Manipur Police cracks down on arms smuggling, extortion gangs; six arrested
'On June 24, we successfully cracked down on an inter-state organised gang involved in illegal arms trade. The gang had been operating clandestinely in the Greater Imphal area, smuggling unauthorized arms across different states. We have taken into custody four individuals involved in this network, including a known cadre of the United National Liberation Front (P) [UNLF (P)] faction', a senior police officer said.
According to police, the arrested individuals were found in possession of a large cache of firearms and ammunition. The officer added, 'We recovered high-end pistols including Smith & Wesson, Sig Sauer, Glock, JD Taurus, and Beretta models, along with several loaded magazines. In total, over 150 rounds of live ammunition were seized, indicating the scale at which this group was operating.'
In a separate operation conducted the same day, three active cadres of the United National Liberation Front (P) UNLF (P) were arrested from Babupara in Imphal West.
'These individuals were extorting money from government employees and contractors, using threats to secure contract work. Their actions have spread fear among the local population', the officer said.
He confirmed that pistols, live ammunition, mobile phones, cash, and identification documents were seized during the arrests.
Also Read: Arambai Tenggol member arrested for murder amid Manipur crackdown
In Thoubal district, another suspect believed to be an active cadre of the UNLF (Ningolmacha), was arrested from the Lilong Hangamthabi area. According to officials aware of the matter, he was actively involved in extorting money from shops, individuals, and even government establishments. 'He had been issuing monetary demands across Thoubal district,' a police official said, adding that a mobile phone and personal documents had been recovered from him.
In a similar operation, police arrested a People's Revolutionary Party of Kangleipak-Progressive [PREPAK (Pro)] (a banned underground outfit) faction operative, identified as Thoudam Johnjackson Singh, from his residence at Liwa Road, Ahongshangbam Leikai under Singjamei Police Station in Imphal West.
A senior police official confirmed the arrest and stated, 'We are tracking all elements involved in subversive activities, and we will continue our crackdown on groups trying to destabilise the region.'
Police have said that all arrested individuals will be produced before the relevant courts, and investigations are underway to identify further links to arms trafficking and militant networks.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
2 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
SC moots fast-track courts for criminal trials in Delhi-NCR
The Supreme Court on Thursday mooted the creation of fast-track courts in Delhi to expedite trials in cases lodged against 'professional' gangsters and directed both the Delhi government and the Centre to formulate a concrete proposal in this regard within four weeks. At the core of the court's concern was to nip the possibility of such persons securing bail and unleashing a spectre of violence. (HT Archive) The court passed the order after being informed by the Delhi Police, in an affidavit, that 288 cases against gangsters and criminal gangs operating in Delhi are pending trial. Only 108 cases have reached the stage of framing of charges. The affidavit also indicated that by any rate, it will take three to four years for a case to move from framing of charges to prosecution evidence being taken up. So far, only 25% of cases have reached the prosecution evidence stage, the first step of trial, it said. A bench of justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi found the delay impeding the right of the accused to a speedy trial. At the same time, the bench raised a larger issue about such gangsters securing bail on the grounds of prolonged trials. Even the security of witnesses gets compromised in these situations, the bench added. The court said, 'This week, we read an instance where a witness was murdered. Who is going to depose against gangsters? What is the protective cover that you give them? They are your eyes and ears. If you don't protect them, public confidence in the criminal justice system gets affected and rule of law gets absolutely impaired in the eyes of the common man.' At the core of the court's concern was to nip the possibility of such persons securing bail and unleashing a spectre of violence. The bench said, 'What is happening in the geographical belt of Delhi near to Haryana... They commit crime there and come to Delhi. Just yesterday, a man who committed a murder in Panipat was arrested from Ghaziabad. Society needs to get rid of these gangsters. They must be dealt with ruthlessly. We should not have any misplaced sympathy for them.' While the Delhi Police suggested the court set up dedicated court complexes within jail premises for trial of such hardened criminals, the court said that the issue needs to be dealt with holistically, as such courts will require adequate judicial manpower, support staff and infrastructure. The bench said, 'While the Delhi High Court will not have any objection to providing speedy trial by establishing dedicated courts, this can only happen provided that the Union government and the state of Delhi resolve to introduce a mechanism like fast-track courts (FTC) for trial of these cases.' Making Centre a party to the proceedings, the court said, 'Keeping in mind the pendency of 288 cases against gangsters, there will have to be appropriate strength of courts to ensure cases can be equitably distributed and trial can be held on day-to-day basis.... If such a decision is taken by appropriate authority, it seems to us that all pending trials can be brought to an end.' The court asked additional solicitor general (ASG) SD Sanjay, appearing for the Delhi Police, to also appear for the Centre and give effect to the order. The court agreed to pass subsequent directions for expediting the hearing of such cases once a resolution is adopted by the Centre and the Delhi government. The matter will next be heard after four weeks. The court made the observations while hearing a bail petition filed by one Mahesh Khatri alias Bholi, who is facing 55 criminal cases, many of which are heinous offences. In February, the court refused him bail but expanded the scope of the petition by asking the Delhi Police to specify whether a mechanism could be introduced for a speedy trial in cases concerning gangsters. The Delhi Police affidavit, filed in response to this order, noted that while multiple factors lead to delayed trials, the primary reason was that courts hearing cases against such gangsters facing charges under the Indian Penal Code and Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act (MCOCA) handle other routine matters and are burdened with multiple sensitive matters involving the IPC, economic offences and money laundering, among others. ASG Sanjay said that, considering these aspects, the Delhi Police urged the court to set up dedicated court complexes on jail premises. This would not only expedite cases against gangsters but prevent them from getting bail. At the same time, it will enable better safety for witnesses and accused persons and will reduce the opportunity available for such criminals to generate reels and other social media content glamourising their lives, something that is observed when members of gangs are transported from jails to court complexes, it said. The ASG assured the court that a joint meeting of the Centre and the Delhi government will be held to resolve the issue.
