Outrage after Afghan man, 45, marries 6yo child bride as Taliban say he can't have her until she's nine
The man, who already has two wives, reportedly paid the little girl's family money to take her as his bride.
Hasht-e Subh Daily
, an independent Afghan media outlet operating in exile, reported the sickening case had even forced the Taliban to intervene.
Sources had said that while the Islamic rulers had made no official comment about the marriage in Helmand's Marjah district, the Taliban was currently preventing the girl from being transported to the man's house.
The man has reportedly been told he must 'wait until the girl turns nine before bringing her home'.
Child marriages have soared in Afghanistan since the Taliban returned to power in 2021, clamping down on women's rights, including limiting their schooling, work and independence in daily life.
It is especially rife in villages where poverty abounds.
'There are many families in our village who have given away their daughters for money. No one helps them. People are desperate,' said Mahbob, a community activist told
The Afghan Times
.
Before the Taliban seized back power, Afghan civil law set the minimum age for marriage at 16 years for girls and at 18 years for boys. since they have been in power a minimum age for marriage has not been set.
A UN Women report said 28.7 per cent of girls in Afghanistan under the age of 18 years were married — 9.6 per cent of those aged under 15.
'Statistical modelling shows the ban on Afghan girls education after primary school is estimated to be associated with an increase of the rate of child marriage by 25 per cent. This would put 37.5 per cent of Afghan girls at risk of child marriage,' the report read.
Child marriage has been shown to lead to increased likelihood that a girl or woman will experience domestic violence, have limited access to reproductive health services, and receive only lower levels of education.
Earlier this month the International Criminal Court issued arrest warrants for two Taliban leaders, including supreme spiritual leader Haibatullah Akhundzada, accusing them of the persecution of women and girls.
The ICC said there were reasonable grounds to believe that Akhundzada and Abdul Hakim Haqqani, chief justice of the Taliban, had committed the crime against humanity of persecution on gender grounds against girls, women and other persons non-conforming with the Taliban's policy on gender, gender identity or expression.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Perth Now
2 hours ago
- Perth Now
UK had secret plan to relocate Afghans after data leak
The United Kingdom set up a secret scheme to relocate thousands of Afghans to the country after people's personal details were disclosed in a data leak, risking reprisals from the Taliban after their return to power in Afghanistan in 2021, court documents show. Concerns that individuals named could be targeted by the Taliban led the previous Conservative government to set up the relocation scheme, involving thousands of people and estimated to cost the government 2 billion pounds ($A4.1 billion). UK defence minister John Healey apologised for the data leak, which included details about members of parliament and senior military officers who supported applications to help soldiers who worked with the UK military and their families relocate from Afghanistan. "This serious data incident should never have happened," Healey told MPs in the House of Commons. "It may have occurred three years ago under the previous government but to all whose data was compromised I offer a sincere apology." The breach resulted in the creation of a secret Afghan relocation scheme - the Afghanistan Response Route - by the government in April 2024. Healey said that about 4500 affected people "are in Britain or in transit ... at a cost of around 400 million pounds". But he added that no-one else from Afghanistan will be offered asylum because of the data leak. News of the leak comes as the UK's public finances are tight and the populist Reform UK political party leads in the opinion polls. UK forces were first deployed to Afghanistan in 2001 following the September 11 attacks on the United States and they played a major role in combat operations there until 2014. The government is facing lawsuits from those affected by the breach, further adding to the ultimate cost of the incident. A Ministry of Defence-commissioned review of the data breach, a summary of which was also published on Tuesday, said more than 16,000 people affected by it had been relocated to the UK as of May this year. The details emerged on Tuesday after a legal ruling known as a superinjunction was lifted. An unprecedented superinjunction was made at the High Court in September 2023 after the MoD argued that a public disclosure of the breach could put people at risk of extra-judicial