wildlife Trust Natalie Buttriss said: "'If development like this is allowed on SSSIs in Wales it will set a precedent. "In terms of important landscapes and biodiversity corridors in Wales it opens doors to that not being valued or seen as important. It would just completely change the characteristics of the area for communities too. 'On one field you'd have giant solar panels and on the other you'd have a biodiverse criss-cross of waterways that it is at the moment. That's what people would see as they walked the Wales coastal path." The hearing continues on Thursday. For our free daily briefing on the biggest issues facing the nation, sign up to the Wales Matters newsletter here
Los Angeles Times
18-06-2025
- Los Angeles Times
He donated the land that became Griffith Park. Then he shot his wife
Surely you are familiar with the sprawling, rugged glory of Los Angeles' Griffith Park. But do you know about the park's benefactor and namesake, Griffith J. Griffith? The philanthropist and felon endowed L.A. with what was then the largest urban park in the world and still remains a jewel of the city. He also shot his wife in the face. She survived; he served two years at San Quentin; they divorced. We'll get to that. But first, let's rewind back to December 1896. Los Angeles was a city with great ambitions — a rapidly exploding boomtown that was still in the process of leaving its rancho past behind. Col. Griffith J. Griffith and his wife Tina were the talk of the town, often spotted at theater openings or the opera. She was from a prominent society family. He was a formerly penniless Welsh immigrant who'd made his fortune in mining and other ventures. Our paper described Griffith as 'part visionary and part blowhard.' One acquaintance dubbed him as 'midget egomaniac,' another as a 'roly-poly pompous little fellow.' He was, by all accounts, bizarre. His business card just read: 'G.J. Griffith, capitalist.' He insisted on being called 'Colonel,' though his military title was thought to be entirely phony. On December 16, 1896, Tina and Griffith donated more than 3,000 acres of hilly splendor to be used as an L.A. public park. The massive, city-altering gift was several times larger than New York's Central Park. 'It must be made a place of rest and relaxation for the masses, a resort for the rank and file, for the plain people,' Griffith demanded at the time. Griffith was grandiose and eccentric, but he also believed in shaping the fledgling city, according to Mike Eberts, a historian and author of 'Griffith Park: A Centennial History.' 'He was a fellow who wanted to be loved. He wanted to be seen as a great leader. He was also, in his own way, and for his time, something of an idealist,' Eberts said. Some believed that Griffith's mighty bequest was also angled, in part, to dodge taxes. But for generations of Angelenos who've savored the park, such details are — like Griffith's military title — mere semantics. The initial gift brought him great acclaim locally. Here's how our paper put it in 1898: 'No need to ask 'Who is G.J. Griffith?' The individuality of the man has impressed itself so deeply and favorably on this community that his name is even as a 'household word.'' While thought to be in a delusional — and potentially drunken — stupor in a room at Santa Monica's Arcadia Hotel, Griffith shot his wife in the face in 1903. She lost an eye but lived. Our paper breathlessly covered the ensuing trial, which ended with Griffith taking a short trip to San Quentin. A few years after his release, Griffith (now divorced, according to Eberts) appeared at City Hall once again bearing gifts just before Christmas and hoping to rehabilitate his tarnished image. 'I wish to pay my debt of duty in this way to the community in which I have prospered,' Griffith reportedly told the mayor and City Council as he offered a significant sum of money to build Griffith Observatory. They accepted, though our paper reported that other citizens and public officials angrily protested the decision. One prominent community member suggested that the 'bribe' would send an egregious message to the city's youth: 'Are you prepared to say to them that if a man is a millionaire he can commit a crime and then with his wealth bribe the community to receive him back into fellowship?' The city's parks commission eventually rejected Griffith's gift, our paper reported, and it wasn't until after his death in 1919 that it was accepted as a bequest in his will. The observatory celebrated its 90th birthday this year. For Eberts, the takeaway is simple: 'You don't have to be a perfect person to do a great thing.' Today's great photo is from Times photographer Myung J. Chun, outside the Lucas Museum of Narrative Art, which is set to open next year. Kevinisha Walker, multiplatform editorAndrew Campa, Sunday writerKarim Doumar, head of newsletters How can we make this newsletter more useful? Send comments to essentialcalifornia@ Check our top stories, topics and the latest articles on
Yahoo
16-06-2025
- Yahoo
Artificial reef aims to bring wild oysters back
Wild Oysters are set to be introduced into Conwy Bay after an almost two-year delay was brought to an end by a succession of storms. Bangor University have been given permission to proceed to the final stage of the project and "reseed" a 660-tonne artificial reef. Harbourmaster Matthew Forbes said the project would "finally move towards completion" with the first distribution run set to take place on Friday. Wild oysters, once a major part of Wales's fishing industry, have been in decline as a result of over-fishing, changes in water quality, and disease. It was first reported in July 2023 that Bangor University was working with the Zoological Society of London to reintroduce wild oysters into the waters. Conwy Council's Harbour Advisory Committee met this week for an update on the project. Speaking at the meeting, harbourmaster Matthew Forbes said the reef was initially "above the marine licensed permitted height". "Over the last couple of years, storms have knocked the reef height down," he added. Mr Forbes said Natural Resources Wales had agreed the project could now move forward and 76 bags of oysters were ready to be distributed. Meeting chairwoman Joan Vaughan said it would be "lovely" to have oysters in the River Conwy. Native oysters used to be found around Conwy in large numbers but have virtually disappeared in recent years. Oyster beds were a common sight in the Menai Strait and around Anglesey. The Wild Oysters Project website said they were a "vital food source" for coastal communities and "contributed" to the Welsh economy. The Mumbles or 'Oystermouth' fishery was the largest in Wales supporting 400 fishers across 188 boats. In the mid-1800s Welsh oyster boats reported landing 8,000 oysters daily, but up to 15,000 to 20,000 oysters in some areas. The efforts to reintroduce the shellfish in Wales follow a pattern of declining numbers in other parts of the UK. A wildlife project on the East Yorkshire coast is testing a new breeding technique to reintroduce 500,000 native European flat oysters over the next five years. It was also mooted that oysters could return to the Thames as part of an effort to clean London's rivers last year. Mass oyster release aims to stop species dying out New breeding technique aims to bring back oysters Baby oysters move from maternity ward to nursery