Hindustan Times
3 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Ludhiana: 1-kg opium seized, Jharkhand man held
A Jharkhand resident, claiming to be a national-level para archer, has been arrested and 1.11-kg opium seized from his possession near Sudhar, police said. His aide managed to escape. Police officials with the arrested man on Thursday. (HT Photo) The accused, suffering from polio, has been identified as Patras Odia of Khunti district of Jharkhand. The police said he claimed to have won a gold medal in a national-level tournament. His aide who managed to escape has been identified as Rajan of Jharkhand. Deputy superintendent of police (Dakha) Varinder Singh Khosa said the Sudhar police got a tip-off and arrested the accused from grain market, Sudhar Road, where they were waiting for customers. Rajan managed to escape but Patras was nabbed as he couldn't flee due to his physical condition (polio). When frisked, the police recovered 1.11-kg opium, ₹700 and a mobile phone from his possession. The DSP added that during questioning, the accused told police that they used to travel in trains and had delivered some consignments in Ludhiana in the past. 'The arrested man claimed that he has been a national-level archer. The police have asked his family to produce any proof in support of his claims. The accused stated that he took up drug peddling due to unemployment,'said the DSP. The accused was produced before a court on Thursday. The court remanded the accused to two-day police custody for questioning. A hunt is on for the arrest of the rest of the accused. An FIR under Sections 18, 61 and 85 of the NDPS Act has been registered against the accused.
The Hindu
8 hours ago
- The Hindu
Assertions like ‘J&K is illegally occupied', ‘should separate from India' attract UAPA sections: J&K High Court
The J&K High Court has observed that 'advocating and inciting unlawful activity by asserting that J&K is illegally occupied and must be separated from the Indian Union' attracts sections of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA). 'Section 13 specifically states that whoever takes part in, incites, advocates, or abets unlawful activity shall be punishable with imprisonment which may extend to seven years and shall also be liable to fine. Such accusations against the respondents squarely fall within the ambit of Section 13(1), because, as per the statements recorded under Section 161 CrPC, they were advocating and inciting the commission of an unlawful activity by asserting that J&K is illegally occupied and must be separated from the Indian Union, thereby advocating secession,' a Division Bench, comprising Justices Sanjeev Kumar and Sanjay Parihar, held. The Bench was hearing a petition challenging the order of discharge drawn by the Court of Additional Sessions Judge (Special Judge) for trial of offences under ULA(P) Act for districts of Baramulla, Bandipora, and Kupwara. The respondents, who were facing prosecution for offences under Section 13 UAPA in FIR No. 41/2015 of Police Station Bandipora stood 'discharged by the trial judge'. However, the Division Bench observed that the order was 'not sustainable on any count as it suffers from non-application of mind and erroneous application of law, thus, on the face of it, is perverse and is, therefore, set aside.' 'The charge sheet shall stand restored with the direction to the trial court to proceed with framing of charge against the respondents for offence under Section 13 of ULA(P) Act, and thereafter proceed to dispose of the challan in accordance with law,' the Court directed. The trial court was of the view that since the respondents were merely raising slogans with no activity of inciting violence, 'Section 13 was not applicable'. 'This view was palpably wrong, because what Section 13(1), read with Section 2(1)(o) of the UAPA, relates to is the commission of an unlawful activity, and the allegations raised against the respondents were squarely covered within the definition of 'unlawful activity. The trial court appears to have not appreciated the version of the witnesses under Section 161 CrPC, who were present at the spot when the occurrence is stated to have happened,' the Division Bench further observed.