killing or serious violence by the Taliban, with the decision to apply for an order made by then-defence secretary Ben Wallace. The superinjunction, lifted on Tuesday, is thought to be the longest lasting order of its kind and the first time the government has sought such a restrictive measure against the media. At multiple hearings, lawyers for the MoD said in written submissions that there was a "very real risk that people who would otherwise live will die" if the Taliban gained access to the data. Healey, the Defence Secretary, told MPs the superinjunction had left him feeling "deeply uncomfortable to be constrained from reporting to this House" about the breach and the secret relocation scheme set up in its wake. Under plans set out last October, the Afghanistan Response Route was expected to allow up to 25,000 people - most of whom were ineligible for Arap but deemed to be at the highest risk from Taliban reprisals - to be relocated. Judge Martin Chamberlain, who ruled that the injunction should be lifted, said on Tuesday at the High Court that the gag order had "given rise to serious free speech concerns". "The superinjunction had the effect of completely shutting down the ordinary mechanisms of accountability, which operate in a democracy," he said. "This led to what I describe as a 'scrutiny vacuum'." The dataset contained personal information of nearly 19,000 Afghans who had applied to be relocated to the UK and their families. A High Court said in a summary of its ruling to lift the injunction that the data "contained personal information about more than 33,000 applicants". It was released in error in early 2022 before the MoD spotted the breach in August 2023 when part of the dataset was published on Facebook. The former Conservative government obtained the injunction the following month. Prime Minister Keir Starmer's Labour government, which was elected last July, launched a review into the injunction, the breach and the relocation scheme, which concluded that although Afghanistan remains dangerous, there was little evidence of intent by the Taliban to conduct a campaign of retribution. with PA and AP
News.com.au
3 hours ago
- News.com.au
Thousands of Afghans win UK asylum after huge data breach
Thousands of Afghans who worked with the UK and their families were brought to Britain in a secret programme after a 2022 data breach put their lives at risk, the British government revealed on Tuesday. Defence Minister John Healey unveiled the scheme to parliament after the UK High Court on Tuesday lifted a super-gag order banning any reports of the events. In February 2022, a spreadsheet containing the names and details of almost 19,000 Afghans who had asked to be relocated to Britain was accidentally leaked by a UK official just six months after Taliban fighters seized Kabul, Healey said. "This was a serious departmental error," Healey said, adding: "Lives may have been at stake." The previous Conservative government put in place a secret programme in April 2024 to help those "judged to be at the highest risk of reprisals by the Taliban", he said. Some 900 Afghans and 3,600 family members have now been brought to Britain or are in transit under the programme known as the Afghan Response Route, at a cost of around £400 million ($535 million), Healey said. Applications from 600 more people have also been accepted, bringing the estimated total cost of the scheme to £850 million. They are among some 36,000 Afghans who have been accepted by Britain under different schemes since the August 2021 fall of Kabul. As Labour's opposition defence spokesman, Healey was briefed on the scheme in December 2023 but the Conservative government asked a court to impose a "super-injunction" banning any mention of it in parliament or by the press. When Labour came to power in July 2024, the scheme was in full swing but Healey said he had been "deeply uncomfortable to be constrained from reporting" to parliament. "Ministers decided not to tell parliamentarians at an earlier stage about the data incident, as the widespread publicity would increase the risk of the Taliban obtaining the dataset," he explained. - 'No retribution' - Healey set up a review of the scheme when he became defence minister in the new Labour government. This concluded there was "very little evidence of intent by the Taliban to conduct a campaign of retribution". The Afghan Response Route has now been closed, the minister said, apologising for the data breach which "should never have happened". He estimated the total cost of relocating people from Afghanistan to Britain at between £5.5 billion to £6 billion. Conservative party defence spokesman James Cartlidge also apologised for the leak which happened under the previous Tory government. But he defended the decision to keep it secret, saying the aim had been to avoid "an