Myanmar crisis demands Asean rethink on regional diplomacy
the bloc's credibility and relevance
Advertisement
More than four years have passed since Myanmar's military
staged a violent coup , plunging the country into a deepening political and humanitarian crisis. The regime's grip has inflicted devastating harm: more than 20,000 political prisoners remain behind bars, millions of people have been displaced and countless communities endure daily threats of
air strikes
forced conscription and systemic oppression.
What began as a national emergency has become a defining test of regional credibility and moral resolve. In 2021, Asean adopted a
five-point consensus as its core diplomatic framework. Even so, the junta has
continuously flouted it by intensifying violence, obstructing humanitarian access and disregarding dialogue efforts with impunity. Devoid of enforcement and political will, the consensus has become a hollow instrument, invoked for appearances while atrocities continue unabated.
The paralysis in the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (Asean) is exacerbated by growing internal divisions. While Malaysia and Indonesia have taken principled steps to engage with
Myanmar's democratic opposition and ethnic groups, other member states have undermined regional coherence. Thailand maintains a posture of strategic ambiguity, the Philippines has called for a new diplomatic framework and Cambodia has entertained the junta's plans for staged elections. This fragmentation has weakened Asean's leverage and made a mockery of
the notion of centrality
Compounding the challenge is Asean's institutional structure, particularly its annually rotating chairmanship, which undermines continuity and strategic depth. Each
incoming chair often brings a different tone, set of priorities and diplomatic style, disrupting momentum and making it difficult to sustain long-term engagement. This revolving leadership hampers consistency and reflects the bloc's limited political will and uneven commitment to addressing the crisis in Myanmar.
Advertisement
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South China Morning Post
5 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
How powerful is Thailand's constitutional court? PM's suspension reignites influence debate
The suspension of Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra has reignited debate over the Constitutional Court's growing influence in Thailand 's democratic system, amid concerns electoral mandates risk being curtailed by judicial and conservative power centres. While the court's decision on Tuesday to suspend Paetongtarn over a leaked phone call with Cambodia 's former leader Hun Sen was framed as a procedural response to an ethics complaint, observers say it fits into a broader trend of interventions that have reshaped Thailand's political landscape in recent years. Rawin Leelapatana, assistant professor at Chulalongkorn University's law faculty, told This Week in Asia that Paetongtarn's case marked the resurgence of 'judicial activism' following the dissolution of the Move Forward Party, which won the most seats in the 2023 election. It was dissolved by the Constitutional Court in 2024 over its push to reform Thailand's royal defamation law. 'The intervention of the Constitutional Court in … politics remains likely in the future,' he said. 04:40 Thai court suspends PM Paetongtarn Shinawatra over leaked phone call Thai court suspends PM Paetongtarn Shinawatra over leaked phone call The court has not yet ruled on whether Paetongtarn violated ethical standards, but accepted a petition from 36 senators who allege she brought disrepute to the office by referring to Hun Sen as 'uncle' and criticising a top Thai military commander – during a June 15 phone call that was leaked to the public.
South China Morning Post
11 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
Philippine lawmakers revive divorce bill, but will it be passed this time?
Philippine lawmakers have refiled a long-delayed bill legalising divorce in the country just a few days into the new Congress after its passage fell short in the previous term, with divorce advocates hopeful that the legislation will finally see the light of day. Advertisement Lawmakers have been trying to pass a divorce law since 2005, but continue to face resistance in the Catholic-majority country. Nearly 79 per cent of Filipinos are Roman Catholic and the Philippines and the Vatican are the only countries in the world that do not have divorce laws. Annulment exists but is a tedious and often expensive process. Muslims are currently the only Filipinos able to legally divorce under the Code of Muslim Personal Laws. As the 20th Congress opened on Monday, three representatives filed two measures that aim to revive the absolute divorce bill that the House of Representatives passed earlier but ultimately languished in the Senate as conservative legislators and religious leaders vowed to fight the bill. Representatives Antonio Tinio and Renee Louise Co of the Alliance of Concerned Teachers and Kabataan partylists filed House Bill 210, while Jonathan Clement Abalos of the 4Ps partylist filed House Bill 108. Both versions establish the grounds for granting absolute divorce. These include physical violence, drug addiction, homosexuality and other factors related to the annulment of marriage under the country's Family Code. Filipino Catholic devotees jostle to touch the carriage carrying the statue of the Black Nazarene during the annual procession on its feast day in Manila on January 9. Nearly 79 per cent of Filipinos are Roman Catholic. Photo: Reuters Divorce advocates said lawmakers had neglected the divorce bill in favour of other issues, such as the crimes linked to Philippine offshore gaming operators (Pogos), despite divorce being 'a national issue'.
South China Morning Post
12 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
Philippine lawmakers revive divorce bill, but will it be passed this time?
Philippine lawmakers have refiled a long-delayed bill legalising divorce in the country just a few days into the new Congress after its passage fell short in the previous term, with divorce advocates hopeful that the legislation will finally see the light of day. Lawmakers have been trying to pass a divorce law since 2005, but continue to face resistance in the Catholic-majority country. Nearly 79 per cent of Filipinos are Roman Catholic and the Philippines and the Vatican are the only countries in the world that do not have divorce laws. Annulment exists but is a tedious and often expensive process. Muslims are currently the only Filipinos able to legally divorce under the Code of Muslim Personal Laws. As the 20th Congress opened on Monday, three representatives filed two measures that aim to revive the absolute divorce bill that the House of Representatives passed earlier but ultimately languished in the Senate as conservative legislators and religious leaders vowed to fight the bill. Representatives Antonio Tinio and Renee Louise Co of the Alliance of Concerned Teachers and Kabataan partylists filed House Bill 210, while Jonathan Clement Abalos of the 4Ps partylist filed House Bill 108. Both versions establish the grounds for granting absolute divorce. These include physical violence, drug addiction, homosexuality and other factors related to the annulment of marriage under the country's Family Code. Filipino Catholic devotees jostle to touch the carriage carrying the statue of the Black Nazarene during the annual procession on its feast day in Manila on January 9. Nearly 79 per cent of Filipinos are Roman Catholic. Photo: Reuters Divorce advocates said lawmakers had neglected the divorce bill in favour of other issues, such as the crimes linked to Philippine offshore gaming operators (Pogos), despite divorce being 'a national issue'.