error by an official of the British state leading to torture or even murder of persons in the dataset at the hands of what remains a brutal Taliban regime". Healey said all those brought to the UK from Afghanistan had been accounted for in the country's immigration figures. Prime Minister Keir Starmer has vowed to cut the number of migrants arriving in Britain. In 2023, the UK defence ministry was fined £350,000 by a data watchdog for disclosing personal information of 265 Afghans seeking to flee Taliban fighters in the chaotic fall of Kabul two years earlier. Britain's Afghanistan evacuation plan was widely criticised, with the government accused by MPs of "systemic failures of leadership, planning and preparation". Hundreds of Afghans eligible for relocation were left behind, many with their lives potentially at risk after details of staff and job applicants were left at the abandoned British embassy in Kabul. jkb/pdh/gil
SBS Australia
2 days ago
- SBS Australia
Israeli attack on Gaza water distribution site kills at least eight, including children
At least eight Palestinians, most of them children, were killed and more than a dozen were wounded in central Gaza when they went to collect water on Sunday, local officials said, in an Israeli strike which the military said missed its target. The strike hit a water distribution point in Nuseirat refugee camp, killing six children and injuring 17 others, said Ahmed Abu Saifan, an emergency physician at Al-Awda Hospital. Water shortages in Gaza have worsened sharply in recent weeks, with fuel shortages causing desalination and sanitation facilities to close, making people dependent on collection centres where they can fill up their plastic containers. The Israeli military said the missile had intended to hit an Islamic Jihad militant in the area but that a malfunction had caused it to fall "dozens of metres from the target". Medics say those killed in a strike that hit a water distribution point included a 12-year-old. Source: AP / Abdel Kareem Hana Hours later, 12 people were killed by an Israeli strike on a market in Gaza City, including a prominent hospital consultant, Ahmad Qandil, Palestinian media reported. The Israeli military did not immediately comment on the attack. Gaza's health ministry said on Sunday that more than 58,000 people had been killed since October 2023, with 139 people added to the death toll over the past 24 hours. The ministry says over half of those killed are women and children. Ceasefire talks stalled Negotiations aimed at securing a ceasefire appeared to be deadlocked, with the two sides divided over the extent of an eventual Israeli withdrawal from the Palestinian enclave, Palestinian and Israeli sources said at the weekend. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was set to convene ministers late on Sunday to discuss the latest developments in the talks, an Israeli official said. The indirect talks over a US proposal for a 60-day ceasefire are being held in Doha, but optimism that surfaced last week of a looming deal has largely faded, with both sides accusing each other of intransigence. Israel's army says a missile malfunctioned and missed its target, hitting a water distribution site. Source: AAP / AP / Alex Brandon Netanyahu in a video he posted on Telegram on Sunday, said Israel would not back down from its core demands - releasing all the hostages still in Gaza, destroying Hamas and ensuring Gaza will never again be a threat to Israel. At least 20 of the remaining 50 hostages in Gaza are believed to still be alive. Netanyahu and his ministers were also set to discuss a plan on Sunday to move hundreds of thousands of Gazans to the southern area of Rafah, in what Israeli Defence Minister Israel Katz has described as a new "humanitarian city" but which would be likely to draw international criticism for forced displacement. An Israeli source briefed on discussions in Israel said that the plan was to establish the complex in Rafah during the ceasefire, if it is reached. On Saturday, a Palestinian source familiar with the truce talks said that Hamas rejected withdrawal maps which Israel proposed, because they would leave around 40 per cent of the territory under Israeli control, including all of Rafah. Israel's bombardment of Gaza has displaced almost the entire population of more than 2 million people, but Palestinians there say nowhere is safe in the coastal enclave. Early on Sunday morning, a missile hit a house in Gaza City where a family had moved to after receiving an evacuation order from their home in the southern outskirts. "My aunt, her husband and the children, are gone. What is the fault of the children who died in an ugly bloody massacre at dawn?" said Anas Matar, standing in the rubble of the building. "They came here, and they were hit. There is no safe place in Gaza," he said.
